WandaVision spoiler discussion

Home » Forums » Movies, TV and other media » WandaVision spoiler discussion

Author
Topic
#50226

The show starts on Disney+ this Friday, with the first two episodes.

Here’s an article revealing a little more about the show, including what sitcoms are homaged along the way.

Presumably the Malcolm in the Middle-inspired episode will introduce us to twins Tommy and Billy, thus introducing two more Young Avengers to the MCU.

Viewing 100 replies - 101 through 200 (of 685 total)
Author
Replies
  • #51197

    if these have been covered, sorry but many posts were tl/dr
    The sitcom I want most to be parodied is Full House
    (speculation)Since the fox/disney split is over, mutants can be used. That said, the kids will disappear at some point and Wanda will snap[avengers disassembled, House of M, No More Mutants]. Only this time instead of removing mutants, she will create them through the use of a dimensional rift. the Rift will be uncontrollable and Dr. Strange will spend his movie dealing with it.(speculation)

  • #51199

    if these have been covered, sorry but many posts were tl/dr
    The sitcom I want most to be parodied is Full House
    (speculation)Since the fox/disney split is over, mutants can be used. That said, the kids will disappear at some point and Wanda will snap[avengers disassembled, House of M, No More Mutants]. Only this time instead of removing mutants, she will create them through the use of a dimensional rift. the Rift will be uncontrollable and Dr. Strange will spend his movie dealing with it.(speculation)

    More plausible than the Snide cut of Justice League being watchable.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
  • #51201

    I just checked that DS2 is coming out March2022. so if this is a cliffhanger, we will have to wait a year for a resolution.  :negative:

  • #51211

    Not even Wandavision is immune to fan theories:

    Is Dottie mephisto? from WANDAVISION

    1 user thanked author for this post.
  • #51426

    The show would be vastly improved if they were using British sitcoms and it all culminates in an episode of the IT Crowd.

  • #51442

    Screencrush are posting easter egg summary videos for each episode if anyone is interested.

     

  • #51455

    I suspect the answer to the question “Who is doing this to you Wanda?” is going to be “Wanda”.

    She has suffered a considerable amount of loss in a short period of time. The events of Infinity War and End Game were breaking point. Her mind has a tremendous amount of power, perhaps too much for a human brain to contain. When her mental health takes a downturn her mind takes over, shutting down the rest of her body and letting her fantasise life in a cosy, warm environment where everyone is safe and any problems are miniscule and easily handled.

    SWORD are trying to contact her mind to bring her back in the real world. Eventually they’ll succeed but ripping her mind out of the fantasy releases some of that incredible mental power and blows a hole in reality itself. This exposes the universe to the multiverse, leading into Dr Strange 2 as he tries to stop it bleeding out and overwhelming the MCU.

    And at that point we can do a reverse of House of M and have Wanda responsible for creating the mutants.

  • #51456

    I’d be surprised if Doctor Strange 2 is just a follow-on from this show. Nobody wants to watch a film that starts, “previously, on WandaVision…”

  • #51459

    It would likely just be a post-credits scene in the final episode that shows the problem is worse than originally thought, with that scene playing into the opening of Dr Strange 2.

    Disney have to demonstrate that these Marvel shows actually “matter” with respect to the movies, unlike the Netflix ones and Agents of SHIELD.

  • #51464

    Well it’d seem that Daredevil (at least… maybe?)  mattered… so take that back! =P

  • #51466

    I’d be more than happy to have that version of Daredevil back, so long as we can all pretend that version of Karen Page never happened…

  • #51468

    Just watched episode 3. It appears “Geraldine” was just an act and Monica wasn’t under Wanda’s spell, like some of the others appear to be – although the spell is breaking down. The way Monica is treated at the end, it’s hard to say whether Westview is a SWORD construction or some other organisation which she infiltrated. Judging by the commercial, Hydra may be playing a part.

    Also, this whole episode was eerily reminiscent of Avengers #200 – not something most comic fans want to be reminded of!

  • #51472

    Hum… to me it looked like she was under her spell until the end when she started remembering… they all did in fact, probably because of the magic getting all weird ’cause of the birth. And defniently no on the Westview thing… I really interpreted it as Wanda having created a bubble reality in some town, and it seems like maybe different factions (but sword, primarly of course) are investigating. Wanda does seem to be in control, even if she also seems to be out of it, possibly gone cray cray… but that’s twice now that she’s changed the narrative of her own soap opera… that’s no coincidence.

    “Geraldine” was probably sent in to investigate what is going on. Although I don’t know why they’re using Sword and not Shield, since techinically that would be Shield’s jurisdiction… wait did Shield ever get re-establsihed in the movie-verse or did it get flatout replaced by Sword? Maybe that’s why… =P

    At any rate, so yeah, the should’ve for sure released the 3 first episodes last week… this one was also somehow still kind of overdrawn and boring at times, but it definetly gets a lot better by the end. I really hope it starts moving along and they drop the whole “episode within an episode” thing, because those episodes happen to be rather bland and boring.

  • #51473

    I really hope it starts moving along and they drop the whole “episode within an episode” thing, because those episodes happen to be rather bland and boring.

    There are at least 2 more sitcom episodes – a Malcolm in the Middle one and a Modern Family one – maybe more. But the series is about 6 hours in total over 9 episodes, so given that the sitcom episodes are half an hour each, that must mean there are longer episodes towards the end that break out of the sitcom format, and presumably just get on with the main story.

    I wonder if this episode is foreshadowing Pietro’s return to the MCU, since Wanda finally acknowledged him and Vision spent most of the episode using super-speed.

    And I definitely think Geraldine is an infiltrator – the neighbours said she doesn’t have a home in Westview. She clearly doesn’t belong, hence why Wanda cast her out.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
  • #51477

    I know that this is a spoiler thread, but could we limit it to spoilers that have actually been broadcast (so to speak) not stuff that’s leaked out – or at least spoiler tag them? I’m pretty much going to avoid this thread now – the one place to talk about the show – because it seems it’s not possible to do that without people feeling the need to talk openly about info beyond what’s in the show itself to spoil what’s yet to come.

