Star Wars Thread

Home » Forums » Movies, TV and other media » Star Wars Thread

Author
Topic
#156

As part of the testing process I thought I’d kick off the traditional Star Wars thread.

The Obi-Wan Kenobi series with Ewan McGregor has been confirmed for Disney+ to begin shooting next year.

https://www.theverge.com/2019/8/23/20830478/obi-wan-kenobi-standalone-spinoff-series-disney-plus-series-ewan-mcgregor-streaming-star-wars

There’s also been new footage previewed from Rise Of Skywalker, although it’s not online

https://io9.gizmodo.com/new-star-wars-the-rise-of-skywalker-footage-featured-r-1837449069

Sounds like it could be interesting.

Viewing 100 replies - 1 through 100 (of 992 total)
Author
Replies
  • #157

    The D23 footage is online now, hoping for some double bluff and not the obvious path it seems to be on.

  • #159

    The D23 footage is online now, hoping for some double bluff and not the obvious path it seems to be on.

    Yes, the footage looks pretty good but hopefully that last shot of Rey is a bit of a red herring. It reminds me of all those Rey-clone theories from a while back.

  • #163

    More than anything I want this to make sense as an ending to all the trilogies, and while I think that’s an order too tall… I’m really hoping for Kylo/Ben to turn sides.

  • #167

  • #168

    Youtube links appear pretty huge, not a showstopper but maybe another tweak if possible.

  • #711

    Away from the eternal firestorms of the sequel trilogy, a ton of news dropped in the last 24 hours:
    – new SW OT comic in Jan, post Empire. Soule writing, Saiz on art.
    – new Vader comic in Feb, also post Empire. Pak writing, Ienco on art.
    – Alphabet Squadron Shadow Fall, the second in a trilogy. Amazon has it for June.
    – new Thrawn trilogy, Ascendancy, set a couple of decades earlier. For summer 2020

  • #866

    Wedge is back for Rise of Skywalker, apparently.

  • #868

    Might explain why we’re finally getting a Wedge Action figure. Or it’s because they gave some work to his nephew.

  • #905

    Haven’t watched this in months:

  • #919

    I assume that Lawson was sincere at not wanting to revisit the character because, well, there wasn’t much character to revisit. If he’s back it should be because Wedge will have something interesting to do in the story?
    .

    Which is what audiences want too; interesting stories about interesting people.
    .

    Everyone wins, except the First Order, hopefully.

    • This reply was modified 5 years, 2 months ago by SteveUK.
    • This reply was modified 5 years, 2 months ago by SteveUK.
  • #925

    I assume that Lawson was sincere at not wanting to revisit the character because, well, there wasn’t much character to revisit. If he’s back it should be because Wedge will have something interesting to do in the story?

    Krusty Sells Out

  • #934

    I would guess they offered him some good money when they asked him to appear in Episode VII?

    Unless he’s lost all his cash in Vegas or something, he’s changed his mind for a different reason?

  • #1295

  • #1298

    First they give him a red arm, now he’s a pot? Disney really does not give a fuck about Star Wars fans.

  • #1306

    I know people who will eat that shit up.

  • #1325

    Le Creuset are normally fairly classy – these look quite naff.

    I look forward to my family purchasing a “Han Solo in carbonite” coffin for me when the time comes.

  • #1372

    I look forward to my family purchasing a “Han Solo in carbonite” coffin for me when the time comes.

    You know you’d totally be into that. ;-)

  • #1383

    Well, yes, now that you mention it.

  • #1439

    Dave is now hoping his kids do not literally re-enact the carbon chamber sequence in Empire

  • #1448

    They are altering the deal, I pray they don’t alter it any further.

  • #1455

    I thought you were hoping to be frozen in carbonite as a way to ride out Brexit.

  • #1463

    Brexit leads to anger, anger leads to hate, hate leads to suffering.

  • #2600

    Tony Gilroy is writing and directing for the Disney+ ‘Rogue One’ prequel show with Diego Luna;
    .

    Gilroy joined the Star Wars galaxy in June 2016, when Lucasfilm hired him to lend a hand on Rogue One. By August, he was directing reshoots and taking a leading role in post production, work that ultimately earned him millions in pay and a screenwriting credit. Gareth Edwards remained the credited director on Rogue One, but many consider Gilroy the film’s ghost director. In April 2018, Gilroy gave a candid, revealing interview about his Rogue One experiences on The Moment With Brian Koppelman podcast, noting when he came aboard the film was so troubled that “all you could do was improve their position.”

