Space

Author
Topic
#7584

I figured there needed to be a “Space” thread.
If the mods think it should be rolled into the Science thread, I have no problem with that.
If it’s the “nutjobs” this thread seems to pull in you’re worried about, just double-up on the tinfoil hat
_______________________
The following has been debunked. see post #9 on Dec.14th)
Toldya about the tinfoil hat…
_______________________________________________________
Scientists Just Found an “Impossible” Black Hole in The Milky Way Galaxy
A newfound black hole in the Milky Way is weirdly heavy
Monster black hole that ‘should not exist’ discovered in the Milky Way

The chemical composition of our galaxy’s most massive stars suggests that they lose most of their mass at the end of their lives through explosions and powerful stellar winds, before the star’s core collapses into a black hole.

The hefty stars in the mass range that could produce a black hole are expected to end their lives in what is called a pair-instability supernova that completely obliterates the stellar core. So astronomers are scratching their heads trying to figure out how the black hole – named LB-1 – got so chonky.

“Black holes of such mass should not even exist in our galaxy, according to most of the current models of stellar evolution,” said astronomer Jifeng Liu of the National Astronomical Observatory of China.

“LB-1 is twice as massive as what we thought possible. Now theorists will have to take up the challenge of explaining its formation.”

Viewing 100 replies - 401 through 500 (of 650 total)
Author
Replies
  • #62076

    Slow news day at space.com? :unsure:

    That just seems like a complete non-story. “There is always the chance that scientists could run into something unexpected”. Well, duh.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
  • #62082

    Heh. Pretty picture, though.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
  • #62121

    Solar System Planets: Order of the 8 (or 9) Planets

    Reference Article: Facts about our solar system’s planets.


    Artist’s rendition of our solar system. (Not to scale.)

    Ever since the discovery of Pluto in 1930, kids grew up learning that the solar system has nine planets. That all changed in the late 1990s, when astronomers started arguing about whether Pluto was indeed a planet. In a highly controversial decision, the International Astronomical Union ultimately decided in 2006 to designate Pluto as a “dwarf planet,” reducing the list of the solar system’s true planets to just eight.

    Astronomers, however, are still hunting for another possible planet in our solar system, a true ninth planet, after mathematical evidence of its existence was revealed on Jan. 20, 2016. The alleged “Planet Nine,” also called “Planet X,” is believed to be about 10 times the mass of Earth and 5,000 times the mass of Pluto.

    The order of the planets in the solar system, starting nearest the sun and working outward is the following: Mercury, Venus, Earth, Mars, Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, Neptune and then the possible Planet Nine.

    If you insist on including Pluto, it would come after Neptune on the list. Pluto is truly way out there, and on a wildly tilted, elliptical orbit (two of the several reasons it was demoted).

    The order of the planets in the solar system, starting nearest the sun and working outward is the following: Mercury, Venus, Earth, Mars, Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, Neptune and then the possible Planet Nine.

    If you insist on including Pluto, it would come after Neptune on the list. Pluto is truly way out there, and on a wildly tilted, elliptical orbit (two of the several reasons it was demoted).

    The IAU defines a true planet as a body that circles the sun without being some other object’s satellite; is large enough to be rounded by its own gravity (but not so big that it begins to undergo nuclear fusion, like a star); and has “cleared its neighborhood” of most other orbiting bodies. Yeah, it’s a mouthful.

    But that restrictive definition helped isolate what should and should not be considered a planet — a problem that arose as astronomers discovered more and more planet-like objects in the solar system. Pluto was among the bodies that didn’t make the cut and was re-classified as a dwarf planet.

    The problem with Pluto, aside from its small size and offbeat orbit, is that it doesn’t clear its neighborhood of debris — it shares its space with lots of other objects in the Kuiper Belt. Still, the demotion of Pluto remains controversial.

    The IAU planet definition also put other small, round worlds into the dwarf planet category, including the Kuiper Belt objects Eris, Haumea and Makemake.

    Ceres, a round object in the Asteroid Belt between Mars and Jupiter, also got the boot. Ceres was considered a planet when it was discovered in 1801, but it was later deemed to be an asteroid. That still didn’t quite fit because it was so much larger (and rounder) than the other asteroids. Astronomers instead deemed it a dwarf planet in 2006, although some astronomers like to consider Ceres as a 10th planet (not to be confused with Nibiru or Planet X).

    Below is a brief overview of the eight true planets in our solar system, moving from that closest to the sun to farthest from the sun:

    MERCURY: THE CLOSEST PLANET TO THE SUN

    The planet Mercury, innermost world of our solar system.

    Zipping around the sun in only 88 days, Mercury is the closest planet to the sun, and it’s also the smallest, only a little bit larger than Earth’s moon. Because its so close to the sun (about two-fifths the distance between Earth and the sun), Mercury experiences dramatic changes in its day and night temperatures: Day temperatures can reach a scorching 840 F (450 C), which is hot enough to melt lead. Meanwhile on the night side, temperatures drop to minus 290 F (minus 180 C).

    Mercury has a very thin atmosphere of oxygen, sodium, hydrogen, helium and potassium and can’t break-up incoming meteors, so its surface is pockmarked with craters, just like the moon. Over its four-year mission, NASA’s MESSENGER spacecraft revealed incredible new discoveries that challenged astronomers’ expectations. Among those findings was the discovery of water ice and frozen organic compounds at Mercury’s north pole and that volcanism played a major role in shaping the planet’s surface.

    Discovery: Known to the ancient Greeks and visible to the naked eye
    Named for the messenger of the Roman gods
    Diameter: 3,031 miles (4,878 km)
    Orbit: 88 Earth days
    Day: 58.6 Earth days

    VENUS: EARTH’S TWIN IN THE SOLAR SYSTEM

    An image of the cloudtops of Venus as photographed by Akatsuki’s ultraviolet instrument in 2019.

    The second planet from the sun, Venus is Earth’s twin in size. Radar images beneath its atmosphere reveal that its surface has various mountains and volcanoes. But beyond that, the two planets couldn’t be more different. Because of its thick, toxic atmosphere that’s made of sulfuric acid clouds, Venus is an extreme example of the greenhouse effect. It’s scorching-hot, even hotter than Mercury. The average temperature on Venus’ surface is 900 F (465 C). At 92 bar, the pressure at the surface would crush and kill you. And oddly, Venus spins slowly from east to west, the opposite direction of most of the other planets.

    The Greeks believed Venus was two different objects — one in the morning sky and another in the evening. Because it is often brighter than any other object in the sky, Venus has generated many UFO reports.

    Discovery: Known to the ancient Greeks and visible to the naked eye
    Named for the Roman goddess of love and beauty
    Diameter: 7,521 miles (12,104 km)
    Orbit: 225 Earth days
    Day: 241 Earth days

    2 users thanked author for this post.
  • #62124

    EARTH: OUR HOME PLANET, FILLED WITH LIFE

    An image of the Earth taken by the Russian weather satellite Elektro-L No.1.

    The third planet from the sun, Earth is a waterworld, with two-thirds of the planet covered by ocean. It’s the only world known to harbor life. Earth’s atmosphere is rich in nitrogen and oxygen. Earth’s surface rotates about its axis at 1,532 feet per second (467 meters per second) — slightly more than 1,000 mph (1,600 kph) — at the equator. The planet zips around the sun at more than 18 miles per second (29 km per second).

    Name originates from “Die Erde,” the German word for “the ground.”
    Diameter: 7,926 miles (12,760 km)
    Orbit: 365.24 days
    Day: 23 hours, 56 minutes

    MARS: THE SOLAR SYSTEM’S RED PLANET

    Mars, the Red Planet, as seen from the Hubble Space Telescope.

    The fourth planet from the sun is Mars, and it’s a cold, desert-like place covered in dust. This dust is made of iron oxides, giving the planet its iconic red hue. Mars shares similarities with Earth: It is rocky, has mountains, valleys and canyons, and storm systems ranging from localized tornado-like dust devils to planet-engulfing dust storms.

    Substantial scientific evidence suggests that Mars at one point billions of years ago was a much warmer, wetter world. Rivers and maybe even oceans existed. Although Mars’ atmosphere is too thin for liquid water to exist on the surface for any length of time, remnants of that wetter Mars still exist today. Sheets of water ice the size of California lie beneath Mars’ surface, and at both poles are ice caps made in part of frozen water. In July 2018, scientists revealed that they had found evidence of a liquid lake beneath the surface of the southern pole’s ice cap. It’s the first example of a persistent body of water on the Red Planet.

    Scientists also think ancient Mars would have had the conditions to support life like bacteria and other microbes. Hope that signs of this past life — and the possibility of even current lifeforms — may exist on the Red Planet has driven numerous space exploration missions and Mars is now one of the most explored planets in the solar system.

    Discovery: Known to the ancient Greeks and visible to the naked eye
    Named for the Roman god of war
    Diameter: 4,217 miles (6,787 km)
    Orbit: 687 Earth days
    Day: Just more than one Earth day (24 hours, 37 minutes)

    JUPITER: THE LARGEST PLANET IN OUR SOLAR SYSTEM

    This stunning image of Jupiter, taken by the Hubble Space Telescope, was captured on Aug. 25, 2020 and shows ripples in the planet’s atmosphere, Jupiter’s famous Great Red Spot and the planet’s striking colors.

    The fifth planet from the sun, Jupiter is a giant gas world that is the most massive planet in our solar system — more than twice as massive as all the other planets combined, according to NASA. Its swirling clouds are colorful due to different types of trace gases.

    And a major feature in its swirling clouds is the Great Red Spot, a giant storm more than 10,000 miles wide. It has raged at more than 400 mph for the last 150 years, at least. Jupiter has a strong magnetic field, and with 75 moons, it looks a bit like a miniature solar system.

    Discovery: Known to the ancient Greeks and visible to the naked eye
    Named for the ruler of the Roman gods
    Diameter: 86,881 miles (139,822 km)
    Orbit: 11.9 Earth years
    Day: 9.8 Earth hours

    1 user thanked author for this post.
  • #62126

    SATURN: THE RINGED JEWEL OF THE SOLAR SYSTEM

    The Hubble Space Telescope captured this image of Saturn during its northern hemisphere summer on July 4, 2020.

    The sixth planet from the sun, Saturn is known most for its rings. When polymath Galileo Galilei first studied Saturn in the early 1600s, he thought it was an object with three parts: a planet and two large moons on either side.

    Not knowing he was seeing a planet with rings, the stumped astronomer entered a small drawing — a symbol with one large circle and two smaller ones — in his notebook, as a noun in a sentence describing his discovery. More than 40 years later, Christiaan Huygens proposed that they were rings.

    The rings are made of ice and rock and scientists are not yet sure how they formed. The gaseous planet is mostly hydrogen and helium and has numerous moons.

    Discovery: Known to the ancient Greeks and visible to the naked eye
    Named for Roman god of agriculture
    Diameter: 74,900 miles (120,500 km)
    Orbit: 29.5 Earth years
    Day: About 10.5 Earth hours

    URANUS: THE TILTED, SIDEWAYS PLANET IN OUR SOLAR SYSTEM

    A composite image of Uranus shows both X-ray emissions and infrared emissions against an optical view of the planet.

    The seventh planet from the sun, Uranus is an oddball. It has clouds made of hydrogen sulfide, the same chemical that makes rotten eggs smell so foul. It rotates from east to west like Venus. But unlike Venus or any other planet, its equator is nearly at right angles to its orbit — it basically orbits on its side. Astronomers believe an object twice the size of Earth collided with Uranus roughly 4 billion years ago, causing Uranus to tilt. That tilt causes extreme seasons that last 20-plus years, and the sun beats down on one pole or the other for 84 Earth-years at a time.

    The collision is also thought to have knocked rock and ice into Uranus’ orbit. These later became some of the planet’s 27 moons. Methane in the atmosphere gives Uranus its blue-green tint. It also has 13 sets of faint rings.

    Discovery: 1781 by William Herschel (was originally thought to be a star)
    Named for the personification of heaven in ancient myth
    Diameter: 31,763 miles (51,120 km)
    Orbit: 84 Earth years
    Day: 18 Earth hours

    NEPTUNE: A GIANT, STORMY BLUE PLANET

    Neptune’s winds travel at more than 1,500 mph, and are the fastest planetary winds in the solar system.

    The eighth planet from the sun, Neptune is about the size of Uranus and is known for supersonic strong winds. Neptune is far out and cold. The planet is more than 30 times as far from the sun as Earth. Neptune was the first planet predicted to exist by using math, before it was visually detected. Irregularities in the orbit of Uranus led French astronomer Alexis Bouvard to suggest some other planet might be exerting a gravitational tug. German astronomer Johann Galle used calculations to help find Neptune in a telescope. Neptune is about 17 times as massive as Earth and has a rocky core.

    Discovery: 1846
    Named for the Roman god of water
    Diameter: 30,775 miles (49,530 km)
    Orbit: 165 Earth years
    Day: 19 Earth hours

    1 user thanked author for this post.
  • #62127

    PLUTO: ONCE A PLANET, NOW A DWARF PLANET

    New Horizons’ photo of Pluto showing the heart-shaped area now named ‘Tombaugh Regio’.

    Once the ninth planet from the sun, Pluto is unlike other planets in many respects. It is smaller than Earth’s moon; its orbit is highly elliptical, falling inside Neptune’s orbit at some points and far beyond it at others; and Pluto’s orbit doesn’t fall on the same plane as all the other planets — instead, it orbits 17.1 degrees above or below.

    From 1979 until early 1999, Pluto had actually been the eighth planet from the sun. Then, on Feb. 11, 1999, it crossed Neptune’s path and once again became the solar system’s most distant planet — until it was redefined as a dwarf planet. It’s a cold, rocky world with a tenuous atmosphere.

    Scientists thought it might be nothing more than a hunk of rock on the outskirts of the solar system. But when NASA’s New Horizons mission performed history’s first flyby of the Pluto system on July 14, 2015, it transformed scientists’ view of Pluto.

    Pluto is a very active ice world that’s covered in glaciers, mountains of ice water, icy dunes and possibly even cryovolcanoes that erupt icy lava made of water, methane or ammonia.

    Discovery: 1930 by Clyde Tombaugh
    Named for the Roman god of the underworld, Hades
    Diameter: 1,430 miles (2,301 km)
    Orbit: 248 Earth years
    Day: 6.4 Earth day

    PLANET NINE: A PLANET SEARCH AT SOLAR SYSTEM’S EDGE

    The orbits of distant Kuiper Belt objects and the hypothesized Planet Nine around the sun are shown in this image.. Orbits in purple are primarily controlled by Planet Nine’s gravity and exhibit tight orbital clustering. Green orbits are strongly coupled to Neptune and exhibit a broader orbital dispersion. Planet Nine is an approximately 5-Earth-mass planet that resides on a mildly eccentric orbit with a period of about 10,000 years.

    In 2016, researchers proposed the possible existence of a ninth planet, for now dubbed “Planet Nine” or Planet X. The planet is estimated to be about 10 times the mass of Earth and to orbit the sun between 300 and 1,000 times farther than the orbit of the Earth.

    Scientists have not actually seen Planet Nine. They inferred its existence by its gravitational effects on other objects in the Kuiper Belt, a region at the fringe of the solar system that is home to icy rocks left over from the birth of the solar system. Also called trans-Neptunian objects, these Kuiper Belt objects have highly elliptical or oval orbits that align in the same direction.

    Scientists Mike Brown and Konstantin Batygin at the California Institute of Technology in Pasadena described the evidence for Planet Nine in a study published in the Astronomical Journal. The research is based on mathematical models and computer simulations using observations of six other smaller Kuiper Belt Objects with orbits that aligned in a similar matter.

    A recent hypothesis proposed September 2019 on the pre-print server arXiv suggests Planet Nine might not be a planet at all. Instead, Jaku Scholtz of Durham University and James Unwin of the University of Illinois at Chicago speculate it could be a primordial black hole that formed soon after the Big Bang and that our solar system later captured, according to Newsweek. Unlike black holes that form from the collapse of giant stars, primordial black holes are thought to have formed from gravitational perturbations less than a second after the Big Bang, and this one would be so small (5 centimeters in diameter) that it would be challenging to detect.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
  • #62137

    Once the ninth planet from the sun

    It will always be the ninth planet for me.

    #JusticeForPluto

    2 users thanked author for this post.
  • #62140

    Regarding Pluto: as you know, I’m a traditionalist. I think we should keep things the way they always have been.

    So I don’t count anything past Saturn.

    • This reply was modified 3 years, 8 months ago by DavidM.
    1 user thanked author for this post.
  • #62223

    Regarding Pluto: as you know, I’m a traditionalist. I think we should keep things the way they always have been.

    So I don’t count anything past Saturn.

    • This reply was modified 3 years, 8 months ago by DavidM.

    So you have a problem with Uranus?

    2 users thanked author for this post.
  • #62255

    How did you spend your week? NASA pretended to crash an asteroid into Earth.

    …the scenario presented an impact just six months away, a pointed reminder that limited lead time is a key weakness in our asteroid defense systems…

    …”I think that in the context of COVID, if this was to happen now, it would be very natural for decisionmakers to look at the worst-case scenario,” … “Why? Because COVID has shown that the worst-case scenario can really happen.”
    ______________________________________

    Earth’s crust is way, way older than we thought
    Earth’s continents have been leaking nutrients into the ocean for at least 3.7 billion years, new research suggests.

    …they found evidence that Earth’s continental crust was around at least 3.7 billion years ago, much older than previous estimates…

    …That means there were well-established continents around 3.7 billion years ago — half a billion years earlier than previously estimated based on carbonate minerals…
    ____________________________________________

    Hubble offers a glimpse of a Jupiter-sized, still-forming planet – Tech Explorist

    A rare look at a Jupiter-sized, still-forming planet, captured by NASA‘s Hubble Space Telescope, offers astronomers an opportunity to see material falling onto a planet. This planetary system seems to feed off material surrounding a young star.
    The exoplanet called PDS 70b is located 370 light-years from Earth in the constellation Centaurus. It orbits the orange dwarf star PDS 70, which is known to have two actively forming planets inside a huge disk of dust and gas encircling the star.


    This illustration of the newly forming exoplanet PDS 70b shows how material may be falling onto the giant world as it builds up mass. By employing Hubble’s ultraviolet light (UV) sensitivity, researchers got a unique look at radiation from extremely hot gas falling onto the planet, allowing them to directly measure the planet’s mass growth rate for the first time. The planet PDS 70b is encircled by its own gas-and-dust disk that’s siphoning material from the vastly larger circumstellar disk in this solar system. The researchers hypothesize that magnetic field lines extend from its circumplanetary disk down to the exoplanet’s atmosphere and are funneling material onto the planet’s surface. The illustration shows one possible magnetospheric accretion configuration, but the magnetic field’s detailed geometry requires future work to probe. The remote world has already bulked up to five times the mass of Jupiter over a period of about five million years, but is anticipated to be in the tail end of its formation process. PDS 70b orbits the orange dwarf star PDS 70 approximately 370 light-years from Earth in the constellation Centaurus.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
  • #62407

    I am surprised by the size of Mars. I always thought it is much bigger. All the science fiction written about it gave me the impression it was much closer to Earth size.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
  • #62462

    Dark matter could be destroying itself inside the bellies of exoplanets

    Researchers propose learning more about dark matter by looking for its effects inside exoplanets.


    An artist’s impression of a gaseous exoplanet. Large gaseous planets would accumulate more dark matter, so are good candidates for the search for this mysterious substance.

    Large gaseous exoplanets could be filled with self-destructing dark matter. And now, a team of researchers has proposed using the soon-to-be-launched James Webb Space Telescope to scan distant behemoths in the galaxy for potential heating effects that could arise from the mysterious substance, which outweighs regular matter by almost 6 to 1 in the universe.

    Physicists know dark matter exists because it tugs gravitationally on stars and galaxies. But, so far, the invisible material has foiled every attempt to better understand its properties.

    Many theories of dark matter propose that it is made of individual particles and that these particles can sometimes hit one another as well as regular matter particles, Juri Smirnov, an astroparticle physicist at The Ohio State University, told Live Science. According to these models, two dark matter particles might also smash together and annihilate each other, generating heat, he added.

    If those assumptions are true, dark matter particles should occasionally crash into large objects such as exoplanets, causing the particles to lose energy and accumulate inside those worlds. There, they could annihilate each other and produce a measurable heat signal that’s visible from far away, Smirnov said.

    Along with his colleague Rebecca Leane, a postdoctoral researcher at SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory in Menlo Park, California, Smirnov has suggested using the space-based Webb telescope, which will scan the skies in the infrared part of the electromagnetic spectrum, to look for this characteristic heat signature.

    Larger exoplanets would accumulate more dark matter, so the best candidates for such searches would be gas giants bigger than Jupiter, or brown dwarfs — enormous worlds that nearly became stars but failed to gather enough gas to ignite nuclear fusion in their cores, the researchers wrote in a paper published April 22 in the journal Physical Review Letters.

    Determining that the heat is coming from dark matter annihilation and not some other process would be tricky, so Smirnov and Leane propose looking for exoplanets that have been flung away from their parent star and are quite old, meaning they will have cooled to very low temperatures. If such an object were glowing abnormally bright in the infrared, it could indicate the presence of dark matter.

    But an even more reliable method would be to search for large numbers of exoplanets throughout the Milky Way and make a map of their temperatures, Smirnov said. Dark matter is expected to pile up in the galactic center, so this map should show exoplanet temperatures rising slightly as you look closer to the Milky Way’s core.

    No known astrophysical activity could account for such a signature. “If we see that, it has to be dark matter,” Smirnov said.

    Capturing such a signal could help physicists determine the mass of dark matter particles and the rate at which they interact with regular matter. Since Webb, which is expected to be launched in October, will already be looking at exoplanets throughout the galaxy, Smirnov thinks the map of dark matter’s potential heat signature could be made within four to five years.

    “It’s a neat idea,” Bruce Macintosh, an astronomer who studies exoplanets at Stanford University in California and was not involved in the work, told Live Science. Researchers have built enormous underground detectors on Earth to try capturing dark matter particles, but “there’s a limit to how big a detector you can build as a human being,” he added.

    “We should take advantage of the big things nature provides,” Macintosh said.

    His one quibble with the study was that Webb — which will do targeted, in-depth studies of relatively few objects — might not be the best telescope for the job. The Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope, which should launch in the mid-2020s, will map the entire sky in exquisite detail and might be better suited for this task, he added.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
  • #62857

    ‘Spaghettified’ star wrapped around a black hole spotted for the first time

    Astronomers observe as a giant black hole sucks in a spaghettified star.


    A black hole tears down a star, leaving a long string of star material, which then wraps itself around the black hole.

    Filaments of material wrapped around a supermassive black hole have been spotted for the first time suggesting a star trapped by the black hole’s gravity has just been destroyed by ”spaghettification”.

    Astronomers believe that the effect more commonly known as tidal disruption, takes place because the black hole’s gravity pulls more strongly on the side of the star closer to the black hole. The black hole first rips the star apart and then sucks in its matter, turning the star into a long filament in the process.

    Previously, the only evidence of such a situation where a star met a violent demise venturing too close to a galaxy’s center, came in the form of short bursts of electromagnetic radiation that astronomers occasionally observed emanating from supermassive black holes.

    However, it wasn’t until now that scientists have seen evidence of the actual physical filament from a star in the black hole’s vicinity. In this new study, published in the journal Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society on March 24, a team of astronomers from the Netherlands Institute for Space Research (SRON) and Radboud University in the Netherlands has successfully detected such a spaghettified star in spectral absorption lines around the poles of a distant black hole.

    Absorption lines are unusually dark lines detected in the otherwise continuous spectrum of electromagnetic radiation emitted by a source, in this case a black hole. These lines appear when material that absorbs part of the electromagnetic radiation (in this case the spaghettified star) obscures the source.

    The astronomers observed the spectral absorption lines when looking at the black hole’s rotational pole. The observation suggested that there was a strand of material wrapped multiple times around the black hole like a yarn ball, the scientists said in a statement on April 23. The team believes that this material is the torn star as it orbits around the black hole before disappearing inside of it.

    Disks of accreted matter are known to exist around black hole’s equators. Made of material that is drawn to but not yet swallowed up by the black hole, the disk orbits around the equator at a very high speed, emitting heat, X-rays and gamma-rays in the process.

    The authors of the current study, however, claim that the material they were looking at wasn’t part of the accretion disk.

    “The absorption lines are narrow,” said Giacomo Cannizzaro, the lead author of the paper. “They are not broadened by the Doppler effect, like you’d expect when you would be looking at a rotating disk.”

    The Doppler effect, caused by the fast motion of the material in the accretion disk, stretches or shrinks the electromagnetic waves depending on whether the source is moving towards or away from the observer. As a result, the light emitted by the part of the accretion disk that is moving away from Earth would be brighter. But the scientists saw no evidence of that.

    The researchers also said in the statement that they knew they were facing the black hole’s pole because they could detect X-rays. “The accretion disk is the only part of a black hole system that emits this type of radiation,” the statement said. “If we were looking edge-on, we wouldn’t see the accretion disk’s X-rays.”

    Millions and even billions of times heavier than the sun, supermassive black holes are believed to lurk at the center of most galaxies. They grow over billions of years, swallowing up everything that falls into their gravitational embrace. Astronomers can detect black holes thanks to the bright X-rays they emit as they gorge on gas and matter from their surroundings.

    Stars that orbit in the central parts of galaxies might occasionally wander so close to the black holes that they get trapped by their gravity. They get pulled closer and closer to the black hole and eventually die a premature death by spaghettification.

    2 users thanked author for this post.
  • #62858

    A huge Chinese rocket will fall to Earth this weekend. Here’s how to track it online.

    The Long March 5B booster is expected to come down this weekend.

    Several websites give regular updates on the Chinese Long March 5B rocket core that’s uncontrollably falling to Earth, with an expected re-entry on Saturday night (May 8).

    update: As of Saturday afternoon, the falling rocket booster was forecast to reenter Earth’s atmosphere over the northern Atlantic Ocean on Saturday at about 11:30 p.m. EDT (0330 GMT), according to a Twitter update from Aerospace Corp., which is tracking the object.

    The 23-ton (21 metric tons) core stage likely will fall into an uninhabited area, given that 70% of Earth’s surface is covered by ocean. That said, entities around the world are keeping an eye out just in case — and providing regular updates online.

    We’ll keep you posted here at Space.com, but here are some of the sources you can look at yourself in the coming days.

    Updated picture:


    This reentry prediction plot by the Aerospace Corporation shows the estimated splashdown point of China’s 21 metric ton Long March 5B rocket booster on Saturday, May 8, 2021. As of Saturday afternoon, it was estimated to fall in the northern Atlantic Ocean west of Europe give or take 4 hours.

    U.S. Space Command is updating space-track.org at least once a day with the latest information about where the rocket is likely to fall, based on parameters such as how high Earth’s atmosphere is billowing and how drag is expected to affect the massive Chinese vehicle.

    The Aerospace Corporation, which supports national security space programs, posts regularly on its Twitter feed and occasionally on Medium about the core stage status. More details about re-entry predictions are also available on its website.

    Another Twitter feed to keep an eye on is that of Jonathan McDowell, a well-known tracker of uncontrolled falls in the U.S. space community. He’s been posting several times a day about the progress of the Long March 5B.

    Amateur skywatchers are also keeping an eye out for the rocket, with the Virtual Telescope’s Gianluca Masi planning to broadcast live footage from Rome if the core stage is visible from there. Weather permitting, that webcast is expected to begin tonight, May 7, at 10:40 p.m. EDT (0240 GMT). You can watch it directly from the Virtual Telescope here and on YouTube.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
  • #63057

    ‘Oddball’ star shocks scientists with strange supernova


    This artistic visualization shows a blue star stripping the hydrogen away from a yellow supergiant star.

    A massive star’s “oddball” violent death has scientists puzzled.

    In a new study, an international team of researchers used images from the Hubble Space Telescope to document the demise of a giant star 35 million light-years from Earth.

    Those Hubble images showed something strange: The cool, yellow star had no hydrogen in its outer layer.

    “We haven’t seen this scenario before,” lead study author Charles Kilpatrick, a postdoctoral researcher at Northwestern University in Illinois, said in a statement.

    “If a star explodes without hydrogen, it should be extremely blue — really, really hot,” Kilpatrick explained. “It’s almost impossible for a star to be this cool without having hydrogen in its outer layer. We looked at every single stellar model that could explain a star like this, and every single model requires that the star had hydrogen, which, from its supernova, we know it did not. It stretches what’s physically possible.”


    The Hubble Space Telescope spotted the site of supernova 2019yvr two and a half years before the star exploded.

    In the images from Hubble, the researchers observed the star two-and-a-half years before it died in a supernova explosion and through that dramatic event. They witnessed what they describe as a “very normal hydrogen-free supernova,” Kilpatrick said. However, “the progenitor star didn’t match what we know about this type of supernova,” he added.

    In the study, the researchers suggest that, possibly, in the years leading up to the star’s death, it could have lost its hydrogen layer in a number of different ways. For example, the star could have shed the layer, or, potentially, the hydrogen could have been pulled off by a nearby stellar companion. However, in observing the star they noticed that, after the supernova occurred, material flung from the star in the explosion collided with massive amounts of hydrogen.

    This supported the idea that the star shed its shroud of hydrogen years before its demise.

    “Astronomers have suspected that stars undergo violent eruptions or death throes in the years before we see supernovae,” Kilpatrick said. “This star’s discovery provides some of the most direct evidence ever found that stars experience catastrophic eruptions, which cause them to lose mass before an explosion. If the star was having these eruptions, then it likely expelled its hydrogen several decades before it exploded.”

    Still, the researchers are not completely discounting the possibility that a nearby star stripped this star of its hydrogen. To find such a companion star, the researchers will have to wait until the supernova fades, as its brightness is currently obscuring the view. This fading could take up to 10 years, according to the statement.

    With these hypotheses in mind, the team points to this supernova, known as 2019yvr, as a prime example of just how strange and mysterious stellar explosions can be.

    “What massive stars do right before they explode is a big unsolved mystery,” Kilpatrick said in the same statement. And this star was especially mysterious.

    “Unlike its normal behavior right after it exploded, the hydrogen interaction revealed it’s kind of this oddball supernova,” Kilpatrick said. “But it’s exceptional that we were able to find its progenitor star in Hubble data. In four or five years, I think we will be able to learn more about what happened.”

    2 users thanked author for this post.
  • #63075

    The Hubble Space Telescope spotted the site of supernova 2019yvr two and a half years before the star exploded.

    Actual pictures!!!!! all those visualization artists must feel so jealous! :whistle:

    2 users thanked author for this post.
  • #63273

    3 users thanked author for this post.
  • #63789

    Distant star drowns its partner in gas, forming gorgeous ‘Necklace Nebula’

    The larger star swallowed up its smaller companion 10,000 years ago, NASA says.


    The Necklace Nebula shines like jewelry — but actually, it’s just a load of star farts.

    Two stars, bound together in orbital matrimony, are slowly ripping each other apart. And, like many relationship squabbles, this stellar spat ends with jewelry.

    Meet the Necklace Nebula (known less sexily as PN G054.203.4). This planetary nebula is located about 15,000 light-years from Earth, inside the Sagitta constellation in the northern sky. To telescopes like NASA’s Hubble, the nebula looks like an emerald oval, ringed with sparkling clusters of jewel-like gas. A pair of binary stars forms a bright speck at the center.

