Spider-Man: No Way Home – SPOILER discussion

Home » Forums » Movies, TV and other media » Spider-Man: No Way Home – SPOILER discussion

Author
Topic
#80681

Out in some territories as early as Wednesday, elsewhere on Friday.

Viewing 100 replies - 1 through 100 (of 110 total)
Author
Replies
  • #80754

    ‘Spider-Man: No Way Home’ Review: The Most Exciting, Surprising And Emotional Spidey Of Them All

  • #80758

    Cringe when you keep calling Aunt May Aunt “Mae”… come on people, this is like, what, the 9th or 10th on-screen appearance of Aunt May in the movies? I swear… xD

  • #80828

    Saw it earlier and loved it. Charlie Cox’s appearance brought an audible gasp from the audience.  Andrew Garfield’s brought a spontaneous cheer and round of applause.

    2 users thanked author for this post.
  • #80839

    Yeah, Charlie Coc’s appearance (which, sadly, I’d been spoilt on by a fuzzy screencap on Twitter a couple of months back) elicited the closest to a cheer I’ve ever heard from a British cinema audience. Garfield’s appearance produced literal gasps. It was pretty wild.

    I’m still ambivalent on the concept of the film. It lives in the shadow of Spider-Verse and Arrowverse’s CoIE. Sure, it’s an interesting way of doing a Sinister Six movie without having to set up six villains across the MCU, but on the other hand, there’s a reason we ditched those previous iterations of Spider-Man. As nice as it was to see Alfred Molina back as Doc Ock, having Rhys Ifans’ boring-ass Lizard in the mix was just underwhelming. I’d have rather seen the MCU’s take on some of these characters, instead of getting a salvage job of Sony’s versions.

    It’s hard not to read a metatextual commentary into the film; the MCU can fix what Sony broke and I guess it kinda does. I still haven’t seen Amazing 2 (I asked on Twitter if I should watch all the previous SM films before NWH and the consensus was yes, but I didn’t have enough time and, weirdly, Raimi 2 isn’t on the same streaming platforms as the others) but it definitely feels like they did a big rehaul on Electro to make him worthy of being here.

    Anyway, all that aside, I really enjoyed the film. It’s the first time I’ve seen Cumberbatch as Dr Strange and gone “it’s Dr Strange” instead of mentally griping about his casting. The interaction between the Peters was fun and I guess worth the bother (although it definitely felt like everyone involved considered Garfield’s as the least interesting – it might have just worked better with only Maguire if Spider-Verse hadn’t done that dynamic already and it needed Garfield’s villains). I like where it’s left Peter. I thought for a moment it might have him leaving the MCU entirely, but instead it sort of divorced most of his existing connections to it while also making him more faithful to the source material. In a way, it’s the MCU fixing all the previous Spider-Man movies so it can go “right, now we can really engage with all that ourselves”.

    Weird that Damage Control is a a government agency that can arrest and detain people now, not just a clean-up crew.

  • #80847

    The Cox and Hardy cameos were fun.

    We had cheers at Garfield and clapping for Maguire. All very reserved and British, but unusual all the same.

    The film’s a lot of fun. Does slow down from time to time. But, Holland is great in it and carries it through.

    A strange brand new day type ending. Wonder where it will go from here.

    Suspect we’ll see Tom return the favour in Dr Strange 2 next year.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    Ben
  • #80850

    I’m not sure there’s any room for him in Dr Strange 2, especially given Strange doesn’t know him any more. Interesting to see America Chavez in the trailer for that at the end.

  • #80870

    Cox, Garfield and Maguire have been rumored for so long that I don’t even consider them a spoiler at this point… but hey, spoil me further, do we get an actual Sinister Six, or is it just the five?

  • #80874

    Cox, Garfield and Maguire have been rumored for so long that I don’t even consider them a spoiler at this point… but hey, spoil me further, do we get an actual Sinister Six, or is it just the five?

    There’s a point at which they kind of do the Ultimate Six thing of Peter becoming the sixth member  and helping the baddies (against Strange’s wishes) but they don’t make a big thing of it being six of them or anything.

    The only additional villain is Hardy’s Venom showing up in the post-credits scene, but that’s more of a joke than an important part of the plot.

  • #80875

    Overall I had mixed feelings on this. It’s a lot better than Far From Home, and of all the MCU Spidey movies it feels like the one that ‘gets’ the character best.

    The story is more solid and thoughtful than I thought it would be – a bit more than just a flimsy excuse for all the cameos – and there were a couple of moments that as a longtime Spidey fan I found pretty moving (particularly May’s death, Ock meeting the older Maguire, and Garfield saving MJ).

    But on the other hand it felt like they didn’t really make the most of having all these guys back – with so many characters in the mix, it feels like they each don’t get that much time to shine, even Maguire and Garfield. And a lot of the time they’re reduced to little more than catchphrases and memes (Osborn’s “I’m something of a scientist myself” got laughs in my screening).

    It felt like the movie thought it was enough of a big climax just to have Garfield and Maguire show up, and didn’t really do anything interesting with them or the three Spider-Men dynamic. (And maybe for most people it is enough just for them to show up – there were screams in the audience when Garfield unmasked and gasps when Maguire stepped out. Even Cox received an audible murmur of approval early on.)

    I don’t know, it feels like stuff like the long lab scene with all three of them just didn’t have the energy or excitement that we should have been feeling at that point, when we’ve only just got all the Spideys together.

    Also, the fake-out Maguire-death near the end was pretty half-hearted.

    But overall it was a pretty fun movie – Strange was good, Dafoe was pretty great, and overall it was an ok ride Of a story. Although not one I really see myself coming back to.

    I do wonder whether the big reset button at the end was wise though. I like the idea of a more traditional low-tech solo Spidey in future, but it felt like the development was mainly included because of the uncertain state of Sony-Marvel relations – giving them an option to make a completely MCU-free Sony movie again or have him reintegrate into the MCU.

    And the magic spell resolution of the identity thing is just as much of a headache here as in the comics. Time to prepare for months of movie audiences having exactly the same “but how does… surely they… but isn’t…?” conversations that we all had when One More Day and Brand New Day came out.