    .

    https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/heat-vision/rogue-one-writer-tony-gilroy-joining-disney-star-wars-prequel-1247962

  • #2605

    Any word on when the final trailer for Episode 9 is out? It feels like we’re due another one soon.

  • #2608

    Maybe with Frozen 2 in November?

    • This reply was modified 5 years, 1 month ago by paul f.
  • #2618

    Feels quite late, but maybe.

  • #2647

    The rumour is; next Monday.
    .
    But the rumour was; last Monday.
    .
    It’s been pointed out that next Monday would’ve been Carrie Fisher’s 63rd birthday, so maybe that will be a factor?

  • #3043

    The rumour is; next Monday.
    .
    But the rumour was; last Monday.
    .
    It’s been pointed out that next Monday would’ve been Carrie Fisher’s 63rd birthday, so maybe that will be a factor?

    Can’t you talk to someone and get a clearer date?!? 😉

  • #3049

    Look, I’ll know when the trailer has gone active – my other Internet demesne will have crashed!

  • #3132

    Final trailer confirmed for Monday night (closer to Tuesday morning here), during football.

  • #3135

    Tickets go on sale Tuesday, so that makes sense.

  • #3417

    If anyone posts that autoplay teaser here, there’ll be trouble.

    The teaser is cool, the autoplay isn’t.

  • #3421

    YouTube version of the teaser:

  • #3424

    Bill Burr is in the The Mandalorian! That is pretty cool.

  • #3475

    It has arrived.

  • #3476

    Looks gorgeous, but I have little doubt the saga will go out with a whimper and not a bang.

    Can’t imagine what it would be like the sequel trilogy had had competent leadership and writers, who could tell an original story that didn’t shit all over the movies that came before it.

    (Speaking of shitting on things… Patriots 24, Jets 0…)

    • This reply was modified 5 years, 1 month ago by Jason.
  • #3478

    All in all, that was “meh” at best.

  • #3485

    I have a good feeling about this.

  • #3486

    A couple of nice moments and the music always works, but I was expecting more to pull you in from this final trailer.

    I think they’re wise to ‘rest’ the Star Wars movies for a while after this one.

  • #3488

    It looks spectacular of course. They’re not giving away the story, it’s just going for the emotions, but it does it well.

  • #3495

    Yeah, it’s a well-made trailer, but no goosebumps this time.

  • #3513

    So the bit with the floating chair? Is it Metron?
    At last?

    Otherwise, I just don’t care any more. I’ll watch it but I have no excitment at all for it.

  • #3516

    It’s unlikely I’ll enjoy it as much as The Last Jedi, but I’m looking forward to it.

    I was the first person to book a ticket for the first non-midnight screening at my cinema.

  • #3539

    Yeah, it’s a well-made trailer, but no goosebumps this time.

    Yeah i’m a muthafucking big ass shrug.

    It was a bunch of shots of set-pieces and great CGI waves. Steve is right to say it looks fantastic as a special effects geeks.

    In terms of making me care about the story of the previous 8 films (or even previous 2 films) it did penis. But it’s a guaranteed billion anyway so the trailer doesn’t have to do that work, it just has to have emotional beats.

    This better be good otherwise im going over to JJs house and beating him up.

  • #3553

    It has arrived.

    That looks amazing. Really looking forward to this.

  • #3558

    This better be good otherwise im going over to JJs house and beating him up.

    I am not expecting this to save the sequels. I am sure it is going to be a good enough movie in its own way, but Abrams hasn’t yet managed to create any movie that was better than okay, for me.

    • This reply was modified 5 years, 1 month ago by Christian.
  • #3571

    Ive watched the trailer and I don’t feel up, I don’t feel down. Just reinforced the fact I don’t really care about Star Wars in any real sense. Even the music kicking in didn’t do anything for me (and usually the William’s score sets the hairs on the back of my neck on end).

  • #3590

    Ive watched the trailer and I don’t feel up, I don’t feel down

    Me too but more surprisingly because I really liked TLJ and Rogue One. It seemed rather flat, I usually get that little thrill from any Star Wars trailer.

  • #3591

    Put me down on the list of those this trailer didn’t thrill.

