Space

Author
Topic
#7584

I figured there needed to be a “Space” thread.
If the mods think it should be rolled into the Science thread, I have no problem with that.
If it’s the “nutjobs” this thread seems to pull in you’re worried about, just double-up on the tinfoil hat
_______________________
The following has been debunked. see post #9 on Dec.14th)
Toldya about the tinfoil hat…
_______________________________________________________
Scientists Just Found an “Impossible” Black Hole in The Milky Way Galaxy
A newfound black hole in the Milky Way is weirdly heavy
Monster black hole that ‘should not exist’ discovered in the Milky Way

The chemical composition of our galaxy’s most massive stars suggests that they lose most of their mass at the end of their lives through explosions and powerful stellar winds, before the star’s core collapses into a black hole.

The hefty stars in the mass range that could produce a black hole are expected to end their lives in what is called a pair-instability supernova that completely obliterates the stellar core. So astronomers are scratching their heads trying to figure out how the black hole – named LB-1 – got so chonky.

“Black holes of such mass should not even exist in our galaxy, according to most of the current models of stellar evolution,” said astronomer Jifeng Liu of the National Astronomical Observatory of China.

“LB-1 is twice as massive as what we thought possible. Now theorists will have to take up the challenge of explaining its formation.”

Viewing 100 replies - 1 through 100 (of 650 total)
Author
Replies
  • #7666

    We Have Some Good News About The Life Expectancy of Jupiter’s Great Red Spot
    .

    Despite what you might have heard, Jupiter’s Great Red Spot is probably not on the point of total disintegration.

    The most powerful storm in our Solar System has been shrinking for at least a hundred years, computational physicist Philip Marcus says, but that doesn’t mean it’s actually dying.

    “I don’t think its fortunes were ever bad,” says Marcus, who works at the University of California, Berkeley (UC Berkeley).

    “It’s more like Mark Twain’s comment: The reports about its death have been greatly exaggerated.”

  • #7898

    How big is the universe?

  • #7907

    Thiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiis big!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • #7909

    I checked with the only reference book that matters and it told me:

    “Space is big. Really big. You just won’t believe how vastly hugely mind-bogglingly big it is. I mean, you may think it’s a long way down the road to the chemist, but that’s just peanuts to space.”

    1 user thanked author for this post.
  • #7910

    How big is the universe?

    Just big enough.

  • #8357

    Asteroid Bennu’s Mysterious Particle Events Explained by NASA’s OSIRIS-REx

    …“Among Bennu’s many surprises, the particle ejections sparked our curiosity, and we’ve spent the last several months investigating this mystery,” said Dante Lauretta, OSIRIS-REx principal investigator at the University of Arizona, Tucson. “This is a great opportunity to expand our knowledge of how asteroids behave.”…


    __________________
    NASA’s Hubble space telescope captures stunning galaxy image

    “Despite being just over 130 million light-years away, the orientation of the galaxy with respect to us makes it easier to spot these new ‘stars’ as they appear; we see NGC 5468 face on, meaning we can see the galaxy’s loose, open spiral pattern in beautiful detail in images such as this one from the NASA/ESA Hubble Space Telescope,” said the ESA, in a statement posted on NASA’s website.


    _________________
    The Mystery at the Center of the Solar System

    For a little NASA spacecraft, the weather outside is frightful.

    The Parker Solar Probe is on a mission toward the sun. The spacecraft has been exposed to scorching temperatures and intense sunlight as it draws closer with every loop around. Eventually, Parker will glide through the star’s outer atmosphere and feel the toastiness of nearly 2 million degrees Fahrenheit (more than 1 million degrees Celsius).

  • #8623

    Neptune-Sized Planet Found Orbiting a Dead White Dwarf Star. Here’s the Crazy Part, the Planet is 4 Times Bigger Than the Star

    Astronomers have discovered a large Neptune-sized planet orbiting a white dwarf star. The planet is four times bigger than the star, and the white dwarf appears to be slowly destroying the planet: the heat from the white dwarf is evaporating material from the planet’s atmosphere, forming a comet-like tail.

    White dwarf star spotted nibbling on the atmosphere of a nearby icy planet
    .

    __________________________________________
    .
    IT’S RAINING ASTEROIDS THROUGH DECEMBER —13 SPACE ROCKS TO MAKE AN APPEARANCE DAYS FROM EACH OTHER

    A total of 13 asteroids will hurtle through space and pass Earth this December. While a few will pass really close to the Earth, none of them are going to collide with the planet in a dramatic doomsday scenario.

  • #9066

    Planets Started Out From Dust Clumping Together. Here’s How

    According to the most widely accepted theory of planet formation (the Nebular Hypothesis), the Solar System began roughly 4.6 billion years ago from a massive cloud of dust and gas (aka. a nebula). After the cloud experienced gravitational collapse at the center, forming the Sun, the remaining gas and dust fell into a disk that orbited it. The planets gradually accreted from this disk over time, creating the system we know today.

    However, until now, scientists have wondered how dust could come together in microgravity to form everything from stars and planets to asteroids. However, a new study by a team of German researchers (and co-authored by Rutgers University) found that matter in microgravity spontaneously develops strong electrical charges and stick together. These findings could resolve the long mystery of how planets formed.

    ____________________________________

    ‘Monster Black Hole’ Discovery Was Wrong — But That’s How Science Progresses, Scientists Say

    Apparently, that “monster black hole” that researchers found isn’t so monstrous after all. But finding errors and working to correct them in how science pushes forward.

    In a recent study (a peer-reviewed study published Nov. 27), a team of scientists reported the discovery of the binary system LB-1, which contains a star and, according to the findings, a black hole companion 70 times the mass of our sun. This was major news, a stellar-mass black holes (black holes formed by the gravitational collapse of a star) are typically less than half that massive. But while the study, led by Jifeng Liu, of the National Astronomical Observatory of China (NAOC) of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, was exciting, it was also wrong.

  • #9103

    I can’t see this thread title with thinking this:

  • #10164

    Apparently, that “monster black hole” that researchers found isn’t so monstrous after all.

    Well, okay. At least this did finally make me look up what the difference between stellar black holes and supermassive black holes is, and that was quite fascinating.

  • #10323

    Newfound “Ablating” Exoplanets Could Reveal Alien Geology

    Move over, Icarus. Six newly discovered exoplanets have been discovered flying so close to their host stars that they are literally evaporating—creating a ring of debris. The discovery of the planets, published today in three separate papers in Nature Astronomy, were identified using a new technique that first looked for that ring of debris. It is thus an efficient method to find small planets orbiting extremely close to their star, which have long eluded detection. In addition, follow-up studies should allow astronomers to probe the geology of these “ablating” worlds and better understand how such planets form and evolve—perhaps even shedding light on the oddities within our own solar system.


    ________________________________
    Asteroids, Comets, Black Holes – 2019 in Astronomy

    From asteroids and (interstellar) comets to black holes and the sun, 2019 has been full of amazing space science.

    This past year has been a fantastic one for astronomy and planetary science. On New Year’s Day, two spacecraft reached their targets, and things took off from there. Join us as we review some of the hottest science news from the last 12 months.

  • #10369

    sun

  • #10795

    Google Maps Now Throws You Into Hyperspace When Switching Between Planets

    Google Maps is one of the best services for navigating the planet and, for a couple of years now, the web version of Maps has been able to show you the surface of other planets too. Now, Google has quietly updated Maps to throw users into hyperspace when switching between planets…


    ____________________________________
    .
    Radio Jupiter: Seeing the Giant Planet in a Brilliant New Light

    Jupiter is the largest planet in our solar system. It is also the brightest planet at radio frequencies. While radio astronomy often focuses on more distant objects such as nebulae and galaxies, the radio astronomy of planets begins with Jupiter.

    While other planets in our solar system emit radio light, Jupiter is by far the most radio bright. When charged particles in space interact with Jupiter’s magnetic field, they emit radio light through a process known as synchrotron radiation. The first radio observation of Jupiter was made by Bernard Burke and Kenneth Franklin in 1955. They weren’t expecting such a signal, so they initially thought it was the radio noise of a farm-hand driving home. But subsequent observations showed the signal was Jovian in origin.


    ______________________________
    .
    The 10 Biggest Asteroids That Pose a Threat to Earth in 2020


    ______________________________
    .
    and for fun…
    .
    Scientists want to MOVE the Sun and the Solar System to Save Earth from Killer Asteroids
    .

  • #10852

    throw users into hyperspace when switching between planets…

    reminds me of Doctor Who. bummed I don’t hear the theme when it happens.

  • #10853

    and for fun…
    .
    Scientists want to MOVE the Sun and the Solar System to Save Earth from Killer Asteroids
    .

  • #10925

    . Scientists want to MOVE the Sun and the Solar System to Save Earth from Killer Asteroids .

    Pfft, they’re just copying Edmund Hamilton plots from the 1930s.

  • #11332

    NASA Telescope has Found it’s First habitable Earth-Sized Planet
    Links: New Scientist, Astronomy Magazine, Business Insider, Science Alert,

    One hundred light years away, there is a planet that might be just right for life. Called TOI 700 d, the planet is the first Earth-sized world with moderate temperatures found by NASA’s newest planet-hunting space telescope, the Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite (TESS).

    TOI 700 d orbits a star about 40 per cent the size of the sun and half its temperature. It’s fairly close to the star, orbiting in what is called the habitable zone – the area around a star that is just warm enough for water on a world’s surface to remain liquid but not so hot that it evaporates. This exoplanet gets 86 per cent as much sunlight as Earth.


    .

  • #11333

    Real Life Tatooine Found
    .
    NASA discovers first planet orbiting two suns
    .

    Imagine a world with two suns like the fabled, fictional home of the Skywalker clan from Star Wars. But this planet is oriented just right so it has a view of one sun eclipsing the other every 15 days.

    NASA’s newest planet-hunting satellite TESS has just spotted an exoplanet with these characteristics, though it’s not likely to be a clone of Tatooine — the dry, sandy and rocky world where George Lucas began his decades-running space epic.

    The planet carries the less memorable moniker TOI 1338 b, and it’s the first planet circling a binary star (or circumbinary) system discovered by the Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite, aka TESS. It weighs in at around seven times the size of Earth, making it closer to the size of Saturn and therefore more likely to be an uninhabitable gas giant than a place hosting sneaky Jawas and other desert dwellers.

  • #11425

    (Tess from Last of Us which seemed the most relevant per Videogame thread)

    Tess sounds really busy this week.

  • #11585

    Supermassive Black Hole Firing Jets at 99% the Speed of Light

    The famous black hole at the heart of the M87 galaxy is emitting jets of material that travel at near the speed of light.

    The black hole at the heart of the Messier 87 galaxy bears the name M87*, and astronomers have been observing it for a long time.

  • #11831

    Real Life Tatooine Found
    .
    NASA discovers first planet orbiting two suns
    .

    Imagine a world with two suns like the fabled, fictional home of the Skywalker clan from Star Wars. But this planet is oriented just right so it has a view of one sun eclipsing the other every 15 days.

    NASA’s newest planet-hunting satellite TESS has just spotted an exoplanet with these characteristics, though it’s not likely to be a clone of Tatooine — the dry, sandy and rocky world where George Lucas began his decades-running space epic.

    The planet carries the less memorable moniker TOI 1338 b, and it’s the first planet circling a binary star (or circumbinary) system discovered by the Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite, aka TESS. It weighs in at around seven times the size of Earth, making it closer to the size of Saturn and therefore more likely to be an uninhabitable gas giant than a place hosting sneaky Jawas and other desert dwellers.

    Good its climate is not like Tatooine’s. Sand is course, rough and irritating, and gets everywhere. :-)

  • #11873

    Real Life Tatooine Found
    .
    NASA discovers first planet orbiting two suns

    The news story on this yesterday revealed that the planet was actually discovered by a 17 year old kid from Scarsdale NY who was interning at the Goddard Space Center. What were you doing when you were 17?

  • #12058

    This Newly Discovered Asteroid Is the Second-Closest Natural Object to the Sun
    .

    Move over, Venus. A newfound asteroid orbits the sun closer than you do.
    A newly discovered asteroid that circles the sun inside Venus’ orbit is breaking all kinds of records. In addition to being the first known asteroid with this orbit, the space rock, called 2020 AV2, has the smallest aphelion, or distance from the sun, of any known natural object in the solar system, excluding Mercury.

    Moreover, by traveling around the sun in a mere 151 days, 2020 AV2 has the shortest orbital period of any known asteroid, according to The Virtual Telescope Project, an online observatory based in Italy.


    .

  • #12059

    This Newly Discovered Asteroid Is the Second-Closest Natural Object to the Sun
    .

    Move over, Venus. A newfound asteroid orbits the sun closer than you do.
    A newly discovered asteroid that circles the sun inside Venus’ orbit is breaking all kinds of records. In addition to being the first known asteroid with this orbit, the space rock, called 2020 AV2, has the smallest aphelion, or distance from the sun, of any known natural object in the solar system, excluding Mercury.

    Moreover, by traveling around the sun in a mere 151 days, 2020 AV2 has the shortest orbital period of any known asteroid, according to The Virtual Telescope Project, an online observatory based in Italy.


    .

  • #12249

    Proxima B: Potential Super-Earth Found Orbiting The Nearest Star From Our Sun

    In 2016, astronomers found a potentially habitable planet called Proxima b around the star Proxima Centauri, which is only 4.2 light-years from Earth.
    Now, researchers have traced a second signal they believe belongs to a super-Earth orbiting the same star, increasing the intrigue of this neighboring planetary system and its potential.
    All of these stars are within the faint Centaurus constellation, which can’t be seen with the unaided eye.


    .

  • #13542

    World’s largest solar telescope produces never-before-seen image of our star
    s

  • #13557

    Space-time is swirling around a dead star, proving Einstein right again

    Space-time is indeed churned by massive rotating bodies, as scientists had thought.
    The way the fabric of space and time swirls in a cosmic whirlpool around a dead star has confirmed yet another prediction from Einstein’s theory of general relativity, a new study finds.

    That prediction is a phenomenon known as frame dragging, or the Lense-Thirring effect. It states that space-time will churn around a massive, rotating body. For example, imagine Earth were submerged in honey. As the planet rotated, the honey around it would swirl — and the same holds true with space-time.

    Satellite experiments have detected frame dragging in the gravitational field of rotating Earth, but the effect is extraordinarily small and, therefore, has been challenging to measure. Objects with greater masses and more powerful gravitational fields, such as white dwarfs and neutron stars, offer better chances to see this phenomenon…


    ——————————-

    Jupiter and Saturn may leave marks on the sun’s corpse

    White dwarfs could soak up clues about far-flung gas giants in their systems.
    Alien scientists billions of years from now may detect traces of Jupiter, Saturn, Neptune and Uranus in our sun’s corpse.

    That’s because the outer layers of superdense stellar remnants known as white dwarfs may often possess the remains of giant planets, a new study suggests.

    White dwarfs are the Earth-size cores left behind after average-size stars have exhausted their fuel and shed their outer layers. Our sun will one day end up as a white dwarf, as will more than 90% of all stars in our Milky Way galaxy…

  • #13614

    Physicists: Ancient life might have escaped Earth and journeyed to alien stars

    A pair of researchers presented a wild new theory in a new paper.
    A pair of Harvard astrophysicists have proposed a wild theory of how life might have spread through the universe.

    Imagine this:

    Millions or billions of years ago, back when the solar system was more crowded, a giant comet grazed the outer reaches of our atmosphere. It was moving fast, several tens of miles above the Earth’s surface — too high to burn up as a fireball, but low enough that the atmosphere slowed it down a little bit. Extremely hardy microbes were floating up there in its path, and some of those bugs survived the collision with the ball of ice. These microbes ended up embedded deep within the comet’s porous surface, protected from the radiation of deep space as the comet rocketed away from Earth and eventually out of the solar system entirely. Tens of thousands, maybe millions, of years passed before the comet ended up in another solar system with habitable planets. Eventually, the object crashed into one of those planets, deposited the microbes — a few of them still living — and set up a new outpost for earthly life in the universe.

    You could call it “interstellar panspermia,” the seeding of distant star systems with exported life.

    We have no idea whether this ever actually happened –.and there’s a mountain of reasons to be skeptical. But in a new paper, Amir Siraj and Avi Loeb, both astrophysicists at Harvard University, argue that at least the first part of this story — the depositing of the microbes into a comet that gets ejected from the solar system — should have happened between one and a few dozen times in Earth’s history. Siraj told Live Science that although a lot more work needs to be done to back up the finding, it should be taken seriously — and that the paper may have been, if anything, too conservative in its estimate of the number of life-exporting events.