    The Strange sequel looks good though. What little we see of Raimi’s take on Ditko’s visuals already looks dazzling.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
  • #80878

    Cox, Garfield and Maguire have been rumored for so long that I don’t even consider them a spoiler at this point… but hey, spoil me further, do we get an actual Sinister Six, or is it just the five?

    There’s a point at which they kind of do the Ultimate Six thing of Peter becoming the sixth member  and helping the baddies (against Strange’s wishes) but they don’t make a big thing of it being six of them or anything.

    The only additional villain is Hardy’s Venom showing up in the post-credits scene, but that’s more of a joke than an important part of the plot.

    Oh that’s a bummer… Man, we were so close to an actual S6… if they hadn’t killed Mysterio and brought back the Vulture for this one we could’ve had an almost OG S6 with Doc Oc, Electro, Sandman, Mysterio and Vulture… plus the 6th one which usually changes because of Kraven… =(

    Glad to hear they’re finally doing a Spider-man movie, and not another Iron Man Jr. movie… not so glad about the May thing… How dare they kill Marissa Tomei??? That should be considered a war crime or something… I mean, shit, if you’re gonna give me a boner inducing Aunt May, at least keep her alive… xD

    Anyways, I guess I’ll have to wait a couple of months to see this… not that interested in it to get my ass to a theater I’m afraid.

  • #80879

    Glad to hear they’re finally doing a Spider-man movie, and not another Iron Man Jr. movie

    This has been my main complaint with the MCU trilogy, especially the second one, so I was glad that they moved Peter out from under Tony’s shadow in this one.

    The tech still plays a significant role here, but the hero-worship of Stark is dialled way down.

  • #80885

    I’d have quite liked it if they’d thrown in a new Spider-Man villain from a universe we hadn’t seen (or just someone Maguire or Garfield’s Spidey fought off-screen) just for the hell of it. Garfield gasps “it’s my greatest nemesis, the White Rabbit played by Elizabeth Banks! Oh the battles we fought! They would have made for an amazing film!”

    Not quite sure how Hardy’s Venom got dragged to the MCU given the spell worked on people who know Peter Parker is Spider-Man and he’s from a universe without Spider-Man. Or at least one where he’s never interacted with him in any manner? Eh, it’s was just a gag cameo, so not a big deal.

  • #80890

    Not quite sure how Hardy’s Venom got dragged to the MCU given the spell worked on people who know Peter Parker is Spider-Man and he’s from a universe without Spider-Man. Or at least one where he’s never interacted with him in any manner? Eh, it’s was just a gag cameo, so not a big deal.

    I had wondered this too. The Morbius trailers have posters of Spider-Man on the wall at one point so I assume the Venomverse has a Spidey, but I don’t see how Brock could know who he is.

    Still a fun cameo either way.

  • #80897

    Well I think it’ would’ve been cooler to have 2 villains from each, so Mysterio and Vulture for Holland, Doc Oc and Sandman for Maguire and Electro and Lizard for Garfield… but of course they were gonna bring Defoe’s GG back… :unsure:

    Also, I don’t know if they changed anything from the trailers, but they should’ve tweaked the Lizard’s look because he looked very shitty in ASM1.

  • #80909

    but of course they were gonna bring Defoe’s GG back

    In fairness he’s great in this, it was well worth bringing him back.

  • #80948

    I mostly enjoyed it. It’s a mess, but a fun mess.

    The interaction between the Peters was a lot of fun, and I liked all the MJ and Ned bits. My crowd cheered for Andrew Garfield, which is the only time that has happened outside of Endgame.

    The whole “cure the villains” plan, and how easy it all was for them, was the weakest part of the movie by far for me. I kind of get what they were going for, but it was fairly lousy, and just felt like a complete cheat. Not all villains can be defeated by a magic potion! That’s a terrible lesson!

    Seeing Otto and Norman again was nice, and it was great to see Jamie Foxx play a version of Electro who didn’t suck. Sandman and Lizard both felt completely unnecessary though, and Sandman’s opening “Peter, it’s me! Flint Marko! Remember?” or whatever was one of the worst lines of dialogue that I can recall in years.

    I’m glad they pulled back on the Iron Man-ification of Spidey from the last few movies, and I’m glad that we didn’t get any Fury, etc (I could have done without Happy too). I’m looking forward to the next movie much more than I was when they announced it a few weeks ago.

    The Matt Murdock cameo was cool, even if they used it to wrap up all of the legal stuff far too quickly. I didn’t need it to be a big thing, but it was odd to set it all up, and then say “it’s all fine now” five minutes later.

    Ending with a full trailer for Doctor Strange 2! A move right out of Matrix Reloaded, a week before the new Matrix gets released!

  • #80960

    My crowd cheered for Andrew Garfield, which is the only time that has happened outside of Endgame.

    I’m actually surprised at the amount of very positive reactions I’m seeing/reading for Garfield’s SM… like a lot of people saying he stole the movie and such, and in a movie with 3 good SMen, not a small thing… Really warms my heart as he’s my favorite SM, both he and Emma Stone got a raw deal.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
  • #80962

    Garfield got as big a reaction as Maguire in my screening, although possibly because he was first to appear and everyone realised what was happening.

    I do think though that him saving MJ might have been the most emotional moment of the film. I got a bit choked up. It was a moment that meant a lot for Spider-Man in general, beyond just these movies, and it also encapsulated the whole ‘second chances’ theme of the film really nicely.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
  • #81019

    Disney and Sony Are ‘Actively’ Developing Spider-Man’s MCU Future

    Would have posted the New York Times article cited as a source, but there’s a paywall.

  • #81101

    Christel and I saw it and really enjoyed it. It was fun to see the Toby, Andrew, and the villains. Sad that Hot Aunt May died but that, along with no one remembering Peter Parker, really strips down the character and sets him off in a new direction with potential.

    It was interesting that they changed it from “everyone forget Peter Parker is Spider-Man” to “everyone forget Peter Parker”. While that seemed more extreme than necessary, I can see why it was done.

    Overall, it was a lot of fun and I would watch it again.

