Starts tomorrow.
Home » Forums » Movies, TV and other media » She-Hulk (Disney+) – SPOILER discussion
Fandom sucks the life out of things I’m afraid.
Look, satisfying storytelling is all well and good but have you considered how much more important it is that everything fits into my very specific range of desires while also being a perfect jigsaw-like fit into the broader fictional universe despite that being literally impossible?
No one seemed to have a problem with John Cena (as Peacemaker) dancing along with the rest of the cast in that recent miniseries. Is there a form of sexism involved here?
Must’ve missed my posts… it’s okay, I don’t take it personally =P
Oh and again, just because, that was fuckin’ cringe! even more than the twearking… except it had no shitty CGI… but still worse.
Ah that’s forever been there. Look at Iron Man again and you are bombarded with Audi logos on every car and Dell on every laptop and Tony asking for a Burger King.
Sure, I’m not saying it’s new, just reiterating it.
Al will come in with some po-faced Youtube video about appropriation that we should accept as fact, despite the fact that clearly Meggan doesn’t give a shit about or she wouldn’t have done it, she doesn’t need the money and her music is very much about doing what she wants, you don’t sing WAP if you want to appease conservative advertisers.
No I won’t
That point has already been made several times.
Not being redundant and beating a dead horse!
Funny… I wanted to put in that laughing face, but my Windows
emoji thing isn’t working now but you all get the point.
— (Not) YouTube Kids (@RealYouTubeKids) September 1, 2022
At this point, I’m just waiting for Daredevil to show up.
Apparently he’s going to do the floss.
This week was another fun one, it’s leaning into the metahumour even more, Wong sparking up a friendship with Madisynn was really cute and fun, the magicians were hilarious. And Jen wearing outsize clothes as she left her home so she could turn into She-Hulk on the way to work was a very nice visible touch
It was fun and the show is what it is with its lighthearted comedic tone.
I have stopped waiting for the show to get serious, although I wonder why they didn’t confiscate those
magic brass knuckles once that guy flunked the school.
Fwiw… Now there are these postings pointing to this dance scene Stark did in his armor back in Iron Man 2.
At this point, I’m just waiting for Daredevil to show up.
Apparently he’s going to do the floss.
Now I’ve got that image living rent-free in my head. Thanks, Dave.
Right, I was hoping for DD to show soon because I’m morbidly curious as to how they’ll fuck that up, but I suppose I’ll just wait until the episode comes out (something tells me it’ll be one of the last two) and I’m probably just gonna stop here ’cause this episode was dull as fuck, on top of the usual problems… although how many episodes is this supposed to be? because if it’s 8 I might as well ride it out, but if it’s 10 or more I’ll just bail…
because if it’s 8 I might as well ride it out, but if it’s 10 or more I’ll just bail…
To leave you in no man’s land it is 9 episodes.
The new episode was okay. I mean, glad Wong got a new friend and possibly drinking buddy. And with a new information that DD will be flossing in his cameo, if that doesn’t happen, I will be disappointed.
because if it’s 8 I might as well ride it out, but if it’s 10 or more I’ll just bail…
To leave you in no man’s land it is 9 episodes.
The 10th episode is actually just an episode of the Sopranos with Wong and wossername doing drunken commentary.
because if it’s 8 I might as well ride it out, but if it’s 10 or more I’ll just bail…
To leave you in no man’s land it is 9 episodes.
The 10th episode is actually just an episode of the Sopranos with Wong and wossername doing drunken commentary.
I’d legit watch that.
The 10th episode is actually just an episode of the Sopranos with Wong and wossername doing drunken commentary.
It’s Madisynn, two Ns, one Y, but it’s not where you thiiiiiink.
I only just noticed in this episode what the GLK in Jen’s firm stands for. Nice. Is that carried over from Slott’s comic run? It’s been so long since I’ve read that.
Right, I was hoping for DD to show soon because I’m morbidly curious as to how they’ll fuck that up, but I suppose I’ll just wait until the episode comes out (something tells me it’ll be one of the last two) and I’m probably just gonna stop here ’cause this episode was dull as fuck, on top of the usual problems… although how many episodes is this supposed to be? because if it’s 8 I might as well ride it out, but if it’s 10 or more I’ll just bail…
Talk about a sunken cosy fallacy. There’s nothing noble about continuing to watch a show you hate just so you can come slag it off here.
Culture wars are so tedious.
Fucking preach!
According to Rotten Tomatoes, the show has an average audience score of 40%.
Ah yes, well-regarded as an accurate measure of quality in the universe.
Eh, don’t worry, they’ll blame the incel men review-bombing this in 3… 2… 1…
So you don’t think Rings of Power was actually review-bombed? Because that seems pretty convincing to me.
Conversely though, I have to admit that its 88% critics rating is almost as nonsensival. The truth lies pretty much in the middle of that. And that would, as usually, be its metacritic critic rating of 67%.
Review bombing is of course a real thing and it’s something that can possibly backfire because if a ‘woke show’ truly is disliked by the audience nobody is going to believe the numbers. It’s also rather pointless because all any producers care about is how many eyes are watching.
So you don’t think Rings of Power was actually review-bombed? Because that seems pretty convincing to me. Conversely though, I have to admit that its 88% critics rating is almost as nonsensival. The truth lies pretty much in the middle of that.