    While the study’s concept may seem far-fetched, humanity is constantly confronted with seeming impossibilities, like Earth going around the sun, or quantum physics, or bacteria hitching a ride into the galaxy aboard a comet — that turn out to be true, Siraj said

    And there’s been reason to suspect that it might be possible. A series of experiments using small rockets in the 1970s found colonies of bacteria in the upper atmosphere. Comets really do enter and leave our solar system from time to time, and Siraj and Loeb’s calculations show that it’s plausible, maybe even likely, this has happened to large comets that graze Earth. Comets are porous, and might actually shield microbes from deadly radiation some microbes can survive a remarkably long time in space.

    That alone is reason for scientists to take the idea seriously, Siraj said, and for researchers from fields like biology to jump in and figure out some of the details.

    “It’s a brand new field of science,” he told Live Science

    However, Stephen Kane, an astrophysicist at the University of California, Riverside, told Live Science that he was deeply skeptical of the suggestion that microbes from Earth might have actually turned up alive on alien planets through some version of this process.

    The first problem would occur when the comet slammed into the atmosphere, he said. Siraj and Loeb point out that some bacteria can survive extraordinary accelerations. But the precise mechanism by which the microbes would adhere to the comet is unclear, Kane said, since the aerodynamic forces around the comet might make it impossible for any microbes to reach the surface and work their way deep enough below the surface to be protected from radiation.

    It’s also not clear, he said, whether any microbes would really have been up high in our atmosphere in the first place Those rocket experiments from the 1970s are old and questionable, he said, and we still don’t have a good picture of what the biology of the upper atmosphere really looks like today — let alone hundreds of millions of years ago, when comet encounters were much more common.

    The biggest question, though, Kane said, is what would happen to the microbes after they landed aboard the comet. It’s plausible, he said, that some bacteria might survive decades in space — long enough to reach, say, Mars. But there’s little direct evidence that any bacteria might survive the thousands or millions of years necessary to travel to another habitable star system. And that’s really the key idea of this paper: Researchers have long suggested that debris from major collisions might blast life around between our solar system’s planets and moons. But exporting life to an alien star system likely requires a more specialized scenario.

    Still, Kane said, the calculations in this study of how precisely a comet might skim through the atmosphere were new to him, and “very interesting.”

    Siraj didn’t strongly challenge any of Kane’s concerns, but reframed them one by one as opportunities for further study. He wants to know, he said, precisely what the biology of the upper atmosphere looks like, and how comets might react to it. There’s reason to think that at least some bacteria might survive super-long trips through deep space, he said, based on how robust they are under extreme conditions on Earth and in orbit. But for now, it’s time for scientists across fields to jump in and start filling in the gaps, Saraj said.

  • #13634

    Coincidentally, I was at a talk about astrobiology last week. Fucking fascinating field, that. One of the things they were talking about is that there’s a moon of Saturn, Enceladus, that in all likelihood could support terran, carbon-based life – they recreated, as far as they can tell, the environmental conditions there and a kind of archaea (um, they’re like bacteria, but different?) not only survived this environment, but actually thrived in it.

    Surviving the travel to even another object in the stellar system still seems unlikely, but it’s interesting to know that theoretically, there would’ve been both a way for life to break away from Earth and that it might conditions in which it might survive.

     

    The most interesting other thing that astrobiologist seem to be doing is trying to figure out what kind of alternatives to carbon-based life there are and in which conditions it might develop. Apparently, it’s not all that crazy to think about silicon forming life, provided the environment is devoid of water and there are high enough pressures involved as well as high amounts of methane as a solvent.

  • #14017

    British ‘X-Files’ of UFO sightings is going public

    The U.K.’s Ministry of Defense will publish secret UFO reports for the first time.
    From the early 1950s until 2009, a department in the United Kingdom’s Ministry of Defence (MoD) documented and investigated reports of UFOs. Now, more than a decade after the program ended, many of those formerly classified files about UFO sightings will be made available to the public for the first time.

    Previously, some MoD files about UFOs had been published online at the U.K. National Archives website, The Telegraph reported. However, all of the agency’s UFO reports will be released this year on “a dedicated gov.uk web page,” a spokesperson for the British Royal Air Force (RAF) told The Telegraph.

    The decision came after PA Media, a British news agency, filed a request for the UFO files under the Freedom of Information Act, according to The Telegraph. MoD officials decided “it would be better to publish these records, rather than continue sending documents to the National Archives,” the RAF spokesperson said.

    The U.K.’s fascination with UFOs spiked around 1950, prompting the MoD to form the Flying Saucer Working Party to address the phenomenon, according to the U.K. National Archives. UFOs in the early 1950s even captured the attention of Prime Minister Winston Churchill, who sent a memo to his air minister in 1952 asking, “What does all this stuff about flying saucers amount to? What can it mean? What is the truth?”

    The flying saucer group concluded that UFOs were hoaxes, delusions or ordinary objects that were misidentified, recommending “that no further investigation of reported mysterious aerial phenomena be undertaken.” Nevertheless, other MoD divisions continued the work of official UFO investigation in the U.K., ushering such efforts into the 21st century, The National Archives reported.

    The last UFO report to be published online by the MoD dates to 2009, covering sightings that took place from January through the end of November of that year. These included “a silver disc-shaped light” (reported in January 2009), “up to 20 orange and red glowing lights” (reported in June), “a large bright silver/white ball/sphere” (reported in July) and “three blazing gold orbs in a diagonal line in the sky” (reported in September).

    After MoD enacted a policy change on Dec. 1, 2009, the agency no longer recorded or investigated UFO sightings, according to the report. But what they did find — including many recent UFO reports that were previously available only as hard copies — will be published online within the next few months, said Nick Pope, a former UFO investigator for the MoD.

    “There should be some interesting nuggets in these new files,” Pope told The Express.

  • #14018

    Spectacular rainbow cloud in space spawned by cosmic showdown between stars

    The red giant star engulfed its smaller stellar companion
    Using the Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array (ALMA), astronomers observed the binary star system called HD101584, revealing a peculiar gas cloud that is believed to be the result of a confrontation between the two stars, according to a statement from the European Southern Observatory.

    Data from ALMA and the Atacama Pathfinder EXperiment (APEX) shows that one of the stars grew so large that it engulfed the other. As the smaller star spiraled towards its giant stellar companion, it caused the larger, sun-like star to shed its outer layers, resulting in the expanding clouds of gas captured in the newly released ALMA images.

    Typically, when sun-like stars burn through all the hydrogen at their core, they become a bright red-giant star. When this type of star dies, it sheds its outer layers, leaving behind a hot, dense remnant called a white dwarf.

    However, the evolution of the red giant in HD101584 “was terminated prematurely and dramatically as a nearby low-mass companion star was engulfed by the giant,” Hans Olofsson, an astronomer at the Chalmers University of Technology in Sweden who led new research on the star pair, said in the statement.

    As the smaller star spiraled toward its larger companion, jets of gas formed, which, in turn, propelled the material ejected from the red giant out into space. This process formed the rings of gas and the bright blue and red blobs of material seen in the ALMA images. The blue clouds of gas represent the material moving the fastest toward us, while the red clouds of gas represent the material moving the fastest away from us, according to the statement.

    Based on the ALMA observations, the researchers suggest the low-mass companion star was captured by the red giant star when it reached a critical size only a few hundred years ago, according to the statement.

    The smaller star spiraled in towards the red giant, but stopped before reaching its core, which is why the pair appears so close together and is represented as a single bright dot at the center of ALMA image.

    “Currently, we can describe the death processes common to many sun-like stars, but we cannot explain why or exactly how they happen,” a Sofia Ramstedt, co-author on the new research and an astronomer at Uppsala University in Sweden, said in the statement. “HD101584 gives us important clues to solve this puzzle since it is currently in a short transitional phase between better studied evolutionary stages. With detailed images of the environment of HD101584 we can make the connection between the giant star it was before, and the stellar remnant it will soon become.”

    Their findings were published last year in the journal Astronomy & Astrophysics.

  • #14370

    Solar Orbiter probe launching today to unveil secrets of the sun’s poles

    CAPE CANAVERAL, Florida — Solar Orbiter, an international collaboration between the European Space Agency (ESA) and NASA, is from here on Sunday (Feb. 9). Its goal: to study the sun up close.

    To do so, the craft is outfitted with a suite of 10 instruments — four remote-sensing and six imagers — that will make detailed observations, providing a comprehensive view of our star. The spacecraft will also capture the first images of the sun’s polar regions. Liftoff is set for at 11:03 p.m. EST (0403 GMT on Feb. 10).

    “Solar Orbiter will be the first time we send a satellite out to take images of the sun’s poles, and we’ll get the first-ever data of the sun’s polar magnetic fields,” Daniel Müller, the mission’s ESA project scientist, said in a prelaunch science briefing on Feb. 7. “We believe this area holds the keys to unraveling the mysteries of the sun’s activity cycle.”
    Click link for more…

    ____________________________________________________

    NASA’s Parker Solar Probe spotted ‘stealth’ outburst on the sun

    Coronal mass ejections aren’t known for being subtle: Each such event can fling huge amounts of the soup of charged particles called plasma off the sun and out into the solar system.

    In November 2018, as seen from Earth and certain spacecraft, the sun seemed to be calm. But it wasn’t: The sun was experiencing what scientists call a “stealth” coronal mass ejection. And conveniently, NASA’s Parker Solar Probe was completing its first close pass behind the sun, putting its instruments in a perfect position to see what was happening on Nov. 11 and 12 during this usually cryptic event.
    More in link…

  • #14371

    Rare monster galaxy grew rapidly 12 billion years ago … then suddenly died

    Astronomers don’t know why the monster’s star-birth engine shut down.
    Astronomers just discovered a rare monster galaxy that grew rapidly in the universe’s early days — and then went quiet surprisingly fast.

    The newfound giant, known as XMM-2599, lies about 12 billion light-years from Earth, meaning that scientists are seeing the galaxy as it existed when the universe was quite young. (The Big Bang that created the universe occurred 13.82 billion years ago.)

    “Even before the universe was 2 billion years old, XMM-2599 had already formed a mass of more than 300 billion suns, making it an ultramassive galaxy,” Benjamin Forrest, a postdoctoral researcher in the Department of Physics and Astronomy at the University of California Riverside (UCR), said in a statement.

    “More remarkably, we show that XMM-2599 formed most of its stars in a huge frenzy when the universe was less than 1 billion years old, and then became inactive by the time the universe was only 1.8 billion years old,” added Forrest, the lead author of a new study reporting the discovery of XMM-2599.

    Forrest and his colleagues used an instrument called the Multi-Object Spectrograph for Infrared Exploration (MOSFIRE), which is installed on a telescope at the Keck Observatory in Hawaii. The MOSFIRE observations allowed the team to nail down XMM-2599’s mass and its distance from Earth.

    The researchers also determined that the galaxy created more than 1,000 suns’ worth of stars every year during its activity peak. (For comparison, our Milky Way is currently forming just one solar mass of new stars annually.) But that peak is in the rearview mirror for XMM-2599; its star-birth engine has shut down, for reasons that remain unclear.

    “Even though such massive galaxies are incredibly rare at this epoch, the models do predict them,” study co-author Gillian Wilson, a physics and astronomy professor at UCR who heads the lab in which Forrest works, said in the same statement.

    “The predicted galaxies, however, are expected to be actively forming stars,” Wilson added. “What makes XMM-2599 so interesting, unusual and surprising is that it is no longer forming stars, perhaps because it stopped getting fuel or its black hole began to turn on. Our results call for changes in how models turn off star formation in early galaxies.”

    The researchers will continue to observe XMM-2599 using Keck, in an attempt to better characterize the galaxy and investigate unanswered questions about it. The most prominent such question may concern the galaxy’s fate.

    “We do not know what it will turn into by the present day,” Wilson said. “We know it cannot lose mass. An interesting question is what happens around it. As time goes by, could it gravitationally attract nearby star-forming galaxies and become a bright city of galaxies?”

    The new study was published online Wednesday (Feb. 5) in The Astrophysical Journal Letters.

  • #14563

    Mysterious ‘fast radio bursts’ from deep space repeat themselves every 16 days

    What’s creating these unusual signals? And why does this one repeat itself?

    One of the universe’s deep mysteries just got a lot stranger. Astrophysicists have discovered a clue that could help explain why, every once in a while, superfast bursts of radio waves flash across Earth from deep space. But the clue — a repeating 16-day pattern in one of the bursts, undermines one of the most popular theories for where the bursts are coming from.

    Fast radio bursts (FRBs) have likely happened for billions of years. But humans only discovered them in 2007, and have detected only a few dozen of them since. And in June 2019, astronomers finally tracked an FRB to its home galaxy.

    But no one knows what causes them. Because these bursts are so rare, unusual and bright — considering that they’re visible from billions of light-years across space — physicists have tended to assume they come from a cataclysmic event, such as the collision of stars.

    This repeating pattern, however, suggests that something else is going on, that there’s some sort of natural machine in the universe for pumping regular shrieks of radio energy across space.

    Researchers looking at data from the Canadian Hydrogen Intensity Mapping Experiment Fast Radio Burst Project (CHIME/FRB) first spotted this FRB, known as FRB 180916.J0158+65, in 2019. In January 2020, they published a paper in the journal Nature that reanalyzed old data and found more than one burst from FRB 180916.J0158+65. They traced this FRB back to a relatively nearby spiral galaxy. What’s new in this latest paper, published Feb. 3 to the arXiv database, is the regular pattern in the bursts. The FRB, they found, goes through four-day cycles of regular activity, bleating out radio waves into space on an almost hourly basis. Then it goes into a 12-day period of silence. Sometimes the source seems to skip its usual four-day awake periods, or lets out only a single burst. CHIME/FRB is able to watch the FRB only some of the time, they noted, so it’s likely the detector misses many FRBs during the awake period.

    No one knows what this pattern means, the researchers noted in a statement, but this pattern doesn’t fit neatly into any existing explanations for FRBs.

    In general, patterns like this in astrophysics are often related to a spinning object or orbiting celestial bodies. Neutron stars often seem to strobe regularly from the perspective of X-ray detectors on Earth, because hot spots on their surface spin in and out of view like a lighthouse beacon. And tiny planets may dim the light of the stars they orbit everytime they pass between that star and Earth.

    In other words, for astrophysics, patterns tend to indicate rotation. But no one knows if this pattern governs all FRBs or just some of them.

  • #14612

    One of the universe’s deep mysteries just got a lot stranger. Astrophysicists have discovered a clue that could help explain why, every once in a while, superfast bursts of radio waves flash across Earth from deep space.

    To save you the time of reading the entire article, the simple answer is:

    It’s GALACTUS!!

  • #14654

    Mars took way longer to form than we thought, ancient impacts reveal

    Scientists believe early cosmic impacts may have influenced the evolution of Mars, and this suggests that the Red Planet formed much slower than previously thought.

    The early solar system was a violent, chaotic place, where planetesimals — small protoplanets measuring up to 1,200 miles (1,900 kilometers) in diameter — asteroids and other debris collided, shaping the planets and celestial bodies we know today.

    A new study from the Southwest Research Institute (SwRI) in San Antonio shows that Mars was likely struck by planetesimals early in its history. These large, long-ago collisions introduced “iron-loving” elements to the Red Planet, and those elements, in turn, influenced how quickly the planet formed, according to a statement from SwRI.

    Using Martian meteorite samples found on Earth, the researchers were able to model the mixture of materials that formed the early Martian mantle. The study revealed that Mars received a variety of elements — such as tungsten, platinum and gold — that are attracted to iron as a result of these collisions.

    “To investigate this process, we performed smoothed-particle hydrodynamics impact simulation,” Simone Marchi, lead author of the study from SwRI, said in the statement. “Based on our model, early collisions produce a heterogeneous, marble-cake-like Martian mantle.”

    The meteorite samples suggest that planetesimals bombarded the Red Planet sometime after the planet’s primary core formed. That’s because “iron-loving” elements like tungsten, platinum and gold generally migrate from a planet’s mantle to its central iron core during formation, according to the statement. “Evidence of these elements in the Martian mantle as sampled by meteorites are important because they indicate that Mars was bombarded by planetesimals sometime after its primary core formation ended,” SwRI said in the statement.

    Earlier studies of the ratio of tungsten isotopes in the Martian meteorite samples suggested that Mars grew rapidly, within 2 million to 4 million years after the solar system began forming, about 4.6 billion years ago. Because tungsten isotopes are produced via radioactive decay processes over time, the ratio of these isotopes in the mantle of Mars provides a clue about the timeline of the planet’s formation.

    However, the new models show that early, large collisions could have altered the ratio of elements in the Martian mantle, meaning the planet may have formed over a period of up to 20 million years.

    “Collisions by projectiles large enough to have their own cores and mantles could result in a heterogeneous mixture of those materials in the early Martian mantle,” Robin Canup, co-author and assistant vice president of SwRI’s Space Science and Engineering Division, said in the statement. “This can lead to different interpretations on the timing of Mars’ formation than those that assume that all projectiles are small and homogenous.”