  • #81110

    Tom Holland: ‘I Feel Like We Might Be Ready to Say Goodbye to Spider-Man’

  • #81111

    Third highest domestic opening weekend of all time, with $253M: https://www.the-numbers.com/box-office-chart/weekend/2021/12/17

  • #81146

    Tom Holland: ‘I Feel Like We Might Be Ready to Say Goodbye to Spider-Man’

    It’s cute that Tom thinks Disney will let him go. He’ll be done playing Spider-Man when king mouse allows it to be so.

    Anyway, that was just fun. Seeing it with a big crowd that got excited every time someone showed up was an experience that I’ve missed during this endless pandemic. It was pure fan service and I dug it all. I was honestly a little surprised that Miles didn’t pop up as some small cameo to commit to the Spiderverse stuff.

    Not entirely sure where they go from here. Setting up Ned as the next villain seems like an obvious choice, especially with his promise to never go that route. Now that he doesn’t remember Peter I would assume that’s where they’re going.

    3 users thanked author for this post.
  • #81419

    I enjoyed it. I felt like Endgame it’s one that works better if you focus on the character beats than the intricacies of the plot that do fall apart if you think about them too much. The moments like Garfield Spidey saving MJ were very well done.

    I suspect with Sandman and Lizard that Church and Ifans did everything from a remote recording studio. They are completely CGI and voiceover bar a few brief seconds they could have done from stock footage.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
  • #81533

    Well… they went going real epic and for the most part they delivered.

    I have been sofa king frustrated and P*ssed off at Parker ever since he naively gave Mysterio those glasses in that movie.
    Now in this one, he messes up the original spell, snatches the return box, outsmarts a trained wizard the first time he is in the wizard’s own “Inception” like dimension, frees and brings all the villains to his home. I mean… When this Parker f*cks up…

    No good deed goes unpunished.

    It was nice seeing the 3 of them together, exchange notes, and so on. At least the MCU is acknowledging the movies and continuity from the other studios.

    Is the spider sense some kind of premonition? Telepathy?
    Confused?

    The post credit with Hardy disappearing and that small piece of Venom goo left on the counter…

    So now the MCU is going even more epic with the Strange and Wanda movie. Can they pull it off, or are they biting off more than what they can chew?

    They are WAY too many stories to be had by Marvel. What space will there be in theatres for Scorcese, Spielberg, Villanueva, and Ridley?

    DC… No comment

    • This reply was modified 2 years, 11 months ago by Al-x.
  • #81558

    These guys have the time on their hands and get paid to over analyze it all.

    It is good for a quick read through

    https://screenrant.com/spiderman-no-way-home-spell-mcu-changes-timeline-future/

  • #81576

    Can they pull it off,

    No, every film they make from now on will be shit. Way of the western.

    3 users thanked author for this post.
  • #81579

    Can they pull it off,

    No, every film they make from now on will be shit. Way of the western.

    Dude, SPOILERS!!!

    2 users thanked author for this post.
  • #81582

    Hope you guys have had your laugh over the wrong thing…

    That is not what I was getting at!

    Next will be the Strange and Wanda movie. According to that trailer, he will meet his twisted counterpart, the one that was in that What if episode…

    Then down the road the MCU will bring in the FF and X-men

    If Stark was this super genius, how will they portray Reed Richards, and Doom who developed his own time machine?

    A lot of ambitious material lies ahead to get into. I hope they can pull it off well. The Wachowskis did not pull off the main issues and questions in the Matrix sequels. I just want the MCU to deliver what they are taking on…

  • #81607

    If Stark was this super genius, how will they portray Reed Richards, and Doom who developed his own time machine?

    Probably the same as the comics, more than one super genius. We kind of already have that, Hank Pym is a super genius and so is Shuri.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
  • #81612

    The MCU has a lot ahead, but I don’t want to see EVERYTHING in the MCU or else we would have a movie a week released in Theatre and D+. Scorcese and co. will be even more p*ssed.

    What would work? Galactus? Eternity? The Living Tribunal? What? 😂

    Back to Spider man … I liked it when Garfield caught MJ. That lifesaving was a redemption for him given Gwen Stacey.

  • #81643

    What would work? Galactus? Eternity? The Living Tribunal? What? 😂

    If it were me in Feige’s job? None of the above.

    Maybe Galactus but I wouldn’t be rushing into using him.

    I don’t think that very cosmic stuff is really what has ever made Marvel tick or in truth was very popular. Guardians of the Galaxy only really stuck when they shifted it to a more character led comic under Abnett and Lanning and that’s the version used in the films . Thanos operates on that cosmic scale but their version was really sold by how relatable they made the character (unlike some of their less successful pantomime villains).

    There’s always a temptation to keep trying to top the scale of the last story but I think something like the great reaction Hawkeye has got says you don’t have to. The moments people react to in those audience clips of the last 2 Avengers movies are all character led. When they all come back through the gates they cheer loudest for Spider-Man, is he the best chance of beating Thanos? No, they just like him best because Tom Holland makes him charming.

    2 users thanked author for this post.
  • #81816

    Hmmm….

    Nick Fury is off world right now according to the story.

    Now when he returns to Earth, he would be the only one who knows about Parker so maybe he will fill in the others to Spideys identity and give Parker access to the tech.

    That is if Feige wants to go that route.

    I am giving too much thought to all this imho… 😂

  • #81898

    EDB578B9-88E8-4D80-A8F8-9D16E037692E

    48336187-615E-43C9-9284-07B5A0D751AA

    3 users thanked author for this post.
  • #81905

    It was a lot of fun, and getting this done is obviously quite an achievement. But it also had the same problem as those big crossover event comics often have – too many characters, who because of that mostly stayed pretty flat, and a plot that was overly complicated and by the numbers at the same time. In all honesty, I would’ve been more interested in a third Spider-Man movie that explored this particular Spider-Man and his relationships more. I hope they’ll do a fourth one that focuses on him getting Ned and MJ back – well, and on whoever the villain for him would be. Speaking of villains – they really should try to create a memorable one for him now. Looking at all those previous Spider-Man villains, it’s kind of hard to miss that this new Spidey doesn’t have any worth speaking of. Vulture was great, but he was really just a guy and Spidey was in his way; he wasn’t all that interested in Peter, and neither was Mysterio (who just wanted Stark’s tech). Honestly now that Dafoe has been there and gone, I’d like to see them go for a new version of the Goblin.