It’s the same old RT problem isn’t it. If a show is OK but doesn’t blow you away, and gets lukewarm reviews across the board, it would still get a 100% RT rating (or near enough) because their system allocates each review a binary good/bad categorisation and then compiles the numbers on that basis.
So 88% for LotR sounds about right. Most people have said it’s good but not (yet?) great, and I would agree with that.
It’s also rather pointless because all any producers care about is how many eyes are watching.
I’m not sure that’s quite true for a show like LotR which has become emblematic of Amazon’s TV efforts as a whole.
They will want it to be well-received as well as well-viewed, because a positive reception not only has the potential to bring more viewers to their service but also (in this case) offers them a kind of seal of quality, after having only a handful of really breakthrough mainstream shows of this type (The Boys is maybe their biggest so far?).
For a show that they have spent so much money on and they have made such a centrepiece of their TV efforts, they will want it to be well-reviewed. As evidenced by Amazon clamping down on the malicious reviews on their own site and heavily moderating them ahead of publication.
For a show that they have spent so much money on and they have made such a centrepiece of their TV efforts, they will want it to be well-reviewed.
Yeah but well reviewed/received is somewhat different to an easily manipulated viewer score.
Sure they would like that to be good as it will be viewed but online pressure groups skewing polls is not a new phenomenon, just one a certain group have jumped on recently. If they get good press reviews, good viewer numbers that sustain and they can measure the sign-ups then if they do take huge note of viewer polls they’d be quite foolish. I don’t think they would.
In the end if viewers truly dislike a product then they switch off. Streaming TV is always more opaque on numbers but there are things out there that are never well regarded or reviewed but carry on anyway.
Don’t know why we’re suddenly talking about Rings of Power but okay… oh I see it has a quite similar score, interesting.
So you don’t think Rings of Power was actually review-bombed? Because that seems pretty convincing to me.
I mean, I’m sure it was review bombed, like I said, RoP has both the “anti-wokers” and the Tolkien nerds to contend with, so I’m not surprised that show’s been hammered with bad reviews. Similarly, I’m sure She-Hulk has had its fair share of review bombing by the anti-wokers, HOWEVER, it IS a MCU show, so a 40% is too low for being the result of just review bombing, imo.
But that doesn’t really matter, because I was more talking about what the narrative will be to “defend” that low score… I’m sure we’ll start seeing articles about how the “toxic male fandom” is behind it all.
because their system allocates each review a binary good/bad categorisation
But wait… isn’t the audience score an actual average of people’s ratings on RT? I was under that impression.
Similarly, I’m sure She-Hulk has had its fair share of review bombing by the anti-wokers, HOWEVER, it IS a MCU show, so a 40% is too low for being the result of just review bombing, imo.
As I said this is potentially where the bombing strategy backfires because nobody takes the viewer score seriously anymore from any direction. So if a show is genuinely disliked you’ll never get that message across.
There is actually a rough way to tell the extent to which shows are being bombed because they just started adding vote counts which reveal in truth most people can’t be bothered to leave reviews or scores on Rotten Tomatoes. Even big genre shows like House of the Dragon or The Sandman only get 4-5k votes (out of tens of millions of viewers) so the 23k for Rings of Power or the 10k for She-Hulk do look out of whack. Unfortunately as that data is new you can’t cross reference it against another MCU show to really know how much is an inflated number.
It’s a bit more complicated than that… the MCU has a very big and passionate and on-line present fanbase… similarly the Tolkien nerds are legion are very on-line as well… so I wouldn’t discount the larger numbers either… but fair enough, I’m sure there’s a fair amount of review bombing in those numbers.
But yeah, it’s hard to trust the audience scores for these type of shows/movies… unfortunately I can say the same about the “critics” scores and reviews, because fuck me dude, a lot of them tend to be a little bit too nice to these type of properties… we all know reviewers don’t wanna risk losing their access, which these companies are more than happy to deny. It’s not even a secret at this point.
That said, having watched this show, I would agree a lot more with the 40+% than the 80+%, but hey…
This was an OK ep, not as good as the previous one but not bad either.
One aspect that perhaps encourages people to stay with MCU content is the puzzle piece element. A show might not be great for someone but the suspicion will be that its going somewhere, or plant something for pick up elsewhere. For me that show was Loki – great cast, odd writing, did lead to Kang but that’s it so far.
Part of me can’t help but think that Wong didn’t need to take this to court. He could have gone to Donny Blaze and taken the sling ring back. If the writers wanted to have Wong in court, they could have had him answering for breaking Blonsky out of prison.
I think the thing is that we have to acknowledge the different tones in MCU material. She-Hulk is pitching way more comedic than most to the extent the lead actress regards it as a sitcom, and that is true to the comics, from the second series under Byrne that has always been a comedic book.
The funniest bit in the whole series was when Wong incriminated himself and just went ‘I must depart’ and disappeared. Analysis of that kind of thing just makes any joke weaker and sitcom has a habit of setting back to the status quo each episode and She-Hulk has been stronger with a ‘case of the week’ format.
Looking at the Secret Invasion trailer that looks a lot more of a serious Winter Soldier tone of espionage and I wouldn’t give that show the same latitude at all for pushing the logic of the story.