    The findings, published Wednesday (Feb. 12) in the journal Science Advances, provide insight on how Mars evolved and how early collisions affected the planet’s formation. The Martian meteorites found on Earth are believed to be the result of more recent collisions with the Red Planet. These meteorite samples offer a unique view into Mars’ past, as they contain a record of the planet’s history, the researchers said.

    “To fully understand Mars, we need to understand the role the earliest and most energetic collisions played in its evolution and composition,” Marchi said in the statement.


    This illustration shows how early Mars may have looked, with signs of liquid water, large-scale volcanic activity and heavy bombardment from planetary projectiles. (Image credit: SwRI/Marchi)

  • #14720

    Scientists just watched a newfound asteroid zoom by Earth. Then they saw its moon.

    One of Earth’s premier instruments for studying nearby asteroids is back to work after being rattled by earthquakes, and its first new observations show that a newly discovered space rock is actually two separate asteroids.

    The instrument is the planetary radar system at the Arecibo Observatory in Puerto Rico. The observatory was closed for most of January, after a series of earthquakes hit the island beginning on Dec. 28, 2019. The observatory reopened on Jan. 29. Meanwhile, on Jan. 27, scientists using a telescope on Mauna Loa in Hawaii spotted an asteroid that astronomers hadn’t seen before. The team dubbed the newfound space rock 2020 BX12 based on a formula recognizing its discovery date.

    Because of the size of 2020 BX12 and the way its orbit approaches that of Earth, it is designated a potentially hazardous asteroid. However, the space rock has already come as close to Earth as it will during this pass (2.7 million miles or 4.3 million kilometers); astronomers have calculated the asteroid’s close approaches with Earth for the next century, and all will be at a greater distance than this one was.

    The asteroid’s flyby wasn’t a threat to life on Earth, but it was an opportunity for scientists who were hoping to learn more about space rocks. On Feb. 4 and 5, the radar station at Arecibo set its sights on 2020 BX12. Based on the observations, the scientists discovered that 2020 BX12 is a binary asteroid, with a smaller rock orbiting the larger rock. About 15% of larger asteroids turn out, on closer inspection, to be binary, according to NASA.

    The larger rock is likely at least 540 feet (165 meters) across, and the smaller one is about 230 feet (70 m) wide, according to the observations gathered by Arecibo. When the instrument observed the two space rocks on Feb. 5, they appeared to be separated by about 1,200 feet (360 m).

    Scientists couldn’t gather enough data to be sure, but they suspect that the two rocks might complete an orbit of each other in 45 to 50 hours and that the smaller rock may be brighter than, and tidally locked with, its companion, meaning the same side always faces the larger object.

    Existential dread is a key motivator for asteroid discoveries, and planetary defense experts hope that, by surveying nearby space rocks, they will identify a threat with enough time for us to protect ourselves. But asteroids are also scientifically interesting, since they represent rubble from the formation of the solar system.

  • #14722

    Arrokoth unmasked: NASA probe’s ‘space snowman’ encounter reveals how planetesimals are born

    The new results may end a longstanding debate.

    A NASA probe’s epic encounter with a small body in the far outer solar system is telling us a lot about how planets are born.

    On Jan. 1, 2019, the New Horizons spacecraft zoomed within just 2,200 miles (3,540 kilometers) of Arrokoth, a 22-mile-wide (36 kilometers) object in the Kuiper Belt, the ring of frigid bodies beyond Neptune’s orbit.

    It was the most distant planetary flyby in the history of spaceflight. Arrokoth lies 4.1 billion miles (6.6 billion km) from Earth — about 1 billion miles (1.6 billion km) farther away than Pluto, which New Horizons cruised past in July 2015.

    New Horizons found Arrokoth to be a suitably exotic denizen of this far-off realm, as the mission team reported last May in a study in the journal Science detailing the flyby’s initial science returns. The probe’s observations revealed a remarkably red object composed of two distinct lobes, both of which are surprisingly flattened. Arrokoth thus looks like a space snowman, albeit one that’s been beaten and bloodied.

    That snowman shape indicates that Arrokoth formed via a merger of two separate objects, and that this coalescence happened very long ago, back when impact speeds in the outer solar system were quite low. (Collisions in the modern Kuiper Belt are too violent to produce an object with lobes as distinct and undamaged as Arrokoth’s, New Horizons team members have said.)

    So, Arrokoth is a primordial body — a planetary building block, or planetesimal, left over from the solar system’s very early days. And each of its two lobes apparently came together in the same swirling, gravitationally collapsing cloud of dust and gas in the Kuiper Belt, far from the newborn sun, the researchers wrote in the May 2019 study.

    That initial interpretation has stood the test of time, it turns out.

    The mission team published three new Arrokoth papers online today (Feb. 13) in Science, reporting analyses of 10 times more flyby data than was at hand during the writing of last year’s study. (It takes a while for New Horizons to beam big datasets home.) The new studies largely confirm and extend the original conclusions about Arrokoth, and they nail down the distant object’s origin story.

    “Arrokoth has told us how planetesimals form, and therefore made a major advance in our understanding of planet formation,” New Horizons Principal Investigator Alan Stern, a co-author of all three new studies, told Space.com. “It is very decisive.”

    Two formation possibilities

    Arrokoth’s “cloud collapse” birth was far from a given. There’s a prominent competing theory about planetesimal formation called “hierarchical accretion,” which posits that the planetary building blocks are built up over time by high-speed collisions of objects from various locales.

    Hierarchical accretion is actually the more venerable idea, dating back 70 years or so, Stern said, whereas cloud collapse (also known as “pebble accretion”) was devised just at the beginning of this century.

    There has been considerable debate between advocates of the two theories over the past two decades. But the three new papers show convincingly how Arrokoth was born, said Stern, who’s based at the Southwest Research Institute (SwRI) in Boulder, Colorado.

    “With Arrokoth, there are half a dozen lines of evidence that all point to cloud collapse, and you can’t explain them with hierarchical accretion,” he said.

    Perhaps the strongest such evidence is provided by the object’s shape. As discussed above, the relatively intact nature of the two lobes implies a very gentle collision, not a high-speed wreck.

    In one of the new papers, researchers led by William McKinnon of Washington University in St. Louis performed detailed modeling of that long-ago merger. These simulations indicated that the two lobes likely formed from the same cloud of material, became a co-orbiting binary object and finally came together in a slow and non-destructive fashion. Indeed, the models peg the collision’s maximum speed at around 9 mph (15 km/h), and it may have been considerably less than that.

    This scenario is further bolstered by the geometric alignment of Arrokoth’s two lobes, which strongly suggests that the duo orbited the same center of mass (when they were separate, free-flying objects), the scientists wrote.

    Another of the new studies, led by SwRI’s John Spencer, digs into the geology and geophysics of Arrokoth, which also point to a cloud-collapse origin. For example, the density of craters on Arrokoth indicates that the object is ancient, with a surface at least 4 billion years old. And, like McKinnon and his team, Spencer et al. found a close alignment of the two lobes, whose poles and equators are geometrically in synch. (They also determined, among other interesting finds, that the lobes aren’t quite as flattened as originally believed.)

    In the third paper, Will Grundy of Lowell Observatory and Northern Arizona University and his colleagues investigated Arrokoth’s composition. They found that the object (which was previously known officially as 2014 MU69, and unofficially as Ultima Thule) is cold and extremely red, with methanol ice and carbon-containing organic materials on its mostly homogeneous surface. These complex organics are probably responsible for the object’s red hue, the researchers wrote. (New Horizons didn’t spot any water ice, but this material may still be on Arrokoth, lurking out of sight.)

    This overall picture is also consistent with a cloud-collapse birth, mission team members said. For instance, the compositional similarity of the two lobes suggests they formed from the same starter material.

    Born from a cloud

    Stern and his fellow New Horizons team members aren’t the only ones who find all this evidence convincing.

    “To me, the observations of Arrokoth show that planetesimals form from collapsing clouds of pebbles,” Anders Johansen, an astronomy professor at Lund University in Sweden, told Space.com via email.

    “The mechanism that gathers the pebbles into such clouds to begin with is called the streaming instability,” added Johansen, who was not involved in the three new studies. “It is amazing to see how Arrokoth resembles the planetesimals that we form in computer simulations of the streaming instability. So, I would say that these observations of Arrokoth provide a window to look into how planetesimals formed in the solar system more than 4.5 billion years ago.”

    This window could let in a great deal of light, according to Stern. He cited as a comparison the vigorous debate about the universe’s origins that stretched from the 1940s through the mid-1960s. Some researchers argued for the “steady state” theory, others pushed the “constant creation” model and a third group backed the Big Bang, Stern said.

    “They battled it out and battled it out and battled it out; nobody could tell who was right. And then, [Arno] Penzias and [Robert] Wilson stumbled onto the cosmic microwave background [in 1964] and settled it,” he said. “Two of the three went into the dustbin, and the Big Bang has been paradigm ever since. This is equivalent in planetary science.”

    Johansen as well sees extension of the newly announced results beyond just Arrokoth’s birth.

    “In the ‘pebble accretion’ theory, the formation of planets happens as the largest planetesimals continue to grow by accreting pebbles,” he said. “So, the fact that Arrokoth formed from a pebble cloud could mean that the solid cores of the giant planets — Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus and Neptune — formed from large planetesimals that continued to accrete pebbles. And maybe even the terrestrial planets in the solar system owe their existence to pebble accretion.”

    There’s one notable caveat to such talk of broader applications: Arrokoth must be representative of most if not all planetesimals, and not some one-off weirdo. But this condition is likely to be met. After all, Arrokoth is similar to other Kuiper Belt objects in size, color and reflectivity, Stern said. And the odds are slim that New Horizons would randomly sample an atypical cosmic body.

    Still going strong

    New Horizons launched in January 2006 to give humanity its first up-close looks at Pluto, which had remained mysterious since its 1930 discovery. The probe aced that primary mission, returning imagery of the dwarf planet that revealed it to be a stunningly complex and diverse world.

    The Arrokoth encounter is the centerpiece of New Horizons’ current extended mission, which runs through 2021. But the probe may well have another flyby in its future.

    New Horizons remains in great shape and has sufficient fuel to conduct another encounter, if the right object is found (and NASA approves another mission extension), Stern said. And, this summer, the mission team will begin a concerted search for potential future flyby targets, using the Subaru telescope in Hawaii and the Magellan and Gemini South telescopes in Chile.

    There’s no guarantee that this search will be successful, Stern stressed.

    “It took us four years to find Arrokoth, so I’m not promising anything,” he said. “But if you don’t swing the bat, you can’t hit the ball.”

  • #14759

    Existential dread is a key motivator for asteroid discoveries

    ????

    Cheerful young child” Yea, I am going to grow up and study space!”

    “Pragmatic” adult:”I’m sorry, you don’t have enough Existential Dread to be an Astronomer”

  • #16040

    Possible new Mini-Moon found orbiting Earth
    https://www.space.com/mini-moon-2020-cd3-discovered.html

    It’s been with us for three years, astronomers say. Sadly, it’ll probably be gone by spring.

    Tumbling through Earth’s increasingly crowded orbit are about 5,000 satellites, half a million pieces of human-made debris and only one confirmed natural object: the moon. Now, astronomers working out of the University of Arizona’s Steward Observatory think they may have discovered a second natural satellite — or at least a temporary one.

    Meet 2020 CD3, Earth’s newest possible “minimoon.”

    A minimoon, also known as a temporarily captured object, is a space rock that gets caught in Earth’s orbit for several months or years before shooting off into the distant solar system again (or burning up in our planet’s atmosphere).

    While astronomers suspect there is at least one minimoon circling Earth at any given time, these tiny satellites are rarely discovered, likely because of their relatively small size. Until now, only one confirmed minimoon has ever been detected: a 3–foot-wide (0.9 meters) asteroid called 2006 RH120, which orbited Earth for 18 months in 2006 and 2007.

    Now, there may be a second. Kacper Wierzchos, a senior research specialist for the NASA and University of Arizona-funded Catalina Sky Survey, announced the discovery of a new temporarily captured object via Twitter Tuesday (Feb. 25). The object appears to measure between 6.2 and 11.5 feet (1.9 to 3.5 m) in diameter and has a surface brightness typical of carbon-rich asteroids, Wierzchos wrote.

    According to an orbital model by amateur astrophysicist and San Francisco high school physics teacher Tony Dunn, the potential minimoon has likely been trapped by Earth’s gravity for about three years now and could make its exit in April 2020, resuming its regularly scheduled journey around the sun.

    n a perfect universe, our departing minimoon would fly off and become trapped by the moon’s gravity, creating an even rarer class of object: a moonmoon. Sadly, moonmoons remain only theoretical, and our possible new minimoon comes with some caveats of its own.

    While the object’s existence has since been confirmed by several other observatories, further analysis is required to say for certain that the object is an extraterrestrial rock and not a large shard of space junk. Hopefully, we’ll have an answer before April.

    3 users thanked author for this post.
  • #16041

    Boom! Scientists spot the biggest known explosion in the universe
    https://www.space.com/biggest-cosmic-explosion-universe-discovery.html

    The blast is five times bigger than any other known explosion.

    Astronomers have spotted a cosmic blast that dwarfs all others.

    A gargantuan explosion tore through the heart of a distant galaxy cluster, releasing about five times more energy than the previous record holder, a new study reports.

    “In some ways, this blast is similar to how the eruption of Mt. St. Helens in 1980 ripped off the top of the mountain,” study lead author Simona Giacintucci, of the Naval Research Laboratory in Washington, D.C., said in a statement. “A key difference is that you could fit 15 Milky Way galaxies in a row into the crater this eruption punched into the cluster’s hot gas.”

    The explosion occurred in the Ophiuchus cluster, which lies about 390 million light-years from Earth. Giacintucci and her colleagues think the source was a supermassive black hole in one of the cluster’s constituent galaxies — specifically, jets of radiation and material spewing from the light-gobbling monster, which are powered by inflowing gas and dust.

    The possibility of an incredibly powerful Ophiuchus explosion was first raised in 2016 in a study led by Norbert Werner, which examined images captured by NASA’s Chandra X-ray Observatory. Werner and his colleagues reported a strangely curved edge in the cluster, which could be part of the wall of a cavity formed by a blast. And what a blast it would be: The scientists calculated that it would take about 5 times 10^54 joules of energy to create such a cavity. (For perspective, humanity’s total global energy consumption each year is about 6 times 10^20 joules.)

    But the 2016 study didn’t establish that an explosion actually was responsible for that curved edge. Giacintucci and her colleagues just made that determination, after analyzing additional X-ray data from Chandra and Europe’s XMM-Newton space telescope, as well as radio information gathered by the Murchison Widefield Array in Australia and the Giant Metrewave Radio Telescope in India.

    The combined data show that the curved edge is indeed part of a cavity wall, because it borders an area rich in radio emission. That emission likely resulted when the black hole’s outburst accelerated electrons to nearly the speed of light, the researchers said.

    “The radio data fit inside the X-rays like a hand in a glove,” study co-author Maxim Markevitch, of NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Maryland, said in the same statement. “This is the clincher that tells us an eruption of unprecedented size occurred here.”

    The energy released by the Ophiuchus blast is hundreds of thousands of times greater than explosions typically seen in galaxy clusters, the researchers said. And it’s about five times higher than the previous record holder, an eruption in the cluster MS 0735.6+7421.

    The Ophiuchus fireworks appear to be over, by the way; the radio data show no evidence for ongoing jet activity, the scientists said.

    The Chandra data reveal just one region of radio emission. That’s a bit odd, because black-hole jets usually go off in two different directions. It’s possible that the jet-feeding gas on the other side — the one opposite the detected cavity — was less abundant and the radio emission there dissipated more quickly as a result, the researchers said.

    The new study was published in the Feb. 27 issue of The Astrophysical Journal. You can read a preprint of the paper for free via arXiv.org.


    Evidence for the biggest explosion seen in the universe comes from a combination of X-ray data from NASA’s Chandra X-ray Observatory and Europe’s XMM-Newton space telescope, and the Murchison Widefield Array and Giant Metrewave Telescope, as shown here. The eruption is generated by a black hole located in the cluster’s central galaxy, which has blasted out jets and carved a large cavity in the surrounding hot gas. Researchers estimate this explosion released five times more energy than the previous record holder and hundreds of thousands of times more than a typical galaxy cluster.

    • This reply was modified 4 years, 10 months ago by Sean Robinson.
    2 users thanked author for this post.
  • #16083

    Scientists need better naming procedures.  Calling something at best 12 ft in diameter a Moon stretches belief.  Also when I googled minimoon I got suggestions for shortened honeymoons. It is the size of a car. at best it is a rock. Astronomers are desperate for attention.

    2 users thanked author for this post.
  • #16093

    If a 12 foot rock can be a moon then Pluto can be a planet, dammit.

