The Picture Thread
- This topic has 996 replies, 20 voices, and was last updated 2 years, 2 months ago by
.
Author
-
thank Mr. Jones’ legal team.
… who “accidentally”
sent it. -
Who’s the muscly guy?
It looks like his name is “Jane”.
1 user thanked author for this post.
-
1 user thanked author for this post.
-
The young guy with the muscles is none other than the rapper mogul known as Fifty Cents.
It is a picture of him in his much younger years.
2 users thanked author for this post.
-
-
I will be honest, I don’t understand most of Al’s pictures. Must be an age thing.
1 user thanked author for this post.
-
-
The young guy with the muscles is none other than the rapper mogul known as Fifty Cents.
Not to be a pedant, but his name is 50 Cent. Not 50 Cents, not Fifty Cent. Or “Fitty” if you’re his friend. Or Curtis James Jackson III if you’re his mother.
1 user thanked author for this post.
-
-
3 users thanked author for this post.
-
3 users thanked author for this post.
-
3 users thanked author for this post.
-
I will be honest, I don’t understand most of Al’s pictures. Must be an age thing.
What pictures do you not understand?
I mean, you often post people like 50 Cent, or several people in your last post, and they aren’t doing anything interesting, they’re just posing. I guess you post them because the people themselves are interesting to you, and that’s fine, but I can can rarely recognise who they are so I’m not sure why they are interesting to you :)
2 users thanked author for this post.
-
6 users thanked author for this post.
-
I will be honest, I don’t understand most of Al’s pictures. Must be an age thing.
What pictures do you not understand?
I mean, you often post people like 50 Cent, or several people in your last post, and they aren’t doing anything interesting, they’re just posing. I guess you post them because the people themselves are interesting to you, and that’s fine, but I can can rarely recognise who they are so I’m not sure why they are interesting to you :)
Ohhhh.. I get it now.
I always posted famous people in their younger years like Jimmy Page as a boy on TV, vintage Hendrix, and now “Elliot” from the movie ET in his 50s now.
This is the main picture thread. I post a few on Star Trek when it is pertinent there, others too in other threads now and then, but this has always been the main depository. Others post in this thread political pics , d*ck pics, nudity, funny and quirky pics… All a mixed bag here. I might post some psych memes…who knows?
I get it that you wonder about a few things that might go over your head. That is understandable. You had me going there thinking that you did not know anything about ET, Olson’s sister, Leo…
1 user thanked author for this post.
-
5 users thanked author for this post.
-
That cannot be serious.
If it is I would like to to be introduced to the drugs they are on.
3 users thanked author for this post.
-
5 users thanked author for this post.
-
3 users thanked author for this post.
-
I feel personally attacked.
3 users thanked author for this post.
-
I feel personally attacked.
You should
3 users thanked author for this post.
-
4 users thanked author for this post.
-
-
There is a good point there though, and the raid on Trump’s property apparently wasn’t because of underage sex. Maxwell is jailed for underage sex trafficking, but who were those kids trafficked to? Is there an effort to arrest those people?
The engines of the state will protect the elite until they’re no longer useful. Epstein’s value had been superseded by his liabilities and he was allowed to fall. You saw the same thing in the UK where Jimmy Saville and other high-profile predators were protected until it was no longer expedient to do so.
2 users thanked author for this post.
-
You saw the same thing in the UK where Jimmy Saville and other high-profile predators were protected until it was no longer expedient to do so.
Where does Prince Andrew fall in this? He’s been accused, he’s been stripped of various royal titles and responsibilities by the family, but he hasn’t been brought to trial…yet. Is he still useful to the powers-that-be in the UK?
2 users thanked author for this post.
-
You saw the same thing in the UK where Jimmy Saville and other high-profile predators were protected until it was no longer expedient to do so.
Where does Prince Andrew fall in this? He’s been accused, he’s been stripped of various royal titles and responsibilities by the family, but he hasn’t been brought to trial…yet. Is he still useful to the powers-that-be in the UK?
He’s effectively a sacrifice to keep the rest of the Royal Family away from the scandal for now
2 users thanked author for this post.
-
-
Where does Prince Andrew fall in this? He’s been accused, he’s been stripped of various royal titles and responsibilities by the family, but he hasn’t been brought to trial…yet. Is he still useful to the powers-that-be in the UK?
He’s not necessarily useful. I think the truth is to bring him to trial and get a conviction is extremely hard. It’s one person’s word against another he had sex with Guiffre and if he did it as she was 17 it wasn’t illegal in the UK as the age of consent is 16.
We know she was trafficked but if he declares ignorance of that fact then the blame all goes back to Epstein and Maxwell for trafficking. I’m a republican (note the small r) so have no interest in defending him, I don’t give a shit if he dies in jail, but unless you have documented evidence showing he knew she was trafficked it’s pretty impossible to pass a conviction. It’s not even illegal to use a prostitute in the UK, only if it can be proven you solicited the deal.