She-Hulk Director: Madisynn/Wong Bonus Scene Didn’t Exist in the Script
I liked the character of Madisynn. She actually made me smile and laugh. Patty Guggenheim and Benedict Wong do have good chemistry. I’d like to see her stick around with Wong. She doesn’t become a mage or anything like that. She helps Wong maintain a “work/life” balance. You see her hanging around Kamar-Taj and Bleeker Street. Madisynn, in her own way, helps the sorcerers and mages have some “normalcy” in their lives.
And it’s not like his work as Wong in the MCU has been entirely serious so far. He’s often there to add a bit of comic relief.
He’s most known for his dramatic movies nowadays but Benedict Wong did most of his early work in comedy and sitcoms so he’s well set up for these cameos.
Oh wow, was that him? I had not connected those two roles at all (to be fair, it’s been ages since I’ve seen any of the IT Crowd).
And it’s not like his work as Wong in the MCU has been entirely serious so far. He’s often there to add a bit of comic relief.
True in his later appearances but having watched back Dr Strange recently Wong is quite stern and unamused as Strange played the irreverent role making pop culture references about Cher and Google Translate.
As they’ve appeared more the roles have somewhat reversed which I think suits both actors better.
And it’s not like his work as Wong in the MCU has been entirely serious so far. He’s often there to add a bit of comic relief.
Wow…
Fun bit of trivia: Leon Lamar, who played Cornelius P. Willows in episode 4, is currently 104 years old, making him the oldest actor to ever appear in the MCU.
So nice, we said it twice…
Sorry I missed the earlier mention in the posting.
104 years… The things he has seen and went through
———————————–
A nine episode season with 5 more to go.
I wouldn’t mind for it to get a little more serious and let’s finally see Murdoch
show up in all his glory.
And it’s not like his work as Wong in the MCU has been entirely serious so far. He’s often there to add a bit of comic relief.
That must be the only part ever he’s played where he can use his own Manchester accent.
So 88% for LotR sounds about right. Most people have said it’s good but not (yet?) great, and I would agree with that.
The 88% was the She-Hulk critics’ rating though. Sorry I didn’t make that clear enough.
I’m sure She-Hulk has had its fair share of review bombing by the anti-wokers, HOWEVER, it IS a MCU show, so a 40% is too low for being the result of just review bombing, imo.
Okay, but, like, since review-bombing is currently a thing and one that’s certainly happening with She-Hulk, why wouldn’t people who like the show point that out to defend it? I get that you don’t like the show, but I think you’re building a strawman about people building strawmen. Um, if you get what I mean.
But wait… isn’t the audience score an actual average of people’s ratings on RT? I was under that impression.
I think Dave was talking about the critics’ score, and it works exactly the way he describes – it’s binary, and thus an actually lukewarm reception will look like it’s an amazing movie/show with an 88% rating (as in the case of She-Hulk). Metacritic rates the reviews on a scale, which is why their assessment is usually way more realistic. (The critics’ reviews are really all I pay attention to anyway; audience scores are always shit as far as I am concerned.)
A very brief rundown of review bombing and social media postings:
She Hulk and the twerking scene
Remarks about every MCU heroine from Black Widow to Danvers
Star Wars and that black woman on the Obi Wan show
Complaints about diversity on LOTR
The Disney mermaid
The black woman in the last James Bond movie
There is a serious racist, anti woman, gatekeeping thing going on…
A very brief rundown of review bombing and social media postings:
She Hulk and the twerking scene
Remarks about every MCU heroine from Black Widow to Danvers
Star Wars and that black woman on the Obi Wan show
Complaints about diversity on LOTR
The Disney mermaid
The black woman in the last James Bond movieThere is a serious racist, anti woman, gatekeeping thing going on…
The trouble is, these complaints have got attention because they have been focused on by so many people (including the media companies themselves) and amplified on social media.
But I think the idea that it represents mainstream views on this stuff is overstated. Really these complaints represent the views of only a very small extreme minority of viewers, and honestly I think they’d be better off ignored.
Unfortunately, there’s a growing trend of media firms seizing on these complaints as a sort of badge of honour – the idea that if we’re pissing off these people then we must be doing something right – as part of promotion for these shows and movies.
What that does is then draw additional attention to the complaints and make that a focus of discussion. And obviously the media love to seize on a big controversial debate and push that angle, so it snowballs.
And so you get to the point where a huge amount of exposure is being given to these aspects, to the point that even audiences that don’t give two shits about black hobbits or twerking hulks end up getting drawn into it too, and encouraged to pick a side in the argument. It becomes inescapable as part of the conversation around the show. All stemming from a very small minority of extreme viewpoints that somehow come to dominate the discussion.
It’s all part of the culture war nonsense that infects so much debate at the moment, and really it’s very tiresome. I don’t think many people really feel that strongly about stupid stuff like the twerking; I also don’t think many people are strongly against diverse casting; but as ever, the loud, argumentative, extreme voices get a disproportionate share of the attention.
And unfortunately you can’t be too cynical about this stuff. This focus on the fringe racists and bigots is clearly a part of the media firms’ promotional strategy for these things these days, and is seen as an active part of getting audiences onside – by suggesting that if you want to stand against the racists then you should support the show.