  • #3593

    I was banking on a bit of force-ghost Luke or an Emperor reveal to get people that little bit more excited about this one. But it feels fairly bland and seen-it-all-before without something like that.

  • #3598

    Star Wars trailers haven’t really done plot spoilers so far. They tend to be montages of things that might appear and I like that but I don’t really know why this one fell so flat for me.

  • #3599

    I guess it depends what you call a spoiler. The Force Awakens sold itself on that shot of old-Han and Chewie, who we knew were going to be in the movie but hadn’t seen before that, just like ghost-Luke and the Emperor in this one.

    But I guess it kind of depends how much of a surprise they’re meant to be, and how little they’re going to be in the movie. It could be that spoiling them here would be more akin to spoiling Luke’s appearance in TFA.

  • #3603

    I liked the shot of the Corellian Corvette

  • #3605

    Yeah that made me feel nothing. I am more exicted for the Mandalorian.

  • #3607

    So, it all proceeded as you had foreseen, Darth Wallace?

    If I get home, I’ll boot up this trailer.

  • #3611

    So, it all proceeded as you had foreseen, Darth Wallace?

    No, I had expected force-ghost Luke or the Emperor. So I was mistaken.

    About a great. Many. Things.

  • #3634

    Man. Are all you guys dead inside???

  • #3637

    Yes.

    No it was just a bit rote.

    I liked threepios line.

    For balance, the shots in The Last Jedi trailer were really interesting and did a better job of getting me curious about the direction of the movie.

  • #3644

    The trailer can be seen as exciting, or underwhelming.
    .
    They’re both truthful reactions, from a certain point of view.

  • #3650

    Yeah, due to all that blue milk shit.

    Saw it a short while ago, it’s…. OK. They’ve managed the impossible of rendering me indifferent to the return of the Emperor, which shouldn’t be possible.
    Krennic Miracle
    Nor do I see any benefit in secrecy for a final film, TFA I can see the reasoning even if I disagree with it, but here? Doesn’t add up.

    • This reply was modified 5 years, 1 month ago by Ben.
  • #3655

    Man. Are all you guys dead inside???

    .
    No. It’s Disney’s Star Wars that is dead inside.
    .
    It’s just a bunch of perfunctory crap to sell tickets to a theme park and put merchandise on store shelves. There’s no story there. When the Mouse bought Lucasfilm seven years ago, they didn’t have any interest in extending the story, developing the universe, or anything remotely interesting. They just cleared the classic characters off of the board and made them into failures in order for the new Disney cast of characters replay the same story.

  • #3666

    I saw someone online call this film Star Wars: Endgame.

  • #3668

    No. It’s Disney’s Star Wars that is dead inside.
    .
    It’s just a bunch of perfunctory crap to sell tickets to a theme park and put merchandise on store shelves. There’s no story there. When the Mouse bought Lucasfilm seven years ago, they didn’t have any interest in extending the story, developing the universe, or anything remotely interesting. They just cleared the classic characters off of the board and made them into failures in order for the new Disney cast of characters replay the same story.

    Bwahahaha. You do realize what franchise created the merchandizing game, right?
    .
    Also, one of the classic actors would only come back if they agreed to kill them and another is only (presumably) being killed off because she actually died.
    .
    TFA and TLJ were incredible films. There’s a lot of rewriting of reality to fit a narrative of people who just didn’t like the direction these films took for whatever reason. That’s fine but that doesn’t make them any more or less commercially motivated than previous films.

    • This reply was modified 5 years, 1 month ago by RonnieM.
  • #3672

  • #3678

    Bwahahaha. You do realize what franchise created the merchandizing game, right?

    Also, one of the classic actors would only come back if they agreed to kill them and another is only (presumably) being killed off because she actually died.

    TFA and TLJ were incredible films. There’s a lot of rewriting of reality to fit a narrative of people who just didn’t like the direction these films took for whatever reason. That’s fine but that doesn’t make them any more or less commercially motivated than previous films.

    Yeah, I went into full Star Wars indifference thanks to the prequels and the EU, so the direction and any perceived damage to the franchise is not something I care about. Looking at comments about Star Wars now compared to 20 years ago, or Star Trek now against the launch of the TNG era, Marvel’s social consciousness now vs the introduction of characters like Black Panther and the All-New, All-Different (except for Cyclops) X-Men – it’s all cycles. A load of the people complaining about the sequel trilogy now are lionising the prequels, but they decried them as merciless cash-grabs that ruined Star Wars 20 years ago. And when the next tranche of Star Wars movies come out, the narrative will be that the sequel movies were the last time Star Wars was great.