That’s why stuff like this gets moved to civil prosecution where the penalties are financial and not criminal so it drives everyone to settle, which is also the Michael Jackson story.
3 users thanked author for this post.
-
-
-
-
-
3 users thanked author for this post.
-
3 users thanked author for this post.
-
-
Edit: dammit, why isn’t it possible to quote just one picture from a post?
I know…
———————
-
2 users thanked author for this post.
-
Edit: dammit, why isn’t it possible to quote just one picture from a post?
I know…
———————
The single best thing about season 2 of Picard was this guy’s cameo.
1 user thanked author for this post.
-
-
8 users thanked author for this post.
-
4 users thanked author for this post.
-
2 users thanked author for this post.
-
Get woke or go broke, cheesebags!
2 users thanked author for this post.
-
Get woke or go broke, cheesebags!
Fuck off, assholes.
2 users thanked author for this post.
-
Get woke or go broke, cheesebags!
Fuck off, assholes.
4 users thanked author for this post.
-
Schoolie McSchoolface made me laugh so hard. That was brilliant.
1 user thanked author for this post.
-
Still… For those who like to repost but don’t want to have to do all 4 pics:
How do you isolate the one pic to repost it?
-
Still… For those who like to repost but don’t want to have to do all 4 pics: How do you isolate the one pic to repost it?
Magic.
1 user thanked author for this post.
-
I don’t know if there’s a less clicky-snippy-copy-clicky-pasty thing to do this but it can be done with any image, the same way quoted text can be edited.
-
4 users thanked author for this post.
-
3 users thanked author for this post.
-
2 users thanked author for this post.
-
-
Rubber was fucking awesome. Reminds me that I didn’t manage to keep up with what Dupieux is doing; I really need to do catch up one of these days.
1 user thanked author for this post.
-
-
-
1 user thanked author for this post.
-
2 users thanked author for this post.
-
4 users thanked author for this post.
-
1 user thanked author for this post.
-
I didn’t manage to keep up with what Dupieux is doing
He’s probably sitting in his office, smoking hot dogs and headbanging into his phone.
1 user thanked author for this post.
-
6 users thanked author for this post.
-
1 user thanked author for this post.
-
-
4 users thanked author for this post.
-
-
“There’s so much evidence, we should put some aside for a different case.”
5 users thanked author for this post.
-
4 users thanked author for this post.
-
3 users thanked author for this post.
-
Is this quite possibly the first trans villain?
———
2 users thanked author for this post.
-
-
6 users thanked author for this post.
-
3 users thanked author for this post.
-
2 users thanked author for this post.
-
1 user thanked author for this post.
-
1 user thanked author for this post.
-
7 users thanked author for this post.
-
That is amazing reporting.
2 users thanked author for this post.
-
Good to know Zuck’s got his priorities straight
2 users thanked author for this post.
-
Zuccs gives zero fuccs.
2 users thanked author for this post.
-
PUZZLE ANSWERS:
Left: window says, “A tattoo for you.” Arm says, “A tattoo.”
Middle: 1. Seattle (e) 2. Hawaii (a) 3. Aegean Sea (b) 4. Yucatan (f) 5. Kuwait (c) 6. Illinois (d)
Right: “Do you have a recipe for a seasick sailor?” “Yes. An eel, a sea anemone, and Imodium.”
-
This reply was modified 2 years, 4 months ago by
.
-
This reply was modified 2 years, 4 months ago by .
1 user thanked author for this post.
-
This reply was modified 2 years, 4 months ago by
-
3 users thanked author for this post.
-
4 users thanked author for this post.
-
6 users thanked author for this post.
-
6 users thanked author for this post.
-
5 users thanked author for this post.
-
4 users thanked author for this post.
-
5 users thanked author for this post.
-
6 users thanked author for this post.
-
-
-
However that begs the question what are the verifiable sources? If you take scientific research as such, that can easily be falsified. Also scientists and academics can be bought just like politicians.
I agree, far better to just check out what random people are saying on the internet.
6 users thanked author for this post.
-
-
-
Well, technically scientists and academics and fact checkers are also people on the internet.
Not if I don’t believe they are, apparently.
2 users thanked author for this post.
-
However that begs the question what are the verifiable sources? If you take scientific research as such, that can easily be falsified. Also scientists and academics can be bought just like politicians.
Often it comes down to what are reliable sources. Do you believe the article in the newspaper? Do you believe their sources are speaking the truth, and are not made up? Do you believe the numbers in the scientific article?
You repeatedly bring up unfounded and debunked conspiracy theories on here, so I’m gonna stick with the vetted experts.
-
The other day somebody pointed out the irony that a woman concerned about people posing as a different gender for personal gain has for years been posing as a man to sell books.
My mind was blown
6 users thanked author for this post.
-
1 user thanked author for this post.