Ultimately though I think that when it comes down to it, a lot of this disposable light entertainment stuff just isn’t substantial enough to support these big arguments. With a bit of time and perspective it’s easy to see what a storm in a teacup it all is.
(Remember all the fuss with the female-led Ghostbusters movie, that became a massive argument about sexism and misogyny and you had packs of people tearing the film down and packs saying it was brilliant? Now that the dust has settled it all feels a bit silly and overblown for what was just a middling comedy franchise film that happened to star women.)
I’m hopeful that we’ll be able to look back on this period as a bit of a silly time when people got very worked up about fringe extreme critics who said some horrible things about some movies and TV shows, but which ultimately all blew over once people decided not to give it all the oxygen of publicity.
Because if it sticks around and becomes the standard approach to discussing this stuff, it’s going to push away reasonable people who just want to discuss movies and TV shows without everything having to be a massive politicised argument.
I’m pretty much convinced its the same, small group of trolls. There’s been some studies too that seem to back this up, that the majority of hate content is from a small group. One giveaway is, no matter what it may be, books, comics, games, TV, it’s always the same bullshit arguments.
You could try arguing that AC Odyssey overdoes the female empowerment angle since, as Kassandra, you can perfectly tight rope crouch walk while lugging a knocked out or dead 200+lb Greek soldier on your shoulders…. Except you can do that as Alexios too.
Trans rights is one of the latest blow-ups. On Twitter the battle lines are drawn, politicians are throwing out meat to the mob, but outside of it? It isn’t reflected more widely.
But while both politicians and media companies continue to amplify and boost it, it’ll continue to be a problem.
There is a serious racist, anti woman, gatekeeping thing going on…
I think Dave said it very well, so I’ll just agree and say nah, it’s just being overly-amplified by the current clickbait practises in media, on both sides of course… money is money on the left and the right and on every direction.
Okay, but, like, since review-bombing is currently a thing and one that’s certainly happening with She-Hulk, why wouldn’t people who like the show point that out to defend it? I get that you don’t like the show, but I think you’re building a strawman about people building strawmen. Um, if you get what I mean.
But I’m not talking about the “people” defending it… I’m talking about Disney defending it (via hit-pieces, like they, i.e. all companies, do). It’s not a strawman when it literally happens all the time… come on.
But I think the idea that it represents mainstream views on this stuff is overstated. Really these complaints represent the views of only a very small extreme minority of viewers, and honestly I think they’d be better off ignored.
Yes very much so.
It is the point I made about RT now publishing the numbers. So for the latest Game of Thrones you had around 4,000 viewer ratings in the first week, HBO revealed 10 million broadcast ratings in just the USA. You add every other country in the world and ‘on demand’ viewing later it would be a conservative estimate to double that. It’s such an insignificant number (4,000 out of 20,000,000) that if I could demand everyone who ever visits this little niche forum vote it up or down we could influence a percentage here or there.
Internet voting influence is and always has been bullshit, I saw my former employer spend tens of millions on Linux pre-loaded PCs that dominated their customer requests and nobody bought them. Linux had a lot of fanboys, who love to tinker and have no desire to buy pre-loaded systems, and used their forums to push an ideology nobody actually wanted practically. Not even them.
In the end the bottom line is all that counts. Hollywood said for years you can’t have a black lead in Asia, it would be rejected, they made Black Panther and it made massive box office in China.
But I’m not talking about the “people” defending it… I’m talking about Disney defending it (via hit-pieces, like they, i.e. all companies, do). It’s not a strawman when it literally happens all the time… come on.
Ah, okay, sure. The company itself will have a vested interest in making the show – and thus their chances at turning a profit – as good as possible. No argument there, if that was what you were refering to.
No mid or post-credit scene this week so people can skip the end. Another fun one, but not as funny as the last couple of weeks. Titania was just sort of there, and the biggest laugh for me was the boba shop and the bootleg Avongers/Avingers merch.
Weird there was no mid-credit scene. You’d think they’d want consistency with that. I guess maybe they thought the DD tease was enough to end on, but a little comedy bit with, say, Jen’s cousin selling the She-Hulk merch could have worked.
No… I will NOT rehash the trademarking stuff…LOL
The show is what it is… I take it that it upsets those who want serious plot advancement.
WandaVision seemed to “meander” in the beginning and then it came around in the end.
The banter of Jennifer and her friends talking about the guys in the dating scene… Upsets the fanboys who aren’t into clubs, the dating scene, rap/hip hop, and having fun twerking in private. LOL!
That designer gave me these “Devil Wears Prada” vibes.
That last scene of what was in that box!
——————————-
Masalny has a cute smile.
Jameela Jamil who plays Titania… She has been through a lot.
I read her Wikipedia snippets and she is an activist against these damaging diet pills pushed on teen girls, and online she goes after these female celebs like the Kardashians, Cardi B, and so on who are promoting almost impossible beauty and body standards.
More power to her…
That last scene of what was in that box!
I am caught up now and I actually like all of the episodes better than the first one. The show itself works well enough, I like the characters and enough of the jokes land that I feel entertained. Loved Tim Roth’s appearance.