  • #81907

    I think reduxing Green Goblin would be a bit weird (especially as this film pretty much stated Osborne doesn’t exist in the main MCU) but doing a Hobgoblin with someone who has picked up Norman’s discarded tech (someone from inside Damage Control maybe) would be interesting.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
  • #81908

    They set up the Scorpion in the first movie. And then nothing happened with him.

  • #81924

    Listening to the podcast by Kevin Smith and co. (It is called Fatman Beyond) Kevin curses way too much but I digress. Some comments were good and someone said that Peter should really have asked Dr. Strange to have altered Mysterio’s existence from history and possibly avoiding all that in the first place.

    Not bad… no real movie though.

    Always a tragedy with Peter as someone has to die

    Always the audience having a better idea of what a movie should have been to one up the writers

  • #81949

    I think reduxing Green Goblin would be a bit weird (especially as this film pretty much stated Osborne doesn’t exist in the main MCU)

    It would be, but it might still work. And they’ve kinda run out of interesting villains for Spider-Man for the next movie, haven’t they?

    Random thought: Tony Stark was this universe’s Norman Osborn for Peter Parker.

  • #81954

    Random thought: Tony Stark was this universe’s Norman Osborn for Peter Parker.

    So you’re saying bring Tony back from the grave and make him a supervillain?

    I dig it.

    3 users thanked author for this post.
  • #82176

    This Spider-Man: No Way Home plot hole ruins the entire MCU

    https://bgr.com/entertainment/this-spider-man-no-way-home-plot-hole-ruins-the-entire-mcu/

  • #82238

    It would be, but it might still work. And they’ve kinda run out of interesting villains for Spider-Man for the next movie, haven’t they?

    I was thinking I’d go with the Black Cat, Peter is trying to woo MJ from scratch again but an extra spoke in the works is this villain who has the hots for him but is a bad choice. It’s maybe a bit low key but I think that worked well for Hawkeye, you just need good character writing.

  • #82241

    Have we abandoned hope for a Kraven/Spidey film?

    1 user thanked author for this post.
  • #82242

    Black Cat makes sense. Although I still think they’re setting up for a Ned villain turn. Would probably have the most emotional weight as Peter wrestles with the fallout of everyone forgetting about him.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
  • #82247

    Have we abandoned hope for a Kraven/Spidey film?

    A pity Tony Dalton is the Swordsman. He would have made a great Kraven.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
  • #82249

    Black Cat makes sense. Although I still think they’re setting up for a Ned villain turn. Would probably have the most emotional weight as Peter wrestles with the fallout of everyone forgetting about him.

    Ned could either become Hobgoblin or as a twist, Venom.

    I still think they could bring Mysterio back. I always figured he faked his death. And have that he somehow remembers Peter is Spidey.

  • #82261

    One thing Spidey is never short of is great villains.

    They still haven’t done Kraven, Hobgoblin, Black Cat, Scorpion, Hydro Man, Hammerhead, Morlun, Mr Negative, Chameleon, Prowler, Silver Sable, even Kingpin might be an option now. Any of those could work as a good movie villain.

    2 users thanked author for this post.
  • #82302

    David has a different definition of a good villain from mine, it seems.

    I was thinking I’d go with the Black Cat, Peter is trying to woo MJ from scratch again but an extra spoke in the works is this villain who has the hots for him but is a bad choice. It’s maybe a bit low key but I think that worked well for Hawkeye, you just need good character writing.

    Yeah, I could see that working pretty well, going back to a bit more low-key teen movie like the first one was. I like it.

    Have we abandoned hope for a Kraven/Spidey film?

    Right, Kraven really is a good one they haven’t done yet.

    So it’s Spidey trying to get MJ back complicated by Black Cat plus he’s being hunted by Kraven at the same time, yeah?
    I could go for that.

    Honestly, I would just like to see Holland Spidey getting a movie of his own now, one that’s not being complicated by Stark or Avengers stuff or other crossovers, just focusing on him.

  • #82312

    David has a different definition of a good villain from mine, it seems

    They might not have all had outstanding comics stories (although I’d argue that a lot of them have) – but that doesn’t really matter when you’re reimagining them for a movie.

    All of those villains listed (and more besides) have the potential to be compelling movie bad-guys, with interesting stories and visual appeal.

    Even characters like Prowler, Mister Negative or Silver Sable, who might seem like second- or third-tier characters to comics fans, have clear potential: the animated Spider-Verse movie and the PS4 video game show how easily they could be adapted as good movie villains.

    Ultimately I don’t think the movies should feel constained by how popular and successful these characters and concepts have been in the comics. Movies like GotG and Shang-Chi should have taught us that lesson (if we hadn’t learned it already from the likes of Blade).

    2 users thanked author for this post.
  • #82315

    Great Spider-Man villains? And no mention of Spot?

    Spot Rumored To Be The Villain Of 'Spider-Man: Into The Spider-Verse 2'

    Or Chance for that matter?

    https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcT7fVfr1jujfDcWdJsdg3f2GSCt66F7vtxW1gJyxXKKqt47Gyu4tN8XX-t4XAQ_k3cu_Wc&usqp=CAU

    1 user thanked author for this post.
  • #82327

    Ultimately I don’t think the movies should feel constained by how popular and successful these characters and concepts have been in the comics. Movies like GotG and Shang-Chi should have taught us that lesson (if we hadn’t learned it already from the likes of Blade).

    I agree completely, and disagree slightly. You can take any character and make them great in a movie by, you know, writing them well. But some characters are rather more compelling than others in the first place, and that can help.

    2 users thanked author for this post.
  • #82330

    Yeah, I don’t disagree there. But I think often what makes a character great isn’t necessarily the same between different media, and it can mean that comics fans overlook the potential of certain characters.

    In comics I think creators are often looking for a great visual, a great gimmick first and foremost. So someone like Doc Ock is really little more than a tough eight-limbed guy, and that was enough to make him a popular comics character. The comics did more with him later, but even then the film version added a huge amount to make him someone who was also interesting dramatically.