    4 users thanked author for this post.
  • #17264

    Rare double brown dwarf eclipse spotted in surprise discovery

    It’s a case of ‘scientific serendipity.’

    Astronomers scouring the cosmos for new planets have made a chance discovery, identifying the rare eclipse of two brown dwarfs.

    “This is a great example of scientific serendipity,” Adam Burgasser, a co-leading author on this study and a professor of physics at UC San Diego, said in a statement. “While searching for planets, we found an eclipsing brown dwarf binary, a system that is uniquely suited for studying the fundamental physics of these faint celestial objects.”

    Brown dwarfs, often referred to as “failed stars,” are celestial objects that are too big to be considered planets and too small to be stars. Roughly between the size of a giant planet and a small star, scientists think that these strange objects emit mostly infrared radiation. Brown dwarfs seem to form like less massive stars, and because astronomers consider them the missing link between gas giant planets like Jupiter and small stars like red dwarfs, they help to provide insights into scientists’ understanding of how objects like stars and planets form.

    Making a rare discovery

    This international team of researchers was working on a project called SPECULOOS (Search for habitable Planets EClipsing ULtra-cOOl Stars), which searches for planets orbiting tiny stars (and brown dwarfs). The project identifies planets by spotting them transiting, or passing, in front of their star, which causes a temporary dip in brightness.

    With this project the researchers set their sights on the brown dwarf 2MASSW J1510478-281817, better known as 2M1510. The brown dwarf, located in the constellation Libra, looked a little different, however. This led the team to speculate that it might actually be two brown dwarfs orbiting one another.

    “Among the first test observations we performed, we turned one of our telescopes to a known brown dwarf. But suddenly the object appeared to get dimmer for about 90 minutes, which indicated an eclipse just took place,” Michaël Gillon, principal investigator of the SPECULOOS project, said in the statement.

    “We rapidly realized that we were probably looking at two eclipsing brown dwarfs, one passing in front of the other, a configuration which is much rarer than planetary systems,” Artem Burdanov, a co-author on this study and a postdoctoral researcher at MIT, added in the statement.

    The team confirmed their suspicion that the brown dwarf was really two from observations with the powerful 10-meter Keck II telescope and the 8-meter Very Large Telescope in Chile, where the SPECULOOS telescopes are located.

    This is only the second such system to ever be identified, making it extremely rare. They are especially difficult to spot because the system needs to be aligned “just so” at just the right time for it to be observed and identified.

    What also made this a rare find was that there was a third component orbiting farther away from the two brown dwarfs, making it a brown dwarf triple system. Yet another unique feature of this system is that 2M1510 is among a very small group of brown dwarfs that scientists can determine the age of.

    “Collecting a combination of mass, radius and age is really rare for a star, let alone for a brown dwarf, Amaury Triaud, the primary author of this study and a Birmingham Fellow at the University of Birmingham in the U.K., said in the statement. “Usually one or more of these measurements is missing.”

    By filling in these missing pieces, “we were able to verify theoretical models for how brown dwarfs cool, models which are over 30 years old. We found models match remarkably well with the observations, a testament to human ingenuity,” Triaud added.


    This artist’s conception shows a Y dwarf. Scientists now say they’ve discovered a rare binary brown dwarf.

    3 users thanked author for this post.
  • #17475

    ‘Minor planet’ bonanza: 139 new objects discovered beyond Neptune

    These newfound bodies could be bread crumbs leading to the mysterious Planet Nine.

    The list of Pluto’s neighbors just got considerably longer, potentially boosting scientists’ odds of finding the putative Planet Nine.

    Astronomers have discovered 139 more “minor planets” — small bodies circling the sun that are neither official planets nor comets — in the dark, frigid depths beyond Neptune’s orbit, a new study reports. The new additions represent nearly 5% of the current trans-Neptunian object (TNO) tally, which stands at about 3,000, the researchers said.

    The scientists pored over data gathered by the Dark Energy Survey (DES) during its first four years of operation, from 2013 to 2017. The DES studies the heavens using the 520-megapixel Dark Energy Camera, which is mounted on the Blanco 4-meter telescope at the Cerro Tololo Inter-American Observatory in Chile.

    As the project’s name implies, the main goal of the DES involves shedding light on dark energy, the mysterious force thought to be behind the universe’s accelerating expansion. But the high-resolution DES imagery has a number of other applications, including the discovery of small objects in our own solar system, as the new study shows.

    The researchers started out with 7 billion DES-detected dots, which they whittled down to 22 million “transients” after ruling out objects such as galaxies that appeared in roughly the same spot on multiple nights. Those 22 million were further culled to 400 TNO candidates, whose movements the team was able to track over at least six different nights.

    After months of vetting by analysis and observation, the team verified 316 of the small bodies as bona fide TNOs. These cataloged objects lie between 30 and 90 astronomical units (AU) from the sun, and 139 of them are new to science, the researchers said. (1 AU is the Earth-sun distance, which is about 93 million miles, or 150 million kilometers.)

    The techniques the researchers developed could aid future TNO searches, including those potentially conducted by the Vera C. Rubin Observatory, which is scheduled to come online in the early 2020s, study team members said.

    “Many of the programs we’ve developed can be easily applied to any other large datasets, such as what the Rubin Observatory will produce,” lead author Pedro Bernardinelli, a physics and astronomy graduate student at the University of Pennsylvania, said in a statement.

    The team members are also now running their analyses on the DES’ entire six-year data set, an effort that could yield an additional 500 or so newfound TNOs. (The DES’ initial run wrapped up in 2019.) Such new additions could end up being bread crumbs that lead to Planet Nine, the hypothesized world that some scientists think lurks undiscovered in the far outer solar system, hundreds of AU from the sun.

    Planet Nine’s existence, after all, is inferred from weird clustering in the orbits of certain TNOs.

    “There are lots of ideas about giant planets that used to be in the solar system and aren’t there anymore, or planets that are far away and massive but too faint for us to have noticed yet,” study co-author Gary Bernstein, an astronomy and astrophysics professor at the University of Pennsylvania, said in the same statement.

    “Making the catalog is the fun discovery part,” Bernstein added. “Then, when you create this resource, you can compare what you did find to what somebody’s theory said you should find.”

    The new study was published this week in The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series. You can read a preprint of it for free at arXiv.org.


    The Dark Energy Camera is mounted on the Victor Blanco telescope, pictured here with other telescopes at the Cerro Tololo Inter-American Observatory in Chile.

    2 users thanked author for this post.
  • #17518

    “Making the catalog is the fun discovery part,” Bernstein added. “Then, when you create this resource, you can compare what you did find to what somebody’s theory said you should find.”

    Astronomers have way too much time on their hands and it leads to such wild and crazy stunts like making catalogs. BTW, if they are looking so hard for planet Nine, why the hell did they downgrade Pluto?

  • #18404

    Newfound Comet ATLAS is getting really bright, really fast

    For years, amateur astronomers have been waiting for a bright, naked-eye comet to pass by Earth — and finally, such an object may have arrived.

    The possible celestial showpiece is known as Comet ATLAS, or C/2019 Y4. When it was discovered on Dec. 28, 2019, it was quite faint, but since then, it has been brightening so rapidly that astronomers have high hopes for the spectacle it could put on. But given the tricky nature of comets, skywatchers are also being cautious not to get their hopes up, knowing that the comet may fizzle out.

    It’s been awhile since a comet gave skywatchers a good show, particularly in the Northern Hemisphere. In March 2013, Comet PanSTARRS was visible right after sunset, albeit low in the western sky. But although it briefly attained first magnitude with a short, bright tail, its low altitude and a bright, twilight sky detracted from what otherwise would have been a much more prominent object. Comet Lovejoy in 2011 and Comet McNaught in 2007 both evolved into stunning objects, but unfortunately, when at their best, were visible only from the Southern Hemisphere.

    It has now been nearly a quarter of a century since we have been treated to a spectacularly bright comet: Comet Hale-Bopp passed by during the spring of 1997 and Comet Hyakutake did so exactly one year earlier. Both were truly “great” comets, very bright and fantastically structured; in very dark conditions, Hyakutake’s tail appeared to stretch more than halfway across the sky.

    So now, after a “comet drought,” Comet ATLAS may finally enliven the evening skies of early spring. Or then again, maybe not.

    Guarded optimism

    The comet’s moniker is an acronym for Asteroid Terrestrial-impact Last Alert System (ATLAS), a robotic astronomical survey system based in Hawaii and optimized for detecting smaller near-Earth objects a few weeks to a few days before their closest approach. But on occasion, the survey will also find a comet.

    When astronomers first spotted Comet ATLAS in December, it was in Ursa Major and was an exceedingly faint object, close to 20th magnitude. That’s about 398,000 times dimmer than stars that are on the threshold of naked-eye visibility. At the time, it was 273 million miles (439 million kilometers) from the sun.

    But comets typically brighten as they approach the sun, and at its closest, on May 31, Comet ATLAS will be just 23.5 million miles (37.8 million km) from the sun. Such a prodigious change in solar distance would typically cause a comet to increase in luminosity by almost 11 magnitudes, enough to make ATLAS easily visible in a small telescope or a pair of good binoculars, although quite frankly nothing really to write home about.

    Except, since its discovery, the comet has been brightening at an almost unprecedented speed. As of March 17, ATLAS was already magnitude +8.5, over 600 times brighter than forecast. As a result, great expectations are buzzing for this icy lump of cosmic detritus, with hopes it could become a stupendously bright object by the end of May.

    A famous lineage

    Another factor buoying hopes for ATLAS as a potential dazzler is that its orbit is nearly identical to that of the so-called Great Comet of 1844.

    Like the 1844 comet, ATLAS follows a trajectory that would require 6,000 years per orbit and take it to beyond the outer reaches of the solar system, roughly 57 billion miles (92 billion km) from the sun. Probably in the far-distant past, a much larger comet occupied this same orbit, but fragmented into several pieces — including the 1844 comet and ATLAS — upon rounding the sun.

    But any comparison is dangerous. The 1844 comet was not discovered until shortly after perihelion, so we have no knowledge of its brightness behavior beforehand. But that information is currently all we know about ATLAS, and we won’t be able to see the object after it reaches the sun.

    And let’s not forget some of the comets of the past that seemingly had “glory” written all over them, only to utterly fail to live up to expectations: Comet ISON in 2013, Comet Austin in 1990 and Comet Kohoutek in 1974.

    So what’s ahead?

    John Bortle, who has observed hundreds of comets and is a well-known expert in the field, got his first look at Comet ATLAS through 15 x 70 binoculars on Sunday night (March 15). And he’s stumped, he wrote. “For the first time in many years I am left at a bit of a loss as to what honestly worthy advice I can offer would-be observers. I really don’t know quite what to make of this object.”

    The head (or coma) of Comet ATLAS is big, albeit “very faint and ghostly,” Bortle said, which doesn’t make sense. “If it’s a truly significant visitor, it should be considerably sharper in appearance. Instead we see, at best, a quite modestly condensed object with only a pinpoint stellar feature near its heart.”

    The unpredictability of comets is an old story. Astronomers use special formulas to try to anticipate how bright a comet will get. Unfortunately, comets’ individual behavior and characteristics can be as varied as people: No two are alike.

    Now, here is the conundrum regarding Comet ATLAS: Until a couple of weeks ago, it was brightening at an astounding rate. That brightening has slowed somewhat, but it is still an impossible rate of brightening to maintain. Were ATLAS to continue to brighten at this rate all the way to its closest approach to the sun at the end of May, it would end up rivaling the planet Venus in brightness!

    “We should expect the rate of increase to slow again,” Carl Hergenrother, an assiduous comet observer based in Arizona, said. “This is where it gets tricky for predicting just how bright it will get.” Right now, no one can predict how long it will continue to quickly brighten and how dramatically that brightening will slow.

    Where to look and what to expect

    The only thing left to do is to track Comet ATLAS in the days and weeks ahead. Fortunately, its path in March and April will be very favorable for Northern Hemisphere observers, as it will be circumpolar and always remain above the horizon. As darkness falls, it will be positioned more than halfway up in the north-northwest sky. Right now, the comet is in western Ursa Major, and it will shift into the boundaries of Camelopardalis the Giraffe — a rather dim, shapeless star pattern — by March 29. There it will stay, right on through the month of April.

    As to how bright Comet ATLAS will get, that’s anybody’s guess. It might become faintly visible to the naked eye under dark sky conditions by mid- or late April. By mid-May, when it disappears into the bright evening twilight, perhaps it will have brightened to second magnitude — about as bright as Polaris, the North Star.

    Whether ATLAS continues to overperform and shines even brighter, develops a significant tail or suddenly stops brightening altogether and remains very faint and ghostly are all unknown right now. We’ll just have to wait and see.

    “It’s going to be fun the next few weeks watching Comet ATLAS develop (and provide a nice distraction from the current state of the world), Hergenrother wrote. “Here’s to good health and clear skies!”


    A comet that passed by Earth in December 2018.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
  • #19119

    We might be living in a gigantic, intergalactic bubble

    We might be living in a bubble.

    That’s the conclusion of a new paper published in the journal Physics Letters B, due for print publication April 10. The paper is an attempt to resolve one of the deepest mysteries of modern physics: Why don’t our measurements of the speed of the universe’s expansion make sense? As Live Science has previously reported, we have multiple ways of measuring the Hubble constant, or H0, a number that governs how fast the universe is expanding. In recent years, as those methods have gotten more precise, they’ve started to produce H0s that dramatically disagree with one another. Lucas Lombriser, a physicist at the University of Geneva in Switzerland and co-author of the new paper, thinks the simplest explanation is that our galaxy sits in a low-density region of the universe — that most of the space we see clearly through our telescopes is part of a giant bubble. And that anomaly, he wrote, is likely messing with our measurements of H0.

    It’s hard to imagine what a bubble would look like that’s on the scale of the universe. Most of space is just that anyway: space, with a handful of galaxies and their stars scattered through the nothingness. But just like our local universe has areas where matter packs closely together or spreads extra-far apart, stars and galaxies cluster together at different densities in different parts of the cosmos.

    “When we look at the cosmic microwave background [a remnant of the very early universe], we see an almost perfectly homogenous temperature of 2.7 K [kelvins, a temperature scale where 0 degrees is absolute zero] of the universe all around us. At a closer look, however, there are tiny fluctuations in this temperature,” Lombriser told Live Science.

    Models of how the universe evolved over time suggest that those tiny inconsistencies would have eventually produced regions of space that are more and less dense, he said. And the sort of low-density regions those models predict would be more than sufficient to distort our H0 measurements in the way that’s happening right now.

    Here’s the problem: We have two main ways to measure H0. One is based on extremely precise measurements of the cosmic microwave background (CMB), which appears mostly uniform across our universe since it was formed during an event that spanned the entire universe. The other is based on supernovas and flashing stars in nearby galaxies, known as cepheids.

    Cepheids and supernovas have properties that make it easy to precisely determine how far away they are from Earth and how fast they’re moving away from us. Astronomers have used them to make a “distance ladder” to various landmarks in our observable universe, and they have used that ladder to derive H0.

    But as both cepheid and CMB measurements have gotten more precise in the last decade, it’s become clear that they don’t agree.

    “If we’re getting different answers, that means that there’s something that we don’t know,” Katie Mack, an astrophysicist at North Carolina State University, previously told Live Science. “So this is really about not just understanding the current expansion rate of the universe — which is something we’re interested in — but understanding how the universe has evolved, how the expansion has evolved, and what space-time has been doing all this time.”

    Some physicists believe that there must be some “new physics” driving the disparity — something we don’t understand about the universe that’s causing unexpected behaviors.

    “New physics would of course be a very exciting solution to the Hubble tension. But new physics typically implies a more complex model that requires clear evidence and should be backed by independent measurements” Lombriser said.

    Others think there’s a problem with our calculations of the cepheid ladder or our observations of the CMB. Lombriser said his explanation, which others have proposed before but his paper fleshes out in detail, falls more into this category.

    “If the less complex standard physics can explain the tension, this provides both a simpler explanation and is a success for the known physics, but it is unfortunately also more boring,” he added.


    A Hubble Space Telescope image shows RS Puppis, one of the cepheids used to measure the expansion of the universe.

    2 users thanked author for this post.
  • #19120

    Distant ‘quasar tsunamis’ are ripping their own galaxies apart

    The most energetic objects in the universe may be stopping the biggest galaxies from growing bigger.

    At the center of almost every galaxy in the universe is a supermassive black hole gobbling up incredible amounts of matter, and belching out incredible amounts of radiation. The biggest and hungriest of these gobblers — called quasars (or quasi-stellar objects, because they look deceptively like stars when seen through most telescopes) — are some of the most energetic objects in the universe.