I don’t know if I’d be watching if it wasn’t Marvel superheroes though. Probably not; it’s just too average a sitcom.
One thing that stood out as a bit weird to me was that it felt a bit like characters like Pug and Mallory are supposed to mean more to us than they do. Especially that moment when Jennifer says to Mallory “I am so glad that we’re friends now!” (and Mallory’s reaction) – that was weird given how up to that episode, she had like two sentences in random scenes.
I’ll keep watching the show, and not just for completism’s sake. I’m having fun with it.
No mid or post-credit scene again this week. A lot more laughs this week vs last as well, especially Titania’s appearance and the abrupt ending to the fight after all the build up. The Mr. Immortal stuff was a lot of fun too.
(Oh, and it took me the entire episode to realise that Lulu was played by Patty Harrison from I Think You Should Leave)
The lack of Daredevil was a bit disappointing after the tease last week, but it was a fun episode.
Seems fairly obvious now they’re setting up the Leader for the end of the season. I really like the idea of positioning him as pseudo-Jordan Peterson. Super-powered incel MRA asshole is a perfect villain for She-Hulk and a good way to use the Leader.
Also, was that Matt Frewer as the voice of the Intelligencia website pop-up?
It was a cute episode.
Only 3 left, so given the last few scenes, I take it now that things will get more serious.
Saving the exciting stuff for last.
That secret surveillance camera on Jen and that Asian guy.
All those camera shots.
Lab coats and that special needle
We might get Daredevil next episode, Can’t wait.
No mid or post-credit scene again this week. A lot more laughs this week vs last as well, especially Titania’s appearance and the abrupt ending to the fight after all the build up. The Mr. Immortal stuff was a lot of fun too.
For me, this episode didn’t work at all. The situation and the gags gelt forced and unnatural, and the writing clunky. Worst episode of the show by far, up to this point. It was the first script written by that author, and I hope it was the last.
Still no Daredevil, but a very fun episode. Loved the group of characters at Abomination’s retreat. Including El Aguila! One of those odd minor characters I have an unfounded fondness for.
They seem to be leaving a lot for the last episode. Though I’m starting to wonder if they’re just trolling with Daredevil and he won’t actually be in it. That would be quite funny.
Nah, they’ll do exactly what they did with Kingpin in Hawkeye and drop him in as a late tease in the penultimate episode to get everyone excited for the finale.
Of course, Josh was evil.
Nah, they’ll do exactly what they did with Kingpin in Hawkeye and drop him in as a late tease in the penultimate episode to get everyone excited for the finale.
I thought this was the penultimate episode. There’s only 8, isn’t there?
For some reason there’s nine.
Caught up on the last 3 episodes. The therapy retreat one was the best, written by Zeb Wells so I guess comics creators can make some money out of the MCU. They did quite well in me really wanting Josh to be genuine even if he wasn’t, I think that’s down to Maslany being so likeable as Jen.
I think I’m in the same place as Christian, I’m enjoying it well enough but if it weren’t an MCU show it’s unlikely I would have watched it.
Only 3 left, so given the last few scenes, I take it now that things will get more serious.
I doubt it to be honest. This is pitched by the cast as a sitcom, I’m sure they will up the stakes for a finale with whoever the lab guy is (the Leader perhaps as Martin suggests) but I think the tone of the show is firmly set as comedic.
I think I’m in the same place as Christian, I’m enjoying it well enough but if it weren’t an MCU show it’s unlikely I would have watched it.
I do wonder whether there’s a point at which these shows will dwindle for Disney+, as a meaningful number of people who watch some of these shows just to keep up with the MCU (rather than because they’re particularly good in their own right) decide that it’s not worth the time any more.
For me, that MCU break-point came a while back when I skipped Eternals because the trailers looked so underwhelming and the reviews were so mediocre, and then never went back to it (even when it was “free” on Disney+) as the interest just wasn’t there for me.
Since then, I’ve tried the latest MCU shows as they’ve launched, but have often dropped them midway through – in Ms Marvel’s case it was well-made with a likeable lead but just not a show with real appeal to me; and in She-Hulk’s case it was because I thought the writing and stories were so mediocre (again, despite the lead being likeable and charming).
I do get that there’s a big element of “keeping up” with some of these shows, especially when they feed back into the MCU movies as they do now. But just as I don’t feel compelled to read every Marvel or DC comic to enjoy some of their stuff, I’m at that same point with the MCU now. That completist mindset has gone for me.
It will be a risk with ever increasing output.
Personally I already skipped the completist part , I found Falcon and Winter Soldier deathly boring so never finished it.
What they are still getting is my attention to watch. I do like She-Hulk, if I didn’t I’d just not bother but equally if it weren’t MCU it’s doubtful I would have seen the first one. (I don’t really gravitate towards US live action sitcoms, I seriously think the last one I watched regularly was Taxi 😂)
I think my problem is that the various series are becoming a bit too superficial. While they have enjoyable qualities, I really am ready for something more. I fell like I’ve been fed a steady diet of candy. While it is fun in the beginning, I’m very ready for some meat and potatoes. While Falcon and the Winter Soldier was far from perfect, I do appreciate it trying to be more serious in its story and themes. I would like some weightier writing in some upcoming series.