    With some of these characters it’s the other way around – they’re not top-tier visuals and so they come off as a bit naff in the comics, but they have somewhat untapped dramatic potential for the movies.

    Chameleon could make for a great paranoid thriller type villain. Mr Negative is a great Jekyll/Hyde type villain with a strong dramatic conflict at the heart of the character. Hobgoblin is a mysterious opportunist at the heart of a criminal empire. Prowler is a redeemable villain who turns hero but is caught between his two lives. With Black Cat there’s the bad romance angle. With Silver Sable Spidey gets drawn into international espionage and politics and is way out of his depth.

    There’s loads of dramatic potential in all these characters, even if the comics were sometimes a bit crap.

  • #82350

    Right, Kraven really is a good one they haven’t done yet.

    According to IMDB.com, there is a KRAVEN THE HUNTER film on the slate for a 2023 release, with Aaron Taylor-Johnson tapped for the lead. No mention of a Spider-Man tie-in…yet.

  • #82384

    According to IMDB.com, there is a KRAVEN THE HUNTER film on the slate for a 2023 release, with Aaron Taylor-Johnson tapped for the lead. No mention of a Spider-Man tie-in…yet.

    So this is probably a Sony Venomverse thing, looks like. The imdb also talks about a Silver Sable movie and a Black Cat one, so I suppose we can forget those where Holland Spidey is concerned.

    (I wonder what happens when the current deal is over? Does anybody know? I’d expect the rights revert to Sony and they’ll be happy to introduce their own new Spidey to their already built universe?)

  • #82395

    (I wonder what happens when the current deal is over? Does anybody know? I’d expect the rights revert to Sony and they’ll be happy to introduce their own new Spidey to their already built universe?)

    I suspect it’s one of those that rolls over as long as they keep releasing material. It is over 20 years since Sony bought them.

    Edit: I misunderstood, you mean the Sony/MCU deal. I don’t know how long it lasts, I suspect they’ll continue with the Spider-Man solo movies since the MCU connection has given them such a box office boost.

  • #82408

    What even is a Kraven movie without Spider-Man? Like, what’s the hook? Venom as a standalone, I can understand (even if I think the lack of connection to Spider-Man lessens the character). And Morbius I can understand being its own separate thing. Even Black Cat I can see working somehow. But literally the only reason I know about Kraven (and the only thing I know about him) is his hunting Spider-Man. You could switch that to hunting Venom or Morbius, but those still would be Venom or Morbius movies.

  • #82415

    You could switch that to hunting Venom or Morbius, but those still would be Venom or Morbius movies.

    I don’t know, you can make it all about a dude who hunts super-creatures for a living. It’s not a bad concept. You can start him off with some homemade super-creeps, like, whatever, and the sequel is a Morbius crossover. That’d be alright, I guess.

  • #82428

    What even is a Kraven movie without Spider-Man? Like, what’s the hook?

    The gist of the story is that renowned surgeon Mrs. Kraven is called in to the hospital for an emergency procedure, leaving Kraven home alone to feed the kids and get them ready for school. But when Baby Kraven goes missing, all plans are out the window as Kraven and the older kids switch to “the Hunter” mode to find the baby before Doctor Mom gets home. Hijinks ensue!!

    6 users thanked author for this post.
  • #82438

    What even is a Kraven movie without Spider-Man? Like, what’s the hook?

    The gist of the story is that renowned surgeon Mrs. Kraven is called in to the hospital for an emergency procedure, leaving Kraven home alone to feed the kids and get them ready for school. But when Baby Kraven goes missing, all plans are out the window as Kraven and the older kids switch to “the Hunter” mode to find the baby before Doctor Mom gets home. Hijinks ensue!!

    Dude, SPOILERS!!!

    1 user thanked author for this post.
  • #82819

    I didn’t think about this before, but apparently the main villain in ALL the seven previous Spider-man movies find out that Peter Parker is Spider-man. That is really lazy of the writers.

    So a great twist for the next one would be a villain who just fights Spider-man and has no idea that Peter Parker even exists. And at no point in the movie does he threaten to kill any of Peter Parkers friends, girlfriends or relatives, he just threatens to kill other people.

    If anyone in Hollowood is interested, I have the time to write a script!

    3 users thanked author for this post.
  • #82844

    There are a few problems with the Spider-Man movies from that angle, I think there’s too much tragedy in them, especially the Amazing ones, too much revealing of Peter’s identity and (this is true of a lot of superhero movies going back to the 1989 Batman) too much of the villains dying at the end.

    The comics always knew, if you had a good villain, keep him around for another day. You can overdo it I suppose, a recent read of the original Lee/Kirby X-Men comics has Magneto coming back every other issue but in essence they were right that he’s a good villain who has stood the test of nearly 60 years in a way The Vanisher and Unus the Untouchable didn’t.

    2 users thanked author for this post.
  • #85727

    A nice pic of the Spideys and their stunt doubles from NWH.

     

    2 users thanked author for this post.
  • #86062

    Ultimately I don’t think the movies should feel constained by how popular and successful these characters and concepts have been in the comics. Movies like GotG and Shang-Chi should have taught us that lesson

    Just to note that Shang-Chi had a comic that ran for 120 issues. By any definition he was always popular and successful.

  • #86063

    The comics always knew, if you had a good villain, keep him around for another day.

    That makes sense for comics, where you’re going to be publishing monthly stories for decades and you’re going to run out of villain ideas. For a  movie franchise where you might get a trilogy if you’re lucky, there is absolutely no need to stockpile returning villains.

    I also agree that it’s bad to always kill off your villains, but that’s because heroes should always find a way to save people, even evil people. But from a movie logistics point of view, it doesn’t matter.

    2 users thanked author for this post.
  • #86072

    Well it maybe didn’t matter but now (albeit via reboots) we’re onto 8 or 9 instalments of things like Spider-Man. Truth is if you look at the early Marvel comics some villains are definitely more successful than others. Magneto and Doom return all the time in X-Men and FF and a slew of bad guys we barely see again over 60 years. (To be fair the X-Men movies always kept Magneto around too).