    That speck looks like a single star, but it’s no bachelor; about 10,000 years ago, the star grew so large that its outermost layer of gas actually swallowed up a smaller companion star, according to a NASA statement. That smaller companion star is still orbiting inside its larger partner’s gassy sheath, known as a common envelope. Ah, romance!

    As you might imagine, having a star orbiting through your insides is not great for one’s gut. As the smaller star orbits through its larger partner, the gas surrounding the duo begins to rotate faster and faster, according to NASA. At some point, the gas surrounding this stellar couple started swirling so fast that huge swaths of it started spilling out into space.

    That runaway gas escaped in an oval shape, gushing outward for trillions of miles in every direction — thus creating the necklace shape we can see so vividly in the above Hubble image. As for the sparkling jewels running along the outside of the ring? These are just areas where the stellar gas bunched up into particularly dense clusters, according to NASA.

    For now, the two stars at the center of the nebula will continue their mad ballroom dance around each other, completing a full orbit in a little more than an Earth day, according to NASA. But their end is uncertain. Many binary couples end their relationships with immense supernova explosions. Even the brightest jewels dim eventually.

    2 users thanked author for this post.
  • #63791

    How does time work?

    From the beginning of the universe to the present day, it’s one of the few things we regard as regular and unchanging. We look at the physics of time.


    Time is all around us, a constant that keeps the world and universe ticking.

    When considering time, it’s easy to quickly get lost in the complexity of the topic. Time is all around us — it’s ever-present and is the basis of how we record life on Earth. It’s the constant that keeps the world, the solar system and even the universe ticking.

    Civilizations have risen and fallen, stars have been born and extinguished, and our one method of keeping track of every event in the universe and on Earth has been comparing them to the present day with the regular passing of time. But is it really a constant? Is time really as simple as a movement from one second to the next?

    13.8 billion years ago the universe was born, and since then time has flown by to the present day, overseeing the creation of galaxies and the expansion of space. But when it comes to comparing time, it’s daunting to realize just how little of time we’ve actually experienced.

    Earth might be 4.5 billion years old, but modern humans have inhabited it for around 300,000 years — that’s just 0.002% the age of the universe. Feeling small and insignificant yet? It gets worse. We’ve experienced so little time on Earth that in astronomical terms we’re entirely negligible.

    More in link…

    __________________________________________________

    What is the Big Bang Theory?

    The Big Bang Theory is our best guess about how the universe began.


    A 2013 map of the background radiation left over from the Big Bang, taken by the ESA’s Planck spacecraft, captured the oldest light in the universe. This information helps astronomers determine the age of the universe.

    The Big Bang Theory is the leading explanation about how the universe began. At its simplest, it says the universe as we know it started with a small singularity, then inflated over the next 13.8 billion years to the cosmos that we know today.

    Because current instruments don’t allow astronomers to peer back at the universe’s birth, much of what we understand about the Big Bang Theory comes from mathematical formulas and models. Astronomers can, however, see the “echo” of the expansion through a phenomenon known as the cosmic microwave background.

    While the majority of the astronomical community accepts the theory, there are some theorists who have alternative explanations besides the Big Bang — such as eternal inflation or an oscillating universe.

    The phrase “Big Bang Theory” has been popular among astrophysicists for decades, but it hit the mainstream in 2007 when a comedy show with the same name premiered on CBS. The show followed the home and academic life of several researchers, including physicists, an astrophysicist and an engineer, and ended in 2019.

    More in link…

    ____________________________________________________

    Where do black holes lead?

    If you travel through a black hole, where do you go?

    So there you are, about to leap into a black hole. What could possibly await should — against all odds — you somehow survive? Where would you end up and what tantalising tales would you be able to regale if you managed to clamber your way back?

    The simple answer to all of these questions is, as Professor Richard Massey explains, “Who knows?” As a Royal Society research fellow at the Institute for Computational Cosmology at Durham University, Massey is fully aware that the mysteries of black holes run deep. “Falling through an event horizon is literally passing beyond the veil — once someone falls past it, nobody could ever send a message back,” he said. “They’d be ripped to pieces by the enormous gravity, so I doubt anyone falling through would get anywhere.”

    More in link…

    1 user thanked author for this post.
  • #63792

    Some of the universe’s stars have gone missing. But where did they go?

    Space Mysteries: An international team of astronomers is on the hunt for objects that should be impossible.


    Could the “missing stars” be a completely new phenomenon?

    Stars don’t just vanish — or do they? For thousands of years, astronomers accepted the idea that the lights in the sky were fixed and unchanging. Even when it became clear that these lights were actually physical objects like the sun, one of the key assumptions for astrophysicists has been that they go through major changes very slowly, on timescales of millions or billions of years.

    And when the most massive stars of all — which are many times heavier than the sun — do go through sudden and cataclysmic changes as they reach the ends of their lives, their passing is marked by the unmissable cosmic beacon of a supernova explosion, which shines for many months, and may even be visible across hundreds of millions of light-years.

    But what if some stars suddenly just wink out of visibility? According to everything we know about stars, that should be impossible, but over the past few years, a group of astronomers has set out to see whether such impossible things do happen, comparing data across decades of observations.

    “VASCO is the Vanishing and Appearing Sources during a Century of Observations project,” said Beatriz Villarroel of the Nordic Institute for Theoretical Physics, Sweden. “We’re actually interested in all kinds of vanishing objects, but ideally I’d like to find a star that’s been steady and has been there in the sky for as long as we can remember and as long as we have data for, and one day it just vanishes. And you can point the biggest telescopes in the world at it and still see nothing there.”

    Since Villarroel and her colleagues began work on the project in 2017, they’ve attracted a lot of attention from scientists who see the potential in searching historic records: “We have astronomers from all kinds of different fields interested in the project — specialists in active galactic nuclei [the power source of intensely brilliant quasars in the distant universe], stellar physicists, and SETI [Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence] scientists — everyone has their reasons for getting involved.”


    Massive stars can destroy themselves in supernovas, but these are hard to miss, outshining entire galaxies for several months and leaving behind superheated remnants.

    Although our current understanding suggests that stars change only very slowly, and dramatic disappearances should leave traces behind, that’s not to say that all stars shine steadily. In fact, the sky is packed full of variable stars that pulsate and change in brightness. Villarroel emphasizes that VASCO is about something different. “We know that there are variables, but their timescales tend to be a few years at most. We want to find something that goes from a completely steady star to just vanishing entirely — this hasn’t been documented, and it’s the kind of discovery that could lead to new physics.”

    Cataloging the sky

    Recent years have seen the development of automated telescopes that can catalog the entire sky at a rate that previous generations of astronomers could only dream about. For instance, the Zwicky Transient Facility (ZTF) at Mount Palomar in California combines a state-of-the-art camera with the venerable Samuel Oschin Telescope.

    Its ultra-wide field of view enables it to survey the entire Palomar sky over just three nights, scanning the plane of the Milky Way twice each night. This massively increases the likelihood of detecting the chance eruptions known as transients — bursts of light that can be caused by intense stellar flares on distant stars, but may also be associated with some of the most violent and rare events in the universe, such as mysterious gamma-ray bursts.

    However, there’s a big difference between looking for stars that appear, and those which disappear, as Villarroel highlights: “Projects like the ZTF work on very short timescales, but if you have a very rare event where something vanishes from the sky every 100 years then you really need a very long timescale to pick it up. In our case we want to find a star that has vanished — or actually appeared — using as large a time span as possible, combined with the best catalogs from older times.

    We’re using data from 70 years ago and comparing it to data from today to see how the sky might have changed.” Perhaps ironically, the team’s search for high-quality historical data led researchers back to Palomar and the Samuel Oschin Telescope, which in the 1950s produced the photographic plates for an all-sky survey that has since been scanned by the US Naval Observatory (USNO). For a modern counterpart they relied on data from the twin telescopes of the Panoramic Survey Telescope and Rapid Response System (Pan-STARRS) at Hawaii’s Haleakalā Observatory.


    The USNO survey plates predate the Space Age, and exposures are long enough to distinguish asteroids as short trails against stars.

    “All of these surveys are freely available, and everything has been digitized and is online,” said Villarroel. “Our IT team at Uppsala University has developed a citizen science webpage where you can click and combine images at ml-blink.org. We have computer game developers who have looked at making the design more appealing, and we also have an AI in development.

    There are several different ways of approaching the problem — whatever gives us data! The point is that people who are interested can go there to compare the images, and if they are very curious about some case they can leave a comment, and we’ll get back to them and inform them about their candidate. But we have quite a lot of work ahead of us before we can follow up on everything.”

    Every object in the USNO catalog that is flagged as having no obvious counterpart in the Pan-STARRS data has to be examined and confirmed by the team. Researchers then look at the shape, brightness, and other characteristics to identify whether it is a defect on the photographic plates of the original survey.

    “You can never guarantee it’s not a plate defect,” said Villarroel. “But you can do some tests in order to eliminate the most obvious things. Then you go to the deeper catalogs like the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) or the new Dark Energy Camera Legacy Survey to see if you can find any remains of the object on these, and depending on what you find that might give you different types of candidates.”

    The team also compares candidates with data from the European Space Agency’s Gaia, which is currently busy gathering precision data for more than a billion stars in the Milky Way.


    The VASCO researchers use data from the European Space Agency’s Gaia space observatory to double-check candidate “missing” stars.

    Promising candidates

    So far, the survey has delivered more than 800 apparently ‘missing’ stars, many of which still need to be processed and studied in depth. And while there’s no perfect match for Villarroel’s ideal object — a vanishing act by a long-lived, stable star —many of the candidates that have been spotted are still intriguing in their own right.

    “We have found a number of short-lived transients that appear on one image, and then not again. Those account for most of what we’ve found so far, but there are other things we’re not sure of what they are yet. We’ve studied some of these short-lived transients, and they don’t seem to be M-dwarf flares [the huge outbursts caused by the tangled magnetic fields of faint red dwarf stars that may cause them to brighten by a factor of 100 or more], or any type of supernova. I think we can start excluding those options.”

    Other options that seem unlikely include variable stars and cataclysmic variables or novae — eruptions on the surface of white dwarf stars in binary systems. None of the sources sit close to a known variable, and the companion star in a nova system ought to be faintly visible on some of the modern surveys, even when the white dwarf isn’t.


    Ageing red giant stars can “disappear” as they shed their outer layers and evolve into white dwarfs, but the process takes hundreds of thousands of years and produces a distinctive planetary nebula.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
  • #63793

    Part 2

    “One possibility is that they could be some kind of optical afterglow from gamma-ray bursts or fast radio bursts,” Villarroel said. The sources of these high-energy cosmic eruptions are still poorly understood, but one common prediction is that as their energy output dwindles, they should pass through a brief period of visibility.

    “Such outbursts are predicted to have super-big amplitudes of about eight to ten magnitudes, but fade in just a few minutes, and don’t seem to have any kind of visible counterpart when we look at the locations with big telescopes. Of course, with 800 candidates we still have a lot of work to do, and I think to be clear it’s almost certainly a mixed bag of objects of different types,” she said.

    If those 800 candidates turn out to contain an ideal vanishing star, what could be the possible explanation?

    One option might turn out to be a so-called “failed” supernova — a truly monstrous star with a core so massive that it collapses into a black hole and consumes the rest of the star from the inside out, cutting off the torrent of nuclear fusion that normally accompanies a supernova explosion and leaving no visible remnant behind.


    Black holes can form at the center of stars in the Milky Way.

    However, Villarroel thinks that the odds are stacked against this explanation — she calculates that such events should happen about once every three centuries in our galaxy, making it unlikely that the VASCO project would stumble upon one by chance.

    At the moment it’s hard to imagine other natural processes that might result in a star simply disappearing — and until a candidate emerges with features that can be studied, there’s little point in speculating on possible new physics that might be involved in this cosmic vanishing act. However, that raises one other possibility that’s inspired VASCO from the outset: The idea that apparently impossible astronomical events might give away the existence of advanced alien civilizations.

    Potential future discoveries


    The Pan-STARRS survey telescopes at Haleakalā Observatory on the Hawaiian island of Maui.

    As increases in telescope size and sensitivity, coupled with computing power, have brought astronomy into its “big data” era, many SETI scientists have argued that we’re more likely to detect the presence of aliens through the otherwise-inexplicable behaviors of stars and other objects than we are from radio signals deliberately or accidentally beamed in our direction by alien life.

    The theory is that if civilizations become sufficiently advanced, at least some of them are likely to develop the technology required for stellar engineering, which would alter the appearance of stars in otherwise-inexplicable ways. A classic example of this is the “Dyson sphere” — a halo of orbiting power plants that would be the most efficient way of extracting energy from a star.


    A really advanced alien civilization could cause stars to disappear in a number of ways — perhaps blocking out their light by surrounding them with Dyson spheres.

    Science-fiction author Arthur C. Clarke stated in his Third Law that “any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic”. If no natural cause for a stellar disappearance could be found, then the influence of intelligent extraterrestrials would certainly seem a more likely explanation than the supernatural.

    “With regard to SETI, there are several different ways of thinking about it,” Villarroel said. “Dyson spheres and other structures, beacons that are turned on and off, or point in our direction for a certain time, or maybe there are ways for a civilization to actually get rid of stars that are getting in the way.”

    Even the red transients that the team has identified so far could have a possible artificial cause: “Of course, the first hypotheses we go for are natural ones — and we don’t have any reason to exclude those yet — but if I was in my extraterrestrial speculation mode, I guess a laser beam could also produce a red transient of this type.”


    One extraordinary possibility is that the disappearing “stars” are actually huge starships moving through space, in which case they might not be missing, but moving.

    While Villarroel hints at exciting discoveries that have already emerged from the data and await formal publication, in the meantime the VASCO project continues. Many of the candidates identified so far still await proper confirmation and analysis, and only a quarter of the sky has actually been checked so far. Further progress will hopefully be accelerated by more volunteer citizen scientists and new automation methods currently being developed in collaboration with the Spanish Virtual Observatory.

    “We don’t know of any processes where a star would just vanish, except for this hypothetical failed supernova,” Villarroel reflects. “Therefore vanishing stars become interesting because we haven’t observed such things in nature. The main principle was to look for things we would think of as being impossible.”

    1 user thanked author for this post.
  • #63803

    The universe, from beginning to end in about 40 minutes, over two videos.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
  • #64464

    Watch this stunning Starforge simulation of a star being born


    The giant gas cloud in the simulation is many millions of times more massive than our sun.

    Astrophysicists have developed the first high-resolution 3D model of a gas cloud coalescing to form a star — and it’s mind-blowing.

    The “Starforge” model (which stands for “star formation in gaseous environments”) allows users to fly through a colorful cloud of gas as it pools into stars all around them. Researchers hope that the visually stunning simulation will help them to explore the many unsolved mysteries of star formation, such as: Why is the process so slow and inefficient? What determines a star’s mass? And why do stars tend to cluster together?

    The computational framework is able to simulate gas clouds 100 times more massive than was previously possible and will enable scientists to model star formation, evolution and dynamics while taking into account things like jets, radiation, wind and even supernovas — the explosions of nearby stars.

    “How stars form is very much a central question in astrophysics,” senior author Claude-André Faucher-Giguère, an astrophysicist at Northwestern University, said in a statement. “It’s been a very challenging question to explore because of the range of physical processes involved. This new simulation will help us directly address fundamental questions we could not definitively answer before.”

    Stars can take tens of millions of years to form — growing from billowing clouds of turbulent dust and gas to gently glowing protostars, before materializing into gigantic orbs of fusion-powered plasma like our sun. While studying the night sky enables astrophysicists to glimpse brief snapshots of a star’s evolution, they need to use an accurate simulation to view and study the full process.

    “When we observe stars forming in any given region, all we see are star formation sites frozen in time,” co-author Michael Grudić, a postdoctoral fellow at Northwestern University, said in the statement. “Stars also form in clouds of dust, so they are mostly hidden.”

    The model is enormous, and it can take three months to run one simulation on one of the world’s largest supercomputers, housed at the Texas Advanced Computing Center. It is the sheer size and computational complexity that makes this new model’s predictions so much more accurate, according to the researchers.

    “People have been simulating star formation for a couple decades now, but Starforge is a quantum leap in technology,” Grudić said. “Other models have only been able to simulate a tiny patch of the cloud where stars form — not the entire cloud in high resolution. Without seeing the big picture, we miss a lot of factors that might influence the star’s outcome.”

    The simulation starts with a cloud of gas — up to many millions of times more massive than our sun — floating in space. As time passes, the gas cloud evolves. It swirls around itself, forming larger structures before breaking apart again. From this creative destruction, small pockets of gas remain that, drawn in by gravity and made ever hotter through constant friction, eventually become stars. The climax of a star’s birth is when two enormous jets of gas are launched outward from its poles at high speed — piercing the clouds around it.

    Astrophysicists used the simulation to understand the role these gas jets play in determining a star’s mass. When they ran the simulation without accounting for the jets, they got stars that were much bigger than usual — roughly 10 times the mass of the sun. Adding the jets back in produced more realistically sized stars, which were around half the mass of the sun.


    A rotating core of gas collapses, forming a star which expels two enormous jets of gas.

    “Jets disrupt the inflow of gas toward the star,” Grudić said. “They essentially blow away gas that would have ended up in the star and increased its mass. People have suspected this might be happening, but, by simulating the entire system, we have a robust understanding of how it works.”

    By giving them a better understanding of how stars form, the researchers also think that their simulation could provide some vital insights into how galaxies spread across the universe, as well as how heavier elements, like carbon and nitrogen — the key building blocks to complex life — are forged inside stars’ fiery hearts.

    “If we can understand star formation, then we can understand galaxy formation. And by understanding galaxy formation, we can understand more about what the universe is made of,” Grudić said. “Understanding where we come from and how we’re situated in the universe ultimately hinges on understanding the origins of stars.”

    1 user thanked author for this post.
  • #64497

    Bummer, I thought the Starforge was going to be something like the Stargate. O well.

  • #64980

    Watch two monster black holes merge into one in this intricate NASA simulation (video)

    Astrophysicists dream of one day truly seeing a merger between two giant black holes, rather than merely painting its portrait based on how it affects surrounding matter.

    To improve the odds of someday doing just that, scientists have enlisted computers to develop ever-more-intricate simulations of what black holes look like, particularly as they merge. The researchers can then translate those super complicated simulations, some of which NASA has just released, into predictions of what signatures might be detectable, and by what instruments.

    “We probably will never find a binary black hole with a telescope until we simulate them to the point we know exactly what we’re looking for, because they’re so far away, they’re so tiny, you’re going to see just one speck of light,” Jeremy Schnittman, an astrophysicist at NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center in Maryland who is working on the simulation research, said in a NASA statement. “We need to be able to look for that smoking gun.”


    A still photo from a new simulation shows the inner accretion disk of a supermassive black hole glowing with X-rays.

    more in link…
    _______________________________________________

    Milky Way’s galactic core overflows with colorful threads in new Chandra panorama (video, photos)

    At the center of our Milky Way galaxy, threads of superheated gas and magnetic fields weave around each other to create a spectacular galactic display captured in a striking new panoramic image from NASA’s Chandra X-ray Observatory.

    This new image of the Milky Way’s core builds on previous observations from Chandra and other observatories. These newest observations stretch higher above and farther below our galaxy’s plane, or the disk where most of the Milky Way’s stars can be found, than previous imaging efforts have achieved, according to a NASA statement.


    The Milky Way’s Galactic Center, as seen by the Chandra X-ray observatory.

    More in link…

    2 users thanked author for this post.
  • #64981

    10 mind-boggling things you should know about quantum physics

    From the multiverse to black holes, here’s your cheat sheet to the spooky side of the universe.

    1. The quantum world is lumpy

    The quantum world has a lot in common with shoes. You can’t just go to a shop and pick out sneakers that are an exact match for your feet. Instead, you’re forced to choose between pairs that come in predetermined sizes.

    The subatomic world is similar. Albert Einstein won a Nobel Prize for proving that energy is quantized. Just as you can only buy shoes in multiples of half a size, so energy only comes in multiples of the same “quanta” — hence the name quantum physics.

    The quanta here is the Planck constant, named after Max Planck, the godfather of quantum physics. He was trying to solve a problem with our understanding of hot objects like the sun. Our best theories couldn’t match the observations of the energy they kick out. By proposing that energy is quantized, he was able to bring theory neatly into line with experiment.

    2. Something can be both wave and particle

    A solar sail: in space, light exerts pressure like the wind on Earth.

    J. J. Thomson won the Nobel Prize in 1906 for his discovery that electrons are particles. Yet his son George won the Nobel Prize in 1937 for showing that electrons are waves. Who was right? The answer is both of them. This so-called wave-particle duality is a cornerstone of quantum physics. It applies to light as well as electrons. Sometimes it pays to think about light as an electromagnetic wave, but at other times it’s more useful to picture it in the form of particles called photons.

    A telescope can focus light waves from distant stars, and also acts as a giant light bucket for collecting photons. It also means that light can exert pressure as photons slam into an object. This is something we already use to propel spacecraft with solar sails, and it may be possible to exploit it in order to maneuver a dangerous asteroid off a collision course with Earth, according to Rusty Schweickart, chairman of the B612 Foundation.

    3. Objects can be in two places at once

    Wave-particle duality is an example of superposition. That is, a quantum object existing in multiple states at once. An electron, for example, is both ‘here’ and ‘there’ simultaneously. It’s only once we do an experiment to find out where it is that it settles down into one or the other.

    This makes quantum physics all about probabilities. We can only say which state an object is most likely to be in once we look. These odds are encapsulated into a mathematical entity called the wave function. Making an observation is said to ‘collapse’ the wave function, destroying the superposition and forcing the object into just one of its many possible states.

    This idea is behind the famous Schrödinger’s cat thought experiment. A cat in a sealed box has its fate linked to a quantum device. As the device exists in both states until a measurement is made, the cat is simultaneously alive and dead until we look.

    4. It may lead us towards a multiverse

    We could just be one bubble of many, each containing a different version of the universe.

    The idea that observation collapses the wave function and forces a quantum ‘choice’ is known as the Copenhagen interpretation of quantum physics. However, it’s not the only option on the table. Advocates of the ‘many worlds’ interpretation argue that there is no choice involved at all. Instead, at the moment the measurement is made, reality fractures into two copies of itself: one in which we experience outcome A, and another where we see outcome B unfold. It gets around the thorny issue of needing an observer to make stuff happen — does a dog count as an observer, or a robot?

    Instead, as far as a quantum particle is concerned, there’s just one very weird reality consisting of many tangled-up layers. As we zoom out towards the larger scales that we experience day to day, those layers untangle into the worlds of the many worlds theory. Physicists call this process decoherence.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
  • #64982

    Continued…

    5. It helps us characterize stars

    The spectra of stars can tell us what elements they contain, giving clues to their age and other characteristics.

    Danish physicist Niels Bohr showed us that the orbits of electrons inside atoms are also quantized. They come in predetermined sizes called energy levels. When an electron drops from a higher energy level to a lower energy level, it spits out a photon with an energy equal to the size of the gap. Equally, an electron can absorb a particle of light and use its energy to leap up to a higher energy level.

    Astronomers use this effect all the time. We know what stars are made of because when we break up their light into a rainbow-like spectrum, we see colors that are missing. Different chemical elements have different energy level spacings, so we can work out the constituents of the sun and other stars from the precise colors that are absent.

    6. Without it the sun wouldn’t shine

    Quantum tunneling is the finite possibility that a particle can break through an energy barrier.

    The sun makes its energy through a process called nuclear fusion. It involves two protons — the positively charged particles in an atom — sticking together. However, their identical charges make them repel each other, just like two north poles of a magnet. Physicists call this the Coulomb barrier, and it’s like a wall between the two protons.

    Think of protons as particles and they just collide with the wall and move apart: No fusion, no sunlight. Yet think of them as waves, and it’s a different story. When the wave’s crest reaches the wall, the leading edge has already made it through. The wave’s height represents where the proton is most likely to be. So although it is unlikely to be where the leading edge is, it is there sometimes. It’s as if the proton has burrowed through the barrier, and fusion occurs. Physicists call this effect “quantum tunneling”.

    7. It stops dead stars collapsing

    It’s theorised that white dwarfs’ cores may crystallize as they age.

    Eventually fusion in the sun will stop and our star will die. Gravity will win and the sun will collapse, but not indefinitely. The smaller it gets, the more material is crammed together. Eventually a rule of quantum physics called the Pauli exclusion principle comes into play. This says that it is forbidden for certain kinds of particles — such as electrons — to exist in the same quantum state. As gravity tries to do just that, it encounters a resistance that astronomers call degeneracy pressure. The collapse stops, and a new Earth-sized object called a white dwarf forms.

    Degeneracy pressure can only put up so much resistance, however. If a white dwarf grows and approaches a mass equal to 1.4 suns, it triggers a wave of fusion that blasts it to bits. Astronomers call this explosion a Type Ia supernova, and it’s bright enough to outshine an entire galaxy.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
  • #64983

    continued…

    8. It causes black holes to evaporate

    Not everything that falls into a black hole disappears – some matter escapes.

    A quantum rule called the Heisenberg uncertainty principle says that it’s impossible to perfectly know two properties of a system simultaneously. The more accurately you know one, the less precisely you know the other. This applies to momentum and position, and separately to energy and time.

    It’s a bit like taking out a loan. You can borrow a lot of money for a short amount of time, or a little cash for longer. This leads us to virtual particles. If enough energy is ‘borrowed’ from nature then a pair of particles can fleetingly pop into existence, before rapidly disappearing so as not to default on the loan.

    Stephen Hawking imagined this process occurring at the boundary of a black hole, where one particle escapes (as Hawking radiation), but the other is swallowed. Over time the black hole slowly evaporates, as it’s not paying back the full amount it has borrowed.

    9. It explains the universe’s large-scale structure

    Starting out as a singularity, the universe has been expanding for 13.8 billion years.

    Our best theory of the universe’s origin is the Big Bang. Yet it was modified in the 1980s to include another theory called inflation. In the first trillionth of a trillionth of a trillionth of a second, the cosmos ballooned from smaller than an atom to about the size of a grapefruit. That’s a whopping 1078 times bigger. Inflating a red blood cell by the same amount would make it larger than the entire observable universe today.

    As it was initially smaller than an atom, the infant universe would have been dominated by quantum fluctuations linked to the Heisenberg uncertainty principle. Inflation caused the universe to grow rapidly before these fluctuations had a chance to fade away. This concentrated energy into some areas rather than others — something astronomers believe acted as seeds around which material could gather to form the clusters of galaxies we observe now.

    10. It is more than a little ‘spooky’

    The properties of a particle can be ‘teleported’ through quantum entanglement.

    As well as helping to prove that light is quantum, Einstein argued in favor of another effect that he dubbed ‘spooky action at distance’. Today we know that this ‘quantum entanglement’ is real, but we still don’t fully understand what’s going on. Let’s say that we bring two particles together in such a way that their quantum states are inexorably bound, or entangled. One is in state A, and the other in state B.

    The Pauli exclusion principle says that they can’t both be in the same state. If we change one, the other instantly changes to compensate. This happens even if we separate the two particles from each other on opposite sides of the universe. It’s as if information about the change we’ve made has traveled between them faster than the speed of light, something Einstein said was impossible.

    • This reply was modified 3 years, 7 months ago by Sean Robinson.
    1 user thanked author for this post.
  • #64985

    Gravitational wave ‘memories’ could help us find elusive cosmic strings

    Many theories of the early universe predict that the cosmos should be flooded with cracks in space-time, called cosmic strings, but no cosmic strings have been detected yet. Now, a new proposal suggests that we may need to look for them not through traditional astronomy, but through their gravitational-wave signature, which may persist in space-time long after the cosmic string has vanished.

    When the universe wasn’t even a second old, it underwent the most radical and transformative phase transitions of its existence — a feat not repeated even until the present day, billions of years later. These phase transitions completely reorganized the universe as the (hypothetical) unified force splintered off into the separate fundamental forces: gravity, the strong nuclear force, the weak nuclear force and electromagnetism.

    As the forces splintered off, the fundamental quantum vacuum energy of space-time realigned itself to support the new forces. But this realignment wasn’t perfect. Think of water in an ice cube tray freezing into an ice cube. As the phase transition occurs, different regions of water can form ice crystals oriented in various ways. In some parts of the ice, the water molecules will line up in one direction to form a crystal; in other parts of the ice, the water molecules will line up in a different direction. No matter what, all of the water turns into ice when it’s cold enough, but defects can appear between the domains of differing crystal arrangements.

    You can see those defects as cracks and flaws in these ice cubes. But to see the cracks and flaws that developed in space-time, we have to look much harder. The defects that appeared during the early phase transitions of the universe can come in a variety of dimensions, but the most common is likely a one-dimensional fissure, known as a cosmic string (which is unrelated to the superstrings of string theory).

    Making waves

    Encountering a cosmic string would be a fearsome sight. It would be no wider than a proton, but it would pack an entire Earth’s worth of mass in less than a mile. Because of the way a cosmic string would pull on the fabric of space-time, you could make a complete circle around one without having to travel a full 360 degrees. Cosmic strings also split the light coming from any background objects, making them appear double. Depending on how they interact with other particles and forces, cosmic strings may glow with intense radiation and high-energy particles. They would also likely stretch across the entire universe.

    The best way to search for a cosmic string isn’t by looking for the string itself, but for when they manage to tangle up with themselves or others. When that happens, loops of stringy stuff can form. These loops are incredibly unstable, vibrating like crazy until they emit enough energy that they disappear.

    Many theories of the early universe predict that cosmic strings should be ubiquitous. Indeed, cosmologists once thought the strings would be so common that they would form the skeletons of the largest structures in the cosmos. But survey after survey has turned up nothing — no double images of distant galaxies, no flashes of radiation when the loops vibrate themselves to death.

    So a new paper recently posted to the preprint database arXiv.org suggests a new approach: Instead of looking for direct signs of cosmic strings, we should search for indirect signs, like the imprint they leave on space-time itself.

    Making a memory

    Loops of cosmic strings are incredibly massive and extremely unstable. That’s a potent combo that can make a healthy quantity of gravitational waves, which are ripples in the fabric of space-time. But individual loops won’t contribute much; current instruments don’t have the sensitivity to detect a single vibrating loop the same way they can detect merging black holes.

    But gravitational waves aren’t exactly like water waves or sound waves. They don’t just pass through space-time; they can permanently deform space-time, creating a background “memory” of their passing. Imagine every sound producing a tiny, permanent hum wherever it goes — that’s what gravitational waves can do.

    In the recent study, the astrophysicists explored the nature of the gravitational wave memory left by vibrating cosmic string loops. They found that the strongest waves were produced when cusps and kinks formed in the loops and that their memory would also be the strongest.

    Because astronomers have failed to find evidence of any cosmic strings yet, theorists have long wondered if cosmic strings dissipated long ago, leaving no evidence behind. But if, instead, we search for their gravitational wave memory, we can detect the imprints of the cosmic strings even if they no longer exist.

    But a key question remains: Can we detect these memories? Unfortunately, it’s a little too early to tell. Our usual methods of understanding gravity tend to break down in the extremely strong environment near the cusp of a string loop, so we’re not exactly sure what effects it might have on the surrounding space-time.