    I don’t know how many more episodes are going to be direct sitcom pastiches, I didn’t want to know, I was quite happy with just going along with the show as it happened, taking it as it came and talking about it as it did so, but apparently that’s not enough for those seemingly not even enjoying it in the first place.

  • #51479

    It was mentioned in the article from the first post in this thread. Sorry, I didn’t really consider it spoilery.

  • #51480

    That Teyonnah Parris is playing Monica Rambeau was announced at SDCC 2019 by Kevin Feige; I don’t think it really counts as a spoiler.

  • #51482

    I actually thought it was quite a bit better this week. The pastiche elements were more downplayed in favour of some actual movement in the story, and the hints we get towards what’s really going on were a lot stronger and more intriguing.

    It still feels like it’s taken far too long (90 minutes!) to get to the point where the show feels like it’s just getting started, and I feel like initial opinions would have been a lot more positive if all three of these episodes were released in week 1, but this has me interested enough to continue when I had expected it to be the last episode I watched.

    2 users thanked author for this post.
  • #51483

    I know that this is a spoiler thread, but could we limit it to spoilers that have actually been broadcast (so to speak) not stuff that’s leaked out – or at least spoiler tag them? I’m pretty much going to avoid this thread now – the one place to talk about the show – because it seems it’s not possible to do that without people feeling the need to talk openly about info beyond what’s in the show itself to spoil what’s yet to come.

    I don’t know how many more episodes are going to be direct sitcom pastiches, I didn’t want to know, I was quite happy with just going along with the show as it happened, taking it as it came and talking about it as it did so, but apparently that’s not enough for those seemingly not even enjoying it in the first place.

    I think this is a tough one. I’m not following the show closely enough to have known any of this stuff beforehand (including the Monica Rambeau announcement), so all the stuff about the specific structure of the show and casting and episode number/lengths is stuff I’ve learned here. Basically, if it’s not in the show itself I don’t really have much awareness of it.

    But at the same time, if other people are tracking the show closely and reacting to details that have been made public then I feel like it’s not much different to commenting on knowledge gained from stuff that’s been revealed in a trailer or poster or whatever.

    If Marvel didn’t want people to be aware and be discussing this stuff as part of the conversation around the show, then they shouldn’t have revealed it publicly.

    That said, I think it’s rarely essential to spoil a lot of these details for discussion purposes, so if anyone does want to talk about something that’s going to affect how others anticipate future episodes then there’s always the option of using spoiler tags, even within a spoiler thread. (I think we used to do something similar in the Game of Thrones threads with spoilers based on future knowledge gained from the books.)

    Maybe that’s a considerate way to handle it going forward – what does anyone think?

  • #51487

    I think a) the future episodes were mentioned in an article in a national newspaper, b) the theme of the episodes isn’t a plot spoiler, c) there are likely two other sitcom homages from the 80’s and 90’s that we don’t know about yet, and d) it’s a spoiler thread, which isn’t limited to what’s shown during the episodes that have aired.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
  • #51488

    I agree with that stance, I don’t think anyone has done anything hugely wrong as all this material is not leaked but part of Marvel’s publicity, just as the trailer went past the first couple of episodes, but it doesn’t hurt to put any stuff that isn’t in the actual show behind spoiler tags.

    Also if Martin is still reading they only mentioned 5 classic sitcoms they were using as templates, that does not mean they are only using 5 (in fact I suspect not because of the time gap between the examples used) so nobody here really knows if the sitcom structure will go 5 episodes or all 9, it’s just speculation. If they are doing ‘decades’ the next one will be an 80s show unknown as of now.

     

    2 users thanked author for this post.
  • #51489

    I think a) the future episodes were mentioned in an article in a national newspaper, b) the theme of the episodes isn’t a plot spoiler, c) there are likely two other sitcom homages from the 80’s and 90’s that we don’t know about yet, and d) it’s a spoiler thread, which isn’t limited to what’s shown during the episodes that have aired.

    Yeah I don’t think anyone is denying that stuff was out there, but people might still not want to know before the show itself reveals it.

    What counts as a “spoiler” is a bit tricky, some people feel it’s just knowledge of everything in the show so far, others feel it extends to everything publicly known about a production.

    For example, if there was a set leak and we saw photos that told us that Pietro or Ultron were going to appear later on in the series (that’s completely made-up by the way) then it would still be something that would ruin the viewing experience for a lot of people here to talk about it openly ahead of the reveal in-show.

    And unfortunately we live in an age where even the companies making these shows are happy to spoil them ahead of time.

  • #51490

    I think Marvel are excellent at keeping a lid on things – they’re great at teasing things but also keeping plenty of surprises in reserve, so I don’t think this has ruined the show for anyone. If you think minor things like what I posted are spoilers, then maybe stay off the internet. I’m certainly not one to post idle speculation here that some dodgy website has posted as “news,” which some people here are more than happy to do, even in non-spoiler threads.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
  • #51493

    I understand that attitude and I don’t really think anyone has done anything wrong in mentioning that stuff, but like Gar says it’s easy enough to put anything not in the show in spoiler tags, just put {spoiler}Daniel Day Lewis shows up as Paste Pot Pete in episode 7{/spoiler} but with square brackets instead of wiggly ones, then people can choose whether they want to know more about what’s to come.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
  • #51512

    By the way, I looked back at the trailer and the presence of an 80s head band and 90s flannel shirt suggest pretty strongly they aren’t skipping those decades to get to Malcolm in the Middle

  • #51520

    By the way, I looked back at the trailer and the presence of an 80s head band and 90s flannel shirt suggest pretty strongly they aren’t skipping those decades to get to Malcolm in the Middle

    Yeah, I remember Hahn in the sweatbands standing out as a very 80s image. And the flannel shirt feels very Roseanne to me.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
  • #51558

    I assume one of the 80s shows will be Full House, just for the Olsen connection.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
  • #51563

    I’m kinda bummed that Renner isn’t in this… since him, Olsen and Bettany were 3 of the least explored characters, it would’ve been nice to have him in here too, although I guess he’s getting his own show, so there’s that.