    No Way Home in a sense is a perfect example of that as everyone was there was a big desire to see at least a couple of those villains back again.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
  • #87016

    1 user thanked author for this post.
  • #87022

    Sorry that I posted my observation about Parker’s friend Nate in the Marvel thread instead of here where it really belonged.

    Until next time.

    Al…

    2 users thanked author for this post.
  • #87032

    Ned! :rose:

  • #87043

    Yeah

    It’s Ned

    I typed in Nate because I was watching Euphoria

    😂

    1 user thanked author for this post.
  • #87044

    Ladidaaaa

  • #87050

    I think the trigger for Jed turning supervillain will be his anger at nobody remembering his name.

    2 users thanked author for this post.
  • #87052

    “Yes, Spider-Man, it is I, your best friend and closest confidant, who was the master villain all along!”

    “Oh my god, Fred!”

    “Nnggghhhhhh!”

    5 users thanked author for this post.
  • #87590

    So, I watched this, and yeah it was fine… very smart/good use of nostalgia fuel for once, so props for that.

    I wasn’t a fan of them killing May just because it’s kind of a cop-out to them not doing the uncle Ben schtick, but bleh, Hot May wasn’t really a part of this SM all that much anyways, so whatever.

    It’s really a shame they didn’t just add one more villain, either Mysterio or the Vulture, and then it could’ve finally been the Sinister Six movie everyone’s always wanted to see and Sony’s always wanted to make.

    The second shame is the CGI is sometimes a bit shit, like you can see the Sandman & Lizard actors were nowhere near a set, and their intergration wasn’t great.

    But the best part is we’re finally rid of Iron Man jr. Not a fan of the shiny blue in the last costume, but whatever, it’s the OG one, no fancy stupid Stark tech.

    This was a really good, very comicbook-like SM movie, probably the best of the whole bunch, since it features some of the best parts of the other movies, and a top tier MCU movie too… too bad about the missed opportunity and the weaker CGI parts… but hey, good enough I guess.

    Wait, question: was the statue of liberty always bronze in the MCU? lol, that reminded me of Fringe and how they also had a bronze statue in the alternate world =P

  • #87595

    The statue of liberty is meant to be bronze colour when it was erected, the green tinge came from oxidization.

    So that could be thinking there that it was being renovated in the MCU and they cleaned it off to the original colour (if that works, I don’t pretend to know the science).

  • #87596

    I finally got to see this one, somehow.

    I was surprised to find myself rather underwhelmed by it. Perhaps this was due to watching it in fits and starts while tending to a screaming baby. Perhaps I would have enjoyed it more had I gotten to see it in the opening week, without having already heard so much about the who and what of it all. I did make a conscious effort to avoid hearing spoilers or even watching any of the trailers but still picked up on most of what happened. Something like the Charlie Cox cameo might have seemed cooler while caught up in the heat of the moment but now it fell flat as it became apparent how it meant bugger all to the rest of the movie. Again, I come back to my longstanding gripe about the length of these movies. No need for this to be 2 1/2 hours long when things like that entire opening stretch of the movie could be condensed way, way down without affecting the rest of the film at all. Sandman and Lizard could have been cut out completely without missing a beat. Sorry to say it but the same goes for J Jonah Jameson, who had none of the abrasive allure of the Raimi movies and here was little more than a cinematic version of an auto-play video pop-up ad.

    One thing that did come as a surprise was the death of Hot Aunt May.  My heart sank as soon as she started on the “with great power…” speech and then my worst fears were confirmed. Sad to see this version of the character go. The death scene hit hard and was brilliantly acted by Tomei and Holland.

    It was also cool to see Defoe and Molina getting back to chewing as much scenery as they could a couple of decades later (although Molina’s hair looked rough as hell… then again, I suppose that works for Doc Ock).  Jamie Foxx made the most of getting another chance to play Electro in a non-shit movie. Maguire Spidey was my gateway drug into all things Marvel back in the day so it was great to see him reprise the role here. I still don’t care at all about Garfield Spidey but did enjoy the ‘sorry I’m shit’, “Peter 3!” way they portrayed him.

    I am disappointed that they seemed to send Tom Hardy Venom back. His mid-credits scene was honestly the most enjoyable bit of the whole movie. With a lack of follow-up villains worth a damn for this version of Spidey, why not keep him around and do the crossover/team-up? They left the symbiote in the MCU so something like that will no doubt happen but it would be a stretch to make it as entertaining without the Tom Hardy version they’ve already built up in his two movies. I didn’t really get why Hardy Venom was brought to the MCU when it was only meant to be people who knew Peter Parker was Spider-Man who got pulled over. They could have hand-waved it away as something to do with the symbiote’s composition making him fall through the cracks, perhaps foreshadowing more multiverse problems to come, but then he just got sent back across. Bit of a waste.

    Speaking of all that, did it bother anyone else that Strange even tried to do the spell before Peter messed it up? They made such a fuss in the Avengers movies about all these science/military people having so much unfettered power and how dangerous that was for the world. Now there’s a wizard with zero accountability who can go around erasing people’s memories at will, apparently even for things as innocuous as Wong embarrassing himself at a party. And that’s not to mention Wanda’s recent troubles. Maybe they’ll address this in the next Strange movie. It really seems like they should.

    Also, if I had been waiting around in the theatre an extra 10 minutes to see a post-credits scene and only got a sneak-peek at the next Strange movie, I would have been rather irritated. At least seeing it at home with the fast-forward button made it more palatable.

    I was also left trying to wrap my head around the new reality of nobody remembering Peter Parker at all. Much like the Endgame Snap stuff, it seems like a needless complication. Was he still raised by Hot Aunt May? It seems like Happy still remembered dating her but he only met her via Peter’s relationship with Stark, which nobody knows about now. Did Peter not even go to the same high school as MJ and Ned? How does he even afford to rent a shitty apartment in New York? Does he even have a social security number? It raises way more questions than it needs to, whereas they could have just restored the ‘nobody knows I’m Spider-Man’ spell and gotten to the same place in a less troublesome way.