Nothing has really had the weight of the Netflix series. Even the best ones – WandaVision, Ms Marvel and Loki – haven’t really been as impactful or accomplished as Daredevil or Jessica Jones were.
Once you get to the point where you can handwave away anything with “well, multiverse” it is hard for anything to feel substantial, story-wise.
This week’s ep was easily the best one so far, very fun.
Personally I already skipped the completist part , I found Falcon and Winter Soldier deathly boring so never finished it.
Same here. I bypassed some MCU movies like GotG, Antman, the little Marvel girl (She is a mutant!). No one is obligated to
watch every second. I saw this Tweet that no one is obligated to watch all the Star Wars content, but to think of it as a buffet where you pick want you want to your plate. Sounds reasonable to me.
As for Jennifer Walters… I am surprised she didn’t pick up on that line “taking your blood’ during that group session.
I want that Asian guy who was in on the whole thing (copied stuff to his phone on his way out) to really get his.
I want him, that d*ck male lawyer, to get really theirs for messing with her.
And I want Murdock! (Why are there only two lawyers who are superheroes in the Marvel Universe? 🤣)
It will be a risk with ever increasing output.
Personally I already skipped the completist part , I found Falcon and Winter Soldier deathly boring so never finished it.
What they are still getting is my attention to watch. I do like She-Hulk, if I didn’t I’d just not bother but equally if it weren’t MCU it’s doubtful I would have seen the first one. (I don’t really gravitate towards US live action sitcoms, I seriously think the last one I watched regularly was Taxi 😂)
Yeah, I’m more talking about the risk of getting to the point where people don’t tune into this stuff at all, let alone finishing it all the to the end. The point at which a show being part of the MCU doesn’t provide a reason, in and of itself, for people to watch something they wouldn’t have otherwise bothered with, like you said about She-Hulk.
Having at least tried pretty much everything MCU in the past (albeit that only extending to the first episode of some of the Netflix shows), Eternals was the first MCU thing I just didn’t bother with at all. And having at least started all the Disney+ shows but found most of them pretty average overall, I’m not sure I’m even going to be there for all the opening episodes any more.
I wonder how widespread that sentiment is. The move of Armor Wars from a Disney+ TV show to a movie suggests that maybe they aren’t seeing the value in these shows that they used to, and they can still make a lot more money out of the movies.
There is a risk of the TV stuff diluting the MCU brand and its reputation for quality entertainment, I think.
Yeah, I’m more talking about the risk of getting to the point where people don’t tune into this stuff at all, let alone finishing it all the to the end. The point at which a show being part of the MCU doesn’t provide a reason, in and of itself, for people to watch something they wouldn’t have otherwise bothered with, like you said about She-Hulk.
Having at least tried pretty much everything MCU in the past (albeit that only extending to the first episode of some of the Netflix shows), Eternals was the first MCU thing I just didn’t bother with at all. And having at least started all the Disney+ shows but found most of them pretty average overall, I’m not sure I’m even going to be there for all the opening episodes any more.
It feels to me like this is all part of the plan. She-Hulk and Ms Marvel are deliberately targeting specific demographics – I am sure Marvel are well aware that not everybody from their superhero movie audience will tune in for a female teen superhero and a lawyer sitcom. I think it’s about diversification, and we just aren’t the target audience for these shows.
Maybe that’s where it’s going to go – having “small” shows for specific audiences (that aren’t very expensive) and “big” show events that try to reach everybody and directly tie into the movies (which I expect Secret Invasion will be). You won’t be expected to be caught up with every show anymore (just like you can’t read every Marvel book on the stands), but you’ll tune in for the big events and crossovers.
It feels to me like this is all part of the plan. She-Hulk and Ms Marvel are deliberately targeting specific demographics – I am sure Marvel are well aware that not everybody from their superhero movie audience will tune in for a female teen superhero and a lawyer sitcom. I think it’s about diversification, and we just aren’t the target audience for these shows.
I do think this is the way it could be shaping up. Which again would be a bit of a change for the MCU, which has historically been about broad mass-appeal stuff rather than playing to smaller specific audience segments.
The truth is though that I don’t think that She-Hulk and Ms Marvel really are designed to be only playing to those niche segments. They’re designed to have the same mass appeal as all the MCU stuff. Disney really aren’t pouring money into MCU shows that are only designed to be watched by young kids or millennial women or whatever.
It’s just that, when these shows don’t connect with a certain segment of the audience, it becomes a convenient fallback for the producers/fans to say “ah but these shows aren’t really made for you” – kind of putting critics in their place by tapping into all that culture war bullshit again, and making it look as though anyone who doesn’t like the show is on the wrong side of the argument.
But even through the relative positivity of this thread I think there’s been an acknowledgement that actually the show is fairly mediocre at times, poorly written in places with some clunky production issues. Fairly fundamental problems that can’t be excused simply by saying it’s designed for a niche audience.
Maybe that’s where it’s going to go – having “small” shows for specific audiences (that aren’t very expensive) and “big” show events that try to reach everybody and directly tie into the movies (which I expect Secret Invasion will be). You won’t be expected to be caught up with every show anymore (just like you can’t read every Marvel book on the stands), but you’ll tune in for the big events and crossovers.