    Also, random thought but you guys think there’s a chance for the next Avengers movie to be a West Coast Avengers kind of thing? Because, we have Hawkeye, Wanda, (maybe) Vision, War Machine, Moonkinght (they could bring back Mockingbird)… that’s pretty much a WCA roster… I know they’re setting up a Young Avengers kind of thing, but… maybe before that?

    Anyways… as I was saying yesterday, I think I have a pretty good idea of where the show is going with what was shown yesterday:

    So first of all, it seems clear this is Wanda’s doing. So my guess is she’s having a mental breakdown after what happened in IW/EG and she has created her pocket/bubble reality in which shw can live her fanstasies as a coping mechanism… she seems to be aware that it’s not real, but she also seems to not want to wake up… and while she’s obviously in control of the pocket reality, she’s not fully in control of her powers as we saw this last episode.

    It’s now clear that Vision is a re-creation (I just noticed the mind stone on his forhead, that shit shouldn’t be there anyhow). And obviously Geraldine went in to do recon for SWORD, but she too got “bewitched” and only started remembering because of the “magic” going haywire.

    As for the inhabitants of Westview, it’s still too early to call, but there are basically 3 options, so they’re either:

    1) The actual inhabitants of the real Westview who got hijacked into Wanda’s fantasyscape and are being forced to play a role in it, and they might also be partially aware but can’t really do anything about it or escape… but that’s the most obvious answer.

    2) They’re all “creations” of Wanda, made up by her to populate her fantasyscape… They could also be based on people from her past, or

    3) They’re all dead, and I’m leaning towards this, because I’m thinking these might all be people Wanda killed at some point, like Vision. Maybe they’re the victims of the explosion at the begining of Civil War. So basically manifestations of her guilt, which would fit.

    Also, there might be other infiltrators… But I don’t think this has anything to do with either Hydra or AIM, or that they’re manipulating anything. It seems SWORD is on the case and monitoring very closely, plus they seem to have quarantined the site, so it would be hard for other factions to get near.

    I think the commercials are just tied to important experiences in Wanda’s life, and they’re not really foreshadowing the villains or anything like that: The first one was about Stark industries, which ties to when she was a kid with Pietro and the destruction of her home (the whole thing from AoU). Then there’s the more obvious Strucker one, he gave them powers. And this last one was Hydra, which again, probably has to do with Rumlow and the bomb from CW. So I’m thinking we might get a Wakanda related ad at some point, and an Ultron themed one (and possibly a Thanos/infinity gauntlet related one) too.

    At any rate, I really hope we get a Quicksilver cameo at the very least… I’m personally hoping they use this series to revert his (very stupid #fuckwhedon) death, and also bring back Vision. I know it seems obvious that’s what they’re doing, but not necessarily. I’m thinking we might also get a cameo from either Ben Mendelson or Sam Jackson, given SWORD’s involvement.

     

  • #51572

    It’s been bugging me that the green part of Vision’s head isn’t green any more, but after this episode it’s a little more obvious why it’s silver. Seems like Wanda is kind of conflating Pietro and Vision in her mind a little bit.

    Elizabeth Olsen is fricking amazing in this show, equally at home being a perfect 50’s sitcom housewife or scary as hell when the real Wanda comes out.

    And I loved the transition to wide-screen this episode – it added a surprising amount of drama to that moment.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
  • #51574

    It’s been bugging me that the green part of Vision’s head isn’t green any more, but after this episode it’s a little more obvious why it’s silver. Seems like Wanda is kind of conflating Pietro and Vision in her mind a little bit.

    That bugs me too, but it’s got nothing to do with the show… they transitioned to a more chromed/silvery shade of almost-not-green since Civil War I think… I know that it was pretty much that color in IW:

    Edit: yeah it seems it’s been like that since Civil War:

  • #51589

    Third ep was a lot better. Olsen was terrifically terrifying when she started to remember things. I suppose Geraldine managed to infiltrate Westview in a helicopter that wound up being turned into the toy from episode 2, while she was turned into a supporting character.

    I have a feeling that whenever we meet Kathryn Hayn’s husband that shit is really going to hit the fan. Her word choice when talking about him is rather foreboding, even with the jokey delivery.

    Too bad they didn’t save Debra Jo Rupp for the ’70s show!

    1 user thanked author for this post.
  • #51604

    The neighbors certainly must have some sort of independent sentience since they exist separate from Wanda’s consciousness of them AND they apparently have some idea what’s going on. I do believe that Herb was going to say to Vision “We’re all dead.” Before Agnes stopped him. Though, it could have easily have been “trapped” or “imaginary” but “dead” seems like the obvious dramatic choice.

    The main improvement this episode was that the conflict sharpened. I still find it a bit clunky.

     

    1 user thanked author for this post.
  • #51608

    And I loved the transition to wide-screen this episode – it added a surprising amount of drama to that moment.

    Yes, that was really effective.

  • #51609

    Watched the three eps last night in one go, with the kid. We liked it a lot.

    For me, enjoying the nostalgic humour of the sitcoms worked quite well in itself for those two episodes. It was great to see Bettany being able to cut loose playing Drunk Vision in ep 2, and it was really fun to see things get trippy when Wanda’s rewinding and revising started. The horror elements in the show are great overall; the way Olsen’s voice changed that first moment when Wanda left her sitcom character and said “Save him, Vision” was very nicely done; as were all the other moments when reality breaks through. When she starts talking about Pietro, Wanda gets really fucking scary. And the moment when Vision twigs something is going on and she rewinds him is maybe the worst moment of all; what she’s doing to (the construct of?) the man he loves could probably be called a form of mental rape.