    One possibility is that the gravitational energy released by the cusps immediately forms small black holes. In that case, there would be little gravitational wave memory left, since most of the energy would be redirected to the black hole formation. However, if all of the energy went toward forming gravitational waves, then their memories could be detectable with the next generation of detectors, like the space-based Laser Interferometer Space Antenna.

    Gravitational wave memory is a key prediction of general relativity, and astronomers have been slowly developing the technology necessary to see these signatures. Finding the memories of cosmic strings would be a double bonus — a confirmation of Einstein’s theory of general relativity and the first-ever detection of a remnant from the first second of the universe.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
  • #65451

    A dozen ultra-high-energy particle accelerators discovered in the Milky Way

    New observations help astronomers hone in on a long-standing mystery about where cosmic rays come from.


    The Crab Nebula is one source of ultra-high-energy cosmic rays.

    A century-old celestial mystery is one step closer to being solved as researchers discover a dozen ultra-powerful natural particle accelerators in our galaxy.

    The findings help astronomers understand the origin of cosmic rays — charged particles and atomic nuclei flying through space at near light speed that have been imbued with mind-boggling amounts of energy.

    Discovered in 1912, cosmic rays arrive from almost every direction in the Milky Way, though scientists have yet to determine exactly how they reach their ultra-fast speeds, according to NASA.

    Many researchers suspected that cosmic rays are flung away from massive stars as they die in supernova explosions, Siming Liu, an astrophysicist with the Southwest Jiaotong University in Chengdu, told Live Science. During such events, “stars release the same amount of energy in two months as over their whole life,” he added.

    more in link…

    ______________________________________________________

    Fluffy ball of darkinos could be lurking at the center of the Milky Way

    Our galaxy’s black hole may be something else entirely.


    This artist’s impression video shows the path of the star S2 as it passes very close to the supermassive “black hole” at the center of the Milky Way.

    In the summer of 2014, astronomers watched with giddy anticipation as a cloud of gas, known as G2, swung dangerously close to a supermassive black hole at the center of the Milky Way. Sparks didn’t fly, nor did a feeding frenzy ensue. Instead, G2 zipped by unscathed, surviving what astronomers thought would be a near-death experience.

    But black holes are big bullies, so the fact that the gravity well ignored the gassy passerby was more than surprising. It seemed impossible. Now, astronomers are saying that the supermassive black hole in the center of our galaxy is not a black hole at all, but rather a fluffy ball of dark matter. New research suggests this strange hypothesis is able to account for the “impossible” encounter as well as all observations of the galactic center — and then some.

    More in link…

    _____________________________________________

    Is our sun going into hibernation?

    Each sunspot cycle has been getting less intense. Is our star falling asleep?


    Our sun is exhibiting less activity.

    Solar activity refers to the state of the sun’s magnetic field and associated phenomena: sunspots, flares, solar wind and coronal ejections. During periods of minimal solar activity, such events are often uncommon and weak. During solar maximum, they’re at their strongest and most frequent. Magnetic field fluctuations on the sun can happen on drastically different timescales, ranging from seconds all the way to billions of years. When astronomers speak of a “slowdown” or a period of quiescence in the sun’s activity, it doesn’t mean the sun will stop shining, but that there’s a slowdown in activity.

    The sun has one particular rhythm, lasting approximately 11 years, in which its polar magnetic field flips polarity. Sunspots serve as an indicator of this change. Indeed, it’s often known as “the sunspot cycle.”

    More in link…

    ___________________________________________________

    Satellites may have been underestimating the planet’s warming for decades

    A new comparison of measurements finds that some don’t add up.


    A map of tropical water vapor from NASA. Research on water vapor and other climate features suggests that satellite measurements might have underestimated past warming.

    The global warming that has already taken place may be even worse than we thought. That’s the takeaway from a new study that finds satellite measurements have likely been underestimating the warming of the lower levels of the atmosphere over the last 40 years.

    Basic physics equations govern the relationship between temperature and moisture in the air, but many measurements of temperature and moisture used in climate models diverge from this relationship, the new study finds.

    That means either satellite measurements of the troposphere have underestimated its temperature or overestimated its moisture, study leader Ben Santer, a climate scientist at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) in California, said in a statement.

    More in link…

    2 users thanked author for this post.
  • #65452

    NASA will launch 2 new missions to Venus by 2030 to return to Earth’s hellish twin

    After decades without a NASA mission, it’s Venus’ time to shine.

    NASA will send two new missions to Venus to learn more about how the planet’s hellish atmosphere turned so hostile over its history.

    The announcement came on Wednesday (June 2) during NASA administrator Bill Nelson’s livestreamed State of NASA speech. The two missions, called DAVINCI+ and VERITAS were selected from NASA’s shortlist of four spacecraft for the next round of Discovery missions; the other two contenders would have visited Jupiter’s volcanic moon Io and Neptune’s largest moon Triton.

    DAVINCI+ (short for Deep Atmosphere Venus Investigation of Noble Gases, Chemistry and Imaging) will plunge through the thick Venus atmosphere to learn more about it changes over time. Meanwhile, VERITAS (Venus Emissivity, Radio Science, InSAR, Topography and Spectroscopy) mission will use radar to map Venus’ surface in detail from orbit.


    Venus is swathed in a thick atmosphere that is difficult for scientists to peer through.

    “We hope these missions will further our understanding of how Earth evolved, and why it’s currently habitable when others in our solar system are not,” Nelson said, alluding to the recent NASA refocusing on climate change under the administration of U.S. President Joe Biden, who took office in January.

    “Planetary science is critical in answering key questions that we have as humans, like, Are we alone? What implications beyond our solar system could these two missions [show]? This is really exciting stuff,” Nelson said.

    Discovery missions are capped at $500 million, excluding costs for the launch vehicle and mission operations. Both new Venus missions will launch between 2028 and 2030 and will carry technology demonstrations as well as the main science components, NASA said in a press release.

    VERITAS will host the Deep Space Atomic Clock-2, a successor to similar technology that launched to Earth orbit in June 2019. “The ultra-precise clock signal generated with this technology will ultimately help enable autonomous spacecraft maneuvers and enhance radio science observations,” NASA stated.

    DAVINCI+ will host the Compact Ultraviolet to Visible Imaging Spectrometer (CUVIS), the agency added, which will make high resolution measurements of ultraviolet light using a new instrument based on freeform optics,” NASA officials wrote. “These observations will be used to determine the nature of the unknown ultraviolet absorber in Venus’ atmosphere that absorbs up to half the incoming solar energy.”

    There was little else new in the State of NASA speech, as it included allusions to climate change science, the Artemis moon-landing program and other recent announcements by the Biden administration. Nelson was sworn in as administrator May 3 and the career space politician opened his speech with anecdotes from his six-day flight on the space shuttle Columbia in 1986.

    He used those memories of the fragility of the Earth to reintroduce the Earth System Observatory system the agency said it would design last week to combat global warming. “Anyone who has flown [in space], or who sees these dramatic photos and videos, you look at the rim of the Earth and you can actually see the thin film of the atmosphere,” Nelson said. “You realize that that is what sustains all of life … and you could see from that altitude how we’re messing it up.”

    The new observatory system includes five planned satellites, the first of which would launch in 2023, Nelson said. He hinted there would be more to come in terms of climate science announcements. “The Earth System Observatory is just one of the many missions that we have on the horizon, and I’m excited to share more about the exciting future we have in store here at NASA,” he said.

    The new administrator also paid tribute to the Perseverance rover mission, which landed on Mars on Feb. 18 and helped to launch the Ingenuity drone for the first-ever flights on Mars. “Since then, we’ve created oxygen on Mars and we’ve seen Ingenuity — that little helicopter — defeating the odds and outliving its planned lifespan. It transitioned from a tech demo to a scout,” Nelson said. (Ingenuity experienced an anomaly on its latest flight, but pulled through to a safe landing.)

    Other NASA activities Nelson highlighted included the launch of the James Webb Space Telescope “in just a few months” (NASA and its partner on the mission, the European Space Agency, had announced on Tuesday (June 1) that the mission may delay a few weeks to November) the beginning of the commercial crew program in 2020, and ongoing development for the Artemis moon-landing program.

    Nelson said nothing about the moon-landing deadline of 2024, originally proposed by the administration of President Donald Trump; during a news conference held on Friday (May 28), NASA Chief Financial Officer Steve Shinn acknowledged the timeline could be pushed, “because space development is so hard.” Instead, Nelson focused on the program’s goal to put the first woman and (a new announcement from April) the first person of color on the moon. “The United States must and will continue to lead the way globally, not just in exploration, but also in equity,” he said.

    The address also included a cameo prerecorded video from “Star Trek: The Original Series” captain William Shatner, best known as Captain James T. Kirk to Trekkies, mainly pondering “why we exist” and NASA’s aspirations to seek out habitable environments in the universe.

    While this is Nelson’s first major address as administrator, other priorities came to the fore during his first Congressional hearing two weeks ago as he pledged action about Artemis and recent Chinese activities on the moon and Mars. China’s push for ‘space superiority’ also came up during a Senate hearing this month considering the nomination of former astronaut Pam Melroy as NASA deputy administrator.

    Nelson’s speech today left out mention of the troubled Artemis human landing system (HLS) development. Contract competitors Blue Origin and Dynetics have protested the award of that contract to SpaceX in April; during Nelson’s confirmation hearing, senators pushed him about the importance of having multiple different systems to ensure competitive results. The U.S. Government Accountability Office has until Aug. 4 to decide whether NASA should award a second contract to build a second, redundant HLS.

    Nelson also did not talk about commercial development of low Earth orbit, which received $101.1 million in Biden’s budget request for fiscal year 2022, which begins in October. The value is up nearly 500% from the previous year. Involvement in the International Space Station is still a priority of the new administration; Biden’s $1.3 million budget request is roughly equivalent to 2021’s allocation.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
  • #65567

    Weird nearby gamma-ray burst defies expectations

    This isn’t how GRBs are supposed to behave.


    An artist’s depiction of a gamma-ray burst’s relativistic jet full of very-high-energy photons breaking out of a collapsing star

    A team of scientists has gotten their best look yet at a gamma-ray burst, the most dramatic type of explosion in the universe.

    Astronomers think some of these explosions occur when a massive star — five or 10 times the mass of our sun — detonates, abruptly becoming a black hole. Gamma-ray bursts may also occur when two superdense stellar corpses called neutron stars collide, often forming a black hole. And conveniently, a gamma-ray burst that scientists watched during a few nights in 2019 likely occurred only about 1 billion light-years away from Earth, relatively close by for these dramatic events.

    “We were really sitting in the front row when this gamma-ray burst happened,” Andrew Taylor, a physicist at the Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron (German Electron Synchrotron, or DESY) and co-author on the new paper, said in a statement. “We could observe the afterglow for several days and to unprecedented gamma-ray energies.”

    wo NASA space-based observatories, Fermi and Swift, first detected the event, which is known as GRB 190829A because it was detected on Aug. 29, 2019. The fireworks came from the direction of the constellation Eridanus, a large swath of sky in the Southern Hemisphere.

    When the scientists behind the new research heard about the gamma-ray burst detection, they mobilized a set of five gamma-ray telescopes in Namibia, called the High Energy Stereoscopic System (HESS). Over three nights, the telescopes observed the explosion for a total of 13 hours, in an attempt to understand what took place.


    An artist’s depiction of very-high-energy photons from a gamma-ray burst entering Earth’s atmosphere and being detected by the High Energy Stereoscopic System in Namibia.

    With those observations, the scientists could analyze much higher-energy photons than is possible in more distant gamma-ray bursts.

    “This is what’s so exceptional about this gamma-ray burst,” Edna Ruiz-Velasco, an astrophysicist at the Max Planck Institute for Nuclear Physics in Heidelberg and co-author on the new research, said in the same statement. “It happened in our cosmic backyard, where the very-high-energy photons were not absorbed in collisions with background light on their way to Earth, as happens over larger distances in the cosmos.”


    An artist’s depiction of NASA’s Swift satellite detecting X-rays from a gamma-ray burst.

    During those analyses, the team noticed that the patterns of X-rays and very high-energy gamma-rays matched — something scientists wouldn’t expect, since they believe different phenomena cause the two different types of radiation.

    But so far, scientists have only observed four of these bright explosions from the surface of Earth, so they’re hoping that new instruments and additional observations give them more insight into the details of gamma-ray bursts.

    • This reply was modified 3 years, 7 months ago by Sean Robinson.
    1 user thanked author for this post.
  • #65709

    Einstein’s theory of general relativity

    General relativity pulls in gravity.


    One manifestation of general relativity is gravitational waves, depicted here as created by two colliding black holes. the fabric of space-time.

    General relativity is physicist Albert Einstein’s understanding of how gravity affects the fabric of space-time.

    The theory, which Einstein published in 1915, expanded the theory of special relativity that he had published 10 years earlier. Special relativity argued that space and time are inextricably connected, but that theory didn’t acknowledge the existence of gravity.

    Einstein spent the decade between the two publications determining that particularly massive objects warp the fabric of space-time, a distortion that manifests as gravity, according to NASA.

    HOW DOES GENERAL RELATIVITY WORK?

    o understand general relativity, first, let’s start with gravity, the force of attraction that two objects exert on one another. Sir Isaac Newton quantified gravity in the same text in which he formulated his three laws of motion, the “Principia.”

    The gravitational force tugging between two bodies depends on how massive each one is and how far apart the two lie. Even as the center of the Earth is pulling you toward it (keeping you firmly lodged on the ground), your center of mass is pulling back at the Earth. But the more massive body barely feels the tug from you, while with your much smaller mass you find yourself firmly rooted thanks to that same force. Yet Newton’s laws assume that gravity is an innate force of an object that can act over a distance.

    Albert Einstein, in his theory of special relativity, determined that the laws of physics are the same for all non-accelerating observers, and he showed that the speed of light within a vacuum is the same no matter the speed at which an observer travels, according to Wired.

    As a result, he found that space and time were interwoven into a single continuum known as space-time. And events that occur at the same time for one observer could occur at different times for another.

    As he worked out the equations for his general theory of relativity, Einstein realized that massive objects caused a distortion in space-time. Imagine setting a large object in the center of a trampoline. The object would press down into the fabric, causing it to dimple. If you then attempt to roll a marble around the edge of the trampoline, the marble would spiral inward toward the body, pulled in much the same way that the gravity of a planet pulls at rocks in space.

    EXPERIMENTAL EVIDENCE FOR GENERAL RELATIVITY

    In the decades since Einstein published his theories, scientists have observed countless of phenomena matching the predictions of relativity.

    GRAVITATIONAL LENSING

    Light bends around a massive object, such as a black hole, causing it to act as a lens for the things that lie behind it. Astronomers routinely use this method to study stars and galaxies behind massive objects.

    The Einstein Cross, a quasar in the Pegasus constellation, according to the European Space Agency (ESA), and is an excellent example of gravitational lensing. The quasar is seen as it was about 11 billion years ago; the galaxy that it sits behind is about 10 times closer to Earth. Because the two objects align so precisely, four images of the quasar appear around the galaxy because the intense gravity of the galaxy bends the light coming from the quasar.

    In cases like Einstein’s cross, the different images of the gravitationally lensed object appear simultaneously, but that isn’t always the case. Scientists have also managed to observe lensing examples where, because the light traveling around the lens takes different paths of different lengths, different images arrive at different times, as in the case of one particularly interesting supernova.

    CHANGES IN MERCURY’S ORBIT

    The orbit of Mercury is shifting very gradually over time due to the curvature of space-time around the massive sun, according to NASA. In a few billion years, this wobble could even cause the innermost planet to collide with the sun or a planet.

    FRAME-DRAGGING OF SPACE-TIME AROUND ROTATING BODIES

    The spin of a heavy object, such as Earth, should twist and distort the space-time around it. In 2004, NASA launched the Gravity Probe B (GP-B). The axes of the satellite’s precisely calibrated gyroscopes drifted very slightly over time, according to NASA, a result that matched Einstein’s theory.

    “Imagine the Earth as if it were immersed in honey,” Gravity Probe-B principal investigator Francis Everitt, of Stanford University, said in a NASA statement about the mission.

    “As the planet rotates, the honey around it would swirl, and it’s the same with space and time. GP-B confirmed two of the most profound predictions of Einstein’s universe, having far-reaching implications across astrophysics research.”

    GRAVITATIONAL REDSHIFT

    The electromagnetic radiation of an object is stretched out slightly inside a gravitational field. Think of the sound waves that emanate from a siren on an emergency vehicle; as the vehicle moves toward an observer, sound waves are compressed, but as it moves away, they are stretched out, or redshifted. Known as the Doppler Effect, the same phenomena occurs with waves of light at all frequencies.

    In the 1960s, according to the American Physical Society, physicists Robert Pound and Glen Rebka shot gamma-rays first down, then up the side of a tower at Harvard University. Pound and Rebka found that the gamma-rays slightly changed frequency due to distortions caused by gravity.

    GRAVITATIONAL WAVES

    Einstein predicted that violent events, such as the collision of two black holes, create ripples in space-time known as gravitational waves. And in 2016, the Laser Interferometer Gravitational Wave Observatory (LIGO) announced that it had detected such a signal for the first time.

    That detection came on Sept. 14, 2015. LIGO, made up of twin facilities in Louisiana and Washington, had recently been upgraded, and were in the process of being calibrated before they went online. The first detection was so large that, according to then-LIGO spokesperson Gabriela Gonzalez, it took the team several months of analysis to convince themselves that it was a real signal and not a glitch.

    [See our full discovery story here and our complete coverage of the historic scientific discovery here]

    “We were very lucky on the first detection that it was so obvious,” she said during at the 228 American Astronomical Society meeting in June 2016.

    Since then, scientists have begun quickly catching gravitational waves. All told, LIGO and its European counterpart Virgo have detected a total of 50 gravitational-wave events, according to program officials.

    Those collisions have included unusual events like a collision with an object that scientists can’t definitively identify as black hole or neutron star, merging neutron stars accompanied by a bright explosion, mismatched black holes colliding and more.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
  • #66210

    The ‘ring of fire’ solar eclipse of 2021: What time does it begin?

    The “ring of fire” solar eclipse is coming up Thursday (June 10) and here’s when you can watch it.

    The eclipse will be visible will be partially visible from the United States, northern Canada, Europe, northern Asia, Russia and Greenland, according to Time and Date. You can also watch it live online with several live webcasts, and if you live in any of the areas where it’s visible and it’s safe to travel, you can look at it outside — just make sure to wear proper eye protection.

    Solar eclipses happen when the moon passes in front of the sun, from the viewpoint of our planet. Total solar eclipses — which are relatively rare — happen when the moon covers the entire sun; the moon’s orbit is tilted with respect to the sun and doesn’t always perfectly align. A “ring of fire” or annular eclipse happens when the moon is near its farthest point from Earth during an eclipse, so the moon appears smaller than the sun in the sky and doesn’t block the whole solar disk.

    What time is the solar eclipse?

    The first locations where you can see the partial phase of eclipse — where the moon takes a “bite” out of the sun — will happen at 4:12 a.m. EDT (0812 GMT); local time will vary depending on where you are situated. You can see a partial eclipse if you are living north and east of a line running roughly from Edmonton, Alberta, to Des Moines, Iowa, down through Savannah, Georgia.

    The annular eclipse will start being visible in those northerly regions fortunate enough to see it at 5:49 a.m. EDT (0949 GMT), according to Time and Date. The maximum eclipse will happen at 6:41 a.m. EDT (1041 GMT) in the north polar region, where the annular phase will last roughly 3 minutes and 51 seconds.

    Annularity will be best visible in Canada, as the path begins on the north shoreline of Lake Superior and is highly visible in the Canadian Shield of northwest Ontario and the Canadian Arctic tundra. Unfortunately, those living in the United States won’t be able to see the “ring of fire” in person because the border to Canada has been closed to non-essential travel due to the pandemic.

    The last glimpse of the annular eclipse will happen at 7:33 a.m. EDT (1133 GMT), while the partial eclipse’s last visible location will see it at 9:11 a.m. EDT (1311 GMT).

    If you can’t catch this eclipse for whatever reason, the bigger eclipse of 2021 — a total solar eclipse in Antarctica and partial in South Africa and the South Atlantic — will take place on Dec. 4, according to NASA. But if you can see it, here is where the eclipse is visible from parts of the United States and worldwide cities

    The solar eclipse timetables below provide viewing prospects for various cities in the U.S. and around the world. If the moment of maximum eclipse happens before sunrise, the eclipse magnitude — the percent of the sun that is covered by the moon — is denoted with an asterisk (*).

    click the link for that…

  • #66211

    Do parallel universes exist? We might live in a multiverse.

    Sci-fi loves a good parallel universe story. But could we really be in one?


    Do we live in just one of many bubble universes?

    Our universe is unimaginably big. Hundreds of billions, if not trillions, of galaxies spin through space, each containing billions or trillions of stars. Some researchers studying models of the universe speculate that the universe’s diameter could be 7 billion light-years across. Others think it could be infinite.

    But is it all that’s out there? Science fiction loves the idea of a parallel universe, and the thought that we might be living just one of an infinite number of possible lives. Multiverses aren’t reserved for “Star Trek,” “Spiderman” and “Doctor Who,” though. Real scientific theory explores, and in some cases supports, the case for universes outside, parallel to, or distant from but mirroring our own.

    Multiverses and parallel worlds are often argued in the context of other major scientific concepts like the Big Bang, string theory and quantum mechanics.

    click the link for more…

  • #66213

    ‘Missing link’ explosion on the sun could unravel longstanding solar mysteries


    A new study of a “missing link” solar eruption hopes to figure out the mechanism that causes all solar eruptions. This simulations shows the evolution of a stealth CME.

    An incredible explosion on the sun is helping scientists uncover new information about what causes powerful solar eruptions and how we might be able to better predict them in the future.

    Back in March of 2016, scientists used NASA’s Solar Dynamics Observatory and theSolar and Heliospheric Observatory, a joint mission of NASA and the European Space Agency (ESA) to observe a dramatic explosion on the sun. The event showed characteristics of three different types of solar eruptions that usually happen separately but, uniquely, occurred together this time, according to a statement from NASA. Because it included many different types of events at once, scientists investigating the explosion in a new study think this strange phenomenon could reveal what causes all types of solar eruptions.

    “This event is a missing link, where we can see all of these aspects of different types of eruptions in one neat little package,” Emily Mason, lead author on the new study and solar scientist at NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Maryland, said in the same statement. “It drives home the point that these eruptions are caused by the same mechanism, just at different scales.”

    There are typically three different varieties of eruptions that can take place on the sun: coronal mass ejections (CMEs), jets or partial eruptions. CMEs and jets are explosive and blast particles and energy out into the vacuum of space.Jets are ejected as thin beams of solar material, and CMEs create massive bubbles of material that are pushed out by the sun’s magnetic fields. Unlike these two, partial eruptions originate from the sun’s surface but don’t make it all the way out into space; the material that erupts just falls back onto the sun.

    During the March 2016 eruption, scientists observed hot solar material erupt from a “magnetically active” region of the sun’s surface, according to the statement. This ejection was too big to be considered a jet but not quite big enough to be labeled a CME and, soon after the eruption, cooler surface material began blasting from the same place before falling back to the sun. The event seems to have characteristics of all three different types of solar eruptions, so scientists think that they could all be caused by the same phenomenon and, therefore, by finding the mechanism behind this event, they could explain the origins of all solar eruptions.

    This is why scientists are referring to the event as a “Rosetta Stone” eruption, which references the Rosetta Stone, an artifact with writing in hieroglyphics, ancient Egyptian demotic and ancient Greek, which helped scholars decipher ancient hieroglyphics at long last.

    Following the observations of the eruption, scientists continue to study the eruption and others like it, modeling them to investigate the mechanism behind them and the trigger that started them. This is of importance to us here on Earth, in particular, because CMEs release large amounts of charged particles and can interfere with utility grids on Earth and even create danger for astronauts and space technology. So, by better understanding the mechanism behind solar eruptions, scientists hope that they can better predict them and prevent damage from CMEs.

  • #68146

    Never-before-seen colossal comet on a trek toward the sun

    A week after astronomers noticed a new object in the sky, they’ve identified it as a comet.


    The Bernardinelli-Bernstein comet takes 5.5 million years to complete its orbit.

    A new visitor is swinging by the solar system: a never-before-observed comet that hails from the Oort Cloud.

    This alien object was just designated as a comet Wednesday (June 23), only a week after astronomers first observed it as a tiny, moving dot in archival images from the Dark Energy Camera at the Cerro Tololo Inter-American Observatory in Chile. The comet is now known as Comet C/2014 UN271, or Bernardinelli-Bernstein after its discoverers, University of Pennsylvania graduate student Pedro Bernardinelli and astronomer Gary Bernstein.

    The comet, which may be an impressive 62 miles (100 kilometers) wide, is 20 times the distance from Earth to the sun away, heading toward our blue dot. It will reach its closest point to the sun in its orbit on Jan. 23, 2031, when it will be just beyond the orbit of Saturn, or about 10.95 times the distance between Earth and the sun.

    “We will have practically 20 years to study it,” said Peter Vereš, an astronomer at the Center for Astrophysics Harvard & Smithsonian and at the Minor Planet Center, which identifies and computes orbits for new comets, minor planets and other far-flung rocky bodies. That’s an exciting opportunity, he said, because the comet is likely a near-pristine object from the Oort Cloud, a field of icy, rocky debris that likely surrounds the solar system like a crunchy shell.

    Unidentified orbiting object

    Comet Bernardinelli-Bernstein first made its appearance in the 2014 archives of the Dark Energy Camera. Bernardinelli and Bernstein soon realized that the object, which looked like nothing more than a dot, was moving over time as they traced it through 2015, 2016, 2017 and 2018.

    The astronomers sent the observation to the Minor Planet Center, which at first classified the object as an asteroid or minor planet, since its surface appeared to be chemically inert. The report of the new object triggered amateur astronomers to point their telescopes skyward, though, and some soon noticed a “coma,” or haze of vapors and dust, emanating from the object.

    “They found out, ‘Oh look, this object is active,'” Vereš told Live Science.

    Comets are active because the sun’s heat and solar wind cause gas to release from the surface. It’s likely that the surface has become more active over the past few years as the comet streaked closer to the sun, Vereš said, making the activity easier to spot.

    A long journey

    The comet takes approximately 5.5 million years to complete its orbit, which is vertical to the plane of the planets, Minor Planet Center researchers have calculated. At its farthest point away, it’s approximately a light-year from the sun. Based on its orbit, the comet is likely an emissary from a far-off, ice-cold region past the outer edges of the solar system known as the Oort Cloud. Objects like the Bernardinelli-Bernstein comet were probably once part of the solar system, Vereš said, but they were kicked out by gravitational interactions with large planets like Saturn and Neptune.

    Though the comet’s history isn’t certain, this newfound trek may be its first foray back into the solar system since its initial banishment, Vereš said. That’s exciting, because the short-periodicity comets that circle within the solar system are significantly altered from their original form, baked and diminished by many rotations around the sun. Long-periodicity comets like Bernardinelli-Bernstein that stay in the outer parts of the solar system don’t change as much, meaning they’re a time capsule of conditions at their formation in the early days of the solar system.

    “We are receiving more and more observations basically every day,” Vereš said. To the eye, the comet still looks like a fuzzy dot and probably won’t ever be visually impressive, he said; but sensitive instruments on large telescopes may soon be able to detect variations in the light coming from the comet that can reveal the molecules coming off its surface. These data could reveal what the comet is made of.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
  • #68147

    Scientists catch 1st glimpse of a black hole swallowing a neutron star

    “These were not events where the black holes munched on the neutron stars like the Cookie Monster and flung bits and pieces about,” one physicist said.

    After more than four years of exploring a menagerie of cosmic happenings through gravitational waves, scientists have finally spotted the third expected variety of collision — twice.

    The new flavor of collision includes one black hole and one neutron star, making it a mash-up of sorts. Scientists have observed dozens of mergers of pairs of black holes, and a couple mergers of pairs of neutron stars, the superdense stellar corpses. But a crash between a black hole and neutron star, while predicted by scientists, had not been definitively detected.

    Now, researchers say they have done just that, observing the unique ripples in space-time caused by such a collision.

    “With this new discovery of neutron star-black hole mergers outside our galaxy, we have found the missing type of binary,” Astrid Lamberts, a CNRS researcher at Observatoire de la Côte d’Azur in France, said in a statement. “We can finally begin to understand how many of these systems exist, how often they merge, and why we have not yet seen examples in the Milky Way.”


    An artist’s depiction of gravitational waves produced by a black hole and a neutron star merging.

    The two new detections both came in January 2020, just 10 days apart, and the collisions are now known as GW200105 and GW200115 for the dates they were observed. One was detected by both twin Laser Interferometer Gravitational-wave Observatory (LIGO) detectors and Europe’s similar Virgo detector, the other by only one of the LIGO detectors and Virgo. (The partnership now also includes a detector in Japan called KAGRA, but that facility began observations only in February 2020.)

    GW200115 was particularly well detected and observed by all three facilities. Scientists believe that it involved a black hole nearly six times the mass of our sun devouring a neutron star with a mass half again larger than our sun, and that the merger took place between 650 million and 1.5 billion light-years away

    GW200105 wasn’t detected as definitively, but scientists suspect it was a merger between a black hole about nine times the mass of the sun and a neutron star about twice as massive as the sun about 550 million and 1.3 billion light-years away.


    An artist’s depiction of a merging black hole and neutron star displaying tidal disruption.

    Scientists aren’t sure yet whether these mixed mergers create a visible light signal (as neutron star pairs merging seem to do) or not (as in the case of binary black hole mergers).

    Astronomers couldn’t match either of these new gravitational-wave detections with observations of light waves, but that doesn’t necessarily mean there was no such corresponding flash. For the less precise detection, scientists could only narrow down the location of the source to about 17% of the sky; for the more precise detection, scientists were still confronting an area the equivalent of 2,900 full moons. Besides, at such vast distances from the collisions, any light would have been extremely dim by the time it reached Earth anyway.

    However, the scientists do suspect that at least for these particular mergers, there was no light signal to see.

    “These were not events where the black holes munched on the neutron stars like the Cookie Monster and flung bits and pieces about,” Patrick Brady, a physicist at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee and current spokesperson of the LIGO Scientific Collaboration, said in a statement. “That ‘flinging about’ is what would produce light, and we don’t think that happened in these cases.” (The messy eating is also called tidal disruption.)


    A graphic showing the masses of the original and final objects of collisions detected by gravitational wave measurements.

    These two events mark the first times scientists have seen a merger and been confident that it represented a mixed pair. For two previous detections, however, the same scenario is a possibility, although not one that astronomers can confirm. One of those events, detected in August 2019, represents a large black hole with what is either the largest known neutron star or the smallest known black hole. Another event detected four months earlier may be a mixed pair merging — but could just represent noise in the detectors.

    Given the two January 2020 observations, scientists now predict that one merger between a black hole and a neutron star occurs once per month within one billion light-years of Earth.

    Scientists have two theories for how such mergers occur. One is that each member of a binary star independently goes supernova, exploding and forming two dense remnants that eventually merge. The other theory suggests that disparate stars experience supernova explosions, then establish a binary relationship.