    Looking back at this trilogy of Holland Spidey movies now and it is hard to shake the feeling that it has been a bit of a waste of someone who is so great in the Parker/Spidey roles.  Homecoming was fantastic and had such a palpable, youthful energy to it that was not bogged down by the broader MCU ties. Unfortunately, the Stark Kid elements did come to dominate things in Far From Home and his other appearances. Then we have No Way Home effectively being a tie-in mini-series to a Doctor Strange crossover event, albeit with some enjoyable moments sprinkled throughout. It seems like a fourth movie should at least be able to get on with street-level Spidey stuff without billionaire-funding or Avengers tie-ins and focus on Parker as a broke kid trying to make ends meet, which is always a classic take on the character – but it would just involve ignoring all the ‘a wizard did it’ nonsense that it took to get back to that point.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
  • #87598

    I didn’t really get why Hardy Venom was brought to the MCU when it was only meant to be people who knew Peter Parker was Spider-Man who got pulled over. They could have hand-waved it away as something to do with the symbiote’s composition making him fall through the cracks, perhaps foreshadowing more multiverse problems to come, but then he just got sent back across. Bit of a waste.

    In the Venom 2 post-credit scene, the symbiote talks about being able to tap into the combined knowledge of all symbiotes from across the multiverse, and says he’s going to show Brock what he’s talking about. Then at that point Venom is transported to the MCU. I think we’re meant to infer that Venom suddenly gains the knowledge of Pete’s identity from the SM3 version of the character at that moment. But yeah it’s never really explicitly stated.

  • #87599

    Speaking of all that, did it bother anyone else that Strange even tried to do the spell before Peter messed it up? They made such a fuss in the Avengers movies about all these science/military people having so much unfettered power and how dangerous that was for the world. Now there’s a wizard with zero accountability who can go around erasing people’s memories at will, apparently even for things as innocuous as Wong embarrassing himself at a party. And that’s not to mention Wanda’s recent troubles. Maybe they’ll address this in the next Strange movie. It really seems like they should.

    If I remember right, this Spidey movie was originally slated to come out after Doctor Strange 2. It isn’t too much of a stretch to think that maybe something happens in that movie to shift his characterisation somewhat, whether it’s a move to being more relaxed about his magic or even potentially being replaced by an alternate version (like the ones we’ve seen in the trailers). And that would have originally set up the version of him that we see in this movie.

    While they would have been able to smooth over some of the disconnects that came with reversing the order of the movies with reshoots, dialogue changes etc. for the Spider-Man movie, it probably would have been difficult to remove Strange’s willingness to participate in the spell altogether.

  • #87600

    Sandman and Lizard could have been cut out completely without missing a beat. Sorry to say it but the same goes for J Jonah Jameson, who had none of the abrasive allure of the Raimi movies and here was little more than a cinematic version of an auto-play video pop-up ad.

    Yeah I agree on this. JJJ was a nice Easter egg at the end of NWH but maybe they should have left it at that. He didn’t really add anything here.

  • #87602

    Looking back at this trilogy of Holland Spidey movies now and it is hard to shake the feeling that it has been a bit of a waste of someone who is so great in the Parker/Spidey roles.  Homecoming was fantastic and had such a palpable, youthful energy to it that was not bogged down by the broader MCU ties. Unfortunately, the Stark Kid elements did come to dominate things in Far From Home and his other appearances. Then we have No Way Home effectively being a tie-in mini-series to a Doctor Strange crossover event, albeit with some enjoyable moments sprinkled throughout. It seems like a fourth movie should at least be able to get on with street-level Spidey stuff without billionaire-funding or Avengers tie-ins and focus on Parker as a broke kid trying to make ends meet, which is always a classic take on the character – but it would just involve ignoring all the ‘a wizard did it’ nonsense that it took to get back to that point.

    I agree on this too. I recently rewatched Homecoming and it was better than I remembered – a decent teen movie take on Spidey – but I still found all the Stark/tech/Avengers elements pretty intrusive. And then that’s obviously ramped up even more in NWH, which I disliked quite a bit for that reason.

    It is a weird feeling to get to the end of this trilogy and feel like they’re finally ready for Holland to do a Spidey movie that’s in line with the comics version of the character.

    However I do also think some of that is about leaving it open for Sony to movie forward with Spidey alone and outside of the MCU if they can’t reach a future deal on a shared movie. This film leaves things in a place where they could do a solo Spider-Man story and not really reference anything from the MCU other than the casting of Holland, and it make sense for that approach to be taken.

  • #87604

    Thanks for the replies, all good points there. We’ll see where things go from here for Holland Spidey but it does seem like there would have been an easier way to get him to the point they left him at here. It seems inevitable to be a letdown after the tease of inflicting drunk Tom Hardy Venom onto Peter Parker but maybe they’ve got something just as good in mind (although none of Black Cat, Kraven, Scorpion or Morbius would seem to be it).

    2 users thanked author for this post.
  • #88113

    Speaking of all that, did it bother anyone else that Strange even tried to do the spell before Peter messed it up? They made such a fuss in the Avengers movies about all these science/military people having so much unfettered power and how dangerous that was for the world. Now there’s a wizard with zero accountability who can go around erasing people’s memories at will, apparently even for things as innocuous as Wong embarrassing himself at a party. And that’s not to mention Wanda’s recent troubles. Maybe they’ll address this in the next Strange movie. It really seems like they should.

    It’s what the next Strange movie is all about, isn’t it? Reality falling apart because he messed around with it?

    It’s a pretty good character arc for him, it’s just a bit of a shame the first part wasn’t developed before it was sprung on us in Spider-Man.

  • #88150

    9FEAD6BC-8FAB-4A0F-9E07-7348FE5CF719

    2 users thanked author for this post.
  • #89083

    I got the blu-ray of this yesterday. I feel like they changed some of the shots in the end sequence, specifically of Connors and possibly Marko when they’re teleported away. It might be me misremembering, but I thought the cinema release repeated a shot of Connors originally, when he’s cured and when he disappears, but they’re different here. I know that some VFX and editing changes were made even while the film was still in cinemas (the portal effects and entrance for Garfield’s Spider-Man were tweaked, the scene where Norman smashes his mask was re-edited) but I can’t find any notes about changes for the home media release.