    The neighbors certainly must have some sort of independent sentience since they exist separate from Wanda’s consciousness of them AND they apparently have some idea what’s going on. I do believe that Herb was going to say to Vision “We’re all dead.” Before Agnes stopped him. Though, it could have easily have been “trapped” or “imaginary” but “dead” seems like the obvious dramatic choice.

    I was leaning more towards “trapped”, butI suppose simply for practical reasons? It seems more pragmatic to me that Wanda would just turn the inhabitants of a neighbourhood she’s stranded in into characters in her little world rather than her re-animating the dead. Also, what Herb was saying could then be interpreted to mean that Geraldine had come to save them, which is probably how you’d like to see what is going on.

    It’d make sense for the Hydra elements to just be projections of Wanda’s memory, what with her presumably being very traumatised from her time with them. But then again, who knows, they may be making a play to get her back, and maybe even in some form contribute to the chaos in her mind. That’d be pretty cool, too.

  • #51619

    Another possible hint/Easter Egg. Since the series borrows a lot from Steve Englehart’s 1986 Vision & Scarlet Witch series (Glamor & Illusion were characters in that series and in the show, that’s what Wanda & Vision call themselves during their magician act) the commercial in the latest episode uses the tagline “Find the Goddess Within,” and look who turns up in the mini-series.

    Personally, I’d be very surprised if the show took an Asgardian turn, but… who knows! :unsure:

    clean

     

  • #51628

    Why would Spider-man show up? =P

  • #51632

    Watched the three eps last night in one go, with the kid. We liked it a lot.

    I feel that if Disney+ had released the first three episodes together last week, and they were watched together in succession, there would have been fewer complaints. As we’ve progress from ep to ep, the glamor/illusion has developed bigger and bigger cracks, so the most recent episode would have provided a more satisfying conclusion in terms of where the story is leading, and the idea of framing these episodes in the guise of old sitcoms begins to make more sense.

    3 users thanked author for this post.
  • #51634

    For me, enjoying the nostalgic humour of the sitcoms worked quite well in itself for those two episodes.

    Me too. I can get the complaints about the first two episodes being largely just sitcom pastiche wasn’t for some (and they probably should have dropped 3 episodes rather than 2) but I do think that really helped create an impact when Geraldine stepped out of it. I had a little gasp when she said ‘Pietro was killed by Ultron’, I don’t think I would have if that came in episode one.

  • #51638

    Watched the three eps last night in one go, with the kid. We liked it a lot.

    I feel that if Disney+ had released the first three episodes together last week, and they were watched together in succession, there would have been fewer complaints. As we’ve progress from ep to ep, the glamor/illusion has developed bigger and bigger cracks, so the most recent episode would have provided a more satisfying conclusion in terms of where the story is leading, and the idea of framing these episodes in the guise of old sitcoms begins to make more sense.

    I agree. The end of episode three is a good moment of intrigue where it feels like the premise of the show has been more clearly set up and everything established nicely. The end of episode two is more of a gentle hint in that direction but not enough to really get excited about.

    I still think it’s taken a little too long to get to this point though. A full 90 minutes for something that could have been done (without really losing anything) in half the time.

     

    3 users thanked author for this post.
  • #51644

    I was leaning more towards “trapped”, butI suppose simply for practical reasons? It seems more pragmatic to me that Wanda would just turn the inhabitants of a neighbourhood she’s stranded in into characters in her little world rather than her re-animating the dead. Also, what Herb was saying could then be interpreted to mean that Geraldine had come to save them, which is probably how you’d like to see what is going on.

    Herb and Agnes seemed hostile to Geraldine, though. Also, I’m basically going by the fact we all know Vision is dead. So, I’m expanding that to the idea that everyone else possibly is dead too. So, if this is the only life you have and Geraldine threatens that, then I can see why they wouldn’t trust her. If she fixes the problem, what happens to them?

    Also, Westview sounds more like the name for a cemetery than a town. Is there a Westview in Marvel comics? At least it wasn’t “Marville.”

  • #51645

    . I had a little gasp when she said ‘Pietro was killed by Ultron’, I don’t think I would have if that came in episode one.

    It was interesting, but I did wonder what the plan was there. I can see trying to break Wanda out of whatever this is, but at the same time, it didn’t seem like Geraldine had a plan for whatever happens next.

  • #51646

    It was interesting, but I did wonder what the plan was there. I can see trying to break Wanda out of whatever this is, but at the same time, it didn’t seem like Geraldine had a plan for whatever happens next.

    I think the plan was just to try to bring her back to reality. She engaged with it, remembering that she had a brother, and then Monica tried to nudge her a little further. But of course reminding her how he died backfired spectacularly.

  • #51657

    Westview sounds more like the name for a cemetery than a town. Is there a Westview in Marvel comics?

    Not that I know of.

    In one of the easter egg videos they suggest it reflects Wanda’s upbringing in eastern Europe, watching the sitcoms on TV was her view of the west – Westview. It’s just someone’s speculation though and could be complete bollocks.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
  • #51659

    True – that makes sense to explain why the sitcom format. Also, of course, WandaVision > WestView

  • #51661

    In one of the easter egg videos they suggest it reflects Wanda’s upbringing in eastern Europe, watching the sitcoms on TV was her view of the west – Westview. It’s just someone’s speculation though and could be complete bollocks.

    Based on the end of episode 3, Westview appears to be a named place in the real world within which Wanda has created a bubble of altered reality. So I’m not sure it would make sense for the name to have come from her in that way, in-universe. Possible that it’s a deliberate hidden meaning by the writers though, I guess.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
  • #51664

    I’m pretty sure that video came out before episode 3 aired anyway.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
  • #51665

    True – that makes sense to explain why the sitcom format. Also, of course, WandaVision > WestView

    Of course Westview is also an anagram of WWI Steve so we can probably expect a time-travelling Captain America to make a guest appearance by the end of the series.