    The two new collision observations aren’t enough to determine what’s going on, but scientists do hope that eventually, gravitational wave detections will solve the puzzle.

    “There’s still so much we don’t know about neutron stars and black holes — how small or big they can get, how fast they can spin, how they pair off into merger partners,” Maya Fishbach, a postdoc at Northwestern University in Illinois and a coauthor on the study, said in a university statement. “With future gravitational wave data, we will have the statistics to answer these questions, and ultimately learn how the most extreme objects in our universe are made.”

    The twin LIGO detectors, Virgo and KAGRA are all undergoing preparations for the partnership’s fourth observing run, which is scheduled to begin next summer. Scientists say that work could see the partnership detecting one gravitational wave signal every day, opening scientists to immensely more information about what is taking place across the cosmos, as in these dramatic mergers.

    “Each collision isn’t just the coming together of two massive and dense objects. It’s really like Pac-Man, with a black hole swallowing its companion neutron star whole,” Susan Scott, a physicist at the Australian National University and co-author on the study, said in a university statement. “These collisions have shaken the universe to its core and we’ve detected the ripples they have sent hurtling through the cosmos.”

    1 user thanked author for this post.
  • #68375

    Smallest, densest white dwarf ever discovered packs the sun’s mass into a moon-size stellar corpse


    The white dwarf ZTF J1901+1458 is depicted above the moon in this artistic representation; in reality, the white dwarf lies 130 light-years from Earth in the constellation Aquila, the eagle.

    Astronomers may have discovered the smallest and heaviest white dwarf star ever seen, a smoldering ember about the size of our moon but 450,000 times more massive than Earth, a new study finds.

    White dwarfs are usually about the size of Earth and are the cool, dim cores of dead stars that are left behind after average-size stars have exhausted their fuel and shed their outer layers. Our sun will one day become a white dwarf, as will about 97% of all stars.

    Although the sun is alone in space without a stellar partner, many stars orbit around each other in pairs. If these binary stars are both less than eight times the mass of the sun, they will both evolve into white dwarfs over time.

    The newfound white dwarf, designated ZTF J1901+1458, is located about 130 light-years from Earth and may be an example of what can happen when white dwarf pairs merge. If the white dwarfs were more massive, they would explode in a powerful thermonuclear explosion known as a Type Ia supernova. However, if their combined masses fell below a certain threshold, they could form a new white dwarf heavier than either of its parents, which is what scientists think happened in the case of ZTF J1901+1458.

    “Our discovery is the most massive and smallest white dwarf ever found,” study lead author Ilaria Caiazzo, an astrophysicist at the California Institute of Technology in Pasadena, told Space.com.

    The discovery was made using the Zwicky Transient Facility at the Palomar Observatory in California, which scans the entire northern sky every two nights looking for cosmic bodies that blink, erupt, move or similarly change in brightness. Study co-author Kevin Burdge, an astrophysicist at the California Institute of Technology in Pasadena, first spotted the new white dwarf based on its high mass and rapid spin.

    The researchers used a host of telescopes to help analyze the dead star, which is about 100 million years old or less. These included the Hale Telescope at Palomar, the W.M. Keck Observatory’s Keck I telescope, the European Gaia space observatory, the University of Hawaii’s Pan-STARRS (Panoramic Survey Telescope and Rapid Response System) and NASA’s Neil Gehrels Swift Observatory.

    The scientists found the white dwarf was about 2,670 miles (4,300 kilometers) wide, making it a bit larger than the moon, which is about 2,158 miles (3,474 km) in diameter. ZTF J1901+1458’s tiny size makes it the smallest known white dwarf, edging out previous record holders, RE J0317-853 and WD 1832+089, which each have diameters of about 3,100 miles (5,000 km).

    At the same time, the newfound white dwarf is about 1.35 times the mass of our sun, which may make it the most massive white dwarf discovered yet.

    “It might be a bit counter-intuitive that the most massive white dwarf known is also the smallest white dwarf found,” Caiazzo said. This is because gravity and other factors lead white dwarfs to be smaller the more massive they are, she added.

    This white dwarf is barely under the mass at which one would expect a white dwarf to detonate. “This one is really at the limit,” Caiazzo said. “If it was slightly more massive, it would have exploded.”

    The white dwarf spins very rapidly, completing one revolution every seven minutes. When its progenitor stars spiraled together to merge, ZTF J1901+1458 inherited their combined spin, the researchers said. (The fastest-whirling white dwarf known, called EPIC 228939929, rotates every 5.3 minutes).

    The white dwarf’s quick rate of spin also helps give it a very powerful magnetic field, more than one billion times stronger than Earth’s. “All of these characteristics — its mass and spin and high magnetic field — all suggest this white dwarf was not born the same as normal white dwarfs,” Caiazzo said.

    Since this white dwarf is so massive, it may be possible that it might collapse further, as the incredible pressure within its core forces electrons to fuse with protons in atomic nuclei to form neutrons. “It could get even smaller than the moon,” Caiazzo said, perhaps shrinking as small as about 1,240 to 1,865 miles (2000 to 3000 km) wide.

    If this shrinking does occur, at some point maybe 100 million to 200 million years from now, the white dwarf might become unstable and detonate as a thermonuclear type Ia supernova, Caiazzo said. Another possibility is that if a large enough number of electrons get captured, the white dwarf might potentially collapse to form a neutron-rich dead star known as a neutron star.

    “A neutron star is an extremely dense object the mass of the sun but just the size of a city, so even more extreme than this white dwarf,” Caiazzo said.

    If a white dwarf does collapse to form a neutron star, atoms fusing together within its core would release a huge amount of heat, potentially in just hours or days. “The entire white dwarf would very quickly burn,” Caiazzo said.

    Neutron stars are thought to normally form when stars much more massive than our sun explode as supernovas, Caiazzo explained. If giant white dwarfs can also collapse to become neutron stars, a significant number of neutron stars may arise this way. However, if a white dwarf’s core freezes to become a crystalline solid faster than it shrinks, this collapse will likely not happen.

    “We don’t know if such a collapse may happen, and if it does, which outcomes might occur,” Caiazzo said. “But if white dwarfs can create neutron stars, this could be a quite common way to form neutron stars.”

    In the future, the scientists hope to use the Zwicky Transient Facility to find more white dwarfs like this one and to analyze white dwarfs as a whole.

    “There are so many questions to address, such as what is the rate of white dwarf mergers in the galaxy, and is it enough to explain the number of type Ia supernovae?” Caiazzo said in a statement. “How is a magnetic field generated in these powerful events, and why is there such diversity in magnetic field strengths among white dwarfs? Finding a large population of white dwarfs born from mergers will help us answer all these questions and more.”

  • #68376

    Supermassive black holes could host giant, swirling gas ‘tsunamis’


    This artist’s visualization shows a supermassive black hole surrounded by dust and gas forming tsunamis on its outer edges.

    Could gas escaping the gravitational grasp of supermassive black holes be forming “tsunamis” in space?

    In a new, NASA-funded study, astrophysicists used computer simulations to model the environment around supermassive black holes in deep space. They found that there could be massive, tsunami-like structures forming near these black holes that are essentially massive, swirling walls of gas that have narrowly escaped the intense gravitational pull of the black hole. They even think that supermassive black holes could host the largest tsunami-like structures in the universe.

    “What governs phenomena here on Earth are the laws of physics that can explain things in outer space and even very far outside the black hole,” Daniel Proga, an astrophysicist at the University of Las Vegas, Nevada (UNLV), said in a NASA statement.

    In this study, researchers took a close look at the strange environment around supermassive black holes and how gases and radiation interact there.

    Supermassive black holes sometimes have large disks of gas and matter that swirl around them, feeding them over time in a combined system known as an active galactic nucleus. These systems, which often shoot out jets of material, emit bright, shining X-rays above the disk, just out of gravitational reach of the black hole. This X-ray radiation pushes winds that stream out of the center of the system. This is called an “outflow.”

    This X-ray radiation could also help to explain denser, gaseous regions in the environment around supermassive black holes called “clouds,” the researchers think.

    “These clouds are 10 times hotter than the surface of the sun and moving at the speed of the solar wind, so they are rather exotic objects that you would not want an airplane to fly through,” lead author Tim Waters, a postdoctoral researcher at UNLV who is also a guest scientist at Los Alamos National Laboratory in New Mexico, said in the same statement.

    The team showed with computer simulations how, far enough away from the black hole to be outside of its reach, the atmosphere of the disk spinning around the black hole can start to form waves of gas and matter. With the addition of the outflow winds that are pushed out by X-ray radiation, these waves can grow into massive tsunamis. These swirling waves of gas can stretch up to 10 light-years above the disk, the researchers found. Once these tsunami-like structures form, they are no longer under the influence of the black hole’s gravity, according to the statement.

    In these simulations, the researchers showed how bright X-ray radiation close to a black hole seeps into pockets of hot gas in the outer atmosphere of the disk. These bubbles of hot plasma expand into nearby, cooler gas at the edges of the disk, helping to spur the tsunami-like structures. The bubbles also block the outflow wind and spiral off into separate structures up to a light-year in size. These side structures are known as Kármán vortex streets, which are weather patterns that also occur on Earth (though on Earth, this pattern of swirling vortexes looks quite different.)

    Kármán vortex streets are named for the Hungarian-American physicist Theodore von Kármán, whose name also marks the boundary between Earth’s atmosphere and space.

    This research goes against previous theories that have suggested that clouds of hot gas near an active galactic nucleus form spontaneously because of fluid instability, according to the statement. This study also contradicts the previous notion that magnetic fields are necessary to move cooler gas from a disk around a supermassive black hole.

    While no satellites currently operational can confirm their work, the team hopes to bolster their findings with future research and hopefully telescopic observations. Additionally, observations of plasma near active galactic nuclei from NASA’s Chandra X-ray Observatory and the European Space Agency’s XMM-Newton space telescope are consistent with this team’s findings, according to the statement from NASA.

    • This reply was modified 3 years, 6 months ago by Sean Robinson.
  • #68378

    Newly found mega comet may be the largest seen in recorded history


    This artist’s illustration shows the distant Comet Bernardinelli-Bernstein as it might look in the outer solar system. Comet Bernardinelli-Bernstein is estimated to be about 1000 times more massive than a typical comet, making it arguably the largest comet discovered in modern times. It has an extremely elongated orbit, journeying inward from the distant Oort Cloud over millions of years. It is the most distant comet to be discovered on its incoming path.

    A giant comet found far out in the solar system may be 1,000 times more massive than a typical comet, making it potentially the largest ever found in modern times.

    The object, officially designated a comet on June 23, is called Comet C/2014 UN271 or Bernardinelli-Bernstein after its discoverers, University of Pennsylvania graduate student Pedro Bernardinelli and astronomer Gary Bernstein.

    Astronomers estimate this icy body has a diameter of 62 miles to 124 miles (100 to 200 km), making it about 10 times wider than a typical comet. This estimate is quite rough, however, as the comet remains far away from Earth and its size was calculated based on how much sunlight it reflects. The comet will make its closest approach to our planet in 2031 but will remain at quite a distance even then.

    more in link…
    __________________________________________________

    Many nearby Earth-size exoplanets could be hiding in plain sight

    There could be many Earth-size exoplanets that have been overlooked by current survey methods.


    This illustration shows how the light created by two stars in a binary system may occult Earth-sized planets from detection by spacecraft like NASA’s TESS mission.

    The universe is populated with stars that live in pairs, and these systems could mean double trouble for scientists wanting to find Earth-like planets.

    A team led by Katie Lester, a postdoctoral fellow at NASA’s Ames Research Center, recently used ground-based high-resolution technologies to peer at points of light studied with NASA’s Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite (TESS) mission. The scientists found that, upon closer inspection, some of the would-be stars in the sample were actually binary stellar systems. In addition, the researchers found that stellar pairs may disguise Earth-like exoplanets from the watchful eyes of missions like TESS. Rocky worlds about the size of our own planetary home could therefore be hiding in plain sight, and may exist in greater numbers than once thought.

    TESS hunts for planets around nearby stars by watching for dips in their light caused when a planet transits, or passes in front of, a star. Since TESS launched in April 2018, astronomers have positively identified more than 100 previously unknown exoplanets and more than 2,600 candidates are awaiting confirmation, according to NASA.

    More in link…
    _________________________________________

    Could there be a link between interstellar visitor ‘Oumuamua and unidentified aerial phenomena?

    If so, ‘Oumuamua could be scanning Earth’s neighborhood for signals.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
  • #68753

    A ‘strange signal’ is coming from the Milky Way. What’s causing it?

    Space Mysteries: A fast radio burst was detected from within our galaxy for the first time. We may be closer to uncovering its origin.

    On April 28, 2020, two ground-based radio telescopes detected an intense pulse of radio waves. It only lasted a mere millisecond but, for astonished astronomers, it was a major discovery, representing the first time a fast radio burst (FRB) had ever been detected so close to Earth.

    Located just 30,000 light-years from our planet, the event was firmly within the Milky Way, and it was, to all intents and purposes, almost impossible to miss. The Canadian Hydrogen Intensity Mapping Experiment (CHIME) and the Survey for Transient Astronomical Radio Emission 2 (STARE2) certainly had no problems picking it up. “CHIME wasn’t even looking in the right direction and we still saw it loud and clear in our peripheral vision,” said Kiyoshi Masui, assistant professor of physics at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. “STARE2 also saw it, and it’s only a set of a few radio antennae literally made out of cake pans.”

    Until that point, all FRBs had been observed outside our galaxy. “They’ve been billions of light years away, making them a lot harder to study,” said doctoral candidate in physics Pragya Chawla from McGill University in Canada. April 2020’s discovery was also notable for being the most energetic radio blast that astronomers have ever recorded in the Milky Way, but what made it most exciting is that scientists are now closer to determining the origin of FRBs than at any point since they were first discovered.

    That happened in 2007, when Duncan Lorimer and David Narkevic were studying data taken by the Parkes radio dish in Australia. Discovering an FRB so close to home has been the breakthrough astronomers have wished for ever since. “We can learn more from a source that’s 30,000 light-years away than one that’s a billion or more light-years’ distance,” Masui affirms. “We finally have a nearby source to study.”

    One of the major problems with detecting FRBs, aside from most of them having been so far away, is that they are so fleeting. They’ve been and gone in the blink of an eye despite being 100 million times more powerful than the sun — they can release as much energy in a few thousandths of a second as the sun in 100 years. Ideally, astronomers would discover an object and focus one or more different telescopes at it, but the ephemeral nature of these bursts removes any such opportunity.

    But despite these challenges, astronomers have succeeded in building up a bank of knowledge about FRBs, most of which has been based on the dozens of recorded events from beyond our own galaxy. For starters, we know they are bright flashes of radio light lasting for microseconds to milliseconds. “All-sky searches for them also suggest that thousands of these bursts occur in the sky every day,” Chawla added.


    An artist’s impression of the SGR 1935+2154 magnetar during an outburst, highlighting its complex magnetic field structure and beamed emissions.

    Lots more in link…

    2 users thanked author for this post.
  • #69103

    Star cluster overrun with black holes may dissolve into space, study finds

    In a few billion years, there may be no stars left in the Palomar 5 cluster.


    This all-sky view of the Milky Way galaxy shows the globular cluster Palomar 5 and its tidal tails in the top center.

    A cluster composed of thousands of stars may dissolve to become a mob of dozens of black holes in a billion years, a new study finds.

    This dark fate may arise from the actions of a few black holes that may currently lie within that cluster of stars, and the finding may shed light on the future of dozens of similar clusters in the Milky Way, researchers say.

    Scientists analyzed globular clusters, which are densely packed collections of ancient stars. Roughly spherical in shape, they may each contain up to millions of stars. The Milky Way possesses more than 150 globular clusters arranged in a nearly spherical halo around the galaxy.

    The researchers focused on Palomar 5, a globular cluster about 11.5 billion years old located in the Milky Way’s halo, about 65,000 light-years from Earth in the Serpens constellation.

    Palomar 5 is one of the sparsest known globular clusters. Whereas the average globular cluster is about 200,000 times the mass of the sun and about 20 light-years in diameter, Palomar 5 is about 10,000 times the mass of the sun yet about 130 light-years across, overall making it about 3,000 times less dense than average, study lead author Mark Gieles, an astrophysicist at the University of Barcelona in Spain, told Space.com.

    At the same time, Palomar 5 is known for two long tails streaming from it, composed of stars the globular cluster has shed. These spectacular tails span more than 22,800 light-years in length — more than 20 degrees across the sky, or about 40 times the apparent diameter of the full moon. Palomar 5 is one of the few known star clusters with such long tails, making it key to understanding how such tails might form.

    Previous research suggested Palomar 5’s tails resulted from the way in which the Milky Way was shredding apart the globular cluster. The galaxy’s gravitational pull is stronger on one side of Palomar 5 than the other, tearing it apart — an extreme version of how the moon’s gravitational pull causes tides on Earth. This so-called “tidal stripping” may help explain not only Palomar 5’s tails but also a few dozen narrow streams of stars recently detected in the Milky Way’s halo.

    “I see Palomar 5 as a Rosetta Stone that allows us to understand stream formation and learn about the progenitors of streams,” Gieles said.

    Scientists had suggested that Palomar 5 formed with a low density, making it easy for tidal stripping to rip it apart and form its tails. However, a number of its stars’ properties suggest it was once similar to denser globular clusters.

    Now Gieles and his colleagues suggest Palomar 5 may indeed have once been much denser than it is now and that its current sparse nature and its long tails may be due to more than 100 black holes lurking within it.

    The researchers simulated the orbits and the evolution of each star within Palomar 5 until the globular cluster finally disintegrated. They varied the initial properties of the simulated cluster until they found good matches with actual observations of the cluster and its tails.

    The scientists discovered Palomar 5’s structure and tails may have resulted from black holes making up about 20% of the mass of the globular cluster. Specifically, they suggest Palomar 5 may currently possess 124 black holes, each on average about 17.2 times the mass of the sun. Altogether, this is three times more black holes than one would currently expect of a globular cluster of that mass, Gieles said.

    In this scenario, Palomar 5, like typical globular clusters, formed with black holes consisting of just a small percent of its mass. However, the gravity of the black holes slung around stars that got near them, puffing up the cluster and making it easier for the Milky Way’s gravity to rip stars away. A billion years from now, they calculated Palomar 5 might have ejected all of its stars, leaving behind only black holes.

    Gieles and his colleagues suggest that gravitational interactions within dense globular clusters may drive them to eject most of their black holes. As such, dense globular clusters may keep most of their stars. In contrast, the researchers found that globular clusters that start out less dense, such as Palomar 5, may eject fewer black holes and instead shed most of their stars. As such, black holes may come to completely dominate such globular clusters, making up 100% of their mass.

    Advertisement

    “I am most excited about finally understanding why some clusters are large, and others small,” Gieles said. “Many people simply assumed that this was a result of different formation channels — that is, nature. We showed that the difference in appearance is due to evolution — that is, nurture.”

    “Because Palomar 5 has several peculiar features that are also found in all other dense clusters, we can reconcile these findings and assume that Palomar 5 probably formed in a similar way as all the other clusters,” Gieles added.

    The researchers found that when it comes to globular clusters in the outer halo of the Milky Way — that is, those further from the galactic center than the sun — “about half of the clusters seems to be comparable to Palomar 5 and the other half is denser,” Gieles said. The half that is similar to Palomar 5 may experience a similar black-hole-dominated fate, the researchers said.

    Gieles cautioned that they were able to devise a model of Palomar 5 that had no black holes and was not dense at its formation but also matched all the details astronomers have seen of it. Still, he said there was only a 0.5% chance Palomar 5 could have formed this way.

    “The ‘no black hole’ model is very unlikely to occur in nature, and does not resolve the issue that Palomar 5 has properties similar to other dense clusters,” Gieles said.

    These findings may help shed light on the 10% of the Milky Way’s globular clusters that are fluffy like Palomar 5, which are less than 100,000 times the mass of the sun but more than 65 light-years in diameter. The researchers suggest these fluffy globular clusters are rich in black holes and may eventually completely dissolve, resulting in many thin stellar streams.

    Future research can analyze Palomar 5 to learn more about its black holes, Gieles said.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
  • #69345

    Dozens of starless ‘rogue’ alien planets possibly spotted


    An artist’s depiction of a rogue planet.

    Astronomers have spotted more strange “free-floating” planets that could roam deep space untethered to any star.

    While we might think that planets must need to orbit some kind of star, astronomers have detected such orphaned “rogues” before. And a new study uses data collected by NASA’s planet-hunting Kepler space telescope to identify other possible exoplanets roaming freely on their own.

    “Kepler has achieved what it was never designed to do, in providing further tentative evidence for the existence of a population of Earth-mass, free-floating planets,” co-author Eamonn Kerins, a researcher at the University of Manchester in the U.K., said in a statement.

    In the study, which was published July 6 in the journal Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, the team used data that Kepler collected during a two-month stint in 2016 during the space telescope’s K2 mission phase.

    During this two-month period, Kepler observed a field of millions of stars near the center of our galaxy every 30 minutes. In analyzing this data, the team hoped to see signs of rare gravitational microlensing events, which occur when the gravity of a massive foreground object bends the light of a more-distant star or quasar, acting like a cosmic magnifying lens that allows scientists to see objects that might otherwise be too far to spot.

    Over the course of the study, they found 27 short-duration signal candidates of varying lengths, from an hour all the way up to 10 days long.

    Some of these signals had been seen previously in other data captured from the ground on Earth. However, the data from the four shortest of these microlensing events is consistent with the presence of planets with roughly the same mass as Earth.

    If the microlensing events spotted with Kepler were to reveal a host star, or a star that has planets in its orbit, scientists might expect a longer signal. So, by finding evidence for these planets but without the longer signal typically associated with a host star, the team suspects that the planets might be free-floating.

    It’s possible that if these are, in fact, rogue, starless planets, that they may have originally formed around a host star and were pulled away by a gravitational force by a more massive planet or object, according to the statement.

    But spotting these signals was no easy feat, especially seeing as Kepler wasn’t designed to detect planets using microlensing, and it wasn’t designed to study such a crowded field of stars. (Kepler, which was decommissioned in November 2018 after nearly a decade of in-space work, hunted for planets using the “transit method,” looking for stellar brightness dips caused when a planet crossed its host star’s face.)

    “These signals are extremely difficult to find,” lead author Ian McDonald, a researcher at the University of Manchester, said in the same statement. “Our observations pointed an elderly, ailing telescope with blurred vision at one of the most densely crowded parts of the sky, where there are already thousands of bright stars that vary in brightness, and thousands of asteroids that skim across our field.”

    “From that cacophony, we try to extract tiny, characteristic brightenings caused by planets, and we only have one chance to see a signal before it’s gone. It’s about as easy as looking for the single blink of a firefly in the middle of a motorway, using only a handheld phone,” McDonald said.

    To do this, the team had to develop new techniques to analyze their data. However, while their results are impressive and exciting, they do not confirm the existence of these rogue planets on their own. Future observations with missions like NASA’s Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope and possibly also the European Space Agency’s Euclid mission, both of which will be able to spot signals of microlensing events, could be used to help confirm the existence of these strange planets, according to the statement.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
  • #69524

    An artist’s depiction of a rogue planet.

    HAHAHAH

    Astronomers have spotted more strange “free-floating” planets that could roam deep space untethered to any star.

    What is the definition of a “planet”? Again, these guys have way too much time on their hands.

    Oxford calls a planet a celestial body moving in an elliptical orbit around a star.

    I have no problem with something called a celestial body. I happen to have a lot of fondness for certain celestial bodies.

    For example, this is a celestial body I really like

    although her sister thinks that pose is foolish

     

    2 users thanked author for this post.
  • #69551

    Rare ‘teardrop’ star and its invisible partner are doomed to explode in a massive supernova

    The star system is the closest Type Ia supernova candidate ever found near Earth.


    This bright star’s distinct teardrop shape suggests that it is being tugged by a powerful, invisible companion

    Astronomers have discovered a rare, teardrop-shaped star swirling through the cosmos some 1,500 light-years from the sun.

    Why does the star cry? Because it is in a toxic relationship with a partner that is literally ripping the life from its body. In stellar relationships like these, there is no amicable uncoupling; the romance only ends when both stars explode in a violent, thermonuclear explosion that’s visible across the galaxy. You’d cry, too.

    But astronomers (cosmic paparazzi that they are) are fired up about this twisted stellar relationship. The star system, named HD265435, is one of only three known binary star systems in the universe — and the closest one to Earth — that is clearly destined to end in a Type Ia supernova, according to a study published July 12 in the journal Nature Astronomy.

    These types of stellar explosions occur when a white dwarf (the shriveled husk of an old, collapsed star) shares an orbit with a larger, younger star that still has some fuel left to burn. Small but gravitationally massive, the white dwarf gladly gobbles up this fuel, yanking so much matter away from its companion that the younger star begins to change shape from a sphere into an ellipse, or teardrop. The older star grows larger and larger over millions of years, finally becoming too big for its own good. Nuclear reactions reignite in its core, the dwarf goes boom and both stars become an irradiated smudge of gas and dust in the night sky.

    Supernovas are easy enough to spot once the blast goes off (one infamous explosion lingered in Earth’s sky for 23 days and nights in A.D. 1054), but finding the doomed star systems that lead to Type Ia explosions is much trickier. That’s partly because white dwarfs are extremely dim and small, packing the mass of a sun into a ball about as wide as Earth, according to NASA.

    Finding a dwarf’s ill-fated companion star isn’t much easier, but because these younger stars tend to be much brighter, they offer a few telltale clues, the authors of the new study wrote. One is an “ellipsoid” shape, suggesting that something massive is tugging on one side of the star and deforming it. Another clue is a rapidly pulsing light signature, which hints at a binary system where two stars are orbiting each other extremely closely and quickly.

    Using observations from NASA’s Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite, the researchers discovered that HD265435 fit both criteria. From these details, the team calculated the bright star’s distance and mass, which allowed the researchers to make some informed estimates about the size and age of the young star’s invisible companion star.

    The team found that the visible star contains about 60% the mass of the sun, suggesting that the visible star isn’t too far from collapsing into a white dwarf itself. The star’s invisible companion, meanwhile, fits the white dwarf profile perfectly, packing roughly one solar mass into a sphere slightly smaller than Earth.

    These two stars fully orbit each other once every 90 minutes or so, indicating that they are extremely close and will probably merge completely millions of years from now. Together, the pair has the right total mass to suggest that a Type Ia supernova is on the horizon — just another 70 million years or so away, the authors concluded.

    Obviously, none of us will be around to watch this stellar duo fall apart (or rather, blow apart). But finding real-world examples of binary systems doomed to go boom is no easy feat, and studying them could help astronomers better understand the still-mysterious mechanisms that power these tremendous cosmic explosions. Perhaps sadly for HD265435, that means the paparazzi lenses of Earth’s space telescopes will be trained on the star system’s messy relationship for ages to come.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
  • #69596

    What is the definition of a “planet”? Again, these guys have way too much time on their hands. Oxford calls a planet a celestial body moving in an elliptical orbit around a star. I have no problem with something called a celestial body. I happen to have a lot of fondness for certain celestial bodies.

    It’s a funny one. They deliberately changed the definition of a planet so they could exclude Pluto, but in doing so they made it impossible for these “rogue planets” to be, well, planets. They can’t have it both ways. If starless solid bodies are planets, then Pluto is too.

     

    2 users thanked author for this post.
  • #69671

    City-sized asteroids smacked ancient Earth 10 times more often than thought

    Tiny bubbles in rocks suggest that ancient Earth was frequently battered by giant asteroids.


    Asteroid impacts created infernal conditions on the young Earth.

    Asteroids the size of cities, like the one that wiped out the dinosaurs, slammed into the ancient Earth way more often than previously thought, a new study has found.

    Approximately every 15 million years, our evolving planet would get a hit by a piece of rock about the size of a city, or even a bigger province, scientists with the new study said in a statement. The research was presented at the Goldschmidt geochemistry conference last week.

    This violent period, which took place between 2.5 and 3.5 billion years ago, saw the planet in upheaval on a regular basis, with the chemistry near its surface undergoing dramatic changes that can be traced in the rocks in the ground even today, the researchers said.

    In the study, Simone Marchi a principal scientist with the Southwest Research Institute in Boulder, Colorado and colleagues looked at the presence of the so-called spherules, small bubbles of vaporized rock that were thrown up to space by every asteroid impact, but then solidified and fell back to Earth, forming a thin layer that geologists see in the bedrock today.

    The team developed a new method to model the effect of asteroid impacts in terms of their ability to generate spherules and affect their global distribution. The bigger the asteroid, the thicker the layer of spherules in the rock should be. But when the researchers looked at the actual amount of spherules in the different layers of the bedrock and compared it with current estimates of past asteroid impacts, they found the two values did not match.

    “We found that current models of Earth’s early bombardment severely underestimate the number of known impacts, as recorded by spherule layers,” Marchi said in the statement. “The true impact flux could have been up to a factor of 10 times higher than previously thought in the period between 3.5 and 2.5 billion years ago.”

    Those past asteroid strikes may also have affected the oxygen levels and the ability of the young planet to support life.

    “We find that oxygen levels would have drastically fluctuated in the period of intense impacts,” Marchi said. “Given the importance of oxygen to the Earth’s development, and indeed to the development of life, its possible connection with collisions is intriguing and deserves further investigation. This is the next stage of our work.”

    According to Rosalie Tostevin, of the University of Cape Town, who was not involved in the study but specializes in ancient geology, some chemical markers point towards the existence of “whiffs” of oxygen in the early atmosphere, before a permanent rise that occurred around 2.5 billion years ago.

    “There is considerable debate surrounding the significance of these whiffs, or indeed, whether they occurred at all,” Tostevin said in the statement. “We tend to focus on the Earth’s interior and the evolution of life as controls on Earth’s oxygen balance, but bombardment with rocks from space provides an intriguing alternative.”


    Some asteroid impact craters are clearly visible on the surface of Earth today but many have been erased by weather and geological activity.

    Rocky bodies without an atmosphere, such as the moon, carry a detailed record of past asteroid impacts. On a planet like Earth, with varied weather patterns and geological activity, the traces of many of the past impacts have long been erased. It took until the late 1970s for scientists to discover the Chicxulub impact crater in Mexico. It took a further few years for them to identify this impact as the cause of the extinction of dinosaurs.

    “These large impacts would certainly have caused some disruption,” Tostevin said. “Unfortunately, few rocks from this far back in time survive, so direct evidence for impacts, and their ecological consequences, is patchy. The model put forward by Dr. Marchi helps us to get a better feel for the number and size of collisions on the early Earth.”

    1 user thanked author for this post.
  • #69673

    It’s a funny one. They deliberately changed the definition of a planet so they could exclude Pluto, but in doing so they made it impossible for these “rogue planets” to be, well, planets. They can’t have it both ways. If starless solid bodies are planets, then Pluto is too.

    Pluto is classed as a Dwarf Planet, though.

    It’s not a Planet, but a Dwarf Planet.

    Rogue Planets are not Planets either. They’re Rogue Planets.

    Much like Fish Sticks aren’t Fish.

    3 users thanked author for this post.
  • #69691

    I’m slightly scared that I followed Anders’ logic there.