    As infalling matter swirls around the quasar’s maw at near-light-speed, that matter heats up and flies outward, propelled by the incredible force of its own radiation. All that intergalactic indigestion makes a quasar an awesome sight, capable of shining a thousand times brighter than a galaxy of 100 billion stars. However, a series of new papers suggests, the very same radiation that puts quasars on our maps of the universe may be devastating the galaxies that host the insatiable objects.

    In six studies published March 16 in a special edition of The Astrophysical Journal supplemental series, astronomers used NASA’s Hubble Space Telescope to spy on 13 quasar outflows — that is, gusts of high-speed radiation pouring out of distant quasars. By observing the outflows over several years and in many wavelengths across the electromagnetic spectrum, the team found that the wind and gas gushing out of a quasar can travel at more than 40 million mph (64 million km/h) and reach billions of degrees in temperature.

    One outflow the team studied accelerated from nearly 43 million mph (69 million km/h) to roughly 46 million mph (74 million km/h) over a three-year period — the fastest-accelerating wind ever detected in space.

    This hot, fast gas is capable of causing incredible damage to a quasar’s host galaxy, the researchers found, rampaging through the galaxy’s disk like a tsunami and blasting potential star-forming material deep into space. In a single year, one quasar outflow can push hundreds of suns-worth of matter into intergalactic space, the researchers found, creating a stunning fireworks display while preventing new stars from forming.

    These findings could help answer a long-standing conundrum about our universe: Why do large galaxies seem to stop growing after reaching a certain mass? When the team plugged their new quasar outflow data into models of galaxy formation, they found that the gales of radiation were capable of stunting the birth of new stars in large galaxies.

    “Theoreticians and observers have known for decades that there is some physical process that shuts off star formation in massive galaxies, but the nature of that process has been a mystery,” Jeremiah P. Ostriker, an astrophysicist at Columbia University in New York and Princeton University in New Jersey not involved in the study, said in a statement. “Putting the observed outflows into our simulations solves these outstanding problems in galactic evolution.”

    Further study of these mighty outflows, which the researchers believe will only accelerate as their quasars suck in more material, could fill in more details about how the universe’s most energetic objects make (and break) entire galaxies.


    An illustration of a quasar blasting a jet of hot, radioactive wind into the cosmos.

    2 users thanked author for this post.
  • #19241

    The universe is such a fucking weird place.

    2 users thanked author for this post.
  • #19744

    Hubble Finds Best Evidence for Elusive Mid-Sized Black Hole

    Astronomers have found the best evidence for the perpetrator of a cosmic homicide: a black hole of an elusive class known as “intermediate-mass,” which betrayed its existence by tearing apart a wayward star that passed too close.

    Weighing in at about 50,000 times the mass of our Sun, the black hole is smaller than the supermassive black holes (at millions or billions of solar masses) that lie at the cores of large galaxies, but larger than stellar-mass black holes formed by the collapse of a massive star.

    These so-called intermediate-mass black holes (IMBHs) are a long-sought “missing link” in black hole evolution. Though there have been a few other IMBH candidates, researchers consider these new observations the strongest evidence yet for mid-sized black holes in the universe.

    It took the combined power of two X-ray observatories and the keen vision of NASA’s Hubble Space Telescope to nail down the cosmic beast.

    “Intermediate-mass black holes are very elusive objects, and so it is critical to carefully consider and rule out alternative explanations for each candidate. That is what Hubble has allowed us to do for our candidate,” said Dacheng Lin of the University of New Hampshire, principal investigator of the study. The results are published on March 31, 2020, in The Astrophysical Journal Letters.

    The story of the discovery reads like a Sherlock Holmes story, involving the meticulous step-by-step case-building necessary to catch the culprit.

    Lin and his team used Hubble to follow up on leads from NASA’s Chandra X-ray Observatory and ESA’s (the European Space Agency) X-ray Multi-Mirror Mission (XMM-Newton). In 2006 these satellites detected a powerful flare of X-rays, but they could not determine whether it originated from inside or outside of our galaxy. Researchers attributed it to a star being torn apart after coming too close to a gravitationally powerful compact object, like a black hole.

    Surprisingly, the X-ray source, named 3XMM J215022.4−055108, was not located in a galaxy’s center, where massive black holes normally would reside. This raised hopes that an IMBH was the culprit, but first another possible source of the X-ray flare had to be ruled out: a neutron star in our own Milky Way galaxy, cooling off after being heated to a very high temperature. Neutron stars are the crushed remnants of an exploded star.

    Hubble was pointed at the X-ray source to resolve its precise location. Deep, high-resolution imaging provides strong evidence that the X-rays emanated not from an isolated source in our galaxy, but instead in a distant, dense star cluster on the outskirts of another galaxy — just the type of place astronomers expected to find an IMBH. Previous Hubble research has shown that the mass of a black hole in the center of a galaxy is proportional to that host galaxy’s central bulge. In other words, the more massive the galaxy, the more massive its black hole. Therefore, the star cluster that is home to 3XMM J215022.4−055108 may be the stripped-down core of a lower-mass dwarf galaxy that has been gravitationally and tidally disrupted by its close interactions with its current larger galaxy host.

    IMBHs have been particularly difficult to find because they are smaller and less active than supermassive black holes; they do not have readily available sources of fuel, nor as strong a gravitational pull to draw stars and other cosmic material which would produce telltale X-ray glows. Astronomers essentially have to catch an IMBH red-handed in the act of gobbling up a star. Lin and his colleagues combed through the XMM-Newton data archive, searching hundreds of thousands of observations to find one IMBH candidate.

    The X-ray glow from the shredded star allowed astronomers to estimate the black hole’s mass of 50,000 solar masses. The mass of the IMBH was estimated based on both X-ray luminosity and the spectral shape. “This is much more reliable than using X-ray luminosity alone as typically done before for previous IMBH candidates,” said Lin. “The reason why we can use the spectral fits to estimate the IMBH mass for our object is that its spectral evolution showed that it has been in the thermal spectral state, a state commonly seen and well understood in accreting stellar-mass black holes.”

    This object isn’t the first to be considered a likely candidate for an intermediate-mass black hole. In 2009 Hubble teamed up with NASA’s Swift observatory and ESA’s XMM-Newton to identify what is interpreted as an IMBH, called HLX-1, located towards the edge of the galaxy ESO 243-49. It too is in the center of a young, massive cluster of blue stars that may be a stripped-down dwarf galaxy core. The X-rays come from a hot accretion disk around the black hole. “The main difference is that our object is tearing a star apart, providing strong evidence that it is a massive black hole, instead of a stellar-mass black hole as people often worry about for previous candidates including HLX-1,” Lin said.

    Finding this IMBH opens the door to the possibility of many more lurking undetected in the dark, waiting to be given away by a star passing too close. Lin plans to continue his meticulous detective work, using the methods his team has proved successful. Many questions remain to be answered. Does a supermassive black hole grow from an IMBH? How do IMBHs themselves form? Are dense star clusters their favored home?

    The Hubble Space Telescope is a project of international cooperation between NASA and ESA (European Space Agency). NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Maryland, manages the telescope. The Space Telescope Science Institute (STScI) in Baltimore, Maryland, conducts Hubble science operations. STScI is operated for NASA by the Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy in Washington, D.C.

    Video


    This Hubble Space Telescope image identified the location of an intermediate-mass black hole, weighing 50,000 times the mass of our Sun (making it much smaller than supermassive black holes found in the centers of galaxies). The black hole, named 3XMM J215022.4−055108, is indicated by the white circle. The elusive type of black hole was first identified in a burst of telltale X-rays emitted by hot gas from a star as it was captured and destroyed by the black hole. Hubble was needed to pinpoint the black hole’s location in visible light. Hubble’s deep, high-resolution imaging shows that the black hole resides inside a dense cluster of stars that is far beyond our Milky Way galaxy. The star cluster is in the vicinity of the galaxy at the center of the image. Much smaller-looking background galaxies appear sprinkled around the image, including a face-on spiral just above the central foreground galaxy. This photo was taken with Hubble’s Advanced Camera for Surveys.

    2 users thanked author for this post.
  • #19747

    A galactic crash could be behind Milky Way’s warped appearance

    The Milky Way’s warped shape probably is due to a long-running collision with a smaller galaxy. But which galaxy this might be is a mystery.

    This insight comes courtesy of the Gaia spacecraft, a European Space Agency mission designed to map the movement of up to a billion stars with high precision.

    Gaia zeroed in on the Milky Way’s disc, which curves up on one side and points down on the other, creating a warped shape. The spacecraft’s observations have shown that the warp is moving over time, and quite quickly.

    The warp is changing so fast that scientists think that previous explanations for the skewed shape — such as a magnetic field or the influence of dark matter, which we cannot see directly — would not work in this case, as these produce slow-moving changes. So that just leaves a drastic solution: galactic collision.

    “We measured the speed of the warp by comparing the data with our models. Based on the obtained velocity, the warp would complete one rotation around the center of the Milky Way in 600 to 700 million years,” lead author Eloisa Poggio, a Ph.D. student at the Turin Astrophysical Observatory in Italy, said in a statement from the European Space Agency. (By comparison, the sun takes about 220 million years to orbit the Milky Way.)

    Which galaxy caused this collision remains a mystery. One possible candidate is the dwarf galaxy Sagittarius, which scientists say likely did move through the Milky Way disc a few times in the past. Moreover, current models show that Sagittarius is being absorbed into the Milky Way. But more study will be required to support this possibility.

    Gaia has been operating in space for six years. Further data releases later in 2020, and in the second half of 2021, may help to shed more light on this mystery, the team said.


    A visualization of the Milky Way’s warped appearance.

    2 users thanked author for this post.
  • #19881

    Scientists Witness the Death of a Solar System, and the Birth of Necroplanetology

    570 light years away, a white dwarf devours its planetary children and creates a whole new field of science in its wake.
    image
    By Jennifer Leman
    Apr 1, 2020

    Astronomers have coined a strange new field of science: necroplanetology.
    At the end of their lives, white dwarf stars grow in size, swallowing everything in their system.
    Researchers have observed 21 other stars that exhibit planet-gobbling traits.

    Five years ago, astronomers caught a lone white dwarf star, 570 light-years away from Earth, devouring its young like the Greek titan Cronus. They noticed that WD 1145+017 was dimming at an irregular rate, and after closer inspection, realized that the star was devouring the planets in its solar system through a process called tidal disruption.

    The discovery marks the beginning of a brand new field of science: Necroplanetology. Slap the Latinized Greek root nekros, meaning “dead,” “corpse” and “dead tissue,” in front of planetology, the study of planets.

    An international team of researchers from Wesleyan University in Connecticut, the University of Colorado, Boulder, and Warwick University in the U.K. first published the findings on the pre-print website arXiv in 2015. It has now been accepted to the Astrophysical Journal for review. They say the discovery could help us understand how planets in different systems get gobbled up by their parent star.

    Right before either going supernova or turning into a black dwarf, dying stars turn into white dwarves. Eventually so will our sun, but not for about six billion years. The atmospheres of these stars usually contain lighter elements such as helium and hydrogen.

    Several important details clued the researchers in on the discovery. First, the team realized that the dimming occurred repeatedly, ever 4.5 to five hours. Second, they discovered that the star’s atmosphere was littered with elements typically found in the cores of rocky exoplanets—heavy elements like iron, oxygen and magnesium.

    To figure out how these planets met their doom, the researchers created a series of computer simulations that mapped how 36 different types of planets would have endured these conditions. For each of the 36 planetary bodies they created, they set the orbital period to about 4.5 hours and let the simulation run 100 times.

    The results showed that rocky bodies with a tiny core and low-density mantle were the most likely to produce the observations they saw. These high-density planets, similar to rocky asteroids like Vesta, are tough enough to withstand the bulk of the disruption, but weak enough to disintegrate within a short period of time.

    WD 1145+017 isn’t the only star with a massive appetite. Astronomers have since observed 21 stars who have been caught dimming in a similar way. Despite its name, the field of necroplanetology is thriving.

    3 users thanked author for this post.
  • #20814

    Pictures from Space.com ! Our image of the day

    Hubble eyes a one-arm spiral galaxy

    Friday, April 3, 2020: A new Hubble Space Telescope image reveals the peculiar structure of a spiral galaxy with only one starry arm rotating about its center. While most barred spiral galaxies are characterized by a distinct bar-shaped structure of stars centered on a galactic core, this barred spiral isn’t like most others. Located 21 million light-years from Earth in the constellation Canes Venatici, this strange galaxy, known as NGC 4618, was first thought to be a star cluster when the astronomer William Herschel discovered it in 1787. Astronomers now think that gravitational interactions with a neighboring galaxy may have influenced this galaxy’s shape.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
  • #20818

    Oops. We lose more starships that way.

    https://spacenews.com/third-starship-prototype-destroyed-in-tanking-test/

    Awesome video.

     

    2 users thanked author for this post.
  • #21286

    This weird black hole is bending light back on itself like a boomerang


    An artist’s depiction of a black hole pulling light back toward its disk.

    For decades, scientists have suspected that some of the light that escapes from around massive black holes nearly doesn’t make it — and now, they’ve finally seen it happen.

    That’s according to scientists who conducted a new analysis of old observations of a black hole feeding on a sunlike star. The researchers focused on measurements of the black hole’s disk, where light escaping from the black hole shines. Specifically, the scientists teased apart, on the one hand, light that was coming directly from the disk, and on the other, light that failed to escape the disk and got pulled back toward the black hole before being reflected out into space.

    “We observed light coming from very close to the black hole that is trying to escape, but instead is pulled right back by the black hole like a boomerang,” Riley Connors, lead author of the new research and a physicist at Caltech, said in a statement. “This is something that was predicted in the 1970s, but hadn’t been shown until now.”

    The team relied on observations gathered by NASA’s Rossi X-ray Timing Explorer, which observed black holes and neutron stars. The spacecraft launched in 1995 and took its last data in 2012.

    Specifically, the scientists used observations taken during a series of outbursts that the black hole and its sunlike star, a binary system formally known as XTE J1550-564, experienced between 1998 and 2000. That data suggested that some of the X-ray light observed at the time wasn’t directly escaping from the black hole but instead dodged the black hole by reflecting off the light in the accretion disk that is being pulled toward the black hole.

    The observations could help scientists better understand what black holes are doing, an ongoing mystery in astronomy. “Since black holes can potentially spin very fast, they not only bend the light but twist it,” Connors said. “These recent observations are another piece in the puzzle of trying to figure out how fast black holes spin.”

    And the new work is also satisfying when considering the history of black hole research. Not only was the effect predicted more than 40 years ago, it also offers additional support for Albert Einstein’s general theory of relativity, the scientists said in the statement.

    “The disk is essentially illuminating itself,” Javier Garcia, a physicist at Caltech and co-author of the new research, said in the same statement. “Theorists had predicted what fraction of the light would bend back on the disk, and now, for the first time, we have confirmed those predictions.”

    2 users thanked author for this post.
  • #21620

    Apollo 13 at 50: How NASA turned near-disaster at the moon into a ‘successful failure’ in space


    The crewmembers of the Apollo 13 mission, step aboard the USS Iwo Jima recovery ship after successfully surviving their journey around the moon and splashing down in the Pacific ocean.

    Fifty years ago today (April 11), three astronauts launched to space, poised to be the next humans to walk on the moon. But things didn’t exactly go according to plan.

    Famously described as a “successful failure,” the Apollo 13 mission almost ended in complete and utter disaster. However, while the astronauts never made it to the moon’s surface, their very survival serves as a testament to the human spirit and incredible ingenuity.

    At 2:13 p.m. EST (1813 GMT) on April 11, 1970, commander James “Jim” Lovell, command module pilot John “Jack” Swigert and lunar module pilot Fred Haise took off without a hitch from Launch Complex 39A at NASA’s Kennedy Space Center in Florida. The astronauts were on their way to the moon. But about 56 hours into the mission, things went seriously awry.

    The crew, who had just finished a television broadcast from aboard the command module, nicknamed Odyssey, noticed a slight drop in cabin pressure. Swigert went to see what was going on and check on the service module’s oxygen tanks.

    The crew heard a loud bang coming from outside and Swigert uttered the famous line: “Okay Houston, we’ve had a problem here.”

    Jack R. Lousma, the mission’s communication link between the astronauts and flight controllers (the “CAPCOM”), asked the crew to repeat the transmission, and Lovell responded: “Uh, Houston, we’ve had a problem.” (The phrase is often remembered as “Houston, we have a problem,” but that line was just some movie magic from actor Tom Hanks, who played Lovell in the film “Apollo 13.”)

    It turned out that electrical shorts in the fan circuit in cryogenic oxygen tank 2 ignited wire insulation, causing the tank to heat up and become pressurized, eventually exploding. The tank explosion was so intense that it blasted off a chunk of the service module. As a result of this explosion, power and oxygen quickly started to drop and, all of a sudden, things were a matter of life or death.