    3 users thanked author for this post.
  • #51669

    True – that makes sense to explain why the sitcom format. Also, of course, WandaVision > WestView

    2 users thanked author for this post.
  • #51673

    I agree with what pretty much everyone has said upthread. I found that I had to motivate myself to watch episode 3, expecting more of the same but in a Brady Bunch pastiche instead of a Bewitched one this week. So the episode as is was a very welcome change. The creepiness ramping up worked very well, as did introducing proper cracks in the illusion for both Wanda and Vision. I’m much more positive about the show after this week.

    3 users thanked author for this post.
  • #51692

    Of course Westview is also an anagram of WWI Steve

    Or Wet Wives, which sounds like a popular adult video series on PornHub.

    4 users thanked author for this post.
  • #51693

    Of course Westview is also an anagram of WWI Steve

    Or Wet Wives, which sounds like a popular adult video series on PornHub.

    Wait… you’re onto something there… this episode’s commercial was for Hydra’s bubble baths for tired house wives… =P

    4 users thanked author for this post.
  • #51694

    Of course Westview is also an anagram of WWI Steve

    Or Wet Wives, which sounds like a popular adult video series on PornHub.

    Wait… you’re onto something there… this episode’s commercial was for Hydra’s bubble baths for tired house wives… =P

    And Wanda set off the sprinklers and got soaked!

    2 users thanked author for this post.
  • #51698

    Fellas…I think we’ve cracked the code!!

    2 users thanked author for this post.
  • #51704

    2 users thanked author for this post.
  • #51737

  • #51741

    Man they’re really trying to make the AIM connection happen… The beekeper guy had A SWORD LOGO ON HIS FUCKIN BACK!!!!!!!! He’s obviously, painfully obviously I might add, not AIM, but another Sword agent (probably wearing a hazmat suit in reality) trying to get in and see why Geraldine didn’t report back or something like that… u_u

    The hexagon motifs could mean anything… in fact I wouldn’t be surprised if it’s something dumb as just a connection to the word HEX, as in hex magic (Wanda’s type of magic).

    1 user thanked author for this post.
  • #51747

    Yeah, AIM seems unlikely unless it was always a department in SWORD which could work for the MCU. However, he definitely was in a beekeeper suit with bees around it. What the hell?!

    At this point, I can’t believe that agencies like SHIELD or SWORD aren’t essentially the villains of the Marvel Universe. However, I’m not up to date on what exactly SWORD is in the movies. Is it the result of the Thanos invasion or has it been around for long (and if so, what the hell was it doing while Hydra took over SHIELD)?

    I don’t necessarily like the direction this is going as the idea that there is a local reality bending event and some esoteric security service is already on the case is, well… pretty mundane in science fiction terms. ANNIHILATION did that a little better as the Zone was simply too xenotic to understand whereas this scenario is actually fairly simple. The one saving grace is that it seems like they don’t think Wanda is simply doing this herself. It seems like there must be some overarching entity involved that they need to pin down.

     

  • #51752

    Yeah, AIM seems unlikely unless it was always a department in SWORD which could work for the MCU. However, he definitely was in a beekeeper suit with bees around it. What the hell?!

    Yeah he appeared as a guy in a beekeeper suit, but remember, the helicopter turned into a toy and Monica seems to have been transformed into Geraldine (like, her clothes insta changed into period accurate clothes, presumably)… seems everything that enters the bubble is somehow changed/transformed to fit into the fantasy, so it wouldn’t make sense for a guy to appear with a modern hazmat suit. Why as a beekeeper with bees (or flies) around it? Who knows… misdirection maybe… or simply, since he’s an outside “danger” from Wanda’s POV, maybe she just imagined him as an ominous threatening thing. :unsure:

    As for SWORD, I was trying to remember what was going on in the MCU with that whole thing… Best I could remember is that, in the movies at least, SHIELD went tits up after Winter Soldier, but Fury was hanging out in the SWORD space station at the end of homecoming, so presumably SWORD is basically a continuation of SHIELD… I don’t know… I mean, I’m ignoring Agents of Shield because no one cares about that show and I doubt it’s gonna be cannonized, so I don’t think we ever saw anything SHIELD-related after Winter Soldier’s events in the movies. Fury showed up with some remnants of shield in AoU, but I don’t think they ever formed it back officially.

    The one saving grace is that it seems like they don’t think Wanda is simply doing this herself. It seems like there must be some overarching entity involved that they need to pin down.

    I’m of the opposite opinion, and I hope it is all Wanda’s doing and not some “evil” third party doing it, because as much as people are also trying to make Mephisto happen, I think it’s a much more interesting character developpment for Wanda if she’s the one creating this whole mess. And boy, she needs that character developpment… specially after that Captain Marvel dud and the fact that they never bothered doing something greater with Black Widow (yes I know a movie is coming, but feels like too little too late, and mostly like a way of introducing her replacement).

    1 user thanked author for this post.
  • #51753

    I’m of the opposite opinion, and I hope it is all Wanda’s doing and not some “evil” third party doing it, because as much as people are also trying to make Mephisto happen, I think it’s a much more interesting character developpment for Wanda if she’s the one creating this whole mess. And boy, she needs that character developpment… specially after that Captain Marvel dud and the fact that they never bothered doing something greater with Black Widow (yes I know a movie is coming, but feels like too little too late, and mostly like a way of introducing her replacement).

    I wouldn’t be surprised if they used this opportunity to bring in some element of the X-Men actually. Not necessarily Magneto or Xavier but some hint of mutants in the MCU and maybe an X-men villain (Mastermind?). In the comics SWORD was introduced in the X-men, wasn’t it? Whedon’s run?