    5 users thanked author for this post.
  • #69702

    I’m slightly scared that I followed Anders’ logic there.

    Only slightly?

    2 users thanked author for this post.
  • #70027

    Gigantic Jet in Dark Heart of the Nearest Radio Galaxy Imaged in Unprecedented Detail – SciTechDaily.com


    Composition of images of Centaurus A in the optical range (ESO/WFI) and X-rays (NASA/CXC/CfA). Centaurus A is a massive galaxy that is in the process of merging with a neighboring spiral.

    An international team anchored by the Event Horizon Telescope (EHT) Collaboration, which is known for capturing the first image of a black hole in the galaxy Messier 87, has now imaged the heart of the nearby radio galaxy Centaurus A in unprecedented detail. The astronomers pinpoint the location of the central supermassive black hole and reveal how a gigantic jet is being born. Most remarkably, only the outer edges of the jet seem to emit radiation, which challenges our theoretical models of jets. This work, led by Michael Janssen from the Max Planck Institute for Radio Astronomy in Bonn and Radboud University Nijmegen is published in Nature Astronomy today (July 19th, 2021).

    At radio wavelengths, Centaurus A emerges as one of the largest and brightest objects in the night sky. After it was identified as one of the first known extragalactic radio sources in 1949, Centaurus A has been studied extensively across the entire electromagnetic spectrum by a variety of radio, infrared, optical, X-ray, and gamma-ray observatories. At the center of Centaurus A lies a black hole with the mass of 55 million suns, which is right between the mass scales of the Messier 87 black hole (six and a half billion suns) and the one in the center of our own galaxy (about four million suns).


    The top left image shows how the jet disperses into gas clouds that emit radio waves, captured by the ATCA and Parkes observatories. The top right panel displays a color composite image, with a 40x zoom compared to the first panel to match the size of the galaxy itself. Submillimeter emission from the jet and dust in the galaxy measured by the LABOCA/APEX instrument is shown in orange. X-ray emission from the jet measured by the Chandra spacecraft is shown in blue. Visible white light from the stars in the galaxy has been captured by the MPG/ESO 2.2-metre telescope. The next panel below shows a 165000x zoom image of the inner radio jet obtained with the TANAMI telescopes. The bottom panel depicts the new highest resolution image of the jet launching region obtained with the EHT at millimeter wavelengths with a 60000000x zoom in telescope resolution. Indicated scale bars are shown in light years and light days. One light year is equal to the distance that light travels within one year: about nine trillion kilometers. In comparison, the distance to the nearest-known star from our Sun is approximately four light years. One light day is equal to the distance that light travels within one day: about six times the distance between the Sun and Neptune.

    In a new paper in Nature Astronomy, data from the 2017 EHT observations have been analyzed to image Centaurus A in unprecedented detail. “This allows us for the first time to see and study an extragalactic radio jet on scales smaller than the distance light travels in one day. We see up close and personally how a monstrously gigantic jet launched by a supermassive black hole is being born,” says astronomer Michael Janssen.

    Compared to all previous high-resolution observations, the jet launched in Centaurus A is imaged at a tenfold higher frequency and sixteen times sharper resolution. With the resolving power of the EHT, we can now link the vast scales of the source, which are as big as 16 times the angular diameter of the Moon on the sky, to their origin near the black hole in a region of merely the width of an apple on the Moon when projected on the sky. That is a magnification factor of one billion.

    Understanding jets

    Supermassive black holes residing in the center of galaxies like Centaurus A are feeding off gas and dust that is attracted by their enormous gravitational pull. This process releases massive amounts of energy and the galaxy is said to become ‘active’. Most matter lying close to the edge of the black hole falls in. However, some of the surrounding particles escape moments before capture and are blown far out into space: Jets — one of the most mysterious and energetic features of galaxies — are born.


    Highest resolution image of Centaurus A obtained with the Event Horizon Telescope on top of a color composite image of the entire galaxy.

    The new image shows that the jet launched by Centaurus A is brighter at the edges compared to the center. This phenomenon is known from other jets, but has never been seen so pronouncedly before. “Now we are able to rule out theoretical jet models that are unable to reproduce this edge-brightening. It’s a striking feature that will help us better understand jets produced by black holes,” says Matthias Kadler, TANAMI leader and professor for astrophysics at the University of Würzburg in Germany.
    Future observations

    With the new EHT observations of the Centaurus A jet, the likely location of the black hole has been identified at the launching point of the jet. Based on this location, the researchers predict that future observations at an even shorter wavelength and higher resolution would be able to photograph the central black hole of Centaurus A. This will require the use of space-based satellite observatories.

    “These data are from the same observing campaign that delivered the famous image of the black hole in M87. The new results show that the EHT provides a treasure trove of data on the rich variety of black holes and there is still more to come,” says Heino Falcke, EHT board member and professor for Astrophysics at Radboud University.

    Background information

    To observe the Centaurus A galaxy with this unprecedentedly sharp resolution at a wavelength of 1.3 mm, the EHT collaboration used Very Long Baseline Interferometry (VLBI), the same technique with which the famous image of the black hole in M87 was made. An alliance of eight telescopes around the world joined together to create the virtual Earth-sized Event Horizon Telescope. The EHT collaboration involves more than 300 researchers from Africa, Asia, Europe, North and South America.

    The EHT consortium consists of 13 stakeholder institutes: the Academia Sinica Institute of Astronomy and Astrophysics, the University of Arizona, the University of Chicago, the East Asian Observatory, Goethe University Frankfurt, Institut de Radioastronomie Millimétrique (MPG/CNRS/IGN), Large Millimeter Telescope, Max Planck Institute for Radio Astronomy, MIT Haystack Observatory, National Astronomical Observatory of Japan, Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics, Radboud University and the Center for Astrophysics | Harvard & Smithsonian.

    TANAMI (Tracking Active Galactic Nuclei with Austral Milliarcsecond Interferometry) is a multiwavelength program to monitor relativistic jets in active galactic nuclei of the Southern Sky. This program has been monitoring Centaurus A with VLBI at centimeter-wavelengths since the mid 2000s. The TANAMI array consists of nine radio telescopes located on four continents observing at wavelengths of 4 cm and 1.3 cm.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
  • #70098

    Our universe might be a giant three-dimensional donut, really.

    Imagine a universe where you could point a spaceship in one direction and eventually return to where you started. If our universe were a finite donut, then such movements would be possible and physicists could potentially measure its size.

    “We could say: Now we know the size of the universe,” astrophysicist Thomas Buchert, of the University of Lyon, Astrophysical Research Center in France, told Live Science in an email.

    Examining light from the very early universe, Buchert and a team of astrophysicists have deduced that our cosmos may be multiply connected, meaning that space is closed in on itself in all three dimensions like a three-dimensional donut. Such a universe would be finite, and according to their results, our entire cosmos might only be about three to four times larger than the limits of the observable universe, about 45 billion light-years away.

    A tasty problem

    Physicists use the language of Einstein’s general relativity to explain the universe. That language connects the contents of spacetime to the bending and warping of spacetime, which then tells those contents how to interact. This is how we experience the force of gravity. In a cosmological context, that language connects the contents of the entire universe — dark matter, dark energy, regular matter, radiation and all the rest — to its overall geometric shape. For decades, astronomers had debated the nature of that shape: whether our universe is “flat” (meaning that imaginary parallel lines would stay parallel forever), “closed” (parallel lines would eventually intersect) or “open” (those lines would diverge).

    That geometry of the universe dictates its fate. Flat and open universes would continue to expand forever, while a closed universe would eventually collapse in on itself.

    Multiple observations, especially from the cosmic microwave background (the flash of light released when our universe was only 380,000 years old), have firmly established that we live in a flat universe. Parallel lines stay parallel and our universe will just keep on expanding.

    But there’s more to shape than geometry. There’s also topology, which is how shapes can change while maintaining the same geometric rules.

    For example, take a flat piece of paper. It’s obviously flat — parallel lines stay parallel. Now, take two edges of that paper and roll it up into a cylinder. Those parallel lines are still parallel: Cylinders are geometrically flat. Now, take the opposite ends of the cylindrical paper and connect those. That makes the shape of a donut, which is also geometrically flat.

    While our measurements of the contents and shape of the universe tell us its geometry — it’s flat — they don’t tell us about the topology. They don’t tell us if our universe is multiply-connected, which means that one or more of the dimensions of our cosmos connect back with each other.

    Look to the light

    While a perfectly flat universe would extend out to infinity, a flat universe with a multiply-connected topology would have finite size. If we could somehow determine whether one or more dimensions are wrapped in on themselves, then we would know that the universe is finite in that dimension. We could then use those observations to measure the total volume of the universe.

    But how would a multiply-connected universe reveal itself?

    A team of astrophysicists from Ulm University in Germany and the University of Lyon in France looked to the cosmic microwave background (CMB). When the CMB was released, our universe was a million times smaller than it is today, and so if our universe is indeed multiply connected, then it was much more likely to wrap in on itself within the observable limits of the cosmos back then. Today, due to the expansion of the universe, it’s much more likely that the wrapping occurs at a scale beyond the observable limits, and so the wrapping would be much harder to detect. Observations of the CMB give us our best chance to see the imprints of a multiply connected universe.

    The team specifically looked at the perturbations — the fancy physics term for bumps and wiggles — in the temperature of the CMB. If one or more dimensions in our universe were to connect back with themselves, the perturbations couldn’t be larger than the distance around those loops. They simply wouldn’t fit.

    As Buchert explained to Live Science in an email, “In an infinite space, the perturbations in the temperature of the CMB radiation exist on all scales. If, however, space is finite, then there are those wavelengths missing that are larger than the size of the space.”

    In other words: There would be a maximum size to the perturbations, which could reveal the topology of the universe.

    Making the connection


    This image from the Planck satellite reveals the cosmic microwave background, the oldest light in our cosmos. This CMB image shows temperature fluctuations that correspond to regions of slightly different density.

    Maps of the CMB made with satellites like NASA’s WMAP and and the ESA’s Planck have already seen an intriguing amount of missing perturbations at large scales. Buchert and his collaborators examined whether those missing perturbations could be due to a multiply-connected universe. To do that, the team performed many computer simulations of what the CMB would look like if the universe were a three-torus, which is the mathematical name for a giant three-dimensional donut, where our cosmos is connected to itself in all three dimensions.

    “We therefore have to do simulations in a given topology and compare with what is observed,” explained Buchert. “The properties of the observed fluctuations of the CMB then show a ‘missing power’ on scales beyond the size of the universe.” A missing power means that the fluctuations in the CMB are not present at those scales. That would imply that our universe is multiply-connected, and finite, at that size scale.

    “We find a much better match to the observed fluctuations, compared with the standard cosmological model which is thought to be infinite,” he added.

    “We can vary the size of the space and repeat this analysis. The outcome is an optimal size of the universe that best matches the CMB observations. The answer of our paper is clearly that the finite universe matches the observations better than the infinite model. We could say: Now we know the size of the universe.”

    The team found that a multiply-connected universe about three to four times larger than our observable bubble best matched the CMB data. While this result technically means that you could travel in one direction and end up back where you started, you wouldn’t be able to actually accomplish that in reality. We live in an expanding universe, and at large scales the universe is expanding at a rate that is faster than the speed of light, so you could never catch up and complete the loop.

    Buchert emphasized that the results are still preliminary. Instrument effects could also explain the missing fluctuations on large scales.

    Still, it’s fun to imagine living on the surface of a giant donut.

    2 users thanked author for this post.
  • #70156

    Pictures from space! Our image of the day

    Chandra images the brightest known pulsar

    Thursday, July 22, 2021: NASA’s X-ray space telescope Chandra has obtained new images of the brightest pulsar in the sky.

    The M82 X-2 pulsar, a fast spinning neutron star, is located in the galaxy Messier 82 some 12 million light-years from Earth. M82 X-2’s brightness varies but at its brightest it can be more than 10 times brighter than any other known pulsars of this type, NASA said on Twitter.

    The pulsar, which defies some of the physical limits for pulsar brightness, rotates around its axis very fast, completing one rotation every 1.37 seconds. Being extremely dense, the pulsar draws to itself matter, which generates the X-ray light detected by Chandra.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
  • #70159

    Astronomers spot 1st moon-forming disk around an alien world

    The disk has the potential to form numerous moons.


    The PDS 70 system captured by the Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array (ALMA). The system features a star at the center and at least two planets orbiting it. PDS 70c is visible in this image surrounded by a circumplanetary disk (the dot to the right of the star in the center).

    Astronomers have discovered the first disk surrounding a planet outside the solar system.

    The impressive circumplanetary disk is about 500 times larger than Saturn’s rings and encircles a Jupiter-like planet dubbed PDS 70c. Scientists have seen plenty of disks surrounding distant stars, and moon-forming disks around planets like this have been suspected before, but this is the first time such a system has been definitively identified, according to the researchers.

    “Our work presents a clear detection of a disk in which satellites could be forming,” Myriam Benisty, study lead author, an astronomer at the University of Grenoble and the University of Chile said in a statement.

    PDS 70c is one of two young gas giants located approximately 400 light-years away from Earth. This world and its counterpart, PDS 70b, are still in the early stages of formation and provide a unique research opportunity to study planets and moons in their infancy.

    “More than 4,000 exoplanets have been found until now, but all of them were detected in mature systems,” Miriam Keppler, study co-author and researcher at the Max Planck Institute for Astronomy said in the same statement. Not so for the two planets observed by the current research. “PDS 70b and PDS 70c, which form a system reminiscent of the Jupiter-Saturn pair, are the only two exoplanets detected so far that are still in the process of being formed.”

    Using the Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array (ALMA), based at the European Southern Observatory (ESO) in the Atacama desert of northern Chile, scientists were able to measure the diameter of the disk to be roughly the same as the distance between Earth and the sun (1 astronomical unit, or approximately 92,955,807 miles or 149,597,870 kilometers). The researchers also found that the disk contained enough material to form up to three satellites about the size of Earth’s moon.


    Close-up view of the newly discovered moon-forming disk surrounding PDS 70c.

    Unlike its companion, PDS 70b is disk-less. The high resolution ALMA observations indicate that the PDS 70b was probably starved of disk-building dust by PDS 70c during their early formation.

    “These new observations are also extremely important to prove theories of planet formation that could not be tested until now,” Jaehan Bae, a co-author and an astronomer at the Carnegie Institution for Science, said in the same statement.

    Scientists theorize that planets establish themselves in dusty disks around young stars, clearing a path through their orbit and gorging on material as they go. As a planet grows it can then form its own circumplanetary disk that continues to feed the young planet with gas and dust. Within that disk, the gas and dust particles also collide and can form increasingly larger bodies, eventually resulting in the birth of moons. However, astronomers have yet to fully understand and witness these processes.

    “In short, it is still unclear when, where, and how planets and moons form,” Stefano Facchini, an astrophysics research fellow at ESO and co-author on the research said in the same statement. The latest observations of PDS 70b and PDS 70c are helping shed light on such formation processes.

    The researchers hope to be able to revisit the pair using ESO’s Extremely Large Telescope (ELT), which is currently being built on Cerro Armazones, a peak in the Chilean Atacama Desert.

    “The ELT will be key for this research since, with its much higher resolution, we will be able to map the system in great detail,” Richard Teague, study co-author and a fellow at the Center for Astrophysics at Harvard and the Smithsonian.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
  • #70161

    Space calendar 2021: Rocket launches, sky events, missions & more!

    July

    July 23: The full moon of July, known as the Full Buck Moon, arrives at 10:37 p.m. EDT (0237 July 24 GMT).

    July 24: Conjunction of the moon and Saturn.
    July 25: Conjunction of the moon and Jupiter.

    August

    Aug. 8: The new moon arrives at 9:50 a.m. EDT (1350 GMT)
    Aug. 11: Conjunction of the moon and Venus.
    Aug. 11-12: The annual Perseid meteor shower, which is active from mid-July to the end of August, peaks overnight.
    Aug. 19: Jupiter at opposition.
    Aug. 20: Conjunction of the moon and Saturn.

    Aug. 22: The full moon of August, known as the Full Sturgeon Moon, occurs at 8:02 a.m. EDT (1202 GMT). This will also be a so-called “Blue Moon” because it is the third full moon in a season that has four full moons.

    Aug. 22: Conjunction of the moon and Jupiter.

    September

    Sept. 3: Mercury reaches its highest point in the evening sky.
    Sept. 6: The new moon arrives at 8:52 p.m. EDT (0052 Sept. 7 GMT).
    Sept. 9: Conjunction of the moon and Venus.
    Sept. 13: Mercury at greatest elongation east.
    Sept. 14: Neptune at opposition.
    Sept. 16: Conjunction of the moon and Saturn.
    Sept. 18: Conjunction of the moon and Jupiter.

    Sept. 20: The full moon of September, known as the Full Harvest Moon, occurs at 7:55 p.m. EDT (2355 GMT).

    Sept. 22: The equinox arrives at 3:21 p.m. EDT (1921 GMT), marking the first day of autumn in the Northern Hemisphere and the first day of spring in the Southern Hemisphere.

    Sept. 24: The waning gibbous moon and Uranus will make a close approach, passing within 1.3 degrees of each other. Shining at magnitude 5.7, Uranus may be bright enough to spot with the naked eye under dark skies.

    • This reply was modified 3 years, 5 months ago by Sean Robinson.
    2 users thanked author for this post.
  • #70529


    __________________________________________

    52-foot-tall ‘megaripples’ from dinosaur-killing asteroid are hiding under Louisiana

    These are the largest known megaripples on Earth.


    An illustration of an asteroid or meteor striking Earth.

    Ancient “megaripples” as tall as five-story buildings are hiding deep under Louisiana, and their unique geology indicates that they formed in the immediate aftermath of the asteroid strike that killed the nonavian dinosaurs, a new study finds.

    The 52-foot-tall (16 meters) megaripples are about 5,000 feet (1,500 m) under the Iatt Lake area, in north central Louisiana, and date to the end of the Cretaceous period 66 million years ago, when that part of the state was underwater, the researchers said. The megaripples’ size and orientation suggest that they formed after the giant space rock, known as the Chicxulub asteroid, slammed into the Yucatán Peninsula, leading to the Chicxulub impact tsunami, whose waves then rushed into shallower waters and created the megaripple marks on the seafloor, the researchers said.

    The occurrence of “ripples of that size means something very big had to disturb the water column,” study lead researcher Gary Kinsland, a professor in the School of Geosciences at the University of Louisiana at Lafayette, told Live Science. “This is just further evidence that the Chicxulub impact ended the Cretaceous period.”

    The project began when the energy corporation Devon Energy took a 3D seismic survey of Iatt Lake. A seismic survey entails creating loud sound waves (often made with “explosives or big thumps,” Kinsland said) and placing surface detectors around the area that can capture the returning sound waves, which are reflected when they hit various underground rock layers. Data from these sound waves allow researchers to make maps of the underground geology.

    Study co-researcher Kaare Egedahl, then a master’s student of petroleum geology at the University of Louisiana at Lafayette, took the Devon Energy data and created a seismic image of the subterranean area. “Kaare brought it to me, and he said, ‘What’s this?’ because it’s so different than anything you would expect to see in deposits laid down by the sea or by rivers,” Kinsland said. “I looked at it, and I went ‘OMG.'”


    A black-and-white seismic image of the megaripples, created by study co-researcher Kaare Egedahl for his master’s thesis. The seismic image covers an area of about 11 by 7 miles (18 by 11 kilometers).

    Kinsland had previously studied the Chicxulub impact crater. When he looked at the seismic image, “I immediately saw the ripples, and I immediately knew the direction the water would have had to have been traveling [to create them],” he said. “And I knew that if you go backwards from that, you run right in Chicxulub.”

    Kinsland was able to determine the tsunami’s direction because the megaripples are asymmetrical, which shows the direction the water was flowing when they were made. In this case, the long, asymmetrical side of the megaripples have a south-southeast-facing slope, which points back to the Chicxulub impact crater, he said.


    This map shows the Chicxulub impact crater (red arrow) and the location of the newly discovered megaripples (red star) that were likely left by a tsunami caused when the asteroid hit 66 million years ago. The numbers represent previously identified tsunami deposits from the event.

    The megaripples have an average wavelength (from one crest to the next) of 1,968 feet (600 m). That, combined with their 52-foot-high amplitude, makes them “the largest ripples documented on Earth,” the researchers wrote in the study.

    Moreover, these megaripples are at the top of the Cretaceous/Paleogene geological boundary dating to 66 million years ago, and lie beneath a layer of debris that were kicked up in the aftermath of the Chicxulub impact, the researchers wrote in the study.

    How did the megaripples persist?

    The megaripples indicate that after the space rock hit Earth 66 million years ago, a tsunami rushed across the Gulf of Mexico and then shoaled and broke offshore as it “reached the abrupt shallowing of the Gulf of Mexico within what is now central Louisiana,” the researchers wrote in the study. “The resulting pulses of water flowing north-northeast over the shelf area produced the asymmetric megaripples which are imaged within the seismic data.”

    But tiny ripples left by waves on a sandy beach are short-lived. So how did the megaripples persist for 66 million years?

    After the tsunami created the megaripples, they remained underwater. They were deep enough underwater that when storms swept through the Gulf of Mexico, the megaripples remained undisturbed, Kinsland said. Then, the megaripples were buried by shale — in essence, a sedimentary rock made of mud mixed with clay and mineral fragments — over a period of about 5 million years, during the Paleocene epoch (66 million to 56 million years ago), he said. Later, that shale was covered by even younger sediments, he added.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
  • #70530

    2 users thanked author for this post.
  • #71427

    What does the edge of the solar system look like?

    It’s weirder than you may have imagined.

    Earth is the sixth planet from the edge of the solar system, meaning we’re none too near this cold and inhospitable frontier. But we’ve sent out various spacecraft over the years, so do we have any idea what the edge of the solar system looks like?

    The answer is yes, but it’s a work in progress. One of the latest developments, a 3D map of the solar system’s edge that took 13 years to create, revealed a few more secrets about this mysterious boundary, called the outer heliosphere.

    The outer heliosphere marks the region of space where the solar wind, or the stream of charged particles emitted from the sun, is “deflected and draped back” by the interstellar radiation that permeates the empty space beyond the solar system, said Dan Reisenfeld, a space science researcher at Los Alamos National Laboratory in New Mexico and head of the team that conducted the research on the 3D map. In other words, solar wind and interstellar particles meet and form a boundary at the far reaches of the solar system.

    Earthlings first got a glimpse of the solar system’s outer edge in 2012, when Voyager I, a NASA spacecraft that launched in 1977, crossed into interstellar space, according to NASA. Voyager 2 was not far behind, repeating the feat in 2018. Equipped with golden records full of Bach, Louis Armstrong and humpback whale songs, in addition to their scientific instruments, Voyagers 1 and 2 reported a sudden dropoff in solar particles and a substantial increase in galactic radiation when they left the solar system, according to NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory at the California Institute of Technology.

    The new 3D map reveals even more about the heliosphere. The inner layer — where the sun and its planets are nestled — is roughly spherical and is thought to extend roughly 90 astronomical units (AU) in all directions. (One AU is the average distance between Earth and the sun, about 93 million miles, or 150 million kilometers.) The outer layer is much less symmetrical. In one direction — that in which the ever-moving sun plows through the space in front of it, encountering cosmic radiation — the outer heliosphere extends about 110 AU, but in the opposite direction, it’s much longer, at least 350 AU, according to Reisenfeld.


    The outer heliosphere marks the region of space where the solar wind, or the stream of charged particles emitted from the sun, is “deflected and draped back” by interstellar radiation.

    That lack of symmetry comes from the sun’s movement through the Milky Way, as it experiences friction with the galactic radiation in front of it and clears out a space in its wake. “There’s a lot of plasma [charged particles] in the interstellar medium, and… the inner heliosphere, which is pretty round, is an obstacle in this stream of plasma which is flowing past it,” Reisenfeld told Live Science. “It has the same effect as water going around a rock in a stream,” with a rush of water crashing into the rock in front and a sheltered calm behind it.

    Measurements for the 3D map were gathered using the Interstellar Boundary Explorer (IBEX), which was launched in 2008 and is “the size of a bus tire,” according to NASA. It’s pronounced “like the animal,” Reisenfeld said, referring to the ibex mountain goats known for their gravity-defying treks up alpine cliffs. But the animal that IBEX really takes after is the bat.

    Many bats hunt insects, such as mosquitoes, by emitting a pulse of sound and using the time delay of the echo to figure out the distance to their prey. Likewise, IBEX detects solar-wind particles that have bounced back from the edges of the solar system, allowing Reisenfeld and his colleagues to determine the distances involved by measuring how long their round trip took. “The sun will send out a pulse … and then we passively wait for a return signal from the outer heliosphere, and we use that time delay to determine where the outer heliosphere must be,” Reisenfeld explained.

    As the sun circles the outer rim of the Milky Way, the solar wind keeps cosmic radiation at bay, forming a protective bubble. This is good for us, since “that radiation can damage spacecraft and it can be a health hazard for astronauts,” Reisenfeld said.

    However, the boundaries may not stay this way in the long term. Reisenfeld noted that there is a correlation between the strength of the solar wind and the number of spots on the sun. A sunspot is a relatively dark patch that temporarily appears on the surface of the sun as a result of intense magnetic disturbances within. From 1645 to 1715, a period known to sun watchers as the Maunder minimum, there were very few sunspots, and thus there may have been only weak solar winds.

    “The sunspots disappeared for almost a century, and if that happens, the shape of the heliosphere could have also changed significantly,” Reisenfeld said. “We do see variations in solar activity, and at any time, another Maunder minimum could happen. It’s not a pie-in-the-sky concern to be worried that the [heliosphere’s] effectiveness at shielding could change over time.”

    To learn more about the heliosphere, NASA plans to launch a new mission called the Interstellar Mapping and Acceleration Probe (IMAP) in 2025. If all goes according to plan, IMAP will reveal further details about interactions between solar winds and cosmic radiation at the solar system’s edge.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
  • #71428

    Hubble captures stunning image of squabbling galaxies – CNN

    A galactic sibling rivalry is taking place millions of light-years away, and the Hubble Space Telescope has captured it in a stunning image.

    About 747 million light-years from Earth, a triplet of galaxies is locked in a gravitational tug-of-war that was spied by Hubble as it observed them interacting in the Lynx constellation.

    This unique system of galaxies, which is referred to as Arp 195, was featured in the Atlas of Peculiar Galaxies. The atlas is a catalog of unusual galaxies across the universe that was compiled and published by astronomer Halton Arp in 1966.

    Many of the weirdly wonderful galaxies showcased within the atlas are interacting and merging, like Arp 195.

    However, Hubble was able to provide an awe-inspiring new look at this galactic trio, including its signature swirl and oblong streak — which somewhat resembles a bubble releasing from a bubble wand.

    The storied space telescope has a busy observation schedule, so astronomers don’t waste any of its precious time — especially since Hubble has already endured for 31 years and is still going strong, despite recent issues that took it out of commission for more than a month.

    Occasionally, Hubble is able to take bonus images — like the image of Arp 195 — in between long observation campaigns.
    While these extra observations of distinct features in the universe provide beautiful imagery, they can also help astronomers select targets they wish to follow up on using new, upcoming observers, like NASA’s James Webb Space Telescope, scheduled to launch in October.

    2 users thanked author for this post.
  • #71550

    Applications Now Open for NASA’s Mission to Mars Simulation

    2 users thanked author for this post.
  • #71568

    Solar System 2.0: We’ve Found A Water World, A Mini-Venus And A Potentially Habitable Planet, Says Scientists – Forbes


    This artist’s impression shows L 98-59b, one of the planets in the L 98-59 system 35 light-years away. The system contains four confirmed rocky planets with a potential fifth, the furthest from the star, being unconfirmed. In 2021, astronomers used data from the Echelle SPectrograph for Rocky Exoplanets and Stable Spectroscopic Observations (ESPRESSO) instrument on ESO’s VLT to measure the mass of L 98-59b, finding it to be half that of Venus. This makes it the lightest planet measured to date using the radial velocity technique.

    Astronomers have found three intriguing planets around a star just 35 light-years distant that resemble those found in our own Solar System.

    They include an ocean world, a planet with half the mass of Venus and a possible planet in the star’s habitable zone.

    Is this a “Solar System 2.0?”

    “The planet in the habitable zone may have an atmosphere that could protect and support life,” says María Rosa Zapatero Osorio, an astronomer at the Centre for Astrobiology in Madrid, Spain, and one of the authors of the study published today in Astronomy & Astrophysics.

    The findings around the star dubbed both L 98-59 and TOI-175—a red dwarf star in the constellation of Volans—could be a sign of things to come for modern astronomy, according to the researchers. That’s because it host rocky planets, like Earth or Venus, which are close enough to the star to be warm.

    “We have been chasing terrestrial planets since the birth of astronomy,” said Olivier Demangeon, a researcher at the Instituto de Astrofísica e Ciências do Espaço, University of Porto in Portugal and lead author of the new study. “Now we are finally getting closer to the detection of a terrestrial planet in the habitable zone of its star, of which we could study the atmosphere.”


    This infographic shows a comparison between the L 98-59 exoplanet system (top) with part of the inner Solar System (Mercury, Venus and Earth), highlighting the similarities between the two. L 98-59 contains four confirmed rocky planets (marked in colour in the top panel), orbiting a red-dwarf star 35 light-years away. The planet closest to the star is around half the mass of Venus, making it the lightest exoplanet ever detected using the radial velocity technique. Up to 30% of the third planet’s mass could be water, making it an ocean world. The existence of the fourth planet has been confirmed, but scientists don’t yet know its mass and radius (its possible size is indicated by a dotted line). The team also found hints of a potential fifth planet, the furthest from the star, though the team knows little about it. If confirmed, it would sit in the system’s habitable zone where liquid water could exist on its surface. The distances from the stars and between the planets in the infographic are not up to scale. The diagram has been scaled to make the habitable zone in both the Solar System and in L 98-59 coincide. As indicated by the infographic, which includes a temperature scale (in Kelvin [K]), the Earth and the fifth (unconfirmed) planet in L 98-59 receive similar amounts of light and heat from their respective stars. Assuming their atmospheres are similar, this fifth planet would have a similar average surface temperature to Earth and would support liquid water at its surface.

    The study of an exoplanet’s atmosphere is critical because it could reveal the presence of biosignatures—such as oxygen and methane—which might be considered scientific evidence of past or present life. However, current telescopes lack the resolution to study them.

    However, because the L 98-59 system is relatively close to Earth the researchers were able to use the exoplanet-hunting ESPRESSO instrument on the European Southern Observatory’s (ESO) Very Large Telescope (ESO’s VLT) in Chile—and in future may able to return to their findings with the upcoming Extremely Large Telescope (ELT) when it goes “first light” in 2027.

    What the researchers have uncovered so far certainly puts L 98-59 on the “to do” list for all huge telescopes:

    -three previously known planets may contain water in their interiors or atmospheres.
    -the closest planet to the star, L 98-59a, has half the mass of Venus.
    -the two planets closest to the star – L 98-59a and L 98-59b – might have small amounts of water.
    -up to 30% of the third planet L 98-59c’s mass could be water, making it an ocean world.
    -a “new” fourth planet—L 98-59d.
    -A “new” fifth planet—called L 98-59e and so far merely suspected—in a zone at the right distance from the star for liquid water to exist on its surface.