    The possibility of a moon landing quickly fell out of focus as the astronauts and NASA ground crew had to immediately start brainstorming and working together to save the astronaut’s lives. They decided to power down the crew module, as they would need to preserve it for re-entry, and they evacuated to the lunar module, nicknamed Aquarius, and used it as a “lifeboat” out in space.

    They planned to travel around the far side of the moon and use the moon’s orbit as a “slingshot” to help them get back to Earth. Mission Control was concerned that, if they were to instead just turn around and head straight back, their engine (they weren’t sure how damaged it was) might not be able to make it.

    But Aquarius was only meant to carry two astronauts down to the lunar surface and back, and now it was carting three grown men around the far side of the moon. This posed a number of issues as, not only were the astronauts cramped, they noticed that carbon dioxide levels were starting to rise in the air.

    Lithium hydroxide canisters aboard both the lunar module and the command module were designed to “scrub” or remove carbon dioxide from the air. But the canisters on Aquarius couldn’t handle the extra carbon dioxide from a third passenger. The crew acted quickly, grabbing other canisters from the command module, but those canisters were a different shape and didn’t quite fit into the air filtration system aboard Aquarius.

    But the crew needed to make it work, so they used things including spacesuit hoses, plastic bags and duct tape. Eventually, they got the canisters from the command module to fit in Aquarius. And, voila: a do-it-yourself air filtration system.

    About an hour before they reentered Earth’s atmosphere, the team jettisoned the lunar module, saying goodbye to the capsule that kept them alive during their unbelievable journey around the moon.

    After bidding adieu to Aquarius, the crew buckled into Odyssey and prepared for an intense re-entry and descent. Ionized air around the module created a complete communication blackout for over four minutes as the craft was descending. NASA still thought that there could be an issue with the craft’s parachutes or shields and was anxiously waiting to hear from the astronauts.

    So, when the crew finally re-established contact with NASA and let them know that they’d splashed down safely and successfully in the Pacific Ocean on April 17, everyone breathed a heavy sigh of relief.

    2 users thanked author for this post.
  • #21635

    It’s an amazing story. My dad often talks about staying up through the night to listen for progress updates on the radio.

    And a great movie, of course.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
  • #21949

    ‘Oumuamua origin story: How our mysterious interstellar visitor may have been born


    This simulation depicts the interstellar object ‘Oumuamua as a mass of fragments forced into an elongated shape by stellar tidal forces.

    The new hypothesis doesn’t involve aliens.

    Our solar system’s first known interstellar visitor may have a very violent origin story.

    The mysterious object ‘Oumuamua, which was spotted zooming through the inner solar system in October 2017, is probably a fragment of a larger body that was torn apart by gravitational forces during a close flyby of its native star, a new study suggests.

    This “tidal fragmentation scenario not only provides a way to form one single ‘Oumuamua but also accounts for the vast population of asteroid-like interstellar objects,” lead author Yun Zhang, of the National Astronomical Observatories of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, said in a statement.

    The hypothesis explains ‘Oumuamua’s weirdness as well, according to Zhang and study co-author Douglas Lin, an astronomer at the University of California, Santa Cruz.

    That weirdness is extreme and multilayered. For example, ‘Oumuamua is highly elongated, like a big space cigar (and may be somewhat flattened as well). Astronomers had never before seen a cosmic object with that shape.

    In addition, ‘Oumuamua displayed “non-gravitational acceleration” during its trek through our neighborhood — motion that can’t be attributed to tugs by the sun, Jupiter or other big bodies. Such motion can be caused by cometary outgassing, which pushes an object this way and that like thrusters on a spacecraft.

    But ‘Oumuamua displayed no signs of outgassing — no visible tail or coma — even though most astronomers thought the interloper was likely to be a comet. (Comets tend to reside far from their host stars and are therefore easier to boot into interstellar space.)

    Finally, detecting ‘Oumuamua at all is odd, and quite informative. Considering how vast space is, how long it takes to cross interstellar gulfs and how half-hearted our hunt for such bodies has been thus far, stumbling onto even a single ‘Oumuamua implies a truly huge population of similar objects.

    “On average, each planetary system should eject in total about 100 trillion objects like ‘Oumuamua,” Zhang said.

    This combination of characteristics has spurred some scientists — most prominently, Avi Loeb, who chairs Harvard University’s astronomy department — to propose that ‘Oumuamua might be an alien spacecraft. The available data are consistent with a light-sailing probe, perhaps a defunct one, Loeb has said, stressing that researchers should at least be open-minded about this possibility.

    The new study, however, posits a natural explanation. Zhang and Lin used computer simulations to investigate how objects are affected by flybys of their native stars. This modeling work revealed that very close encounters can rip these bodies into elongated fragments, which are then ejected into interstellar space.

    Extreme heating during the flyby and the cooling that follows it causes these fragments to develop a surface crust, which helps support and maintain their odd shape, the results further indicate.

    “Heat diffusion during the stellar tidal disruption process also consumes large amounts of volatiles, which not only explains ‘Oumuamua’s [reddish] surface colors and the absence of visible coma but also elucidates the inferred dryness of the interstellar population,” Zhang said. (“Volatiles” are elements and compounds that are easily lost to space, such as water.)

    “Nevertheless, some high-sublimation-temperature volatiles buried under the surface, like water ice, can remain in a condensed form,” he added. These hidden volatiles could be “activated” during encounters with other stars like our sun, causing outgassing and non-gravitational acceleration, the researchers said.

    The parent bodies of such interstellar objects are a diverse lot, suggests the new study, which was published online today (April 13) in the journal Nature Astronomy. The ejected fragments could be pieces of long-period comets, planetary building bodies or even “super-Earth” planets that strayed too close to their stars. (And those stars don’t necessarily need to be alive; superdense stellar corpses known as white dwarfs could do the required disruption as well.)

    “These interstellar objects could provide critical clues about how planetary systems form and evolve,” Zhang said.

    ‘Oumuamua is not the only interstellar visitor we know about. In August 2019, astronomers spotted a second interloper, known as Comet Borisov (and it is quite clearly a comet). And they should start seeing many more such objects soon, especially after the Vera C. Rubin Observatory comes online in the mountains of Chile.

    “‘Oumuamua is just the tip of the iceberg,” Lin said in the same statement.

    Studying many more such objects may be our best bet to understand ‘Oumuamua, which has long since sped out of sight into the dark depths of the outer solar system. (That said, sending a probe out to rendezvous with ‘Oumuamua is not out of the question.)

    “As future interstellar objects are discovered in coming years, it will be very interesting to see if any exhibit ‘Oumuamua-like properties,” U.S. Naval Academy astronomer Matthew Knight, co-leader of the ‘Oumuamua International Space Science Institute team, said in the same statement.

    “If so, it may indicate that the processes described in this study are widespread,” added Knight, who was not involved in the new study.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
  • #21951

    Boom! Distant star explosion is brightest ever seen

    And it may be an odd type of supernova that has yet to be confirmed observationally.

    We can measure supernovae using two scales: the total energy of the explosion, and the amount of that energy that is emitted as observable light, or radiation,” study lead author Matt Nicholl, a lecturer in the School of Physics and Astronomy and the Institute of Gravitational Wave Astronomy at the University of Birmingham in England, said in a statement.

    “In a typical supernova, the radiation is less than 1% of the total energy,” Nicholl added. “But in SN2016aps, we found the radiation was five times the explosion energy of a normal-sized supernova. This is the most light we have ever seen emitted by a supernova.”

    SN2016aps is so odd and so extreme that Nicholl and his colleagues think it may be a “pulsational pair-instability” supernova, in which two big stars merge before the whole system goes boom. Such events are hypothesized, but astronomers have never confirmed their existence observationally.

    As its name indicates, SN2016aps was discovered in 2016, by the Panoramic Survey Telescope and Rapid Response System in Hawaii. Nicholl and his team tracked the event for two years with NASA’s Hubble Space Telescope and a variety of instruments on the ground, watching as the supernova’s brightness faded to just 1% of its peak output.

    These observations allowed the researchers to characterize the explosion and piece together how it may have happened. For example, the team determined that much of SN2016aps’ brightness probably derived from the interaction between the supernova and a surrounding shell of gas. Before they explode, doomed giant stars experience violent pulsations, which eject such shells into space.

    “If the supernova gets the timing right, it can catch up to this shell and release a huge amount of energy in the collision,” Nicholl said. “We think this is one of the most compelling candidates for this process yet observed, and probably the most massive.”

    In addition, the researchers calculated that the supernova system harbored between 50 and 100 times the mass of the sun. And it may indeed have been a system, not just a single star.

    “The gas we detected was mostly hydrogen — but such a massive star would usually have lost all of its hydrogen via stellar winds long before it started pulsating,” Nicholl said. “One explanation is that two slightly less massive stars of around, say 60 solar masses, had merged before the explosion. The lower-mass stars hold onto their hydrogen for longer, while their combined mass is high enough to trigger the pair instability.”

    The new study, which was published online today (April 13) in the journal Nature Astronomy, heralds future discoveries that may be even more exciting, team members said.

    “Finding this extraordinary supernova couldn’t have come at a better time,” co-author Edo Berger, an astronomy professor at Harvard University, said in the same statement.

    “Now that we know such energetic explosions occur in nature, NASA’s new James Webb Space Telescope will be able to see similar events so far away that we can look back in time to the deaths of the very first stars in the universe.”

    The $9.7 billion James Webb, often billed as Hubble’s successor, is scheduled to launch next year. The new space telescope will conduct a wide range of observations, from studying the formation of the universe’s first stars and galaxies to hunting for signs of life in the atmospheres of nearby alien planets.

    2 users thanked author for this post.
  • #22057

    The new hypothesis doesn’t involve aliens.

    2 users thanked author for this post.
  • #22085

    The Oumuamua theory is interesting, sadly it’ll never be proven one way or the other unless an identical object appears at some point.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
  • #22398

    Earth-Size, Habitable Zone Planet Found Hidden in Early NASA Kepler Data


    Artist’s illustration of what the surface of the newfound exoplanet Kepler-1649c might look like.

    A team of transatlantic scientists, using reanalyzed data from NASA’s Kepler space telescope, has discovered an Earth-size exoplanet orbiting in its star’s habitable zone, the area around a star where a rocky planet could support liquid water.

    Scientists discovered this planet, called Kepler-1649c, when looking through old observations from Kepler, which the agency retired in 2018. While previous searches with a computer algorithm misidentified it, researchers reviewing Kepler data took a second look at the signature and recognized it as a planet. Out of all the exoplanets found by Kepler, this distant world – located 300 light-years from Earth – is most similar to Earth in size and estimated temperature.

    This newly revealed world is only 1.06 times larger than our own planet. Also, the amount of starlight it receives from its host star is 75% of the amount of light Earth receives from our Sun – meaning the exoplanet’s temperature may be similar to our planet’s, as well. But unlike Earth, it orbits a red dwarf. Though none have been observed in this system, this type of star is known for stellar flare-ups that may make a planet’s environment challenging for any potential life.

    “This intriguing, distant world gives us even greater hope that a second Earth lies among the stars, waiting to be found,” said Thomas Zurbuchen, associate administrator of NASA’s Science Mission Directorate in Washington. “The data gathered by missions like Kepler and our Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite (TESS) will continue to yield amazing discoveries as the science community refines its abilities to look for promising planets year after year.”

    There is still much that is unknown about Kepler-1649c, including its atmosphere, which could affect the planet’s temperature. Current calculations of the planet’s size have significant margins of error, as do all values in astronomy when studying objects so far away. But based on what is known, Kepler-1649c is especially intriguing for scientists looking for worlds with potentially habitable conditions.

    There are other exoplanets estimated to be closer to Earth in size, such as TRAPPIST-1f and, by some calculations, Teegarden c. Others may be closer to Earth in temperature, such as TRAPPIST-1d and TOI 700d. But there is no other exoplanet that is considered to be closer to Earth in both of these values that also lies in the habitable zone of its system.

    “Out of all the mislabeled planets we’ve recovered, this one’s particularly exciting – not just because it’s in the habitable zone and Earth-size, but because of how it might interact with this neighboring planet,” said Andrew Vanderburg, a researcher at the University of Texas at Austin and first author on the paper released today in The Astrophysical Journal Letters. “If we hadn’t looked over the algorithm’s work by hand, we would have missed it.”

    Kepler-1649c orbits its small red dwarf star so closely that a year on Kepler-1649c is equivalent to only 19.5 Earth days. The system has another rocky planet of about the same size, but it orbits the star at about half the distance of Kepler-1649c, similar to how Venus orbits our Sun at about half the distance that Earth does. Red dwarf stars are among the most common in the galaxy, meaning planets like this one could be more common that we previously thought.

    Looking for False Positives

    Previously, scientists on the Kepler mission developed an algorithm called Robovetter to help sort through the massive amounts of data produced by the Kepler spacecraft, managed by NASA’s Ames Research Center in California’s Silicon Valley. Kepler searched for planets using the transit method, staring at stars, looking for dips in brightness as planets passed in front of their host stars.

    Most of the time, those dips come from phenomena other than planets – ranging from natural changes in a star’s brightness to other cosmic objects passing by – making it look like a planet is there when it’s not. Robovetter’s job was to distinguish the 12% of dips that were real planets from the rest. Those signatures Robovetter determined to be from other sources were labeled “false positives,” the term for a test result mistakenly classified as positive.

    With an enormous number of tricky signals, astronomers knew the algorithm would make mistakes and would need to be double-checked – a perfect job for the Kepler False Positive Working Group. That team reviews Robovetter’s work, going through each false positive to ensure they are truly errors and not exoplanets, ensuring fewer potential discoveries are overlooked. As it turns out, Robovetter had mislabeled Kepler-1649c.

    Even as scientists work to further automate analysis processes to get the most science as possible out of any given dataset, this discovery shows the value of double-checking automated work. Even six years after Kepler stopped collecting data from the original Kepler field – a patch of sky it stared at from 2009 to 2013, before going on to study many more regions – this rigorous analysis uncovered one of the most unique Earth-analogs discovered yet.

    A Possible Third Planet

    Kepler-1649c not only is one of the best matches to Earth in terms of size and energy received from its star, but it provides an entirely new look at its home system. For every nine times the outer planet in the system orbits the host star, the inner planet orbits almost exactly four times. The fact that their orbits match up in such a stable ratio indicates the system itself is extremely stable, and likely to survive for a long time.

    Nearly perfect period ratios are often caused by a phenomenon called orbital resonance, but a nine-to-four ratio is relatively unique among planetary systems. Usually resonances take the form of ratios such as two-to-one or three-to-two. Though unconfirmed, the rarity of this ratio could hint to the presence of a middle planet with which both the inner and outer planets revolve in synchronicity, creating a pair of three-to-two resonances.

    The team looked for evidence of such a mystery third planet, with no results. However, that could be because the planet is too small to see or at an orbital tilt that makes it impossible to find using Kepler’s transit method.

    Either way, this system provides yet another example of an Earth-size planet in the habitable zone of a red dwarf star. These small and dim stars require planets to orbit extremely close to be within that zone – not too warm and not too cold – for life as we know it to potentially exist. Though this single example is only one among many, there is increasing evidence that such planets are common around red dwarfs.

    “The more data we get, the more signs we see pointing to the notion that potentially habitable and Earth-size exoplanets are common around these kinds of stars,” said Vanderburg. “With red dwarfs almost everywhere around our galaxy, and these small, potentially habitable and rocky planets around them, the chance one of them isn’t too different than our Earth looks a bit brighter.”

    For more information about Kepler and its discoveries, go to: https://www.nasa.gov/kepler

    1 user thanked author for this post.
  • #22619

    Star’s motion around Milky Way’s monster black hole proves Einstein right yet again

    Einstein’s theory of general relativity just passed a dramatic black-hole test with flying colors.

    The motion of a star orbiting Sagittarius A*, the supermassive black hole at the heart of our Milky Way galaxy, precisely matches that predicted by general relativity, a new study reports.

    “Einstein’s general relativity predicts that bound orbits of one object around another are not closed, as in Newtonian gravity, but precess forward in the plane of motion. This famous effect — first seen in the orbit of the planet Mercury around the sun — was the first evidence in favor of general relativity,” study co-author Reinhard Genzel, director of the Max Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial Physics in Garching, Germany, said in a statement.

    “One hundred years later, we have now detected the same effect in the motion of a star orbiting the compact radio source Sagittarius A* at the center of the Milky Way,” Genzel added. “This observational breakthrough strengthens the evidence that Sagittarius A* must be a supermassive black hole of 4 million times the mass of the sun.”


    Observations made with the European Southern Observatory’s Very Large Telescope in Chile have revealed for the first time that a star orbiting the supermassive black hole at the center of the Milky Way moves just as predicted by Einstein’s theory of general relativity. Its orbit is shaped like a rosette and not like an ellipse as predicted by Newton’s theory of gravity. This effect, known as Schwarzschild precession, had never before been measured for a star around a supermassive black hole. This artist’s impression illustrates the precession of the star’s orbit, with the effect exaggerated for easier visualization.