    However, whose voice was on the radio asking “Wanda, who is doing this to you?” It seems like SWORD must believe that someone has trapped her in there and is manipulating her. Maybe that is why Geraldine decided to go for the “Ultron” move in the hopes that it would break Wanda free of the manipulation and was then surprised that Wanda was so committed to the fantasy.

  • #51754

    Also, as for the pendant, I went ahead and took a good shot of it, and blew it up a little and also sharpened it up a bit… it kinda looks like women picking fruit from a tree, which is very common iconography, related to harvest and fertility too… But eh, it could be anything, the “trinity/triumvirate” symbology is also super common within magic tropes… so who knows. It could definetly be the norns, the hecate sisters, or the witches three or whatever else.

  • #51757

    However, whose voice was on the radio asking “Wanda, who is doing this to you?” It seems like SWORD must believe that someone has trapped her in there and is manipulating her. Maybe that is why Geraldine decided to go for the “Ultron” move in the hopes that it would break Wanda free of the manipulation and was then surprised that Wanda was so committed to the fantasy.

    Well, Wanda is supposed to be an Avenger and a hero, wouldn’t you assume someone is doing it to her? Most people are =P

    I don’t think Gerladine “went for” anything, her expression, plus Wanda’s, Vision’s and everyone else’s, was more of starting to remember things… so Wanda mentions Pietro and Geraldine starts remembering Wanda’s file and maybe her mission, which is why she tries to backpedal once she realized that was a mistake.

    But hey, listen, I might be wrong and Agnes might end up being Agatha Harkness or Mephisto or whoever else and she’s behind it, but eh, that’s the bland and boring route… This has the potential to be something a lot more intersting like Legion, so let’s hope they do something really interesting.

  • #51758

    Yeah, that’s actually a version of the “three graces” cameo – a common Victorian piece of jewelry – and it is Greek mythology, not Norse.

    Graces – Ancient History Encyclopedia

  • #51759

    Yeah that could be it too… it does look more greco-roman in style, but again, it’s the MCU, they could be using any kind of tropey thing…

  • #51770

    I don’t think Gerladine “went for” anything, her expression, plus Wanda’s, Vision’s and everyone else’s, was more of starting to remember things… so Wanda mentions Pietro and Geraldine starts remembering Wanda’s file and maybe her mission, which is why she tries to backpedal once she realized that was a mistake.

    Yeah, that’s how I read this, as well, that Geraldine just let this slip because she’s losing herself in the character Wanda created for her, but sometimes her true self comes to the surface. Hard to say though.

  • #51776

    The hexagon motifs could mean anything… in fact I wouldn’t be surprised if it’s something dumb as just a connection to the word HEX, as in hex magic (Wanda’s type of magic).

    I really notice the hexagon thing because it was also a repeated motif in The Seeds which I read recently.

    There’s the obvious connection to the bees with the honeycomb shape, but beyond that I’m not sure of the exact significance.

    Is there some kind of beehive aspect to Westview? Is Wanda the queen bee? Is Vision made of honey?

  • #51788

    I wonder if, as we come up through the sitcom timeline, we will get an Office style episode with the characters explaining themselves to an invisible documentary crew.

    2 users thanked author for this post.
  • #51795

    I wonder if, as we come up through the sitcom timeline, we will get an Office style episode with the characters explaining themselves to an invisible documentary crew.

    From what I’ve seen of Modern Family they do that in that show as well, so it’s very likely.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
  • #51797

    There’s the obvious connection to the bees with the honeycomb shape, but beyond that I’m not sure of the exact significance. Is there some kind of beehive aspect to Westview? Is Wanda the queen bee? Is Vision made of honey?

    Well, in a sense it is some kind of bee colony with Wanda a s the queen bee and the rest as her lackeys… so, sure, that could also be it… :unsure:

    I wonder if, as we come up through the sitcom timeline, we will get an Office style episode with the characters explaining themselves to an invisible documentary crew.

    Nah, I think the environment is too important to use any show as inspiration… they’ll use shows with suburban settings and family themes.

    Edit: Oh, unless what Steve says happens… =P

  • #51805

    Every example we’ve seen so far, and the ones they said are coming, is a suburban couple/family show. I suspect they’ll stick with that, we’ll see if they also stick to one to represent a decade if we see an 80s one next week. That means the 2000s and 2010s are already spoken for.

     

  • #51816

    Every example we’ve seen so far, and the ones they said are coming, is a suburban couple/family show. I suspect they’ll stick with that, we’ll see if they also stick to one to represent a decade if we see an 80s one next week. That means the 2000s and 2010s are already spoken for.

    Also, if they are explaining this with sitcoms that Wanda watched as a child, then I expect it won’t end up with anything too recent.

    Wouldn’t mind a WandaVision version of this:

    Married with Children

    1 user thanked author for this post.
  • #51817

    I really notice the hexagon thing because it was also a repeated motif in The Seeds which I read recently. There’s the obvious connection to the bees with the honeycomb shape, but beyond that I’m not sure of the exact significance. Is there some kind of beehive aspect to Westview? Is Wanda the queen bee? Is Vision made of honey?

    We can be fairly sure that Geraldine (or Monica) is with SWORD due to her necklace – not entirely though, as it could have been some sort of control device, but can we assume that the troops outside the town are SWORD? SWORD could be the Beekeeper behind the entire thing and the troops just regular military who will be just as baffled when Geraldine came flying out of the town with no clue who she is or what her mission is.

    Also, maybe we have a NextWave series in the works.

  • #51823

    Also, if they are explaining this with sitcoms that Wanda watched as a child, then I expect it won’t end up with anything too recent.

    ANIMATED SIMPSONS HOMAGE EPISODE!!!! WHOOOOOOOHOOO!!!!!

    Come on, you all know it’d be awesome.

    (For about 5 minutes, but hey, you could simply do it for those five minutes and then break into something else.)