    Of all the findings, the figuring-out of the mass of the closest planet to the star is perhaps the most important. That’s because it’s the lightest exoplanet ever measured using the radial velocity method—the very slight, but measurable wobble visible in the light of the host star caused by the gravitational tug of a planet. “If we want to know what a planet is made of, the minimum that we need is its mass and its radius,” said Demangeon.

    L 98-59 will surely be studied by the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), which will be launched in October this year. The $9.7 billion, 6-ton space telescope has a primary mirror with a diameter of 21 feet/6.5 meters.

    It’s made up from 18 gold-plated beryllium hexagonal mirror segments and will have vastly improved infrared resolution and sensitivity compared to Hubble—and much more resolution than any ground-based telescope.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
  • #71864

    Powerful X-ray burst from black hole ripples through galactic dust in new NASA image


    Concentric ripples in galactic dust clouds triggered by a black-hole burst.

    NASA has released a new image of ripples in dust clouds created by an unexpected black hole X-ray burst observed in 2015.

    The image, a combination of observations taken by the NASA workhorse Chandra X-ray Observatory and the optical Pan-STARRS telescope in Hawaii, shows blue concentric rings of dust around the V404 Cygni black hole (the Chandra view) on the backdrop of surrounding stars (as seen by the Pan-STARRS telescope).

    The concentric circles reveal interesting information about the dust clouds between Earth and V404 Cygni, NASA officials wrote in a statement. Although the image is two-dimensional, the rings are actually dispersed in space across the 7,800 light-years that separate Earth from the black hole.

    The rings reflect how the X-ray light emitted by the black hole during the burst propagated throughout the Milky Way galaxy and bounced off dust particles concentrated in clouds within it, like sound waves creating echoes. The size of the rings therefore corresponds to the distance between Earth and each dust cloud, with the smaller rings revealing the location of the more distant clouds and the larger rings representing those closer to our planet.

    NASA explained in the statement that the so-called light echoes appear as narrow rings rather than wide rings or haloes because the X-ray burst lasted only a relatively short period of time.

    The unusually powerful X-ray burst was first spotted on June 5, 2015, by the Neil Gehrels Swift Observatory, a NASA space telescope that studies gamma-rays. Chandra subsequently observed the event between July 11 and 25, 2015. However, the brightness of the event forced Chandra’s operators to place the V404 Cygni system in between the telescope’s detectors to prevent damage to the instrument in case of another powerful burst.


    The size of the rings reflects the distance of the dust clouds from Earth.

    Just like a medical X-ray image reveals information about the properties of the various tissues in the body, so do the Chandra observations tell astronomers about the properties of the dust clouds, NASA said in the statement. Researchers compared the brightness of the X-ray light over a range of wavelengths with computer models of interstellar dust of various chemical compositions.

    Since different materials absorb X-ray light differently, scientists were able to learn more about what those clouds are made of. The team determined that the dust most likely contains a mixture of graphite and silicate grains. In addition, by analyzing the inner rings with Chandra, the scientists found that the densities of the dust clouds are not uniform in all directions.

    Several studies based on the initial observations have been published since 2015.

    V404 Cygni is a binary system consisting of a black hole as heavy as nine suns and a companion star about half of the mass of the sun. The black hole sucks in material from the star, which can be observed thanks to the X-rays emitted by the black hole’s accretion disk.

    3 users thanked author for this post.
  • #72085

    IMG_9396-2

    3 users thanked author for this post.
  • #72213

    Solar Orbiter sends postcard from Venus

    Friday, August 13, 2021: Sun-exploring spacecraft Solar Orbiter has captured this video of a glowing crescent of Venus as it flew past the planet at a distance of 4,967 miles (7,995 kilometers) during a gravity-assist flyby on Monday (Aug 9).

    Solar Orbiter, a joint mission of the European Space Agency (ESA) and NASA, will take the closest ever images of the star at the center of the solar system and provide the first ever detailed look at its poles. To get to its desired orbit, which will take it as close as 42 million kilometers from the sun’s surface (about a quarter of the sun-Earth distance), the spacecraft has to perform multiple gravity-assist maneuvers, harnessing the gravitational pull of planets to adjust its trajectory.

    The Monday flyby took place only a day before another inner-solar-system explorer zipped by the boiling, cloudy planet. On Tuesday (Aug 10), the Mercury-bound BepiColombo, a joint mission of ESA and the Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA), passed Venus at a distance of only 340 miles (550 kilometers).

    4 users thanked author for this post.
  • #72257

    Two planes report ‘bright green UFO’ swooping through the clouds over Canada


    Two aircraft reported seeing a bright green UFO over Canada in July 2021.

    A military plane may have had to swerve to avoid the mysterious object, surveillance data shows.

    Late on July 30, pilots of two separate aircrafts — one military and one commercial — reported seeing a mysterious green UFO vanish into the clouds over the Gulf of Saint Lawrence on the Atlantic coast of Canada, Vice News reported.

    According to a report posted Aug. 11 to the Canadian government’s aviation incident database, both flights witnessed a “bright green flying object” that “flew into a cloud, then disappeared.” The object did not impact the operations of either flight, the report noted.

    One of the aircrafts that reported the sighting was a Canadian military plane, flying from a base in Ontario to Cologne, Germany. The passenger flight was a KLM Royal Dutch Airlines plane flying from Boston to Amsterdam. Steffan Watkins, an aviation and shipping researcher, looked at transponder data from the two flights and saw that the military plane climbed 1,000 feet (300 meters) in altitude at the time of the sighting — possibly to avoid the object or get a closer look at it, Watkins tweeted.

    There’s a chance the UFO could have been a meteor streaking through the sky.

    “Yes I know [the UFO sighting] would have been at the early stage of the Perseid meteor shower,” Watkins added, “but don’t be a buzzkill.” (The Canadian aviation report tagged the incident with the catch-all label, “weather balloon, meteor, rocket, UFO,” not ruling out a space rock as the possible culprit.)

    Unlike the U.S. defense department, Canada’s Department of National Defense does not track UFO sightings, a department spokesperson told Vice. Still, there is no shortage of civilian enthusiasts north of the border; in December 2019, a private collector donated more than 30,000 UFO-related documents to the University of Manitoba in Winnipeg — including scores of documents on the Falcon Lake incident, Canada’s most infamous UFO case, Live Science previously reported.

    Meanwhile, in June 2021, the Pentagon publicly released a long-awaited report on more than 140 documented UFO sightings by U.S. Navy pilots. The report concluded that “most of the UAP [unidentified aerial phenomena] reported probably do represent physical objects,” though there is no evidence that alien visitors are behind any of the incidents.

    Of course, that’s just the unclassified, nine-page version of the report. Some of the report’s “juiciest details” hide in a classified annex, which the public will never see, The Guardian reported.
    _________________________________________

    3 users thanked author for this post.
  • #72492

    Scientists locate likely origin for the dinosaur-killing asteroid

    The impactor traveled further than previously predicted, before colliding with Earth.


    A large asteroid caused the Cretaceous-Paleogene mass extinction.

    The asteroid credited with the extinction of the dinosaurs 66 million years ago is likely to have originated from the outer half of the solar system’s main asteroid belt, according to new research by Southwest Research Institute (SwRI).

    Known as the Chicxulub impactor, this large object has an estimated width of 6 miles (9.6 kilometers) and produced a crater in Mexico’s Yucatan peninsula that spans 90 miles (145 kilometers). After its sudden contact with Earth, the asteroid wiped out not only the dinosaurs, but around 75 percent of the planet’s animal species. It is widely accepted that this explosive force created was responsible for the mass extinction that ended the Mesozoic era.

    Researchers used computer models to analyse how asteroids are pulled from their orbit in different areas of the asteroid belt and drawn towards planets. The observations of 130,000 model asteroids, along with data and behaviour seen in other known impactors, found that objects are 10 times more likely to reach Earth from the outer asteroid belt than previously thought.

    Prior to crashing into Earth, the extinction-causing asteroid orbited the sun with others, in the main asteroid belt. This concentrated band lies between planets Mars and Jupiter, with its contents usually kept in place by the forces of gravity. Before this study was released, scientists thought that very few of Earth’s impactors escaped from the belt’s outer half. But, researchers at SwRI discovered that “escape hatches” could be created by thermal forces, which pull more distant asteroids out of orbit and in the direction of Earth.

    The objects found in these outermost parts of the asteroid belt include many carbonaceous chondrite impactors. These are dark, porous and carbon-containing rocks which can also be found on Earth. Leading up to this research, other scientists have attempted to learn more about the object that doomed the dinosaurs. This included examinations of 66-million-year-old rocks. By doing this, geologists discovered that the Chicxulub asteroid had a similar composition to today’s carbonaceous chondrites.


    The Chicxulub asteroid orbited between Mars and Jupiter before hitting Earth.

    In the solar system, many objects surrounding Earth share similar composition to this impactor, however they are all much smaller, with widths around one mile. Researchers at SwRI used NASA’s Pleiades Supercomputer to analyse how asteroids furthest from the sun would have evolved over hundreds of millions of years. One aim was to see where the bigger asteroids lie today.

    “To explain their absence, several past groups have simulated large asteroid and comet breakups in the inner solar system, looking at surges of impacts on Earth with the largest one producing Chicxulub crater,” one of the study’s researchers, Dr. William Bottke, said.

    “While many of these models had interesting properties, none provided a satisfying match to what we know about asteroids and comets. It seemed like we were still missing something important.”

    By looking at wide timescales of the Chicxulub asteroid, the scientists could predict that a 6-mile asteroid is likely to come into contact with Earth once every 250 million years. Their model showed almost 50 percent of these significant impactors to be of the same carbonaceous chondrite composition.

    Details of the new study will be published in the November 2021 issue of the journal Icarus. One of its authors, Dr Simone Marchi, described the findings as “intriguing.”

    “The team’s simulations can, for the first time, reproduce the orbits of large asteroids on the verge of approaching Earth,” said Marchi. “Our explanation for the source of the Chicxulub impactor fits in beautifully with what we already know about how asteroids evolve.”

    According to co-author Dr. David Nesvorný, the new findings can teach us about other sizable asteroids. “This work will help us better understand the nature of the Chicxulub impact,” he said, “while also telling us where other large impactors from Earth’s deep past might have originated.”

    2 users thanked author for this post.
  • #72493

    Multiple supernovas may have implanted our solar system with the seeds of planets

    A nearby star-forming region may explain the mystery of tiny grains from beyond the solar system.


    Data gathered by the European Southern Observatory shows a cloud in the Ophiuchus star-forming region.

    A wave of exploding stars may have provided the conditions required to build the solar system.

    New research probing a nearby star-forming region examines conditions that may have been similar to those found in the early solar system to try to solve the outstanding mystery of how radioactive elements essential to planet formation arrived in the environment around the sun. The new finding concludes that such particles are common in star-forming regions, suggesting that the processes that formed the solar system are readily available throughout the galaxy.

    Scientists used the tiny clues of some of the first solid material that condensed from the cloud of dust surrounding the newborn sun, material that later built the planets. A key ingredient here is aluminum-26, an element built inside of stars and one that has a relatively short lifetime of roughly 100,000 years. Because the first planets likely took a billion years or so to form, this element’s presence suggests a nearby source.

    By observing the conditions found in the nearby star-forming region Ophiuchus, scientists have determined that the most likely source of aluminum-26 for our solar system is a series of nearby supernovas, rather than a single fortunate event.

    “Most of the work on understanding the source of aluminum-26 and other short-lived radionuclides in the solar system has, by necessity, been quite idealized,” John Forbes, an astronomer at the Flatiron Institute in New York City and lead author of the new research, told Space.com by email. “Ophiuchus offers us a real example for how this may play out, which is extremely useful when dealing with such a complex process.”

    The research was published today (Aug. 16) in the journal Nature.

    Death to life

    The researchers hunted aluminum-26 by focusing on calcium-aluminum rich inclusions (CAIs), which are submillimeter-sized grains found in meteorites. Planets form when material left over from the birth of a star condenses into smaller clumps. CAIs provide a substantial source of heat during planetary formation, drying out worlds and reducing the amount of water that survives. But where did these tiny fragments come from?

    Aluminum-26 is one of many metals produced in the fiery heart of massive stars. When the star goes supernova and explodes, it spreads its innards across the nearby galaxy. Theoretically, a single supernova could be the source of all of the aluminum in the solar system. However, according to Forbes, current estimates for the aluminum yield of supernovas just aren’t high enough most of the time to explain our solar system.

    “For certain masses of stars that go supernova, enough aluminum-26 is produced, but because of the rapid decay of aluminum-26, that supernova would have had to happen extremely recently and be in the right mass range,” Forbes said. “It’s possible, but not probable.”

    Ophiuchus is a typical star-forming region located near the solar system; right next-door to it is a cluster rich in massive stars. Giant stars are short-lived compared to the extensive life of the sun: a star 8 times as massive as our own will live for only 40 million years, compared to the sun’s 10-billion-year lifetime. This mortality makes them bad neighbors, as they can heat up gas in nearby planet-forming regions, destroying planetary cores and disks in the process. But giant stars balance this planetary interference by sharing a ready supply of aluminum-26 when they explode, material that can aid in the formation of planets.

    By studying Ophiuchus and its neighboring massive stars in multiple wavelengths, Forbes and his colleagues determined that the disks that would eventually form newborn stars in Ophiuchus would most likely be inundated with aluminum-26 from their dying neighbors. Because Ophiuchus is a typical star-forming region, with nothing that marks it as significantly different from most, this suggests that most stars, our sun included, receive a flood of aluminum-26 from their neighbors before they are born.

    The team also looked for Wolf-Rayet stars, which are more than 20 times as massive as the sun and have also been considered as potential donors of aluminum-26. Wolf-Rayet stars produce extremely strong winds, especially as they near the end of their lifetimes. These winds strip the stars of their surface material, which includes aluminum-26, and blow it into the neighborhood. According to Forbes, it is possible for a single Wolf-Rayet star to produce enough aluminum to account for the material found in the early solar system.

    When they studied the star-forming region of Ophiuchus, however, the team found no Wolf-Rayet stars to seed aluminum to its neighbors. “One could have died in the past million years but compared to a handful of supernovas going off in that time, it’s just less likely,” Forbes said.

    The new research has important implications for understanding the early solar system.

    “The finding that aluminum-26 is going to be readily available to some forming planetary systems is very exciting,” Fred Ciesla, a planetary scientist at the University of Chicago, told Space.com by email. Ciesla, who was not part of the new research, studies early solar system formation and how CAIs contributed.

    “Given the many roles that aluminum-26 played in the formation of our solar system, this means those same processes may have operated in other planetary systems,” Ciesla said.

    Reheating the disk

    The explanation of aluminum-26’s arrival from multiple stellar deaths doesn’t come without its challenges. In order to match observations from meteorites, scientists need to not only address the quantity of aluminum, but also to explain a so-called “global reset” of the aluminum in the stellar disk to synchronize their radiogenic clocks to give them the same apparent formation period. Such a reset would require a global heating event that would vaporize all of the solids in the solar system.

    Such a reset could have been caused by an outburst from the forming sun or from an extremely nearby supernova, but Forbes admits both these hypotheses have drawbacks. Although outbursts have been seen in forming protostars, such explosions would only be capable of heating the disk out to roughly the orbit of Mars, while planetary formation continues farther out. Meanwhile, explaining it with a nearby supernova would require extreme precision — it would have to be close enough to sufficiently heat the disk but far enough away to avoid destroying it completely, which Forbes calls “quite an unusual situation.”

    The researchers favor a variant of the first option, one in which the angular momentum of the planetary disk is turbulent enough to eventually bring all of the material within reach of the young star as it flares.

    But Ciesla is wary of that explanation. He points to dust grains in meteorites that show signs of formation around other stars. These grains would be destroyed in a global heating event. Water would also be a problem. Scientists think that some of the water in the Earth, asteroids and comets came from the early solar environment based on these objects’ concentration of heavy water. In the global heating event called for by the authors, that water would react with other hydrogen molecules and the heavy water enrichment would be lost.

    “This has not happened, as we see that heavy water, so the global heating must not have happened,” Ciesla said.

    He pointed toward what he refers to as the generally accepted paradigm within the meteoritic community. The CAIs most likely formed close to the sun, perhaps by the same flares considered unlikely by the authors, then were redistributed through the disk of material by the mixing process.

    According to Ciesla, the short period of CAI formation may be due to a combination of the small time frame that encompasses when the sun was both hot enough to form CAIs including aluminum-26 and distribute the CAIs in the disk through its evolution. Such a process has been explored by several researchers, including Ciesla.

    “It’s certainly possible that you could explain the level of aluminum-26 in the solar system with some production of the sun via cosmic rays, but I’m not certain that this works for other short-lived radionuclides whose daughter products are seen in meteorites,” Forbes said.

    He also pointed out that the aluminum-26 his team observed is centered on the cluster of massive stars next door to Ophiuchus.

    “The fact that there’s abundant aluminum-26 available right next door to this star-forming region is really suggestive that the enrichment happens by mixing in aluminum-26 produced by nearby massive stars,” Forbes said.

    Ciesla remains heartened by the idea that aluminum-26 would be available to other worlds in the galaxy.

    “While we know that planetary formation is robust, the question is how unique were the conditions and evolutionary pathway that our solar system followed,” Ciesla said.

    “This paper tells us that having aluminum-26 is not a very unique aspect of our solar system’s story.”

    1 user thanked author for this post.
  • #72519

    Not sure if this really belongs here, but it’s a fun thing to watch. Astrophysicist watches Stargate SG-1 and explains where all the science goes wrong:

    Best line (when Sam Carter is trying to completely re-write general relativity): “You’re gonna need a bigger blackboard love.”

    2 users thanked author for this post.
  • #73005

    Fastest-orbiting asteroid in solar system discovered

    It takes asteroid 2021 PH27 just 113 Earth days to complete a lap around the sun.


    Artist’s illustration of the newfound asteroid 2021 PH27 (foreground), which orbits the sun every 113 Earth days. That’s faster than any other known solar system object except the planet Mercury (seen here below and to the left of 2021 PH27).

    A newfound asteroid zips around the sun faster than any of its known kin.

    The space rock, known as 2021 PH27, completes one lap around our star every 113 Earth days, its discoverers determined. That’s the shortest orbital period of any known solar system object except the planet Mercury, which takes just 88 days to loop around the sun.

    However, 2021 PH27 travels on a much more elliptical path than Mercury does and therefore gets considerably closer to the sun — about 12.4 million miles (20 million kilometers) at closest approach, compared to 29 million miles (47 million km) for the solar system’s innermost planet.

    During those close solar passes, 2021 PH27’s surface gets hot enough to melt lead — about 900 degrees Fahrenheit (500 degrees Celsius), the discovery team estimates. Those deep dips into the sun’s gravity well also mean the asteroid experiences the largest general relativity effects of any known solar system object. Such effects manifest as a slight wobble in 2021 PH27’s elliptical orbit around the sun, which the team has observed.

    That orbit, by the way, is not stable over the long haul. 2021 PH27 will likely collide with the sun, Mercury or Venus a few million years from now, if it’s not ejected from its current path by a gravitational interaction first, team members said.

    2021 PH27 was first spotted on Aug. 13 by astronomers using the Dark Energy Camera (DEC), a powerful multipurpose instrument mounted on the Víctor M. Blanco 4-meter Telescope at the Cerro Tololo Inter-American Observatory in Chile.

    The team was able to pin down the asteroid’s orbit over the next few days, thanks to further observations by the DEC and the Magellan Telescopes at the Las Campanas Observatory in Chile, as well as smaller scopes in Chile and South Africa operated by the Las Cumbres Observatory.

    The 2021 PH27 push postponed some scheduled observations with those instruments, but the reshuffling was worth it, team members said.

    “Though telescope time for astronomers is very precious, the international nature and love of the unknown make astronomers very willing to override their own science and observations to follow up new, interesting discoveries like this,” discovery team leader Scott Sheppard, an astronomer at the Carnegie Institution for Science in Washington, D.C., said in a statement.


    Discovery images of the newfound asteroid 2021 PH27, taken on the night of Aug. 13, 2021 using the Dark Energy Camera, an instrument mounted on the Víctor M. Blanco 4-meter Telescope at the Cerro Tololo Inter-American Observatory in Chile.

    Sheppard and his colleagues estimate that 2021 PH27 is about 0.6 miles (1 km) wide. The space rock may have originated in the main asteroid belt between Mars and Jupiter, then gotten kicked inward by gravitational interactions with one or more planets, the researchers say.

    However, 2021 PH27’s orbital path is tilted by 32 degrees relative to the plane of the solar system. Such a high inclination suggests it might instead be an extinct comet that was born in the far outer solar system, then captured into a closer orbit after passing by Mars, Earth or another rocky planet.

    Further observations could help resolve this mystery, but Sheppard and other astronomers will have to wait a few months to collect more data. 2021 PH27 is now moving behind the sun from our point of view, and it won’t re-emerge until early 2022, discovery team members said.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
  • #73116

    Mystery object in space could be a new arm of the Milky Way

    Scientists spot giant feature at edge of the galaxy.


    An artist’s impression of the Milky Way. Our home galaxy is organized into vast spiral arms.

    Astronomers have discovered an enormous new filament of gas and dust hanging at the outer edge of our galaxy. Nicknamed “Cattail,” the feature is not yet fully mapped, and the team who found it believe it could be a previously unknown arm of our Milky Way galaxy.

    The Milky way is a giant spiral galaxy, which has a central bulge surrounded by coiling arms containing stars, gas and dust. Our home galaxy has four known spiral arms — two major arms named Scutum-Centaurus and Perseus, and two minor arms squished between them named Norma and Sagittarius, according to NASA. Earth is on a branch of the Sagittarius arm named the Orion Spur.

    Over the last few years, researchers at the world’s largest radio telescope, the Five-hundred-meter Aperture Spherical Radio Telescope (FAST) in Guizhou province, China, have been doing systematic studies of a sky region known as Cygnus-X, Keping Qiu, an astronomer at Nanjing University, told Live Science.

    FAST sees the universe through the radio portion of the electromagnetic spectrum and so is particularly useful for looking at cold gas clouds containing hydrogen, Qiu added. While observing Cygnus-X, which is an enormous star-forming region located around 4,500 light-years away, Qiu and his colleagues noticed clouds of hydrogen gas that seemed to be far behind it.

    By combining the FAST observations with data from a telescope in Germany and another in Australia, the researchers were able to map the feature, which stretches across nearly 3,600 light-years at a distance of around 68,000 light-years from Earth, making it the largest and most distant giant gas filament ever seen.

    The team estimated that Cattail contains as much mass as 65,000 suns, and its true extent might be even larger, perhaps as long as 16,000 light-years across. They detailed their findings in a paper posted Aug. 4 to the preprint database arXiv that has been accepted for publication in the Astrophysical Journal Letters.

    Cattail is at the outer edge of the Milky Way, located around three times farther from the galactic center than we are. Most of our galaxy’s bulk is closer to the center, making the enormous feature a bit of a puzzle.

    “We don’t know how such a huge filamentary gas structure could form in such an extreme location,” Qiu said.

    As yet, he and his colleagues are unable to determine if Cattail is a standalone gas filament or if it wraps around and connects somewhere to the main portion of the Milky Way. It could be a previously unknown arm or a branch from one of the four main arms, Qiu said.

    Many questions remain about the feature. Our galaxy is thought to be warped at its edges, but Cattail doesn’t seem to follow that same warped pattern, said Qiu. He and his team have plans to further investigate the filament with FAST in order to better understand it.

    “It reminds me that there’s a lot we don’t know about the Milky Way,” Felix J. Lockman, an astronomer at the Green Bank Observatory in West Virginia who was not involved in the work, told Live Science. “Every time we seem to look deeply, there’s more information in there.”

    Because FAST provides better resolution than previous radio telescopes, Cattail could be a part of the galaxy that simply hasn’t been noticed before, he added. The fact that the feature doesn’t appear to follow the galactic warp in the area is strange, Lockman said, though the warp’s exact details are still a matter of debate.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
  • #73117

    Venus and a newly discovered comet will cross paths in December. Will sparks fly?

    If a meteor shower falls on Venus and no one sees it, does it still make a flash?


    An artist’s depiction of a meteor shower on Venus.

    Venus is Earth’s twisted twin in so many ways, what about on the skywatching front?

    Alas, stargazing isn’t great from the Venusian surface: The thick carbon-dioxide atmosphere that blankets the planet means there’s no catching a break in the clouds. But above those clouds — where, come to think of it, conditions are rather less lethal for human stargazers anyway — the view of the night sky might be pretty similar to that on Earth.

    A skywatching session on Venus would require being, say, 35 to 40 miles (55 to 60 kilometers) above the surface, where the temperature and pressure are surprisingly Earthlike, Paul Byrne, a planetary scientist at Washington University in St. Louis who focuses on Venus, told Space.com.

    “It is the only other place in the solar system where room temperature and pressure conditions are present and, potentially, an astronaut could stand on the railing of a gondola with a breathing apparatus on but otherwise in shirtsleeves,” he said. Perhaps the stars would twinkle a little differently or the atmosphere would tinge meteors a different color, but the gist would be the same, he predicted.

    Let’s stick with meteor showers, since plenty of skywatchers are fresh off that terrestrial experience, thanks to August’s stunning Perseid meteor shower.

    As long as you’re above the clouds, Byrne said, if the planet swings through the necessary debris, a meteor shower should work more or less the same way on Venus as it does on Earth. “At that point and above, presumably it would be similar to watching a meteor shower at sea level on Earth,” he said. “I cannot think of any reasons why you would not see shooting star streaks as stuff burns up.”

    The Perseids are caused by Earth plowing through a trail of dust shed by the Comet Swift-Tuttle. Comets are notoriously messy objects, the cosmic equivalent of Pig-Pen in the Peanuts comics, scattering dust wherever they go. And most meteor showers are caused by the same short-orbiting comet leaving a trail of debris along the path it takes, lap after lap through the solar system.

    But there’s a second, much rarer type of meteor shower that relies on just one pass of a long-period comet, one that treks through the solar system on a path so long the icy lump will never retrace its steps during a human lifetime. Trickier might be an understatement: Earthling skywatchers have never caught a meteor shower caused by fresh debris from a long-period comet, at least not according to existing records. Theoretically, since the two planets orbit the sun at similar distances, the same long odds hold for Venus, despite the abysmal lack of skywatching records from that world.

    But implausible doesn’t mean impossible, and if this scenario were ever to unfold in our lifetimes, the best chance of it happening may come this December.

    Meet Comet Leonard

    In December, Venus and a long-period comet called Comet C/2021 A1 (Leonard) will nearly cross paths, with the planet crossing the comet’s debris trail just three days after the icy body dashes by Venus on its first visit to the inner solar system in some 80,000 years.

    “There’s a lot of unknowns here that could affect things a lot,” Qicheng Zhang, a planetary science graduate student at Caltech and lead author of a new paper exploring the scenario, told Space.com. “The chances aren’t particularly good for observing this event, but it’s not out of the realm of possibility and it wouldn’t be completely surprising if something ends up being observed.”

    Zhang is fascinated by comets for their brightness and unpredictability, so every day he checks a list of newly discovered comet candidates to see what scientists have spotted. In January, he stumbled on an announcement for Comet Leonard, which immediately stood out to him.

    “I’m interested in those comets that pass fairly close to the sun,” Zhang said. “This one didn’t pass super close to the sun, but it still got closer than Earth’s orbit, which is more interesting than most comets that are discovered these days.” So, Zhang took a closer look at Comet Leonard to see how its path aligned with the sun and the inner planets.

    “The one thing that stood out was that the comet’s orbit and Venus’ orbit almost perfectly intersect,” Zhang said. Their orbits come within 31,000 miles (50,000 km), equivalent to the distance from Earth to the ring of geosynchronous satellites orbiting high above our heads. The bodies themselves will come within 2.7 million miles (4.3 million km) of each other on Dec. 18; the next day, Venus will cross the comet’s trail three days behind the icy body.

    But Comet Leonard is making just one pass and hasn’t built up such a clear path of debris, so Zhang wanted to determine whether its rubble might be substantial enough to trigger a meteor shower on Venus come the December intersection — and, if it would, whether there was any possibility humans could somehow observe it.

    The research is described in a paper posted on July 26 to the preprint server arXiv.org and submitted to the Astronomical Journal.

    A Venusian meteor shower?

    According to Zhang and his colleagues’ calculations, the most promising scenario for an observable meteor shower as Venus intersects the comet’s trail would require high levels of activity on the icy body when it was at the very least 30 times the average distance of Earth from the sun (or about the distance of Neptune), perhaps more like 100. That’s not impossible, but it is rare, and would mean that Comet Leonard was coated in particularly volatile ices, prone to turn to vapor under still quite frigid conditions.

    For a display dramatic enough for scientists on Earth to spot the fireworks on Venus, according to Zhang’s calculations, that activity would need to have begun at a distance from the sun more like 500 or even 1,000 times that of Earth.

    “That’s really far away, and well before the comet was discovered. We don’t know if the comet was actually even active at that distance,” he said. “If we did have a positive detection of meteors on Venus from this event, it would tell us that this comet was quite active at high distances from the sun.”

    And not much about the comet’s swing through the solar system itself can improve the odds. “The only thing that could possibly change or add meteors to the shower from now on is if there were to be a highly explosive outburst of the sort that very few comets in history have produced,” Zhang said. “That’s not something that you would normally expect to see in a comet and would be highly unusual” — more unusual than spotting meteors on Venus, even.

    That means it’s all unlikely — but still possible.


    An artist’s depiction of the Akatsuki spacecraft at Venus.

    Extraterrestrial shooting stars

    If Comet Leonard does trigger a meteor shower that humans can manage to observe, it wouldn’t be the first such data from beyond Earth.

    In October 2014, a comet dubbed Siding Spring swung past Mars, with the Red Planet plowing through the comet’s dust trail about three hours later. The meteors fell on the side of Mars facing away from Earth, but NASA’s Mars Atmosphere and Volatile Evolution (MAVEN) spacecraft picked up the fleeting signature of magnesium that the comet debris dumped into the Red Planet’s upper atmosphere.

    Siding Spring’s encounter with Mars doesn’t make for an easy comparison with this December’s potential fireworks at Venus. Comet Leonard will never come as close to Venus as its predecessor did to Mars, and Venus hosts only one orbiter, Japan’s Akatsuki spacecraft, unlike the four orbiters and two rovers that were stationed at the Red Planet in 2014, according to NASA.

    But Earth, Venus and the sun will be oriented such that observers on Earth may be able to catch faint flashes from Comet Leonard’s debris, Zhang noted, which was impossible during Comet Siding Spring’s encounter. “There was never a chance to see any Martian meteor shower from Earth,” he said.

    “Venus will be much closer to Earth than Mars was, and so there’s the possibility that maybe if there were something interesting,” — remarkably large meteors born of cometary activity at huge distances from the sun, for example — “that could potentially in theory be visible from Earth by fairly small, even advanced-amateur class telescopes,” he said. (The Hubble Space Telescope won’t be able to attempt observations because Venus will be too close in the sky to the sun at the time.)

    And although Zhang isn’t holding his breath for an impressive display, if the encounter does produce a spectacle, it could produce the same sort of metallic traces in Venus’ atmosphere as Comet Siding Spring did at Mars.