    The motion Genzel mentioned, called Schwarzschild precession, describes a sort of rotation in an object’s elliptical orbit. The location of the object’s closest-approach point changes with each lap, so the overall orbit is shaped like a rosette rather than a simple, static ellipse.

    Astronomers had never measured Schwarzschild precession in a star zooming around a supermassive black hole — until now.

    The research team used the European Southern Observatory’s (ESO) Very Large Telescope (VLT) in Chile to track a star called S2 as it looped around Sagittarius A*, which lies about 26,000 light-years from Earth. Over the course of 27 years, the astronomers made more than 330 measurements of S2’s position and velocity using multiple VLT instruments. (One of those instruments is called GRAVITY, which gives the research team its name: the GRAVITY collaboration.)

    Such a long observational window was necessary to pick up S2’s precession, for the star takes 16 Earth years to complete one orbit around Sagittarius A*.

    The observed precession matched the predictions of general relativity exactly, which could lead to further discoveries down the road, the researchers said.

    “Because the S2 measurements follow general relativity so well, we can set stringent limits on how much invisible material, such as distributed dark matter or possible smaller black holes, is present around Sagittarius A*,” team members Guy Perrin and Karine Perraut — of the Paris Observatory-PSL and the Grenoble Institute of Planetology and Astrophysics in France, respectively — said in the same statement.

    “This is of great interest for understanding the formation and evolution of supermassive black holes,” they added.

    The new study, which was published online today (April 16) in the journal Astronomy & Astrophysics, may presage even more exciting black-hole insights to come. For example, coming megascopes such as ESO’s Extremely Large Telescope could allow astronomers to track stars that get even closer to Sagittarius A* than S2 does, the researchers said.

    “If we are lucky, we might capture stars close enough that they actually feel the rotation, the spin, of the black hole,” said study team member Andreas Eckart of Cologne University in Germany. “That would be again a completely different level of testing relativity.”


    This simulation shows the orbits of stars very close to the supermassive black hole at the heart of the Milky Way. One of these stars, named S2, orbits every 16 years and is passing very close to the black hole in May 2018.

    2 users thanked author for this post.
  • #22809

    Astronomers spot quasar with the most powerful winds ever seen


    An artist’s depiction of a quasar and its surrounding galaxy as seen with optical light.

    Scientists took a second look at a strange object and spotted the most powerful winds ever detected gusting off of a special flavor of black hole called a quasar.

    A quasar forms when a supermassive black hole accelerates certain particles it cannot absorb so dramatically that they reach nearly the speed of light as they shoot away from the black hole in bright, jetlike structures. Quasars often also produce winds that can gust through the surrounding galaxy, reducing star formation. But, until now, scientists haven’t ever seen such powerful quasar winds.

    “While high-velocity winds have previously been observed in quasars, these have been thin and wispy, carrying only a relatively small amount of mass,” Sarah Gallagher, an astronomer at Western University in Canada and lead author on the new research, said in a university statement. “The outflow from this quasar, in comparison, sweeps along a tremendous amount of mass at incredible speeds. This wind is crazy powerful, and we don’t know how the quasar can launch something so substantial.”

    The newly studied quasar, which scientists refer to as SDSS J135246.37+423923.5, is produced by a supermassive black hole containing more than 8 billion times the mass of our sun, or perhaps 2,000 times the mass of the black hole at the center of our own galaxy, according to the team’s calculations.

    This quasar was first discovered by a project called the Sloan Digital Sky Survey, which produces massive maps of the universe, and was revisited by the Gemini North telescope located atop Maunakea in Hawaii. The team behind the new research also needed to apply a recently developed technique for analyzing this sort of quasar, which scientists call a broad absorption line quasar after a characteristic in the data such objects produce.

    “We were shocked — this isn’t a new quasar, but no one knew how amazing it was until the team got the Gemini spectra,” Karen Leighly, a co-author on the new research and an astronomer at the University of Oklahoma, said in the same statement. “These objects were too hard to study before our team developed our methodology and had the data we needed, and now it looks like they might be the most interesting kind of windy quasars to study.”


    An artist’s depiction of the same system as seen in infrared light.

    The calculations based on this analysis suggest that this particular object is producing the most powerful quasar winds scientists have ever detected. The phenomenon is particularly intriguing because scientists believe such winds play a key role in sculpting the galaxies that surround the structure.

    The researchers hope that this quasar isn’t the only one of its kind. “We don’t know how many more of these extraordinary objects are in our quasar catalogs that we just don’t know about yet,” Hyunseop Choi, first author on the new research and a graduate student at the University of Oklahoma, said in the same statement. “There could be more of these quasars with tremendously powerful outflows hidden away in our surveys.”

    The research is described in a paper published March 1 in the Astrophysical Journal.

    2 users thanked author for this post.
  • #23094

    Scientists detect rare crash of two mismatched black holes for the first time ever

    “This is roughly equal to the ratio of filling in a regular Oreo to [that] in a Mega Stuf Oreo. Investigations of connections between Oreos and black hole formation are ongoing.”

    Colliding black holes aren’t always as evenly matched as scientists expected, according to a cosmic chirp astronomers have puzzled over for a year.

    On April 12, 2019, gravitational wave detectors picked up a signal of space-time ripples caused by colliding black holes — which in and of itself has gone from groundbreaking to nearly mundane over the past five years. But as scientists studied the detection more closely, they realized that it didn’t match the signals they have seen so far.

    Instead of two evenly matched black holes, the new detection seemed to be triggered by a lopsided merger in which one black hole was three or four times more massive than the other. Scientists affiliated with the Laser Interferometer Gravitational-wave Observatory (LIGO) announced the discovery April 18 at an online meeting of the American Physical Society.

    “It’s an unlikely observation,” Maya Fishbach, a doctoral candidate at the University of Chicago who presented the new discovery, said during her talk. “It’s an exceptional event because we just wouldn’t have expected it based on those first 10 binary black holes.”


    An artist’s depiction of mismatched black holes colliding.

    Scientists studied those 10 mergers during LIGO’s first two observing runs, conducted between 2015 and 2017. Each time, no matter how big the collision, the two black holes involved were about the same size. Then, just weeks into LIGO’s third observing run in 2019, the newly reported signal appeared and turned that trend on its head.

    “We had detected several binary black hole mergers before, but never one where the bigger black hole is nearly four times more massive than its companion,” Frank Ohme, a LIGO scientist at the Max Planck Institute for Gravitational Physics in Germany, said in a statement. “It’s clear we are just beginning to understand the diversity of black hole binaries out there, and I am excited to decipher the universe’s secrets every day a little more.”

    The newly announced discovery involved objects about 2.4 billion light-years away, Fishbach said, with one black hole about eight times the mass of our sun and the other about 30 times the mass of our sun.

    “This is roughly equal to the ratio of filling in a regular Oreo to [that] in a Mega Stuf Oreo,” Christopher Berry, a gravitational-wave scientist at Northwestern University, wrote in a blog post about the detection. (Don’t get too excited: “Investigations of connections between Oreos and black hole formation are ongoing,” he added.)

    The detection gives scientists a better understanding of how black holes pair up. “We are learning that systems of this kind exist and how rare they are,” Giancarlo Cella, researcher at Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare in Italy and the data analysis coordinator for LIGO’s European counterpart Virgo, said in a statement. “This will allow us to deduce how they formed.”

    LIGO’s third observing run, which was cut short by the spreading coronavirus pandemic, netted a treasure trove of more than 50 detections, Fishbach said. Scientists are still analyzing those observations, so other unbalanced mergers could be hiding in that data. But even just the one asymmetric merger dramatically reshapes the range of black hole pairs scientists are now prepared to expect.

    “This one event represents a big step forward in our understanding of the population,” Fishbach said.

    3 users thanked author for this post.
  • #23138

    “This is roughly equal to the ratio of filling in a regular Oreo to [that] in a Mega Stuf Oreo,” Christopher Berry, a gravitational-wave scientist at Northwestern University, wrote in a blog post about the detection. (Don’t get too excited: “Investigations of connections between Oreos and black hole formation are ongoing,” he added.)

    Guy’s got a weird sense of humor for a scientist.

    2 users thanked author for this post.
  • #23202

    The Lyrid meteor shower of 2020 peaks tonight!

    You may not be able to see the moon in the sky tonight, but if you look up for long enough at a dark, clear sky, you may catch some “shooting stars.”

    The annual Lyrid meteor shower peaks overnight tonight (April 21) and into the early hours of Wednesday (April 22), less than a day before the new moon. Without any glaring moonlight to obstruct the view, skywatchers will have an excellent view of the Lyrids this year — weather permitting.

    From a dark, clear sky, observers in the Northern Hemisphere can expect to see as many as 10 to 20 meteors per hour during the shower’s peak. Because the shower is active from mid- to late April, some Lyrid meteors may still appear before and after the peak, but tonight will be your best chance to see them.


    Photographer Islam Hassan captured this photo of a Lyrid meteor over Egypt on April 25, 2015.

    The shower’s peak will last for a few hours, but maximum activity is expected to occur around 2 a.m. EDT (0600 GMT) on Wednesday, according to the Observer’s Handbook of the Royal Astronomical Society of Canada. That’s about 20 hours before the moon reaches its new phase at 10:26 a.m. EDT (0226 GMT). That tiny sliver of a nearly-new moon still won’t be visible in the night sky, because the moon will be below the horizon. In New York City, for example, the moon sets at 6:23 p.m. local time tonight and rises again at 5:50 a.m. tomorrow.

    To spot the Lyrids, find a dark sky away from light pollution and look up — ideally while lying on your back, so you don’t strain your neck. Lyrid meteors will appear to originate from a point in the sky on the border between the constellations Hercules and Lyra (home of the bright star Vega). This apparent point of origin, known as the meteor shower’s radiant, will be in the northeast after sunset and almost directly overhead in the hours before dawn.


    The radiant, or point of origin, of the Lyrid meteor shower is in the constellation Hercules, near the border with the Lyra constellation.

    Once you’ve located the radiant, don’t just stare at that spot all night. Longer streaks tend to appear farther from the shower’s radiant, so you might miss the best meteors if your eyes are glued on that singular spot all night (also, focusing on a single point in the dark for so long might strain your eyes).

    o, since lying down on the ground is both more comfortable and will give you the best view of the entire sky, we suggest you kick back and relax to make the most of this brilliant, cosmic event.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
  • #23701

    Hubble captures a ‘Cosmic Reef’ in stunning 30th anniversary image

    ____________________________________________

    That’s the way the comet crumbles: Hubble image shows remains of Comet ATLAS

    ______________________________________________

    Celebrating 30 years of the Hubble Space Telescope

    3 users thanked author for this post.
  • #23872

    The radiant, or point of origin, of the Lyrid meteor shower is in the constellation Hercules,

    Uh… :unsure:

    near the border with the Lyra constellation.

    Weak. You screwed up, admit it :-)

     

     

  • #24256

    Is space-time smooth or chunky?

    A new study tried to find out.


    Abstract illustration of particles interacting at the quantum level.

    What is the fundamental nature of reality? Is space-time — the four-dimensional fabric of our universe — ultimately smooth at the tiniest of scales, or something else?

    It seems impossible to measure, but with the power of advanced telescopes peering through billions of light-years of distance, researchers are beginning to look down. Deep down.

    The ultimate fabric

    Einstein’s theory of general relativity is the only way that we understand gravity, and through that prickly tangle of mathematics we have come to know something called “space-time,” a four-dimensional structure (three dimensions of space and one of time) woven together into a unified fabric.

    In the language of relativity, matter and energy bend and warp the fabric of space-time, and in response the bending and warping of space-time tells matter and energy how to move, something we collectively experience as “gravity.”

    In order for the math of general relativity to work, this fabric of space-time has to be absolutely smooth at the tiniest of scales. No matter how far you zoom in, space-time will always be as wrinkle-free as a recently ironed shirt. No holes, no tears, no tangles. Just pure, clean smoothness. Without this smoothness, the mathematics of gravity simply break down.

    But general relativity isn’t the only thing telling us about space-time. We also have quantum mechanics (and its successor, quantum field theory). In the quantum world, everything microscopic is ruled by random chance and probabilities. Particles can appear and disappear at a moment’s notice (and usually even less time than that). Fields can wiggle and vibrate with a will all their own. And nothing can ever be known for certain.

    And so, as the physicist John Wheeler pointed out in 1960, if we were to zoom down to the tiniest possible scale (something called the Planck scale, which is about a billionth of a billionth of a billionth of a billionth of a meter), space-time shouldn’t appear smooth at all. Instead, it should be a roiling, boiling mess — an angry frothing soup of particles, constantly tearing holes in space-time and patching them up again before anyone in the macroscopic world notices.

    Old town road

    But both of these views of space-time can be correct at the same time. Either general relativity is correct and space-time is smooth, or quantum mechanics is correct and space-time is chunky. Physicists think that the ultimate answer lies in a combination of the two views, something called quantum gravity. And no, we do not currently know what that ultimate answer looks like. So if we could crack open space-time and have a look at the tiniest of scales, maybe we could get some clue as to what’s really going on.

    If space-time really is frothy and bubbling, then this should affect anything passing through space-time. For example, a beam of light going along its merry way will encounter all sorts of microscopic bumps and jostles — a Planckian gravel path rather than a smooth highway.

    Sometimes those little jostles will give the light a boost, nudging up its energy level, and sometimes the light will encounter a little speed bump, slowing it down. The net effect is that light traveling through a frothy space-time will slowly spread out in energy.

    This effect is incredibly, incredibly minute, so tiny we couldn’t possibly hope to measure it in a laboratory. But thankfully, nature can provide a laboratory for us. If we can find a nice, coherent beam of light in space (in other words, a natural space laser), and that beam of light travels over billions of years to our telescopes, we can measure the spread in energy and use that to measure the frothiness of space-time.

    Froth for the espresso

    That’s exactly what a team of astronomers did, submitting their results for publication in the Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, and also posting their work to the online preprint site arXiv. And in a perfect coincidence, they searched for the frothiness of space-time using … espresso. No, not the drink. ESPRESSO, the Echelle Spectrograph for Rocky Exoplanet and Stable Spectroscopic Observations, an instrument based at the European Southern Observatory’s Very Large Telescope.

    As its name suggests, ESPRESSO was not designed to search for space-time frothiness, but it turned out to be the best tool for the job. And the astronomers pointed it at a perfect source: a run-of-the-mill gas cloud sitting over 18 billion light-years away. What makes this particular gas cloud especially useful is two facts. One, there is a bright source sitting just behind it, illuminating it. And two, there’s iron in the cloud, which absorbs the background light at a very specific wavelength.

    So from our vantage point on Earth, if space-time is perfectly smooth, that gap in the background light caused by the gas cloud should be just as narrow as if the cloud was sitting right next to us. But if space-time is frothy, then the light traveling over the billions of light-years will spread out, changing the width of the gap.

    The astronomers didn’t find any hint of frothiness, which doesn’t mean that it doesn’t exist — it just means that if space-time is frothy, we need more than 18 billion light-years to see it with our current technology. But the results were able to rule out some models of quantum gravity, sending them into the proverbial dustbin of physics history.

    And if a future experiment does find a sign of frothiness? It would be our first window into the world of quantum gravity, something physicists have been searching for since the 1950s. And it may be all revealed by some random gas cloud.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
  • #24336

    Is space-time smooth or chunky?

    I don’t know about space, but I prefer my peanut butter chunky.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
  • #24398

    These scientists sound like they may not eat enough. First Mega stuf Oreos, now Spacetime and its chunkiness And Espresso and its frothiness. :unsure:

    2 users thanked author for this post.
  • #24588

    Friday, May 1, 2020: A new image from the Hubble Space Telescope features the sparkling spiral galaxy NGC 4100, which is teeming with baby stars. The galaxy’s spiral arms are speckled with pockets of bright blue starlight radiating from hot newborn stars. NGC 4100 is located about 67 million light-years from Earth in the constellation Ursa Major, and it belongs to a group of galaxies called the Ursa Major Cluster. It’s about three-quarters the size of the Milky Way, which is also a spiral galaxy, and it “looks almost stretched across the sky” in this new view.

    Wednesday, April 29, 2020: In a deep-space image featuring countless distant galaxies of all shapes and sizes, a tiny dwarf galaxy takes center stage. The small elliptical galaxy in the foreground of this new Hubble Space Telescope image is known as PGC 29388. It contains between 100 million to a few billion stars, which pales in comparison to our Milky Way galaxy, which has 250 to 400 billion stars. “As beautiful as the surrounding space may be, the sparkling galaxy in the foreground of this image from the NASA/ESA Hubble Space Telescope undeniably steals the show.”