    I stand by my prediction – within 10 years, the defining Star Wars nerd debate will be whether Empire or Last Jedi is the best movie to that point.

  • #3680

    The fact that arguments repeat in cycles doesn’t necessarily make them unfounded, though. Because the media companies that keep resurrecting and dusting-off these franchises are also often operating in similar cycles.

    Saying that the sequel trilogy is a disappointment for Star Wars fans isn’t invalidated by the fact that fans said the same thing about the prequel trilogy. Both can be true and accurate statements.

    (And I don’t think that the people shitting on the sequel trilogy have mostly been praising the prequel trilogy. In my experience, they still complain about both, unlike the Star Trek comparison where people’s views obviously changed on TNG.)

  • #3681

    The fact that arguments repeat in cycles doesn’t necessarily make them unfounded, though. Because the media companies that keep resurrecting and dusting-off these franchises are also often operating in similar cycles.
    .
    Saying that the sequel trilogy is a disappointment for Star Wars fans isn’t invalidated by the fact that fans said the same thing about the prequel trilogy. Both can be true and accurate statements.

    Except that the argument frequently is “the prequels were good actually, unlike the sequels”, which is what I’m talking about. In the next cycle any perceived disappointment with the sequels will be ignored. Just like all the people who were really, really angry with Empire in 1980 have been airbrushed out of the picture.

  • #3683

    Prequels and Sequels need more Ewoks.

    THEN they’d be good.

  • #3684

    Prequels and Sequels need more Ewoks.

    THEN they’d be good.

    This is porg erasure and I won’t stand for it

  • #3685

    What remains hugely weird to me is the difference in presentation between the films and the supporting material. It’s like there are two STs, which also happened on the PT. The PT films sparked off some great stories I’ll go back to. The actual films? Not so much.

    The ST supporting material has rendered the FO far better but only a niche audience benefits from it. Then again, that material also attempts to fuse OT and PT, which the ST films are very wary of. Maybe they want to downplay this and are content to keep them as niche products.

    The one thing the trailer does convince me of is that going the route of Darth Puppy Eyes wasn’t a good idea.

    Oh and they’re not shuffling off the FO any time soon.

    • This reply was modified 5 years, 1 month ago by Ben.
  • #3687

    Bwahahaha!!!!!

    Evil Ronnie is scary

  • #3690

    Except that the argument frequently is “the prequels were good actually, unlike the sequels”, which is what I’m talking about.

    I haven’t seen that argument that frequently, generally the prequels still seem pretty derided to me. Although I have seen some people say that the sequel trilogy at least made them appreciate Lucas trying to do new things in the PT rather than a straight rehash, which seems fair.

  • #3696

    This board (and the MW boards before it) were as deep a dive into fandom as I care to go. Whatever arguments are being had elsewhere can stay there.
    .
    Here, as far as I can see, the new films were received with disappointment by most, but certainly not all, and the prequels are seen as failures with odd bits and ideas that deserved better films around them.
    .
    I want to like the next film, it’s Star Wars, but I’m cautious about being too optimistic…

    • This reply was modified 5 years, 1 month ago by SteveUK.
  • #3698

    I’ve no idea what any of that meant in Ben’s post but I do object to being told to FO.

    • This reply was modified 5 years, 1 month ago by garjones.
  • #3702

    Bwahahaha. You do realize what franchise created the merchandizing game, right?

    Thunderbirds.

  • #3703

    What remains hugely weird to me is the difference in presentation between the films and the supporting material. It’s like there are two STs, which also happened on the PT. The PT films sparked off some great stories I’ll go back to. The actual films? Not so much.

    The ST supporting material has rendered the FO far better but only a niche audience benefits from it. Then again, that material also attempts to fuse OT and PT, which the ST films are very wary of. Maybe they want to downplay this and are content to keep them as niche products.

    The one thing the trailer does convince me of is that going the route of Darth Puppy Eyes wasn’t a good idea.

    Oh and they’re not shuffling off the FO any time soon.

    Crazy Ben is scarier

  • #3708

    See, this is what happens when you go with an adversary called the First Order. You can’t acronym that into FO because of competition.

    Since the trailer is light on story, what does Sidious need a fleet of Death Star Destroyers for? I’m going with a galactic purge.