Yeah, I agree. And I think a key consideration for that approach is the extent to which the films effectively explain this stuff when TV-originating elements are introduced into the movie stories.
We’ve already seen that happen with stuff like the Wandavision backstory in Dr Strange 2, or Matt Murdock showing up in No Way Home. And I think both of those were handled fine.
Disney really aren’t pouring money into MCU shows that are only designed to be watched by young kids or millennial women or whatever.
You can kind of be both though.
A lot of Marvel material is 4 quadrant stuff to appeal to everyone but you can focus more specifically and not really be niche. Say things like Sex and the City or High School Musical have very large audiences even if targeted at a specific demographic. If we think about it too a lot of the expensive action shows have a specific target demographic too, it’s just we’re often part of it.
An interesting question too is how much of the audience does follow everything or feel the need to. Using pre Covid/post Avengers movies to have a fair comparison the US box office of Black Panther is nearly double that of Thor: Ragnarok, so you’d have to assume a decent proportion of the audience are not checking out everything.
Either way you look at it you are right the most important element is being able to follow the material standalone or as a completist. I think they have the right emphasis so far that the completists get enjoyment from little references or appearances but the rest can enjoy. An example is I skipped Falcon and Winter Soldier, but I’ve read enough to know Sam takes up the Cap mantle at the end, however that is also where Avengers: Endgame leaves it with Steve handing over the shield so when the next Captain America movie comes it would make sense either way.
Either way you look at it you are right the most important element is being able to follow the material standalone or as a completist. I think they have the right emphasis so far that the completists get enjoyment from little references or appearances but the rest can enjoy. An example is I skipped Falcon and Winter Soldier, but I’ve read enough to know Sam takes up the Cap mantle at the end, however that is also where Avengers: Endgame leaves it with Steve handing over the shield so when the next Captain America movie comes it would make sense either way.
Definitely. I think they tend to be good at that.
Given that the current phase(s) of the MCU movies are so focused on the multiverse, it will be interesting to see if they can maintain that balance with so many potentially confusing elements (multiple universes/earths, variant versions of the same characters etc.) added to the mix.
Maybe it will end up like the middle section of Dr Strange 2, with clear sections that are there to chuck in a load of cameos and easter eggs for the dedicated fans, but which are kept relatively self-contained and don’t interfere with following the overall plot for the more casual viewer.
Maybe that’s where it’s going to go – having “small” shows for specific audiences (that aren’t very expensive) and “big” show events that try to reach everybody and directly tie into the movies (which I expect Secret Invasion will be). You won’t be expected to be caught up with every show anymore (just like you can’t read every Marvel book on the stands), but you’ll tune in for the big events and crossovers.
It’s an interesting idea, but I don’t know if you could sell that to the people at Disney+ who are pretty desperate for their shows to drive sales of the service.
Nevertheless, it is panning out that way. As far as universal acclaim or appeal, WANDAVISION, surprisingly seems to have the most consensus and interest, but the rest of the shows – even Loki and Hawkeye where primary characters from Phase 1 are stars. However, each subsequent mini-series has not been an improvement on the previous. Even if Ms. Marvel was criticially praised, it didn’t drive a large audience or improve Disney+’s position the way The Mandalorian and other Star Wars series have.
However, I am more optimistic about SECRET INVASION — but on the other hand, I basically checked out of Marvel comics once the event started screwing with every comic. The films do seem to be following the same sort of progress as the comics. If you start with Marvels Ultimate (2000) line and then go to Secret Invasion (2018), it pretty much encapsulates the audience interest in Marvel — the period of highest “heat” in the comics (really more around 1998 – 2008) — before that same heat immediately transferred to Marvel movies from Iron Man to Infinity War (2008 – 2018).
It’s an interesting idea, but I don’t know if you could sell that to the people at Disney+ who are pretty desperate for their shows to drive sales of the service.
It’s still an area though we are feeling out really. If you look at Netflix they still have the lions share of subscribers for scripted content and documentary (the Disney+ claims the other day that they’d passed were not convincing as a quarter of them were subscribers to watch cricket in India on a service they bought and ESPN viewers globally). Partly probably because they started first but also they churn out a massive volume of content for all kinds of audiences, romcoms, sci-fi shows, true crime, anime originals, foreign language shows, pre-school and little kids etc. Some of it isn’t great, a lot they barely publicise but the volume keeps flowing. There ‘new this week’ section right now has 40 different shows and movies.
If we look at households as well as individuals it makes it harder to cancel because of the something for everyone element. Disney+ itself is only standalone product in the US (and maybe Canada), in Europe and Asia it is packaged with the Hulu/ABC content in one portal and it looks like the US is moving towards that soon. They are both starting ad supported versions.
So the question is whether it is more valuable to have big tentpole productions to attract viewers or a large quantity and range of material to justify the keeping up the monthly payments? I suspect it’s a bit of both and even the streamers themselves are pondering the balance and working out the patterns.
It would be easier for Marvel to put out a lot of shows like Hawkeye that follow the standard wisecracking action of most of the movies but they aren’t, the shows are quite distinct. Some complained here that Ms Marvel had too much teen angst drama and not enough superhero action but I think that’s because it was made for the YA audience. As to be honest was the comic, it’s very faithful that way.