    Thursday, April 23, 2020: A “shooting star” crosses the Milky Way galaxy in this photo taken during the peak of the annual Lyrid meteor shower. Photographer Tina Pappas Lee captured this view from Fripp Island, South Carolina, on Wednesday (April 22) at approximately 4:45 a.m. local time. Directly below the meteor, two of the brightest planets in the night sky, Jupiter and Saturn, are visible side by side.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
  • #24594

    I hadn’t followed this before, but I recently heard about how the Space X Spacelink satellites now pop up when you’re watching the nightsky. And the thing is, it’s only a few dozen now, but Musk’s current plan is to put 12.0000 satellites out there, meaning there will apparently be more satellites than stars visible to the naked eye.

    https://www.vox.com/science-and-health/2020/1/7/21003272/space-x-starlink-astronomy-light-pollution

    Of course, Space X aren’t the only company with those kind of plans; amazon and others have similar, if smaller, ideas. Perfect internet coverage will be a big thing over the coming years, and it kind of seems unavoidable that space will very quickly be commercialised in a way it wasn’t before. I think the nightsky is going to look very, very different in a few years.

    2 users thanked author for this post.
  • #24896

    The moon isn’t ‘dead’: Ridges on lunar surface show signs of recent tectonic activity

    “There’s this assumption that the moon is long dead, but we keep finding that that’s not the case.”


    The full moon as seen from the Earth, with the Ocean of Storms (Oceanus Procellarum) border structures superimposed in red. Scientists now think this huge feature on the moon was formed by lunar lava early in the moon’s formation, and not a cataclysmic impact. New research shows that there could could be active tectonic systems on the moon today.

    The moon isn’t “dead” after all. Newly discovered ridges on the moon’s surface are leading scientists to think that the moon might have an active tectonic system.

    Using data from NASA’s Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO), researchers have discovered a number of ridges with exposed bedrock, free of lunar regolith, or powdery lunar “soil,” spread across the moon’s nearside surface. These ridges, speckled with boulders, could be evidence that, not too long ago, tectonic activity broke apart the moon’s surface.

    While most of the moon’s surface is covered in lunar regolith, there are a few, rare patches of this exposed bedrock. But, because regolith builds up quickly on the surface, there must be something creating these ridges with exposed bedrock on the moon, Peter Schultz, a professor in Brown University’s Department of Earth, Environmental and Planetary Sciences and co-author of a new study describing the findings, said in a statement.


    Infrared (upper left) and other images from NASA’s Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter show spots on the moon with ridges and no regolith. These observations could be evidence that there is active tectonic activity on the moon today.

    While ridges with exposed bedrock have been seen before, they could be explained by evidence showing that lava once flowed there, its weight and movement creating the ridges, Schultz added. But in this new study, ridges have been found that can’t be explained by ancient volcanic activity and seem to be related to more recent tectonic activity. “The distribution that we found here begs for a different explanation,” he said.

    “There’s this assumption that the moon is long dead, but we keep finding that that’s not the case,” Shultz said in the same statement. “From this paper, it appears that the moon may still be creaking and cracking — potentially in the present day — and we can see the evidence on these ridges.”

    To make these observations, the team — led by Adomas Valantinas, a graduate student at the University of Bern in Switzerland who conducted this research while a visiting student at Brown — used the LRO’s Diviner instrument, which measures the temperature on the moon’s surface. Diviner data allowed them to determine what types of rocks and what types of surfaces lay in specific areas because areas covered in lunar regolith tend to be colder than exposed areas of bedrock free of regolith.

    Using these observations, the team was able to spot 500 patches of exposed bedrock on narrow ridges across the moon’s surface near the lunar maria (large dark patches on the moon). Valantinas and Schultz mapped out all of these exposed ridges, and it turns out that they line up perfectly with ancient cracks in the moon’s crust spotted by NASA’s GRAIL mission in 2014. Magma once flowed through these cracks to the moon’s surface.

    “It’s almost a one-to-one correlation,” Schultz said. “That makes us think that what we’re seeing is an ongoing process driven by things happening in the moon’s interior.”

    Schultz and Valantinas suggest that what they’ve found is an Active Nearside Tectonic System, or ANTS for short. Within this system, they suggest that the ridges that sit above the ancient cracks found by GRAIL are still today moving upward, with their surface cracking and allowing regolith to fall into cracks leaving the bedrock exposed.

    They think that ANTS may have begun billions of years ago when the moon experienced a significant impact, because regolith usually covers the surface quickly. But such activity could still be going on today, continuously pushing the ridges up, cracking them and leaving the bedrock exposed, the researchers said.

    “Giant impacts have long-lasting effects. The moon has a long memory. What we’re seeing on the surface today is testimony to its long memory and secrets it still holds,” Schultz said.

    The new study, which was published April 13 in the journal Geology, isn’t the only evidence for recent tectonic activity on the moon. For example, seismometers installed on the lunar surface by Apollo astronauts in the late 1960s and early 1970s picked up numerous quakes, which scientists have traced to the moon’s long-term cooling. This cooling causes shrinkage, which in turn causes the brittle lunar crust to crack and shake.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
  • #24899

    1 user thanked author for this post.
  • #24925

    1 user thanked author for this post.
  • #25019

    Totally fake.

    Everyone knows the moon was blown out of Earth’s orbit on September 13, 1999.

    3 users thanked author for this post.
  • #25020

    4 users thanked author for this post.
  • #25172

    Tonight there’s a super full flower moon also known here as the hare moon which is apt as it looms bright close enough to leap over.

    It’s as good an explanation for all the madness as any. Wilde-ly beautiful.

    4 users thanked author for this post.
  • #25187

    My son got a telescope a couple of weeks ago so we’re going to have to take a closer look tonight.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
  • #25221

    Hope you get clear skies.

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/articles/3gDG023plXCJLVpvHZ8qtBf/find-the-apollo-landing-sites

    2 users thanked author for this post.
  • #25225

    That’s very useful – thanks!

    1 user thanked author for this post.
  • #25227

    When I was a kid my Dad made me and my sisters laugh by showing us pictures the weather unit had taken of the nightsky from the roof of the tv station. Intended to be shown on the news that night as a placeholder before the weather-report.

    Mysteriously, there was always someones bare bum in some of the pictures, but they were never shown on the TV for someone reason.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
  • #25228

    Ratings would’ve gone through the roof, depending on the moon.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
  • #25261

    The moon is very confused tonight. It’s sunshine yellow.

    How did you fall up into my night sky, Todd?

  • #25264

    How did you fall up into my night sky, Todd?

    Operator error

    1 user thanked author for this post.
  • #25269

    It was a shiny error. I should’ve taken a picture.

    The yellow rose of Texas has gone all cloudy for now.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
  • #25274

    If Planet Nine Is a Tiny Black Hole, This Is How to Find It
    Our best bet could be to send a swarm of nanospacecraft — propelled from Earth by a powerful laser — to take a look.

    Also story at LiveScience and where the pic is from

    For centuries, astronomers have speculated that the solar system contains undiscovered planets that orbit in the distant, dark reaches of the sun’s realm. From time to time, they have spotted the gravitational effects of unknown bodies, forcing them to look for the culprit. Both Neptune and Pluto came to light in this way.

    Black Hole Puzzle

    Now, astronomers have a similar puzzle on their hands. For some time, they have been gathering evidence that a massive planet must be orbiting the sun at a distance of around 500 astronomical units, or 70 billion kilometers.

    The evidence comes from the orbits of icy bodies in the Kuiper Belt beyond Neptune. These objects seem to cluster together in ways that can only be explained if they were being “herded” by some massive object.

    This object — Planet Nine, as it is dubbed — must be between five and 10 times the mass of Earth, but so far away that it is hard to see from Earth, despite numerous ongoing searches.

    But there is another reason why Planet Nine might be hard to see: because it is not a planet at all. Instead, astronomers say one possibility is that it might be a primordial black hole, left over from the Big Bang but captured by the sun.

    Although between five and 10 times more massive than Earth, this black hole would by tiny — about 5 centimeters across. Consequently, it is almost impossible to spot with a telescope. There is a small possibility that such a black hole might be observable through its interaction with dark matter, but that is by no means guaranteed. So astronomers are scratching their heads to come up with another way of finding it.

    Today, they have an answer, thanks to the work of Ed Witten, a physicist at the Institute for Advanced Study in Princeton, New Jersey. Witten’s idea is to look for the gravitational forces this black hole must exert on anything that passes nearby. So he proposes sending a fleet of nanospacecraft in its direction and then looking for any unexpected deviations from the expected trajectory.

    “If further study of the Kuiper Belt strengthens the case for existence of Planet Nine, but discovery via telescopic searches or a dark matter annihilation signal does not follow, then a direct search by a fleet of miniature spacecraft may become compelling,” he says.

    Witten is not the first to imagine the potential of nanospacecraft. Various scientists and visionaries have studied the idea of using powerful ground-based laser beams to propel tiny chip-based spacecraft toward the stars.

    Powerful Laser

    The big advantage is that such spacecraft needn’t carry their own fuel, but would instead sit on the tip of laser beam generated on Earth. This laser beam could accelerate them continuously for long periods of time, allowing them to reach huge velocities of perhaps 1 or 2 percent the speed of light.

    “To search for Planet Nine, one would like spacecraft velocities of (at least) hundreds of kilometers per second,” says Witten, adding that such speeds would allow a spacecraft to travel 500 AU on a 10-year timescale.

    What’s more, it is possible to launch nanospacecraft by their hundreds, possibly thousands, toward Planet Nine. That’s important, because Witten estimates that such a spacecraft would need to come within a few dozen AU of a black hole for any changes in its trajectory to be observable. And because astronomers don’t yet know exactly where Planet Nine might be, the only option is this scattergun approach.

    Such a mission would be a significant challenge. Witten points to previous and ongoing projects to develop and launch nanospacecraft. The best known is Breakthrough Starshot, a $100 million initiative to develop and test the technology capable of sending laser-propelled nanospacecraft to nearby star systems. The project’s goal is to “lay the foundations for a flyby mission to Alpha Centauri within a generation.”

    A mission to the outer edges of the solar system might be a useful technology demonstrator. Calculations by the British rocket scientist Kevin Parkin suggest that the cost of such a mission would be of the same order as the $1 billion missions that NASA has undertaken many times.

    Nevertheless, almost every part of such a mission would be a challenge, from the development of a laser capable of providing propulsion to the design of a chip capable of relaying position data back to Earth. That will require the spacecraft to carry a high-precision onboard clock within a payload measured in grams. “Sufficiently accurate timekeeping in a miniature spacecraft may be the biggest obstacle to this project,” says Witten.

    But there is certainly motivation to try. The discovery of a black hole orbiting the sun would be quite a prize for whoever undertook such a task. Indeed, it may be the last chance to discover a significant new body orbiting our star.

    Ref: Searching for a Black Hole in the Outer Solar System

    • This reply was modified 4 years, 8 months ago by Sean Robinson.
    1 user thanked author for this post.
  • #25287

    The moon is very confused tonight. It’s sunshine yellow.

    It was very yellow, wasn’t it.

    The kids had to stay up late for it to get dark but we got the telescope out and managed to see some amazing close-ups of the moon before they had to go to bed.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
  • #25299

    That’s cool.

    You might have some mini-Moores from here on out.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
  • #25317

    As long as it’s Patrick and not Alan.

  • #25338

    Test via a xylophone.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
  • #25383

    They looked at the xylophone and started talking at length about how it existed at all points in time simultaneously, from the tree that the wooden bars were carved from all the way through to the fire in which it is destroyed decades from now, but not to be upset by this as all matter is simply energy in a different form.

    Then they suggested we go to Northampton for a bit.

    I’m not sure how to interpret that.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
  • #25393

    Inconclusive. The Soup Dragon is singing a siren song in conjunction with the xylophone from a portal in Northampton?

  • #25406

    May sound like a stupid question and I’m okay with that. I just want to lay an enigma to rest.

    If I have a solid object, say… a metal rod, and that metal rod is one light year long and suspended in space. If I pushed my end of it one foot forward, would the other end move in accordance immediately or would it take time for it to happen?

  • #25427

    Immediately. I’m absolutely sure of that, but it’s theoretical because you wouldn’t be able to see it for one year.

    “It can be two things!”

    2 users thanked author for this post.
  • #25453

    Solar-sailing sentries could allow up-close study of interstellar visitors like ‘Oumuamua

    Chasing these interlopers down might require a novel approach.


    Diagram of a proposed network of solar-sailing “statite” craft, which would look for interstellar objects zooming through the solar system and potentially allow up-close study of such visitors.

    A fleet of solar-sailing sentries stationed far from the sun could someday allow scientists to get up-close looks at interstellar visitors like the mysterious ‘Oumuamua.

    The NASA Innovative Advanced Concepts (NIAC) Program has funded a team of researchers to study the feasibility of building and deploying “statites” (short for “static satellites”) at various points along the outer reaches of our solar system.

    more in link…

    1 user thanked author for this post.
  • #26082

    1st super-fast pulsar found snacking on its companion in far-flung star cluster

    China’s FAST radio telescope has spotted a pulsar pirouetting in Messier 92.


    An artist’s impression of a millisecond pulsar and its stellar companion.

    China’s Five-hundred-meter Aperture Spherical Telescope (FAST) has uncovered the first known pulsar in Messier 92, a globular star cluster roughly 27,000 light-years away from Earth in the constellation of Hercules.

    The swiftly spinning and pulsating object, which goes by two names — PSR J1717+4307A and M92A — forms one part of an eclipsing binary system in which it is siphoning material from a stellar companion, according to the new study.

    A research team led by Zhichen Pan and Li Di from the National Astronomical Observatories of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (NAOC), which operates FAST — the world’s largest radio telescope — has shown that M92A spins at a rapid speed of 316.5 rotations per second and co-orbits a star lighter than our sun, weighing in at 0.18 solar masses.


    Messier 92 lies in the constellation of Hercules (the Hero).

    Using FAST, the researchers observed two eclipsing events in the binary system, when one object passed in front of the other from Earth’s point of view. One eclipse lasted around 5,000 seconds, and the second, which arrived between 1,000 and 2,000 seconds later, lasted for 500 seconds, according to the study. M92A is known as a millisecond pulsar, a souped-up version of the slightly slower-moving pulsar.

    Millisecond pulsars are highly-magnetized neutron stars, which pirouette rapidly at speeds less than 30 milliseconds, according to the Swinburne Astronomy Online Encyclopedia of Astronomy.

    Ever since the discovery of the very first pulsar in 1967 by astronomer Jocelyn Bell Burnell, then a graduate student at the University of Cambridge, astronomers have uncovered thousands of these stellar speedsters in the Milky Way alone, with some clustering in the galactic plane — the region where the majority of a disk galaxy’s mass lies — and others taking residence in the globular clusters that orbit our galaxy’s center.

    Ordinary pulsars spring into existence at the end of a massive star’s life, peaking as a supernova explosion that leaves behind a stellar corpse known as a neutron star in its dusty wake. These neutron stars are small, weighing in at a mass that’s equivalent to anywhere from one to several suns, crammed into a diameter of a mere 12.4 to 14.9 miles (20 to 24 kilometers). Yet what they lack in size, they make up for in speed, completing several rotations per second.

    If there is a magnetic field lurking around the neutron star, charged particles coming from the star itself become snagged, causing the star to blast electromagnetic radiation in a lighthouse-like beam every few seconds or less. These flashing, magnetic neutron stars are known as pulsars.

    Millisecond pulsars, however, move much more quickly, powering hundreds of rotations per second by chewing on gas from a companion star that survived the supernova explosion, spilling material into a disk around the neutron star before falling onto it. During this process, the system is visible as an X-ray binary, according to the National Radio Astronomy Observatory. The neutron star then emerges as a millisecond radio pulsar when the accretion is over.

    In globular clusters like Messier 92, things work a bit differently — stars are so tightly packed together that it’s easier for ancient neutron stars to interact with other stars, allowing normal stellar binaries to be made. In the case of M92A, the pulsar hasn’t found it too difficult to siphon material from its stellar companion, earning itself the reputation of being likened to a “redback spider” — a highly venomous Australian arachnid that often eats their male companions, the researchers said in a statement.

    Also known as Tianyan, FAST is located in the Dawodang depression, a natural groove in the land of Pingtang County in southwest China’s Guizhou. And this isn’t the great radio telescope’s first encounter with M92A, its 1,640-foot (500 meters) dish found tantalizing evidence for the pulsar on Oct. 9, 2017 — and with a light-collecting area that’s twice that of the Arecibo Observatory in Puerto Rico, it’s expected that FAST will improve our understanding of the pulsars that are kicking around the Milky Way galaxy, the researchers said in the statement.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
Viewing 100 replies - 1 through 100 (of 650 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Skip to toolbar