  • #89102

    It could be changed, the Lizard turning back to Rhys Ifans scene was not good. Given the chance I’d have ‘George Lucas’d’ the scenes with Sandman and Lizard that very much gave the impression they were done with solely voice acting and neither of the actors available/present.

  • #89296

    Watched this tonight.

    Lot of fun.  Can’t say I liked the ending, but there was no other way for it to go.

    I do think they may have underestimated just how good the supporting cast is, so erasing them might not be the best move unless they undo it fast.

    The multiverse aspect and Strange made for a good combination.  Some seriously trippy effects too.

    Starting to reckon watching these a few months on from the cinema release makes for a better time.  Don’t have time to follow the rumours, don’t remember which bits of the trailer goes where, all makes for a quite fresh experience.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
  • #90557

    Watched this last night and enjoyed it. Good to Very Good area.
    Definitely the best of this latest trilogy, but I honestly didn’t care for the first two. Both should’ve been so much better.

    As for how they left things, I take it the Iron Spider tech is gone, but why?
    If everyone forgets me, that would include the salesman who sold me my car, therefore my car disappears?
    Don’t buy the logic, but not worth arguing either.
    They’ve set things up for the next director how they wanted, that’s that.

    Would’ve been nice to see Tobey Maguire reference JJJ (“he looks the same in my universe”)

    Tom Holland is the best Spider-Man, and young enough for another 3 solo movies this decade.

    Upcoming villain guesses? Scorpion, Kraven, Hobgoblin?
    I take it that scene means “this” universe will get a version of Venom.

  • #90559

    Don’t buy the logic, but not worth arguing either.

    Whatever logic was there in the MCU went to complete shit with Endgame, so yeah, not even worth thinking about logic at this point =P

    2 users thanked author for this post.
  • #90599

    As for how they left things, I take it the Iron Spider tech is gone, but why?
    If everyone forgets me, that would include the salesman who sold me my car, therefore my car disappears?
    Don’t buy the logic, but not worth arguing either.
    They’ve set things up for the next director how they wanted, that’s that.

    This one actually works easily for me because, you know, tech these days. If you can’t update a machine anymore, it’ll get fucked up pretty quickly.

    2 users thanked author for this post.
  • #90756

    If everyone forgets me, that would include the salesman who sold me my car, therefore my car disappears?

    this one is easy to solve. The sale still took place but if he went back to the dealership no one would recognize him. I know it’s not worth arguing but imo, stuff still happens, just no one remembers it.

    my question is if Peter pulls on the suit do they now recognize him?

    • This reply was modified 2 years, 7 months ago by Rocket.
  • #90758

    Does he have a social security number?  Does his phone remember him via facial recognition or finger print?  Has he managed to get a bank account somewhere despite nobody knowing him?  What about his Netflix subscription?  So many questions…

  • #90759

    What about his Netflix subscription?

    I really wish Netflix had blamed Dr Strange for their declining subscriber numbers in the last quarter.

    4 users thanked author for this post.
  • #90772

    That would be in keeping with Norman Osborn having just bought Twitter.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
  • #93140

    Gory, R-rated Spider-Man fan-film murders Peter Parkers all across the Multiverse

    Have you ever wondered what Sam Raimi’s Spider-Man movies would have been like if they were more like his Evil Dead oeuvre? Welp, this is about as close as you’re ever going to get. The 4-minute short film above (click link) mashes up footage from a variety of Marvel movies with plenty of brutal gore.

    The basic “plot” is that Owen Wilson’s Time Variance Authority character from Loki has to travel the multiverse and eradicate all of the Spider-Man variants who shouldn’t be there. But that’s not really important. What matters here is seeing the most iconic moments from ever Spider-Man movie ruined with horrific blood and violence. And oh boy, it delivers.

    https://boingboing-net.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/boingboing.net/2022/05/31/gory-r-rated-spider-man-fan-film-murders-peter-parkers-all-across-the-multiverse.html/amp?amp_gsa=1&amp_js_v=a9&usqp=mq331AQKKAFQArABIIACAw%3D%3D#amp_tf=From%20%251%24s&aoh=16540231914656&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&ampshare=https%3A%2F%2Fboingboing.net%2F2022%2F05%2F31%2Fgory-r-rated-spider-man-fan-film-murders-peter-parkers-all-across-the-multiverse.html

    • This reply was modified 2 years, 6 months ago by Sean Robinson.
    1 user thanked author for this post.
  • #93204

    Yeah, okay, that was some really impressive CGI, and it was actually quite funny. Good one.

  • #93213

    Now that nobody remembers Peter, the next movie could be called “Spider-Man: Home Alone”.

     

    I expect somebody has already done that joke :unsure:

     

    2 users thanked author for this post.
  • #93238

    They might have.

    • This reply was modified 2 years, 6 months ago by Christian.
    2 users thanked author for this post.
  • #93827

    Spider-Man: Home Is Where You Hang Your Hat

    Tangentially, The Amazing Spider-Man is on Netflix and it is more enjoyable than I remembered. It had a lot of interesting set ups of which the sequel did not take any advantage. Seemed like there was heavy implication that there was something already different about Peter even before the spider bite – that his father had already performed some unauthorized gene crossing on him when he was an infant (similar to the back story for Banner in Ang Lee’s THE HULK). Also, there was the suggestion that the spider in Peter might also affect his personality over time in potentially dangerous ways.

    That would’ve been an intriguing way to go into the black suit saga – the idea that the more violent and impulsive behavior the suit brought out was actually something innate to Peter and he then passes that more predatory nature on to the suit/Venom rather than the other way around.

     

    1 user thanked author for this post.
  • #93832

    Spider-Man: Home Is Where You Hang Your Hat

    Spider-Man: Homo

    4 users thanked author for this post.
  • #93834

    Spider-Man: Home Is Where You Hang Your Hat

    Spider-Man: Homo

    Damn! I hadn’t seen that in a long, long time!

    2 users thanked author for this post.
  • #93838

    Given that I saw the original version on a small screen on an airplane, I may actually be interested in seeing this new extended version of Spider-Man: No Way Home

    1 user thanked author for this post.
Viewing 100 replies - 1 through 100 (of 110 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Skip to toolbar