  • #3710

    I stand by my prediction – within 10 years, the defining Star Wars nerd debate will be whether Empire or Last Jedi is the best movie to that point.

    Agreed. It’s crazy how similar those films are in structure especially how they function in their respective trilogies. Jedi is my favorite of the Original Trilogy. So I have high expectations for this film.

    Evil Ronnie is scary

    You should see Angry Ronnie. :-)

  • #3712

    No you big softy. I know a good cuddle with a puppy will sort out your anger.

    Ben, on the other hand. Whatever lunatic affectation Ben has is incurable!

  • #3714

    I haven’t even got started on the Porgs.

    Then again, I don’t have to, Darth Todd has the porgicide well in hand.

  • #3716

    Bwahahaha. You do realize what franchise created the merchandizing game, right?

    Thunderbirds.

    Amateurs.
    .
    Has everyone heard the story of Mark Hamill and his original contract for the films? Supposedly, he made sure that his contract included that he receive one of every piece of merchandise made for the film. He thought that would be a poster and a mug. Then, Star Wars turned out to be the merchandising juggernaut that it is. I don’t know what he’s done with them. I think he’s made various comments over the years but it seems like it’s been a while since it’s addressed.

    • This reply was modified 5 years, 1 month ago by RonnieM.
  • #3718

    No you big softy. I know a good cuddle with a puppy will sort out your anger.

    Imagine if something happened to said puppy.
    .

    • This reply was modified 5 years, 1 month ago by RonnieM.
  • #3720

    You know, John Wick really is my spirit animal.

    Next to Gambit.

  • #3722

    I stand by my prediction – within 10 years, the defining Star Wars nerd debate will be whether Empire or Last Jedi is the best movie to that point.

    Agreed. It’s crazy how similar those films are in structure especially how they function in their respective trilogies. Jedi is my favorite of the Original Trilogy. So I have high expectations for this film.

    Evil Ronnie is scary

    You should see Angry Ronnie. :-)

    sw

  • #3723

    what does Sidious need a fleet of Death Star Destroyers for?

    what does god need with a starship

  • #3728

    what does Sidious need a fleet of Death Star Destroyers for?

    Because he’s a tactical moron?
    .
    Big ships are now pointless in the Star Wars universe. All you need is one small ship moving through you at lightspeed and you’re annihilated, no matter how big you are. The astute military commander will be scrapping all his capital ships in favour of small, agile units that can evade this kind of attack.
    .
    But maybe this film is too soon after the last one and Sidious hasn’t time to retool. Maybe that fleet we see is actually on its way to the breakers yard?

  • #3732

    Except that the argument frequently is “the prequels were good actually, unlike the sequels”, which is what I’m talking about.

    I don’t think I’ve ever heard that argument. I mean, okay, I don’t talk Star Wars much outside of The Carrier, but still.

    (My impression of the mainstream opinion here would be the one Steve summarised.)

    • This reply was modified 5 years, 1 month ago by Christian.
  • #3767

    What I was getting at before is that a lot of the complaints around the ST have been answered elsewhere. Stuff like where the FO came from, how it differs from the Empire, what happened to the Republic, why have a costume like the the one Ren uses, the Unknown Regions.

    Now you don’t have to look at it, but Disney haven’t even signposted to it. It helps their films, boosts them quite a bit even.

    Then again, the flipside of this is SW fandom has a vengeful inclination that even the Don Corleones, Vito and Michael, would see as excessive. How do you solve a problem like the Empire? Kill them all, every man, woman, child, alien and Porgs. As someone once put it: “Wipe them out, all of them.” It’s pretty scary.

  • #3816

    What I was getting at before is that a lot of the complaints around the ST have been answered elsewhere. Stuff like where the FO came from, how it differs from the Empire, what happened to the Republic, why have a costume like the the one Ren uses, the Unknown Regions.

    I don’t think answering all of that elsewhere helps a lot though – it’s about whether it works in the movies.

    And really if those are the complaints, I think they’re focusing on the wrong aspect here. The explanations don’t matter. The real problem is that they decided to retell the original story instead of building on it; what they called their Emperor analogue, their Empire analogue, their Darth Vader analogue and their Death Star analogue and the explanations for how they came about don’t matter one bit.

  • #3819

    They just need a scene set in parliament whete they explain those things in detail.