    “Our uncertainties can’t rule out that there could be a very large meteor storm, a large impressive meteor storm the sort that would be needed to generate a meteor layer of the sort that appeared on Mars,” Zhang said. “That’s still a possibility, but a much smaller possibility than a very small meteor shower.”

    Once in a lifetime

    Chances are, neither Comet Leonard nor any other will have a similar opportunity to make its mark on Venus within our lifetimes.

    Such close cometary flybys of the inner planets are unusual, Zhang noted. “Probably this event has a recurrence time scale frequency on the order of maybe once every few centuries or so per planet,” he said. “It’s a fairly rare event, as far as comet close encounters go.”

    And whatever happens at Venus, Zhang said, Comet Leonard is on its last pass through the solar system. The sun’s heat may shred the icy body, a risk comets always take during their excursions.

    If it doesn’t, Zhang and his team calculated that the rest of the solar system will jostle the comet’s orbit enough that this time around, Comet Leonard will slip away from our neighborhood and end up stranded in interstellar space.

    • This reply was modified 3 years, 4 months ago by Sean Robinson.
    1 user thanked author for this post.
  • #73161

    Interstellar comets visit our solar system more frequently than thought

    Just because we don’t see them doesn’t mean they’re not here.


    The outer solar system might be full of comets from other stars.

    Comets from other star systems, such as 2019 Borisov, visit the sun’s neighborhood more frequently than scientists had thought, a new study suggests.

    The study, based on data gathered as Borisov zipped by Earth at a distance of about 185 million miles (300 million kilometers) in late 2019, suggests that the comet repository in the far outer solar system known as the Oort Cloud might be full of objects that were born around other stars. In fact, the authors of the study suggest that the Oort Cloud might contain more interstellar material than domestic stuff.

    Named after famous Dutch astronomer Jan Oort, who first proved its existence in the 1950s, the Oort Cloud is a spherical shell of small objects — asteroids, comets and fragments — far beyond the orbit of Neptune. The cloud’s inner edge is thought to begin about 2,000 astronomical units (AU) from the sun, and its outer edge lies about 200,000 AU away. (One AU is the average Earth-sun distance — about 93 million miles, or 150 million kilometers.)

    No spacecraft has ever visited the Oort Cloud, and it will take 300 years for NASA’s farflung Voyager 1 probe to even glimpse the cloud’s closest portion.

    Astronomers have very limited tools to study this intriguing world, as objects in the Oort Cloud don’t produce their own light. At the same time, these objects are too far away to reflect much of the sun’s light.

    So how exactly did the scientists figure out that there must be so many interstellar objects in the Oort Cloud, and what did Borisov have to do with it?

    Amir Siraj, a graduate student at Harvard University’s Department of Astronomy and lead author of the study, told Space.com in an email that he could calculate the probability of foreign comets visiting the solar system simply based on the fact that the Borisov comet had been discovered.

    “Based on the distance that Borisov was detected at, we estimated the implied local abundance of interstellar comets, just like the abundance of ‘Oumuamua-like objects was calibrated by the detection of ‘Oumuamua,” Siraj said.

    The mysterious ‘Oumuamua, first spotted by astronomers in Hawaii in October 2017, was the first interstellar body ever detected within our own solar system. The object passed Earth at a distance of 15 million miles (24 million km), about one-sixth of the distance between our planet and the sun. An intense debate about ‘Oumuamua’s nature ensued, as it wasn’t clear at first whether the object was a comet or an asteroid.

    Even the detection of a single object can be used for statistical analysis, Siraj said. The so-called Poisson method, which the astronomers used, calculates the probability of an event happening in a fixed interval of time and space since the last event.

    Taking into consideration the gravitational force of the sun, Siraj and co-author Avi Loeb, an astronomer at Harvard, were able to estimate the probability of an interstellar comet making its way to Earth’s vicinity. They found that the number of interstellar comets passing through the solar system increases with the distance from the sun.

    “We concluded that, in the outer reaches of the solar system, and even considering the large uncertainties associated with the abundance of Borisov-like objects, transitory interstellar comets should outnumber Oort Cloud objects (comets from our own solar system),” Siraj added.

    So why have astronomers seen just one interstellar comet so far? The answer is technology. Telescopes have only recently gotten powerful enough to be able to spot those small but extremely fast-travelling bodies, let alone study them in detail.

    “Before the detection of the first interstellar comet, we had no idea how many interstellar objects there were in our solar system,” said Siraj. “Theory on the formation of planetary systems suggests that there should be fewer visitors than permanent residents. Now we’re finding that there could be substantially more visitors.”

    The astronomers hope that with the arrival of next-generation telescopes, such as the Vera C. Rubin Observatory, currently under construction in Chile, the study of extrasolar comets and asteroids will truly take off.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
  • #73447

    Rogue black holes could be wandering at the edges of the Milky Way

    There could be 12 of the invisible giants in the Milky Way alone.


    The rogue black holes could make up 10% of the universe’s total black hole mass.

    An enormous number of rogue supermassive black holes may be wandering around the universe, new simulations find.

    In fact, wandering giant black holes may account for a whopping 10% of the nearby universe’s black hole mass “‘budget,'” the research finds. This means that galaxies like our own could have an average of 12 invisible behemoths prowling around their outskirts, gobbling up anything that gets in their way.

    According to the study researchers, because the number of black holes increases the more mass there is in the outer “halo” of material that surrounds galaxies, clusters of galaxies, which have heavy halos, could have even more of the ravenous wanderers.

    “We expect thousands of wandering black holes in galaxy cluster halos,” the researchers wrote in the study.

    Just as a panama basket can be woven around the supporting structure of a stone, astronomers think that most galaxies form around supermassive black holes. The gigantic gravitational beasts, often many millions or even billions times more massive than the sun, act as anchors for long trains of gas, dust, stars and planets that swirl in orbit around them. Closer to the black holes, this material spirals faster and heats up, forming an accretion disk that both feeds the black hole and produces the telltale radiation that makes it visible.

    Usually the mass of these black holes cements them in the centers of their galaxies, which slowly orbit around each other in clusters called galactic groups. But sometimes, an enormous force — such as a collision between two galaxies — can pop a central supermassive black hole loose, forcing it to wander the universe like a cosmic vagabond.

    The wandering monsters can also be set loose when the merging of two black holes is disrupted, sending one or both of them flying.

    To estimate how often this occurs, the astronomers ran a set of simulations called Romulus that account for all known rules about how black holes behave to trace how their orbits might evolve over billions of years.

    The simulations predicted that the frequent galactic collisions of the early universe, between the time of the Big Bang about 13.7 billion years ago and roughly 2 billion years later, produced enough wanderers to outnumber, and even outshine, their galactically fixed supermassive black hole cousins.

    Later, as the universe grew older, many of the loose black holes merged and were recaptured by other supermassive black holes after forming binary systems with them in the centers of galaxies, the simulations found. But many also remained free.

    “Romulus predicts that many supermassive black hole binaries form after several billions of years of orbital evolution, while some SMBHs [supermassive black holes] will never make it to the center,” the researchers wrote. “As a result, Milky Way-mass galaxies in Romulus are found to host an average of 12 supermassive black holes, which typically wander the halo far from the galactic center.”

    The researchers “next steps will be to figure out possible hallmarks of the lost invisible giants'” presence out in the universe so that one day soon, we can observe them first hand.

    • This reply was modified 3 years, 4 months ago by Sean Robinson.
    1 user thanked author for this post.
  • #73625

    Strange brown dwarf ‘The Accident’ hints at possible treasure trove of cosmic anomalies


    An artist’s depiction of a brown dwarf.

    A citizen scientist’s lucky discovery of a bizarre brown dwarf illustrates the tantalizing borderline between stars and planets.

    Brown dwarfs, which are sometimes called “failed stars,” are more massive than most planets but not heavy enough to ignite like stars. Citizen scientist Dan Caselden discovered a brown dwarf nicknamed “The Accident” by sheer luck, as the cosmic object doesn’t quite resemble any other brown dwarfs found in the galaxy to date, according to a statement from NASA.

    “This object defied all our expectations,” Davy Kirkpatrick, an astrophysicist at IPAC at Caltech in Pasadena, California, and lead author of a new study describing “The Accident,” said in the statement. “This discovery is telling us that there’s more variety in brown dwarf compositions than we’ve seen so far. There are likely more weird ones out there, and we need to think about how to look for them.”

    The brown dwarf, formally known as WISEA J153429.75-104303.3, is located about 50 light-years from Earth and spins at about half a million mph (800,000 kph) — faster than all other brown dwarfs discovered at a similar distance from Earth, according to the study.

    However, this cosmic object has puzzled astronomers because it deviates from the typical brightness observed in aging brown dwarfs. Generally, as brown dwarfs age, they cool off and dim in brightness, according to the statement. Conversely, The Accident appeared faint in some key wavelengths, indicating it was very cold and old, but bright in others, suggesting a higher temperature characteristic of a younger brown dwarf, the researchers said in the statement.

    Caselden spotted The Accident using an online program he built to find brown dwarfs in data from NASA’s Near-Earth Object Wide-Field Infrared Survey Explorer (NEOWISE), which began in 2013 as a new mission for a former astronomical space telescope when it was no longer able to complete those observations.


    Data from NASA’s Near-Earth Object Wide-Field Infrared Survey Explorer (NEOWISE) captured a faint object, formally known as WISEA J153429.75-104303.3, or The Accident, moving across the bottom left corner.

    Scientists estimate that The Accident is between 10 billion and 13 billion years old, which is at least double the average age of other known brown dwarfs. This age, in turn, suggests that the brown dwarf formed when the Milky Way was much younger and had a different chemical makeup. As a result, there might be many more brown dwarfs lurking in our galaxy than scientists previously thought, according to the statement.

    Using ground-based telescopes at the W. M. Keck Observatory in Hawaii, researchers attempted to observe The Accident at additional infrared wavelengths. However, the brown dwarf appeared so faint that it was undetectable, confirming it is in fact very cold, and therefore very old. Furthermore, given its fast spin speed, researchers estimate that The Accident has occupied the galaxy for a long time, having encountered massive objects that accelerate the brown dwarf with their gravity.

    Observations of The Accident also show the object contains low levels of methane, compared to most other brown dwarfs. This characteristic further supports the idea that the object formed soon after the Milky Way formed about 13.6 billion years ago, at which point the galaxy was composed almost entirely of hydrogen and helium, and lacking the carbon needed to create methane, according to the statement.

    “It’s not a surprise to find a brown dwarf this old, but it is a surprise to find one in our backyard,” Federico Marocco, an astrophysicist at IPAC and co-author of the study, said in the statement. “We expected that brown dwarfs this old exist, but we also expected them to be incredibly rare. The chance of finding one so close to the solar system could be a lucky coincidence, or it tells us that they’re more common than we thought.”

    1 user thanked author for this post.
  • #73627

    Star-smash supernova? New type of stellar explosion possibly seen

    ‘A merger-triggered supernova, I think, is just scratching the surface of what’s possible.’


    This artist’s illustration shows a compact object (a black hole or neutron star) at the core of its massive stellar companion. Rapid accretion onto the compact object has caused it to form an accretion disk and launch a pair of jets at nearly the speed of light. Those jets have tunneled through the star, which is about to explode in a supernova due to the enormous amount of energy released. In the next few years, the exploded stellar material will plow its way through a dense torus of stellar material ejected by the compact object during its previous centuries of inspiral toward the core, creating a luminous radio afterglow.

    Astronomers have uncovered evidence of explosions triggered by dead stars ramming into live stars, possible proof of a new type of supernova, a new study finds.

    Supernovas are gigantic explosions that can occur when stars die. These outbursts can briefly outshine all of the other suns in these stars’ galaxies, making them visible from halfway across the cosmos.

    For decades, researchers have known of two main supernova types. Large stars more than 10 times the sun’s mass collapse in their centers when their cores burn all their fuel, causing the outer layers to explode and leaving behind a stellar remnant such as a neutron star or black hole. In contrast, stars less than eight times the sun’s mass burn out over time, leaving behind a dense core known as a white dwarf, and these remnants can pull fuel onto themselves off companion stars until they detonate in a thermonuclear explosion.

    However, scientists have suggested other kinds of supernovas may exist. For example, most stars more than eight solar masses are born in close orbits to companion stars. The heavier members of these pairs may die first as supernovas, leaving behind a neutron star or black hole that can theoretically spiral toward its partner and collide, triggering a supernova.

    Now astronomers may have discovered signs of such a merger-triggered core collapse supernova. They detailed their findings online today (Sept. 2) in the journal Science.

    “This is the first of a new class of supernovae,” study lead author Dillon Dong, an astrophysicist at the California Institute of Technology in Pasadena, told Space.com.

    Using data from the Very Large Array Sky Survey (VLASS), a project that scans the night sky for radio outbursts, researchers detected an extremely luminous flare of radio waves, dubbed VT J121001+4959647, that happened in 2017. This outburst was not present in earlier radio surveys and is “tied for the most radio-luminous supernova ever detected,” Dong said.

    Through follow-up radio and optical analysis, the researchers found the radio flare came from a star surrounded by a thick, dense shell of gas. This envelope of matter was likely ejected from the star a few centuries before the radio signals were emitted.

    “The progenitor star had undergone an episode of eruptive mass loss, ejecting more than the mass of the sun from its atmosphere,” Dong said.

    The astronomers suggest the radio outburst happened when the star exploded in a supernova, with debris from the explosion crashing into the surrounding gas shell, generating a blaze of radio waves.

    The scientists then examined previous X-ray data. They found that in 2014, X-ray jets erupted from about the same place as VT J121001+4959647. They suggest these jets happened when a star went supernova, leaving behind a dead star that ripped gas off its companion, generating a dense gas shell. The luminous radio glow then occurred after the dead star rammed into its surviving partner.

    “As the neutron star or black hole spirals in, it’s expected to unbind a lot of the star’s atmosphere and eject it out to large distances,” Dong said. “And if it reaches the core, theory predicts that it can disrupt fusion, trigger a supernova and launch the jets that we observed.”

    “I had no idea that we would find such a system in VLASS,” Dong said. “But that’s kind of the beauty of it — we looked with open eyes at every possibly interesting source and let our experience, particularly of dead ends we’ve gone down in the past, and our intuition point us towards the ones to look further into.”

    The scientists now plan to further monitor VT J121001+4959647 to learn more about how pairs of massive stars spiral toward each other, something that is extremely difficult to model with computer simulations,” Dong said. “Systems like this may be our best handle on the physics of what happens when two stars merge.”

    More discoveries may lie in wait, Dong added.

    “One of the most exciting findings in astronomy of the past decade was that most massive stars are born in binary systems, triple systems, quadruple systems, and so on, and most of them are close enough to have strong interactions within the lifetime of the star,” Dong said. “Where previously astronomers modeled these stars in isolation, we now realize that there is a rich set of phenomena to explore resulting from the interactions of these stars. A merger-triggered supernova, I think, is just scratching the surface of what’s possible. With next-generation sky surveys and new developments in theoretical astrophysics, we may discover that stars behave in all sorts of unexpected ways.”

    1 user thanked author for this post.
  • #73651

    An artist’s depiction of a brown dwarf.

    These depiction guys must be like the paste eaters of the artistic community.

     

    2 users thanked author for this post.
  • #73680

    Astronomers Create ‘Treasure Map’ to Find Proposed Planet Nine – ExtremeTech.com

    If Planet Nine Is Lurking in Our Solar System, We Finally Know Where It Is – InterestingEngineering.com

    Astronomers Believe They’ve Pinpointed Planet Nine (If It Exists At All) – IFLScience.com

    Planet Nine: Scientists Map Its Likely Location – EarthSky.org

    The Most Mysterious Planet in The Solar System Is Missing. But We Know Where to Look – ScienceAlert.com

    Astrophysicists Suggest New Place Where Planet Nine Could Be Hiding – Gizmodo.com

    Planet 9 May Be Out There – Here’s Where We Need To Look – SciTechDaily.com

    There are eight known planets in the solar system (ever since Pluto was booted from the club), but for a while, there has been some evidence that there might be one more. A hypothetical Planet 9 lurking on the outer edge of our solar system. So far this world has eluded discovery, but a new study has pinned down where it should be.

    The evidence for Planet 9 comes from its gravitational pull on other bodies. If the planet exists, its gravity will affect the orbits of other planets. So if something seems to be tugging on a planet, just do a bit of math to find the source. This is how Neptune was discovered, when John Couch Adams and Urbain Le Verrier noticed independently that Uranus seemed to be tugged by an unseen planet.

    In the case of Planet 9, we don’t have any gravitational effect on a planet. What we do see is an odd clustering of small icy bodies in the outer solar system known as Kuiper belt objects (KBOs). If there were no planet beyond the Kuiper belt, you would expect the orbits of KBOs to be randomly oriented within the orbital plane of the solar system. But instead, we see lots of KBO orbits are clustered in the same orientation. It’s possible that this is just due to random chance, but that isn’t likely.

    Back in 2016, the authors looked at the statistical distribution of KBOs and concluded the clustering was caused by an undetected outer planet. Based on their calculations, this world has a mass of 5 Earths and is about 10 times more distant from the Sun than Neptune. The paper even calculated a broad region of the sky where the planet might be. But searches turned up nothing. This led some to conclude the planet doesn’t exist. Orbital oddness doesn’t prove a planet exists. Just ask Planet Vulcan. Others went so far as to argue Planet 9 does exist, but we can’t see it because it’s a primordial black hole.

    This new study reexamines the original work in light of some of the criticism it received. One big criticism is that outer solar system bodies are difficult to find, so we look for them where it’s convenient. The clustering effect we see could just be due to biased data. Taking observational bias into effect, the authors find the clustering is still statistically unusual. There’s only a 0.4% chance of it being a fluke. When they recalculated the likely orbit of Planet 9, they were able to better localize where to look.

    One interesting aspect of the study is that the newly calculated orbit puts Planet 9 closer to the Sun than originally thought. This is odd, because if it is closer then we should have already found it. The authors argue that observations thus far have ruled out the closest options for Planet 9, which helps narrow down its possible location even further. If the planet exists, it should be detectable by the Vera Rubin Observatory in the near future.

    This study isn’t conclusive, and many astronomers still argue that Planet 9 doesn’t exist. But this study makes it clear that we won’t have to argue about it for much longer. Either it will be discovered soon, or observations will rule it out as an explanation for the KBO clustering effect.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
  • #74149

    An ‘Internet apocalypse’ could ride to Earth with the next solar storm, new research warns

    The underwater cables that connect nations could go offline for months, the study warns.

    …a severe solar storm could plunge the world into an “internet apocalypse” that keeps large swaths of society offline for weeks or months at a time…

    more in link…
    ________________________________

    Strange, repeating radio signal near the center of the Milky Way has scientists stumped

    It’s not a fast radio burst, pulsar or low-mass star. So what in the heavens is it?

    Astronomers have detected a strange, repeating radio signal near the center of the Milky Way, and it’s unlike any other energy signature ever studied.

    According to a new paper accepted for publication in The Astrophysical Journal and posted on the preprint server arXiv, the energy source is extremely finicky, appearing bright in the radio spectrum for weeks at a time and then completely vanishing within a day. This behavior doesn’t quite fit the profile of any known type of celestial body, the researchers wrote in their study, and thus may represent “a new class of objects being discovered through radio imaging.”

    The radio source — known as ASKAP J173608.2−321635 — was detected with the Australian Square Kilometre Array Pathfinder (ASKAP) radio telescope, situated in the remote Australian outback. In an ASKAP survey taken between April 2019 and August 2020, the strange signal appeared 13 times…

    more in link…
    ____________________________________

    Super-precise clock tech wins $3 million physics Breakthrough Prize

    Optical lattice clocks could help scientists detect gravitational waves, hunt for dark matter and much more.

    Two physicists just snagged $3 million for helping develop a super-precise clock that could allow scientists to study and explore the universe like never before.

    more in link…

    • This reply was modified 3 years, 4 months ago by Sean Robinson.
    1 user thanked author for this post.
  • #74150

    1st sign of elusive ‘triangle singularity’ shows particles swapping identities in mid-flight

    Weird phenomenon first proposed by Russian physicist Lev Landau in the 1950s.

    Physicists sifting through old particle accelerator data have found evidence of a highly-elusive, never-before-seen process: a so-called triangle singularity.

    First envisioned by Russian physicist Lev Landau in the 1950s, a triangle singularity refers to a rare subatomic process where particles exchange identities before flying away from each other.

    more in link…
    ___________________________________

    Our Milky Way galaxy isn’t very well mixed, study suggests

    Our galaxy isn’t as thoroughly mixed as scientists sometimes assume, according to a new study.

    In particular, that new research focuses on the distribution of what astronomers regard as metals — which is really just every element besides hydrogen and helium, even when these elements are gases. In the new work, scientists used the Hubble Space Telescope and the Very Large Telescope in Chile to map the metal in dust across the Milky Way in hopes of improving models describing the galaxy’s history.

    more in link…

    • This reply was modified 3 years, 4 months ago by Sean Robinson.
    1 user thanked author for this post.
  • #74460

    Cosmic objects with strange orbits discovered beyond Neptune

    Are they being tugged by Planet Nine?


    Many of the objects just discovered hail from the Kuiper Belt, a distant region of the solar system full of icy bodies.

    A six-year search of space beyond the orbit of Neptune has netted 461 newly discovered objects.

    These objects include four that are more than 230 astronomical units (AU) from the sun. (An astronomical unit is the distance from the Earth to the sun, about 93 million miles or 149.6 million kilometers). These extraordinarily distant objects might shed light on Planet Nine, a theoretical, never-observed body that might be hiding in deep space, its gravity affecting the orbits of some of the rocky objects at the solar system’s edge.

    The new observations come courtesy of the Dark Energy Survey, an effort to map the universe’s galactic structure and dark matter that began in 2013. Six years of observation from the Blanco Telescope in Cerro Tololo in Chile yielded a total of 817 confirmed new objects, 461 of which are now being described for the first time in a paper posted on the preprint server arXiv. The paper has been submitted to a journal for peer review, according to ScienceAlert.

    The objects in the study are all at least 30 AU away, in a region of the solar system that is almost unimaginably dark and lonely. More than 3,000 trans-Neptunian objects, or TNOs, have been identified in these icy reaches. They include dwarf planets such as Pluto and Eris as well as small Kuiper Belt objects like Arrokoth, a rocky body visited by the New Horizons spacecraft in 2019. The Kuiper Belt is a region of icy objects orbiting between about 30 AUs and 50 AUs from the sun.

    Of the 461 objects described for the first time in the new paper, a few stand out. Nine are known as extreme trans-Neptunian objects, which have orbits that swing out at least 150 AUs from the sun. Four of those are extremely extreme, with orbital distances of 230 AUs. At these distances, the objects are hardly affected by Neptune’s gravity, but their strange orbits suggest an influence from outside the solar system. Some researchers think that influence might be a yet-undiscovered planet, dubbed Planet Nine. (Others think that the combined gravity of lots of little objects, or, alternatively, nothing more than a statistical anomaly, explain the weird orbits.) The newly discovered objects could thus help researchers hone in on the possible Planet Nine — or disprove its existence.

    The researchers also found four new Neptune Trojans. Trojans are bodies that share the orbits of a planet or moon. In this case, the objects share Neptune’s orbit around the sun. They also observed the Bernardinelli-Bernstein comet, named after the two lead authors of the paper, University of Pennsylvania cosmologist Gary Bernstein and University of Washington postdoctoral scholar Pedro Bernardinelli. The two researchers were the first to spot the comet in the Dark Energy Survey dataset. The Bernardinelli-Bernstein comet may be up to 100 miles (160 km) wide. It hails from the Oort cloud, another layer of icy objects even more distant than the Kuiper Belt.

    At least 155 of the newly discovered objects are what astronomers called “detached.” This means that they are far enough from Neptune that the large planet’s gravity doesn’t affect them much; instead, they’re mostly tied to the solar system by the distant pull of the sun. Detached objects, sometimes known as extended scattered disc objects, tend to have huge elliptical orbits.

    The findings are exciting, the researchers wrote in their paper, because the Dark Energy Survey wasn’t meant as a search for trans-Neptunian objects. Its goals were to characterize the theoretical dark energy that affects the universe’s accelerating expansion. Nevertheless, the data from the survey contains 20% of all currently-known TNOs, the researchers wrote, covering an eighth of the sky.

    “These will be valuable for further detailed statistical tests of formation models for the trans-Neptunian region,” they wrote.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
  • #74686

    Scientists chip away at secrets of planet formation, origin of life in bevy of new research


    An artist’s depiction of planets forming from the disk around the young star GM Aurigae.

    A whopping 20 new scientific papers use data gathered by a host of radio dishes perched high in the Chilean desert to tease apart the mysteries of how planets form.

    The Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array (ALMA) specializes in studying what scientists call protoplanetary disks, the mess of material that surrounds young stars and eventually gloms together to build planets. While scientists do plenty of work analyzing already-formed exoplanets, studying protoplanetary disks as well offers an opportunity to see all those ingredients mixed up and spread out.

    A new set of 20 papers published in The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series shares results from a research program called Molecules with ALMA at Planet-forming Scales (MAPS), which uses the powerful facility to study protoplanetary disks.

    One of the new papers maps the presence of more than a dozen organic molecules throughout five different protoplanetary disks. Organic molecules, which contain carbon, are of particular interest to scientists trying to understand how life begins.

    “These planet-forming disks are teeming with organic molecules, some which are implicated in the origins of life here on Earth,” Karin Öberg, an astronomer at the Center for Astrophysics at Harvard & Smithsonian (CfA) and principal investigator for MAPS, said in a statement. “This is really exciting; the chemicals in each disk will ultimately affect the type of planets that form — and determine whether or not the planets can host life.”

    The maps don’t only show that organic compounds exist in protoplanetary disks, they show that the distribution of such ingredients varies. So, two planets forming in different regions of the same protoplanetary disk could end up with vastly different supplies of these compounds.


    Hydrogen cyanide emissions from a young star called HD 163296 overlay an artist’s depiction of a starfield.

    “Our maps reveal it matters a great deal where in a disk a planet forms,” Öberg said. “Two planets can form around the same star and have very different organic inventories, and therefore predispositions to life.”

    In addition to locating different ingredients, the research also identified compounds built with deuterium, which is a form of hydrogen twice as heavy as the most commonly found flavor of that element. Deuterium levels vary across a disk, the research suggested, with much less of the atom found closer to the star at the heart of the disk.

    Scientists working on the research suite were also able to detect the very earliest signs of a planet coalescing out of a disk. That’s usually very difficult — the same dust and debris that forms the disk itself also blocks the tiny baby stages of planets.

    “It’s like trying to see a fish underwater,” Richard Teague, an astronomer also at CfA and lead of a segment of the MAPS project, said in the same statement. “We know they’re there, but we can’t peer that far down. We have to look for subtle signs on the surface of the water, like ripples and waves.”


    ALMA data show levels of three different compounds surrounding two young stars.

    Another segment of the MAPS research focused on the precursors of massive Jupiter-like planets, in which elements like carbon and oxygen seemed to be much rarer than compounds like methane.

    “Our findings suggest that many gas giants may form with extremely oxygen-poor (carbon-rich) atmospheres, challenging current expectations of planet compositions,” Arthur Bosman, an astronomer at the University of Michigan and lead author of one of the papers, said in a different statement.

    Overall, the research shows that there’s plenty more to learn about what surrounds young stars, how planets form and what that means for the universe and life’s prospects in it.

    “We’re hoping to use ALMA to search for the next stepping stones of chemical complexity in these disks,” John Ilee, an astronomer at the University of Leeds in the U.K. and lead researcher on a new MAPS study, said in another statement. “If we detect them, then we’ll be even closer to understanding how the raw ingredients of life can be assembled around other stars.”

    1 user thanked author for this post.
  • #74912

    Space.com – Calendar
    there’s more in the link…

    Sept. 20: The full moon of September, known as the Full Harvest Moon, occurs at 7:55 p.m. EDT (2355 GMT).

    Sept. 22: The equinox arrives at 3:21 p.m. EDT (1921 GMT), marking the first day of autumn in the Northern Hemisphere and the first day of spring in the Southern Hemisphere.

    Oct. 6: The new moon arrives at 7:05 a.m. EDT (1105 GMT)

    Oct. 8: The Draconid meteor shower, which is active Oct. 6-10, will peak overnight.

    Oct. 9: Conjunction of the moon and Venus. The waxing crescent moon will pass about 3 degrees to the north of Venus. Look for the pair above the western horizon after sunset.

    Oct. 14: Conjunction of the moon and Saturn. The waxing gibbous moon will swing about 4 degrees to the south of Saturn in the evening sky.

    Oct. 15: Conjunction of the moon and Jupiter. The waxing gibbous moon will swing about 4 degrees to the south of Jupiter in the evening sky.

    Oct. 20: The full moon of October, known as the Full Hunter’s Moon, occurs at 10:57 a.m. EDT (1457 GMT).

    Oct. 21-22: The annual Orionid meteor shower, which is active all month long, peaks overnight.

    Oct. 24: Mercury at greatest elongation west. The innermost planet will reach its greatest western separation from the sun, shining brightly at magnitude -0.6. Catch the elusive planet above the eastern horizon shortly before sunrise. The following day (Oct. 25) Mercury will reach its highest point in the morning sky.

    Nov. 2-3: The annual South Taurid meteor shower peaks overnight. Active from mid-September to mid-November, the Southern Taurids rarely produce more than five visible meteors per hour, but the nearly-new moon should make them easier to spot against a dark sky.

    Nov. 4: The new moon arrives at 5:15 p.m. EDT (2115 GMT).

    Nov. 4: Uranus is at opposition, meaning it will appear at its biggest and brightest of the year. Shining at magnitude 5.7, the planet will be visible all night long in the constellation Aries. Uranus may be to the naked eye from dark locations but is best seen through a telescope or binoculars.

    Nov. 7: Daylight Saving Time ends. Turn your clocks back one hour at 2 a.m. local time.

    Nov. 8: Conjunction of the moon and Venus. The waxing crescent moon will pass about 1 degree to the north of Venus. Look for the pair above the western horizon after sunset. Skywatchers in parts of Eastern Asia will see the moon occult Venus, meaning it will briefly pass in front of the planet, blocking it from sight.

    Nov. 10: Conjunction of the moon and Saturn. The waxing crescent moon will swing about 4 degrees to the south of Saturn in the evening sky.

    Nov. 11: Conjunction of the moon and Jupiter. The first-quarter moon will swing about 4 degrees to the south of Jupiter in the evening sky.

    Nov. 11-12: The annual North Taurid meteor shower peaks overnight. The shower, which is active from late October to mid-December, is not expected to produce more than a handful of visible “shooting stars” per hour.

    Nov. 16-17: One of the most anticipated meteor showers of the year, the Leonid meteor shower peaks overnight. The Leonids are expected to produce about 15 meteors per hour on the night of the peak, but the shower is active all month long.

    Nov. 19: The full moon of November, known as the Full Beaver Moon, occurs at 3:58 a.m. EST (0858 GMT).