    1 user thanked author for this post.
  • #51827

    Yes to the Simpsons, but no to animated. You know it makes sense!

    5d666f8b-0b5d-4e82-a979-61c096497dc7

    2 users thanked author for this post.
  • #51839

    Thanks, I hate it.

    5 users thanked author for this post.
  • #51862

    I appreciate the performances of the cast and the production values to recreate classic sitcoms but the show has just been okay for me. While I agree dropping the first three episodes at once would have helped, the reveal at the end of Ep 3 really should have happened at the end of Ep 2. The pace along with the banality of the homages slow the series down.

    I think this series may end up working better in a binge versus weekly release.

    2 users thanked author for this post.
  • #51871

    Yeah the pace is the one major flaw with this show so far… even this episode, while much better because it moved the plot forward, there were still moments where I was like “I got iiiiit… move the fuck on” (that whole chunk with geraldine, the fruit bowl and the crane).

    2 users thanked author for this post.
  • #51874

    Yeah the pace is the one major flaw with this show so far… even this episode, while much better because it moved the plot forward, there were still moments where I was like “I got iiiiit… move the fuck on” (that whole chunk with geraldine, the fruit bowl and the crane).

    It is a headache – the format is paramount rather than the narrative. They can’t easily move the story along without interrupting the very rigid format of each particular sitcom type which would defeat the apparent desire to basically recreate the styles of those archaic shows.

    2 users thanked author for this post.
  • #51875

    Yeah, it’s essentially when they take the time to actually go through all the motions of an actual sitcom that it feels bogged down and unentertaining.

    Because they’re basically riffing on cheesy sitcom gags we’ve seen a hundred times before and not doing anything new with them, but they’re still doing them at length with no additional clever twist or angle.

    It’s what hurt the first two episodes most I think. That sense of “yes, we get it. Just get on with it.”

    Luckily it feels like the show is finally getting on with it.

    2 users thanked author for this post.
  • #51877

    Luckily it feels like the show is finally getting on with it

    Well don’t count your chickens just yet – as previously discussed, there are a number of sitcom episodes to get through still.

    I agree that it’s taken too long to get where we are though. Maybe they could have used the fake commercial breaks to divide the show in half and change to the next type of sitcom – that way we could have halved the amount of time wasted.

    2 users thanked author for this post.
  • #51882

    Luckily it feels like the show is finally getting on with it

    Well don’t count your chickens just yet – as previously discussed, there are a number of sitcom episodes to get through still.

    I agree that it’s taken too long to get where we are though. Maybe they could have used the fake commercial breaks to divide the show in half and change to the next type of sitcom – that way we could have halved the amount of time wasted.

    That’s actually a great idea, it was a very natural and obvious transition point… at the very least for the 1st and 2nd episodes, since let’s be honest, the differences weren’t all that apparent because of the black and white and those 2 episodes could’ve easily been a slightly longer but thigter one. It would’ve also added to the overall eerrieness of the show if suddenly some things changed without explanation, but still looked overall same-ish… but then again they wouldn’t have been able to do their “cute” openings and all that… u_u

    Heck, thinking about it, it would probably work with the rest of the eras too… 70’s and 80’s TV sort of look the same in terms of TV production quality… and the 90’s shows are close enough to the 2000’s too.

    Okay so yeah, this is how you fix this:

    You combine 2 decades into one episode, each half being long enough to do their schtick WITHOUT overstaying their welcome.

    So the first half starts with the opening credits of that decade (say the 50’s one) like they did, then at some point you cut to “commercials”, the commercials serving as a transition point, BUT you use 2 commercials instead of one, but not the complete commercials, the first should cut off halfway through (it should be more than enough to get their “easter eggs” in there) as if someone were channel surfing and transition into the next commercial (of the next decade of course) midway through, and then the second half happens in the next decade (so the 60’s in this instance)… and then, instead of having that monstrous ending credits they have (they’re really fucking long) you just use the end credits with the “cute song and graphics” of that second decade… so they can have their cake and eat it.

    Now it could either be one single story-line through both decades, but it could also be 2 as they did them, because let’s be honest, the “plots” were thin as fuck, so if they trimmed some of the fat they could easily fit both into a single slighlty longer ep. Plus think about it, the begining of the 2nd episode with Wanda and Vision in bed would’ve been a much better transition after a commercial break.

    • This reply was modified 3 years, 10 months ago by Jon.
    1 user thanked author for this post.
  • #52259

    Suppose this was inevitable:

  • #52353

    WARNING: SPOILERS IN THE SPOILER THREAD!

     

    Oh for a close-up of that notice-board, if only to see if Herb’s surname is Wyndham. Also, Dottie is strangely absent from the wall…

     

  • #52446

    After my little rant about The Snap in the MCU thread, this week’s Wandavision addresses the very thing I had a problem with!

    1 user thanked author for this post.
  • #52455

    A very different episode this week, but frustratingly little new information – just different perspectives on what we’ve already seen. And Darcy is an Asgardian connection…

    1 user thanked author for this post.
  • #52457

    Yeah, there weren’t any surprises. It’s more or less what I expected to be happening, with the exception of it only being a day or so since all the SWORD stuff was set up and Monica was sucked in.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
  • #52458

    Darcy

    1 user thanked author for this post.
  • #52462

    I thought this week was ok. Maybe a slightly uninspired way to lay out what’s really going on, but I think it sets things up nicely going forward.