  • #3847

    I think addressing what went wrong would be a good idea.
    .
    ‘Return of the Jedi’ was an uplifting victory. If you show that victory to have been flawed and only temporary, then you should show why that is the case.
    .
    If you can’t get a good story and drama from that, then tell a different story with a different set up.

  • #3861

    Okay, we did it.

    Liz, the biggest Star Wars fan I ever married, has already bought tickets to see the new film on opening morning, 20 December at 10:15am. That means I will be playing hooky from work that day, but I’m alright with that.

  • #3877

    ‘Return of the Jedi’ was an uplifting victory. If you show that victory to have been flawed and only temporary, then you should show why that is the case.

    Well, yeah, that should’ve been the sequel trilogy. You start with a new golden age, with the first new Jedi having great adventures and starting to bring justice and freedom to the galaxy. And then there’s the big new/old threat, and the cracks begin to show. The first movie ends triumphant, but still on a note of vague dread, and the second one shows the new Republic under serious attack from this new threat – big action and adventure, but with a cliffhanger that leads to the third movie, in which, well, the new threat is defeated and the New Republic continues to grow.

    But that isn’t what they did. They wanted to tell the story of the underdogs again, and so they blew up the Republic at the start of it all and turned the heroes into rebels again. And once you’ve gone down that road, what’s the point of telling the story of how it all fell apart? You’re stuck with the decision to tell the same story again – underdogs against Empire. Telling the story of how we got to that point was excruciatingly boring already the first time (the Prequel Trilogy); I certainly don’t want another Prequel Trilogy that shows the New Republic falling apart and Ben turning into Kylo Ren. I don’t care because the whole plot is such a forced repetition of the OT anyway that I’d rather just get it over with.

    Maybe the next set of movies will finally open up the Star Wars galaxy to new stories.

    • This reply was modified 5 years, 1 month ago by Christian.
  • #3880

    You don’t need three movies of back story, just enough to get everyone up to date.
    .
    But the ship sailed and what’s done is done.
    .
    I’m hoping this ends well.
    .
    And I’ve never seen a cavalry charge on a the hull of a spaceship before, so that’s something!

  • #3919

    Your post would make a lot more sense like this Ben.

    What I was getting at before is that a lot of the complaints around the ST have been answered elsewhere. Stuff like where the FO came from, how it differs from the E, what happened to the R, why have a C like the the one R uses, the U R.

    Now you don’t have to look at it, but D haven’t even signposted to it. It helps their films, boosts them quite a bit even.

    Then again, the flipside of this is SW fandom has a vengeful inclination that even the D C, V and M, would see as excessive. How do you solve a problem like the E? KTA, every M,W,C, A and P. As someone once put it: “WTO, all of them.” It’s pretty scary.

  • #3923

    Can’t do text English.

  • #3938

    You lot have been busy:
    I don’t think answering all of that elsewhere helps a lot though – it’s about whether it works in the movies.
    This is the big departure between the old and new material. Lucas tended to want to leave stuff that could be spun off from the film, the go-to example being the line ‘bounty hunter on Ord Mantell’. It works fine as a line but Archie Goodwin and Al Williamson built an entire story out of it, yet it is entirely optional. Disney have made it less so, if you want story info A you have to get it from item X. You don’t like comics or books? Too fucking bad.
    The idea that the films should stand on their own isn’t going to go away as a critique of the sequels and may well be even more cutting after Ep IX.
    I think addressing what went wrong would be a good idea.
    This. A whole lot of what the Sequels have done seems to get slung under the heading of ‘George did it first’ as some sort of catch-all justification. It doesn’t work. It’s 40 years later, it’s a different world with the audiences to match.
    You don’t need three movies of back story, just enough to get everyone up to date.
    Just a few lines, not even a minute’s worth of dialogue could have covered it.
    The charges that won’t go away where the sequels are concerned will be the lack of transition from Ep 6 to Ep 7, the way they killed off Luke, Han and Leia and the missed opportunity of getting the trio back together in TFA.

  • #3947

    Liz, the biggest Star Wars fan I ever married,

    How many other Star Wars fans have you married?

  • #3951

    Well, the news about the Kylo miniseries by Soule has sent the internet apeshit. It’s hilarious watching it all burn.

  • #3954

    Why, what’s happened?

Viewing 100 replies - 1 through 100 (of 992 total)

This topic is temporarily locked.

Skip to toolbar