    Nov. 19: A partial lunar eclipse will be visible from North and South America, Australia, and parts of Europe and Asia. The moon will enter Earth’s faint outer shadow, known as the penumbra, at 1:02 a.m. EDT (0602 GMT). The partial eclipse, when the moon will darken more noticeably, begins at 2:18 a.m. EDT (0718 GMT). Maximum eclipse occurs at 4:02 a.m. EDT (0902 GMT). The entire event will last about six hours.

    Dec. 4: The only total solar eclipse of the year (and the last total solar eclipse until 2023) will be visible from Antarctica. Skywatchers in South Africa, Namibia, the southern tip of South America and some islands in the South Atlantic will be able to see at least a partial solar eclipse, with the moon blocking a portion of the sun from view.

    Dec. 4: The new moon arrives at 2:44 a.m. EST (0744 GMT).

    Dec. 6: Conjunction of the moon and Venus. The waxing crescent moon will pass about 2 degrees to the north of Venus. Look for the pair above the western horizon after sunset.

    Dec. 7: Conjunction of the moon and Saturn. The waxing crescent moon will swing about 4 degrees to the south of Saturn in the evening sky.

    Dec. 9: Conjunction of the moon and Jupiter. The waxing crescent moon will swing about 4 degrees to the south of Jupiter in the evening sky.

    Dec. 13-14: The annual Geminid meteor shower, one of the best meteor showers of the year, peaks overnight. The Geminids are active Dec. 4-17 often produce up to 50 visible meteors per hours, but this year the 78% full moon will outshine the fainter meteors.

    Dec. 18: The full moon of December, known as the Full Cold Moon, occurs at 11:37 p.m. EST (0437 Dec. 19 GMT).

    Dec. 21: The solstice arrives at 10:59 a.m. EST (1559 GMT), marking the first day of winter in the Northern Hemisphere and the first day of summer in the Southern Hemisphere.

    Dec. 21-22: The annual Ursid meteor shower peaks overnight. Typically active around Dec. 17-26, the Ursids produce about five to 10 visible meteors per hour on the morning of the peak.

    2 users thanked author for this post.
  • #74996

    Space Force unveils dress uniforms for guardians

    2 users thanked author for this post.
  • #75019

    Nov. 4: Uranus is at opposition

    Too bad this is not a Tuesday. 1st Tuesdays in November are always days filled with anuses at opposition :mail: :negative:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Election_Day_(United_States)

     

    3 users thanked author for this post.
  • #75133

    Astronomers discover mysterious 500-light-year-wide ‘cavity’ in our Milky Way

    A supernova likely carved it out millions of years ago.


    Astronomers have discovered a giant, spherical cavity within the Milky Way galaxy; its location is depicted on the right. A zoomed-in view of the cavity (left) shows the Perseus and Taurus molecular clouds in blue and red, respectively. Though they appear to sit within the cavity and touch, new 3D images of the clouds show they border the cavity and are quite a distance apart.

    Astronomers have discovered an enormous cavity in the Milky Way galaxy that is believed to have formed after a stellar explosion millions of years ago.

    The bubble-shaped void is 500 light-years wide and is located between star-forming regions in the Perseus and Taurus constellations, a new study reports.

    The star-forming clusters of gas and dust, known as molecular clouds, are believed to have formed in tandem from the same supernova, or explosion of a star that has reached the end of its life, about 10 million years ago. The new finding may shed light on how supernovas generate star formation, study team members said.

    “Hundreds of stars are forming or exist already at the surface of this giant bubble,” study lead author Shmuel Bialy, a postdoctoral researcher at the Institute for Theory and Computation (ITC) at the Harvard-Smithsonian Center For Astrophysics (CfA), said in a statement.

    “We have two theories — either one supernova went off at the core of this bubble and pushed gas outward, forming what we now call the ‘Perseus-Taurus Supershell,’ or a series of supernovae occurring over millions of years created it over time,” Bialy said.

    Using data from the European Space Agency’s star-mapping Gaia spacecraft, the researchers were able to map the Perseus and Taurus molecular clouds in 3D for the first time, revealing the massive void that remained elusive in previous 2D maps of the region.

    “We’ve been able to see these clouds for decades, but we never knew their true shape, depth or thickness. We also were unsure how far away the clouds were,” co-author Catherine Zucker, a postdoctoral researcher at the CfA, said in the statement. “Now we know where they lie with only 1% uncertainty, allowing us to discern this void between them.”

    The team created the 3D molecular cloud maps using a data visualization software called Glue, which was founded by Alyssa Goodman, who is a CfA astronomer and co-author of the study. The team mapped the star-forming regions to better understand how gas and dust released during a stellar explosion rearranges itself in molecular clouds to form new stars. Their findings suggest that the Perseus and Taurus molecular clouds formed as a result of the same supernova shockwave, demonstrating the powerful effects of such stellar explosions.

    “This demonstrates that when a star dies, its supernova generates a chain of events that may ultimately lead to the birth of new stars,” Bialy said.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
  • #75158

    Astronomers discover mysterious 500-light-year-wide ‘cavity’ in our Milky Way

    This is what happens when galaxies forget to floss after dinner.

    3 users thanked author for this post.
  • #75266

    Ancient impact that formed Earth’s moon was likely a one-two punch

    Twice the cosmic violence!


    Earth’s moon is thought to have formed when a Mars-sized object, called Theia, slammed into the proto-Earth more than 4.4 billion years ago, blasting out material that later coalesced into a large satellite as depicted in this artist’s illustration.

    The gigantic impact that created the moon was actually a one-two punch, a new study suggests.

    Scientists think that the moon, our planet’s only natural satellite, was born in violence, coalescing from the material blasted into space after a Mars-size body named Theia slammed into the proto-Earth more than 4.4 billion years ago.

    But there are some problems with the canonical collision scenario, which invokes a single catastrophic event, the authors of the new study said.

    “The standard model for the moon requires a very slow collision, relatively speaking, and it creates a moon that is composed mostly of the impacting planet, not the proto-Earth, which is a major problem since the moon has an isotopic chemistry almost identical to Earth,” lead author Erik Asphaug, a professor at the University of Arizona’s Lunar and Planetary Laboratory (LPL), said in a statement.


    The moon is thought to be the aftermath of a giant impact. According to a new theory, there were two giant impacts in a row, separated by 100,000 to 1 million years, involving a Mars-sized body called Theia and proto-Earth. In this image, the proposed hit-and-run collision is simulated in 3D, shown about an hour after impact. A cut-away view shows the iron cores. Theia (or most of it) barely escapes, so a follow-on collision is likely.

    Double whammy made the moon

    Asphaug and his colleagues performed computer simulations of the long-ago giant impact and came up with what they believe to be a better fit: Theia and the proto-Earth crashed at faster speeds than previously envisioned, producing an initial “hit and run” collision that set the stage for a slower, accretionary encounter between the two battered bodies about 100,000 to 1 million years down the road.

    “The double impact mixes things up much more than a single event, which could explain the isotopic similarity of Earth and moon, and also how the second, slow, merging collision would have happened in the first place,” Asphaug said.

    Hit-and-run collisions weren’t restricted to the nascent Earth-moon system in those early days. Indeed, such bouncing smashups were probably about as common as accretionary mergers in the ancient inner solar system, the same research team reports in a second new study.

    Blocking space rocks for Venus

    In the second paper, the scientists modeled giant impacts in the inner solar system, how those collisions affected planet formation and how the orbits of the involved objects evolved over time. They found that Earth likely acted as a sort of shield for Venus, taking the brunt of hit-and-run first impacts. Those initial collisions slowed the impactors down, setting the stage for accretionary mergers with Venus later.

    “The prevailing idea has been that it doesn’t really matter if planets collide and don’t merge right away, because they are going to run into each other again at some point and merge then,” Alexandre Emsenhuber, the lead author of the second study, said in the same statement.

    “But that is not what we find,” said Emsenhuber, who performed the research during a postdoctoral fellowship in Asphaug’s lab at LPL and is now at Ludwig Maximilian University in Munich, Germany. “We find they end up more frequently becoming part of Venus, instead of returning back to Earth. It’s easier to go from Earth to Venus than the other way around.” (This is because Venus lies closer to the sun, whose powerful gravity draws objects in.)

    The results suggest that the compositions of Earth and Venus may differ more than scientists had thought.

    “You would think that Earth is made up more of material from the outer system because it is closer to the outer solar system than Venus,” Asphaug said. “But actually, with Earth in this vanguard role, it makes it actually more likely for Venus to accrete outer solar system material.”

    1 user thanked author for this post.
  • #75400

    Love and rockets: We need to figure out how to have sex in space for human survival and well-being

    Houston, we have a problem!


    It’s important to understand sex and eroticism in space.

    Houston, we have a problem! Love and sex need to happen in space if we hope to travel long distances and become an interplanetary species, but space organizations are not ready.

    National agencies and private space companies — such as NASA and SpaceX — aim to colonize Mars and send humans into space for long-term missions, but they have yet to address the intimate and sexual needs of astronauts or future space inhabitants.

    This situation is untenable and needs to change if we hope to settle new worlds and continue our expansion in the cosmos — we’ll need to learn how to safely reproduce and build pleasurable intimate lives in space. To succeed, however, we also need space organizations to adopt a new perspective on space exploration: one that considers humans as whole beings with needs and desires.

    As researchers exploring the psychology of human sexuality and studying the psychosocial aspects of human factors in space, we propose that it is high time for space programs to embrace a new discipline: space sexology, the comprehensive scientific study of extraterrestrial intimacy and sexuality.

    The final, intimate frontier

    Love and sex are central to human life. Despite this, national and private space organizations are moving forward with long-term missions to the International Space Station (ISS), the moon and Mars without any concrete research and plans to address human eroticism in space. It’s one thing to land rovers on another planet or launch billionaires into orbit — it’s another to send humans to live in space for extended periods of time.

    In practice, rocket science may take us to outer space, but it will be human relations that determine if we survive and thrive as a spacefaring civilization. In that regard, we argue that limiting intimacy in space could jeopardize the mental and sexual health of astronauts, along with crew performance and mission success. On the other hand, enabling space eroticism could help humans adapt to space life and enhance the well-being of future space inhabitants.

    After all, space remains a hostile environment, and life aboard spacecrafts, stations or settlements poses significant challenges for human intimacy. These include radiation exposure, gravitational changes, social isolation and the stress of living in remote, confined habitats. In the near future, life in space may also limit access to intimate partners, restrict privacy and augment tensions between crew members in hazardous conditions where co-operation is essential.

    To date, however, space programs have almost completely omitted the subject of sex in space. The few studies that relate to this topic mostly focus on the impacts of radiation and micro- or hyper-gravity on animal reproduction (rodents, amphibians and insects).

    Pleasure and taboo

    But human sexuality is about more than just reproduction. It includes complex psychological, emotional and relational dynamics. Love and sex are also pursued for fun and pleasure. As such, space exploration requires the courage to address the intimate needs of humans honestly and holistically.

    Abstinence is not a viable option. On the contrary, facilitating masturbation or partnered sex could actually help astronauts relax, sleep and alleviate pain. It could also help them build and maintain romantic or sexual relationships and adapt to space life.

    Importantly, addressing the sexological issues of human life in space could also help combat sexism, discrimination and sexual violence or harassment, which are unfortunately still pervasive in science and the military — two pillars of space programs.

    Due to taboos and conservative sexual views, some organizations may choose to ignore the realities of space intimacy and sexuality. They may also think that this is a non-issue or that there are more pressing matters to attend to. But this attitude lacks foresight, since producing quality science takes time and resources, and sexual health — including pleasure — is increasingly recognized as a human right.

    More and more, this means that space agencies and private companies may be held accountable for the sexual and reproductive well-being of those that they take into space.

    Thus, space organizations who submit to their conservative funders will likely pay the price of their inaction in a very public and media-fueled way when disaster strikes. The hammer may fall particularly hard on the organizations who have not even tried addressing human eroticism in space, or when the world learns that they knowingly failed to conduct the proper research and take the necessary precautions that scientists have been requesting for more than 30 years.

    Intimacy beyond Earth

    To move forward, space organizations must stop avoiding sexual topics and fully recognize the importance of love, sex and intimate relationships in human life.

    Accordingly, we encourage them to develop space sexology as a scientific field and research program: one that not only aims to study sex in space, but also design systems, habitats and training programs that allow intimacy to take place beyond our home planet, Earth.

    We further propose that, given its expertise and the sociopolitical climate of Canada, the Canadian Space Agency is ideally positioned to become a world leader in space sexology. We have what it takes to pave the way for an ethical and pleasurable space journey, as we continue to boldly go where no one has gone before.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
  • #75459

    they have yet to address the intimate and sexual needs of astronauts or future space inhabitants.

    you know, I would love to comment on this but this makes me speechless. @sean_robinson between this and the boomerang drive by that created the moon these posts have been most amusing. It has been said very often but I believe it needs to be said again that Astrophysicists have TOO MUCH time on their hands.

    2 users thanked author for this post.
  • #75462

    In space, no one can hear you scream “DADDY!”

    3 users thanked author for this post.
  • #75463

  • #75642

    Evidence Indicates There’s Another Planet the Size of Mars in Our Solar System

    If it’s there, the rumored Planet 9 may have company.


    A rogue planet with a flash of an eclipsed star, and a cosmic background.

    Our solar system has more surprises in store.

    The eight official planets aren’t the only ones that survived the formation of our solar system, and the Earth might have another sister planet lurking somewhere in interstellar space, in a “third zone” of the solar system, according to a recent paper published in the journal Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics.

    This means that, if Planet 9 is out there, it might have a Mars-sized company.

    Computer simulations hint at a Mars-sized twin beyond Neptune

    The new study examines data from the mysterious third zone of the solar system, and suggests that, beyond Neptune, there might be something the size of Mars lurking in the darkness. Modern astronomy categorizes all known planets in our solar system into three types. You’re on one of the first, since the Earth is one of the four rocky inner planets that orbit the sun within the main asteroid belt that separates Mars and Jupiter. The second group is the outer solar system, and is also the realm of the gas giants Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, and Neptune. These accumulated unspeakably large quantities of gas and ice around what scientists suspect are rocky cores.

    But the third region of our solar system lies beyond what we typically include in casual conversation about the local planets. Out beyond Neptune is the realm of dwarf planets like Pluto, Sedna, Eris, and even tinier bodies, like comets. But this is all wrong, according to the researchers of the recent study. “It seems unlikely that nature created four giant planet cores, but then nothing else larger than dwarf planents in the outer solar system,” said Kathryn Volk from the University of Arizona and Brett Gladman, of the University of British Columbia, in the study. To fully grasp how the solar system came into being, scientists employ computer simulations to see if special initial conditions or events might evolve into a solar system like ours.

    The hypothetical rogue world isn’t Planet 9

    Multiple models that most closely approximate our real solar system start with at least one extra planet in a baffling position, according to Volk and Gladman. These models hint that the outer solar system used to house one or more rocky planets, roughly the size of Earth or Mars, in addition to the colossal gas and ice giants we now have. But over time, the interaction of these rocky wanderers with the outsized gravity fields of the gas giants nudged them into a far-out orbit, or even on an exit trajectory, away from the entire neighborhood. “I agree that it is likely that a Mars planet was there initially,” said Planetary Scientist David Nesvorny of the Southwest Research Institute, in an Inverse report. “ut the question is whether it has survived and if we have any evidence for it.”

    “Our simulations found that in about half of the cases” of simulated solar systems like ours, “all of the Mars-scale planets in the outer solar system were ejected into interstellar space,” said Astrophysicist Scott Tremaine, of the Institute for Advanced Study, in the Inverse report. “But in the remaining half, one ‘rogue’ planet was left in an orbit similar to that of the detached population of the Kuiper Belt objects.” If this novel rogue planet exists, it won’t be Planet 9, which is a much larger body some scientists suspect exists even farther in space beyond Neptune. But while more modeling could help us pin down where the Mars-sized rogue is lurking, ultimately the only proof will be: To find it.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
  • #75809

    Exceptionally rare planet with three suns may lurk in Orion’s nose

    A Jupiter-sized world may be kicking up dust in the triple-star system GW Ori.


    GW Orionis has three stars centered within three wobbly rings of dust. Astronomers think there could be a rare, three-sun planet in the mix too.

    There’s now even more evidence that a bizarre star system perched on the constellation Orion’s nose may contain the rarest type of planet in the known universe: a single world orbiting three suns simultaneously.

    The star system, known as GW Orionis (or GW Ori) and located about 1,300 light-years from Earth, makes a tempting target for study; with three dusty, orange rings nested inside one another, the system literally looks like a giant bull’s-eye in the sky. At the center of that bull’s-eye live three stars — two locked in a tight binary orbit with each other, and a third swirling widely around the other two.

    Triple-star systems are rare in the cosmos, but GW Ori gets even weirder the closer astronomers look. In a 2020 paper published in The Astrophysical Journal Letters, researchers took a close look at GW Ori with the Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array (ALMA) telescope in Chile, and discovered that the system’s three dust rings are actually misaligned with one another, with the innermost ring wobbling wildly in its orbit.


    The three dusty rings of GW Orionis, a triple star solar system in the Orion constellation. The wobbly inner ring may contain a young planet.

    The team proposed that a young planet, or the makings of one, could be throwing off the gravitational balance of GW Ori’s intricate triple-ring arrangement. If the detection is confirmed, it would be the first triple-sun planet (or “circumtriple” planet ) in the known universe. Eat your heart out, Tatooine!

    Now, a paper published Sept. 17 in the journal Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society offers fresh evidence of that rare planet’s existence. The study authors conducted 3D simulations to model how the mysterious gaps in the star system’s rings could have formed, based on observations of other dust rings (or “protoplanetary disks”) elsewhere in the universe.

    The team tested two hypotheses: Either the break in GW Ori’s rings formed from the torque applied by the three twirling stars at the system’s center, or the break appeared when a planet formed within one of the rings.

    The researchers concluded that there is not enough turbulence in the rings for the stellar torque theory to work. Rather, the models suggest that the presence of an enormous, Jupiter-size planet — or perhaps several planets — is the likelier explanation for the rings’ strange shape and behavior.

    If future observations of the system support that theory, GW Ori may be “the first evidence of a circumtriple planet carving a gap in real time,” lead study author Jeremy Smallwood, from the University of Nevada, Las Vegas, told The New York Times.

    Sadly, a hypothetical observer of this maybe-planet wouldn’t actually be able to see all three suns rise and fall in the sky; the two stars at the center of the system move in such a tight binary orbit that they would appear as one great star, with the third swooping around them, the researchers said.

    But, if confirmed, the mere existence of this world would prove that planets can form under a wider array of conditions than scientists previously realized. If three suns and a wobbling mish-mash of dust rings aren’t enough to thwart a fledgling planet, then who knows what is.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
  • #75851

    The Moon Is Leaving Us. And we can’t stop it. – The Atlantic.com

    The moon is drifting away from us.

    Each year, our moon moves distinctly, inexorably farther from Earth—just a tiny bit, about an inch and a half, a nearly imperceptible change. There is no stopping this slow ebbing, no way to turn back the clock. The forces of gravity are invisible and unshakable, and no matter what we do or how we feel about them, they will keep nudging the moon along. Over many millions of years, we’ll continue to grow apart.

    Given this rather melodramatic description, you might wonder: Don’t you have better things to think about than the moon? Well no, not really, because I’m a space reporter and it’s my job to contemplate celestial bodies and write about them. And also because a representation of this phenomenon recently played out in China during festivities for the Mid-Autumn Festival, which marks the full moon closest to the fall equinox. A giant balloon designed to resemble the moon, craters and all, broke free and rolled into the street. Video footage of the unscripted moment shows two people running after the massive moon as it tumbles away. Bye!

    The moon used to be closer. When it first formed, about 4.5 billion years ago, molded out of rocky debris that had been floating around Earth, the moon orbited 10 times nearer to the planet than it does today. The debris, scientists believe, had come from a collision between Earth and a mysterious Mars-sized object. Fresh out of the cosmic oven, the moon was hot and molten, glowing red in the night sky. Back then, scientists say, the moon was moving away at a rate of about eight inches per year.

    Our planet and its moon were always going to grow apart like this. The gravity of moons, small as they are in comparison, can still tug at their planets, causing the larger worlds to bulge outward a little bit. On an ocean-covered planet like ours, the effect shows up in the shifting tides. The moon pulls at our oceans, but those oceans pull back, making the moon speed up in its orbit. And “if you speed up while orbiting Earth, you are escaping Earth more successfully, so you orbit from a farther distance,” James O’Donoghue, a planetary scientist at JAXA, Japan’s space agency, explained to me. Scientists refer to this phenomenon as “lunar retreat”—a delightful term, as I’d prefer to imagine the moon enjoying itself at a relaxing getaway, bending its rocky body into various yoga poses, rather than slowly ghosting Earth.

    Scientists have measured this retreat by beaming lasers at mirrors that the Apollo astronauts left on the moon, using that data, along with other sources, to estimate past movements. The rate of lunar retreat has shifted over the years; spikes have coincided with significant events, such as a bombardment of meteors on the moon and fluctuating ice ages on Earth. The constant retreat has influenced Earth beyond the ebb and flow of its tides. The forces that draw the moon away from us are also slowing down the planet’s rotation, stretching out the length of our days. In the beginning, when the moon was cozying up to us and Earth spun faster, a day lasted just four hours. At the current rate of lunar retreat, it would take a century to tack on an extra two milliseconds or so to the length of the day.

    The moon is expected to continue drifting this way for the very scientific measure of forever. And, despite the premise of an upcoming action movie called Moonfall, it’s not going to smack into us either. Someday, about 600 million years from now, the moon will orbit far enough away that humankind will lose one of its oldest cosmic sights: total solar eclipses. The moon won’t be able to block the sun’s light and cast its own shadow onto Earth. But the moon will remain bound to Earth, looking out onto a very different, much hotter version of the planet, as oceans start to evaporate. Of course, a few billion years after that, the sun will derail the moon entirely, and Earth too, when it runs out of fuel, expands, and engulfs the inner solar system in a spectacular act of star death.

    This weekend, I looked through a telescope for the first time, into a much calmer solar system. (I know, right? Some space reporter I am!) A neighbor had set one up on my building’s roof, and I tried to pay attention as he explained the different lenses and their amplification capacity, but I was too excited, thinking only, Let me see, let me see. I had seen the moon just as a bright two-dimensional orb in the sky, with dark spots that play tricks on our brains, making us see familiar patterns where none exist. People have interpreted these glyphs in many ways: a human face, the silhouette of a rabbit. What has the moon seen in us? “The moon had been observing the earth close-up longer than anyone,” the Japanese writer Haruki Murakami wrote in his novel 1Q84. “It must have witnessed all of the phenomena occurring—and all of the acts carried out—on this earth.” The moon is still watching. What must it be thinking now, after such a horrid year and a half?

    My neighbor swiveled his telescope across the cloudless sky. There was Jupiter and its twisty bands, faint but unmistakable, and three tiny points of light just off to the side—its largest moons. There was Saturn, a perfect ball, its rings sticking out at each side. And then there was the moon: covered in craters and cracks and shadows, so richly textured that the skin of my fingertips prickled at the sight, as if I were rolling the moon around in my hand like a marble, feeling its jagged edges. I decided not to spoil the moment for everyone else on the roof that night by telling them that the moon was, slowly but surely, distancing itself from us. The experience of distance—from our families, from a time of relative normalcy—had already tormented many of us enough. Better to focus on the little image in the lens, on seeing the moon properly for the first time. It may be wishing Earth a very long goodbye, but it was nice to say hello.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
  • #75903

    The moon is drifting away from us…Over many millions of years, we’ll continue to grow apart.

    Sounds like this belongs in the Relationship Thread. :unsure:

    4 users thanked author for this post.
  • #76327

    Modernizing Planetary Protection: Less Restrictive “Bioburden” Rules Would Make Mars Missions Simpler

    2 users thanked author for this post.
  • #76596

    What if the universe had no beginning?


    An artist’s depiction of the expansion of the universe.

    In the beginning, there was … well, maybe there was no beginning. Perhaps our universe has always existed — and a new theory of quantum gravity reveals how that could work.

    “Reality has so many things that most people would associate with sci-fi or even fantasy,” said Bruno Bento, a physicist who studies the nature of time at the University of Liverpool in the U.K.

    In his work, he employed a new theory of quantum gravity, called causal set theory, in which space and time are broken down into discrete chunks of space-time. At some level, there’s a fundamental unit of space-time, according to this theory.

    Bento and his collaborators used this causal-set approach to explore the beginning of the universe. They found that it’s possible that the universe had no beginning — that it has always existed into the infinite past and only recently evolved into what we call the Big Bang.

    A quantum of gravity

    Quantum gravity is perhaps the most frustrating problem facing modern physics. We have two extraordinarily effective theories of the universe: quantum physics and general relativity. Quantum physics has produced a successful description of three of the four fundamental forces of nature (electromagnetism, the weak force and the strong force) down to microscopic scales. General relativity, on the other hand, is the most powerful and complete description of gravity ever devised.

    But for all its strengths, general relativity is incomplete. In at least two specific places in the universe, the math of general relativity simply breaks down, failing to produce reliable results: in the centers of black holes and at the beginning of the universe. These regions are called “singularities,” which are spots in space-time where our current laws of physics crumble, and they are mathematical warning signs that the theory of general relativity is tripping over itself. Within both of these singularities, gravity becomes incredibly strong at very tiny length scales.

    As such, to solve the mysteries of the singularities, physicists need a microscopic description of strong gravity, also called a quantum theory of gravity. There are lots of contenders out there, including string theory and loop quantum gravity.

    And there’s another approach that completely rewrites our understanding of space and time.

    Causal set theory

    In all current theories of physics, space and time are continuous. They form a smooth fabric that underlies all of reality. In such a continuous space-time, two points can be as close to each other in space as possible, and two events can occur as close in time to each other as possible.

    But another approach, called causal set theory, reimagines space-time as a series of discrete chunks, or space-time “atoms.” This theory would place strict limits on how close events can be in space and time, since they can’t be any closer than the size of the “atom.”

    For instance, if you’re looking at your screen reading this, everything seems smooth and continuous. But if you were to look at the same screen through a magnifying glass, you might see the pixels that divide up the space, and you’d find that it’s impossible to bring two images on your screen closer than a single pixel.

    This theory of physics excited Bento. “I was thrilled to find this theory, which not only tries to go as fundamental as possible — being an approach to quantum gravity and actually rethinking the notion of space-time itself — but which also gives a central role to time and what it physically means for time to pass, how physical your past really is and whether the future exists already or not,” Bento told Live Science.


    Space-time is made up of discrete chunks or space-time “atoms,” similar to the pixels of a computer image.

    Beginning of time

    Causal set theory has important implications for the nature of time.

    “A huge part of the causal set philosophy is that the passage of time is something physical, that it should not be attributed to some emergent sort of illusion or to something that happens inside our brains that makes us think time passes; this passing is, in itself, a manifestation of the physical theory,” Bento said. “So, in causal set theory, a causal set will grow one ‘atom’ at a time and get bigger and bigger.”

    The causal set approach neatly removes the problem of the Big Bang singularity because, in the theory, singularities can’t exist. It’s impossible for matter to compress down to infinitely tiny points — they can get no smaller than the size of a space-time atom.

    So without a Big Bang singularity, what does the beginning of our universe look like? That’s where Bento and his collaborator, Stav Zalel, a graduate student at Imperial College London, picked up the thread, exploring what causal set theory has to say about the initial moments of the universe. Their work appears in a paper published Sept. 24 to the preprint database arXiv. (The paper has yet to be published in a peer-reviewed scientific journal.)

    The paper examined “whether a beginning must exist in the causal set approach,” Bento said. “In the original causal set formulation and dynamics, classically speaking, a causal set grows from nothing into the universe we see today. In our work instead, there would be no Big Bang as a beginning, as the causal set would be infinite to the past, and so there’s always something before.”

    Their work implies that the universe may have had no beginning — that it has simply always existed. What we perceive as the Big Bang may have been just a particular moment in the evolution of this always-existing causal set, not a true beginning.

    There’s still a lot of work to be done, however. It’s not clear yet if this no-beginning causal approach can allow for physical theories that we can work with to describe the complex evolution of the universe during the Big Bang.

    “One can still ask whether this [causal set approach] can be interpreted in a ‘reasonable’ way, or what such dynamics physically means in a broader sense, but we showed that a framework is indeed possible,” Bento said. “So at least mathematically, this can be done.”

    In other words, it’s … a beginning.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
  • #77027

    Deep-space radiation could cause have big impacts on the brain, mouse experiment shows


    This visualization shows space radiation interacting with Earth’s magnetosphere.

    Could deep-space radiation seriously affect the human brain?

    In a new study, male mice exposed to simulated galactic cosmic radiation (GCR) — high-energy radiation in space more commonly known as deep-space radiation — experienced impaired spatial learning. Spatial learning in mice is similar to declarative memory in humans, or the ability to remember what happens day-to-day. The female mice in the study did not show spatial learning impairments.

    “There is ample evidence now from our lab and other labs showing that deep-space radiation affects the central nervous system. So we do need to study this stressor, [and] there are many questions still to answer,” co-author Susanna Rosi, a researcher at the University of California, San Francisco, told Space.com in an email.

    Deep-space radiation is of concern to space agencies and companies as astronauts traveling even on short-duration jaunts to space have to consider the possible effects of the radiation on human health. While researchers continue to conduct research to better understand how radiation in space could affect human health, scientists do know that increased radiation in space does put astronauts at higher risk for health effects like cancer.

    “We know the moment we go outside the Earth’s magnetosphere we are not protected anymore from deep-space radiation,” Rosi said.

    In this study, researchers explored the possible health effects of deep-space radiation by exposing a group of mice to simulated GCR in a controlled environment. “We can’t ethically irradiate humans so the mouse model is the best approximation we can use,” Rosi said.

    “All experiments were conducted in accordance with [the] National Institutes of Health Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals and were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of University of California (San Francisco),” the researchers wrote in a paper describing the study.

    Five months after being irradiated, the mice were observed over several weeks to see how they behaved. The mice were tasked with finding a hidden platform in water using navigational cues.

    When compared to control subjects, the male mice exposed to radiation had, on average, more errors in trying to find the platform, showing impairments in their spatial learning. The female mice did not show these effects.

    “We have previously shown in a study published in 2018 that using a different but similar dosing regimen, female mice were protected from the effects of space radiation,” Rosi said. “Male mice showed activated innate immune system in the brain while female [mice] did not. We believe that these sex differences are due to the way that the innate immune system microglia respond (in male mice) or don’t respond (in female mice) to radiation.”

    The team also evaluated the mice’s behavior and indicators of anxiety, sociability and social memory but observed no changes.

    The researchers were also able to identify a blood biomarker that could be used to predict which male mice could be at risk of cognitive effects. They also found that, by temporarily depleting brain immune cells (known as microglia) after exposure, it could help to mitigate some of the effects seen in these male mice.

    “This research in line with others suggests that we need to consider the effects of deep space radiation for the astronauts, we need to find mitigators that can help,” Rosi said. “The research also tells us that mitigators currently approved in humans to deplete microglia could be used by astronauts!”

    2 users thanked author for this post.
  • #77045

    This visualization shows space radiation interacting with Earth’s magnetosphere.

    No, it clearly shows a giant space spider about to ravage the Earth.

    2 users thanked author for this post.
Viewing 100 replies - 401 through 500 (of 650 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Skip to toolbar