    Overall I think the series has got better after a rocky start. I’m still a bit baffled by that initial release strategy but they’re turning the show around for me.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
  • #52466

    A very different episode this week, but frustratingly little new information – just different perspectives on what we’ve already seen. And Darcy is an Asgardian connection…

    Yeah, that opening sequence was really well done. The episode in general was well-placed, breaking up what will presumably be a few more sitcom episodes before we get another one centred on the outside world, and it was kinda nice to see the usual MCU look and feel back, for all the stick it gets for being samey, the shared visual language anchors the shared universe – I kinda expected to see Coulson or Daisy from AoS walk into frame

    • This reply was modified 3 years, 10 months ago by lorcan_nagle.
    1 user thanked author for this post.
  • #52469

    Darcy

    1 user thanked author for this post.
  • #52470

    Oh so it’s exaclty what I said… xD

    Monica went in to investigate (by accident, but still) and got sitcom-fied, the beekeper guy was indeed a guy wearing a modern hazmat suit going in to get a stirep on Monica, the people are indeed real people who got hijacked into Wanda’s fantasy and it does seem Wanda is both in control but out of it as well. Aaaand there doesn’t seem to be any connection with Hydra or AIM.

    Damn, I’m good =P

    I really enjoyed this one… I was glad to see some of the un-snappening, I kinda wish they had devoted more time to it… I hope they’ll revisit it at some point. Great to see the absolutely gorgeous Kat Dennings again. Not a fan of “quirky/geeky” Jimmy Woo, and not a fan of the actor either (I mean, I guess he does fine in that role, it’s just the role and therefore the casting is just wrong).

    We learnt SWORD is actually an old organization, which is a bit of a retcon, but sure whatever… so it wasn’t technically created as a SHIELD replacement. They made allusions to the SWORD space station too. Uhmm… what else?

    Oh yeah, Wanda’s into necrophilia… I mean, sure, fuck it, after rapist Wonder Woman, who cares… xD

    1 user thanked author for this post.
  • #52472

    Oh so it’s exaclty what I said… xD Monica went in to investigate (by accident, but still) and got sitcom-fied, the beekeper guy was indeed a guy wearing a modern hazmat suit going in to get a stirep on Monica, the people are indeed real people who got hijacked into Wanda’s fantasy and it does seem Wanda is both in control but out of it as well. Aaaand there doesn’t seem to be any connection with Hydra or AIM. Damn, I’m good =P

    It’s pretty much the conclusion that everybody had come to by this point, isn’t it? Nothing in this episode was a real twist or surprise, just a “here’s what it looked like from the other side” kind of thing.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
  • #52473

    I did like though that the show was able to have some fun with the meta aspect of showing people watching the first three episodes and trying to work out what was going on via the various clues. Jimmy Woo’s Whiteboard was basically this thread (including highlighting the whole hexagon thing).

    1 user thanked author for this post.
  • #52475

    It’s notable that SWORD haven’t discovered who “Dottie” is. Agnes says in episode 2, “Dottie is the key to everything in this town.”

    Despite Monica claiming “it’s all Wanda,” I still think she’s being controlled.

  • #52476

    I took a screenshot of the profiles of the townsfolk, but it’s too small… you can only read a portion of Agnes’ profile unfortunately… I guess we’ll need someone to post a high def picture or something… shouldn’t be too long, but there is no real name for her yet, so I don’t think that’ll be too helpful, seems the profiles are mostly a description of their roles within the show.

  • #52477

    The other interesting thing is they clearly allude to there being more sitcom episodes we haven’t seen, so it isn’t as short a timeline as we may have imagined, clearly a lot of time spent between Monica entering the ‘bubble’ of Westview and being ejected and maybe an entire season of ‘Dick Van Dyke’ before she does.

    Episodes 2 and 3 do seem to run directly into each other but that’s fairly easily explained by one being the end of a long run of ‘Bewitched’ era. The are watching Monica for a while before she gets a speaking part.

    I love the huge universe they are creating bringing in disparate characters from previous movies.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
  • #52478

    The other interesting thing is they clearly allude to there being more sitcom episodes we haven’t seen

    I loved Darcy’s line, “why does it keep switching time periods? It can’t be purely for my enjoyment!”

    EDIT: The Loki TV show features time-travel…

    1 user thanked author for this post.
  • #52480

    yeah… I’m thinking that in the next batch of episodes we’ll jump in and out from the sitcoms… or at least I hope so, it’d be soooooooooooo underwhelming to get back to more sitcom-centric episodes.

    Also, one last bit, I didn’t connect the dots last week, but we’ve been wondering if Wanda’s powers are still just “mind stone-related” or if she’s getting reality-altering magic… and so far, most of what we’ve seen fits into the mental category, but when Geraldine gets the boot, she does appear as her sitcom character in the real world… and that can’t be explained away with any mental powers… Same goes for the CRB energy in this episode, or the actual broadcasting of the show…

    So it would seem they are really expanding her powers, which means that yes, a Vision ressurection is indeed on the table (maybe even Pietro), and I guess that also means Tommy & Billy are for sure gonna be a thing moving forward… however I wonder if that scenario would necessitate Wanda to die at the end… man I hope not, I’d rather have Vision and Pietro back.

  • #52482

    Also, one last bit, I didn’t connect the dots last week, but we’ve been wondering if Wanda’s powers are still just “mind stone-related” or if she’s getting reality-altering magic… and so far, most of what we’ve seen fits into the mental category, but when Geraldine gets the boot, she does appear as her sitcom character in the real world… and that can’t be explained away with any mental powers… Same goes for the CRB energy in this episode, or the actual broadcasting of the show…

    Same for the wire that’s cut off in the sewer and gets reeled back in by the agents outside.

    It seems like the bubble around Westview has altered the reality within (even though you can’t see that from outside), not just mind control, and it’s powerful enough that it can ‘contaminate’ objects or people that then pass back outside.

  • #52483

    Aaaand there doesn’t seem to be any connection with Hydra or AIM.

    I’m still assuming a Hydra connection, if only because of the references in the mid-episode commercials (the Strucker watch and the Hydra bath soak).

  • #52489

    There’s a Hydra link but it may not be to the current situation but her past. Strucker’s name appears in the ads and he was the one imprisoning Wanda and Pietro back in Sekovia.

Viewing 100 replies - 101 through 200 (of 685 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Skip to toolbar