Disney+ itself is only standalone product in the US (and maybe Canada), in Europe and Asia it is packaged with the Hulu/ABC content in one portal and it looks like the US is moving towards that soon. They are both starting ad supported versions.
HBO Max and Discovery+ will combine into one platform next year. I could see Disney and Hulu formerly doing that as well. Those combined platforms will put them in a better position to compete directly with Netflix.
I am not sure if they would include ESPN in a merged platform. I have seen rumors of Disney wanting to sell it off. Sports has been one of the areas that has struggled in the streaming platforms. I think a big issue is the licensing and rights tied to the various leagues. I’m sure as various contracts come up for renewal, this will be addressed.
I could see Disney and Hulu formerly doing that as well.
They’ve already announced that package will be the norm in a couple of months and I’d expect full integration onto one homepage/app by next year.
Agreed ESPN may be an outlier. This part is also still up in the air and being assessed. Amazon have moved into live sport, they have paid for tennis, football and rugby in Europe. Netflix have dug their heels in that live events are not in their model but they have compromised recently, I saw another trail of an original today they are not dumping in one block.
So the question is whether it is more valuable to have big tentpole productions to attract viewers or a large quantity and range of material to justify the keeping up the monthly payments? I suspect it’s a bit of both and even the streamers themselves are pondering the balance and working out the patterns.
A bit of a larger question is sustainability – not in the sense of environmentally sustainable, but in the sense of who and how is money being made and the cost of the product. A streaming service might negotiate a good deal to purchase an already produced show/pilot or series or movie and find that is better than actually paying for the production. However, obviously, HBO/Warner and Disney are still going to be making their own product in-house. Netflix and Amazon, though, – even Apple – might decide fully funding productions is not as great a business model as they first thought. These guys did not grow up from studios and even the studios have long been outsourcing productions to lessen leverage and exposure.
So, it will squeeze back to the productions themselves. There is the old stereotype that even billion-dollar blockbusters do not make a profit with Hollywood accounting, but honestly a lot of movies really don’t make money even if they are successful and I can’t see a movie or show on a streaming service really doing much better than theatrical releases or network shows did in the past pre-streaming. Also, I do think that we are leaving the period where the corporations will be willing to keep losing money to build the subscriber base or compete – and the first place they will cut is in the production and acquisition budget for new content – so not only will things like VFX get squeezed until companies go out of business, but all aspects of production from script to screen will be under pressure.
I can see more streamimg companies realising that they need to go beyond the exclusivity forever aspect. They’ll do physical / digital releases to boost income because people still like to own stuff in one form or another.
People will still go to the streamer first, as for a time that’ll be the only option a la cinema. Months later you can buy a copy.
Will subs count reduce? Probably little more than they would without doing the purchase option. The trick is to have enough new content to incentivise continued subbing, D+ have that down to an art.
I do think that we are leaving the period where the corporations will be willing to keep losing money to build the subscriber base or compete – and the first place they will cut is in the production and acquisition budget for new content
I think we are also leaving that period but the first thing is already in process, increasing the prices and inserting ads in the current lowest tier. Netflix and Disney+ have it already scheduled for the end of this year.
I can see more streamimg companies realising that they need to go beyond the exclusivity forever aspect. They’ll do physical / digital releases to boost income because people still like to own stuff in one form or another.
People will still go to the streamer first, as for a time that’ll be the only option a la cinema. Months later you can buy a copy.
Will subs count reduce? Probably little more than they would without doing the purchase option. The trick is to have enough new content to incentivise continued subbing, D+ have that down to an art.
Not too long ago, I was at Walmart looking for something for Christel. I happened to see the box set for Season 2 of The Umbrella Academy. It surprised me to see it. It had the Netflix branding on it. As I was pressed for time, I didn’t look for other Netflix series.
Considering the sheer volume of Netflix’s output, I imagine they are probably somewhat selective in what goes out on DVD.
Finally, the character you've all been waiting for. 🐸
Don't miss a brand new episode of Marvel Studios' #SheHulk: Attorney at Law, streaming tomorrow on #DisneyPlus. pic.twitter.com/kAGDqfnmFG
— Disney+ (@DisneyPlus) October 5, 2022
He's back! Watch Daredevil make his highly-anticipated return to the MCU in a sneak peek at an all new episode of #SheHulk. https://t.co/51ehlVRUDh pic.twitter.com/pzSyWuXL6q
— Entertainment Tonight (@etnow) October 5, 2022
Everything with Jen and Matt/Daredevil was insanely charming, Tatiana Maslany and Charlie Cox have incredible chemistry on-screen and their banter was a ton of fun. Leap Frog was hilarious as well. The end was a bit eh, but it’s kind of a mix of it being a bit stupid but also a bit too believable as the kind of thing that could happen these days
Also, no mid or post credit scene again.
Charlie Cox continues to be excellent and I agree that he and Jen together are great. That walk of shame moment was brilliant.
I’m starting to suspect entitled Wakandan spear client guy is behind the Intelligencia. Seems a bit odd putting him in this episode if not.
Charlie Cox continues to be excellent and I agree that he and Jen together are great. That walk of shame moment was brilliant.
I’m starting to suspect entitled Wakandan spear client guy is behind the Intelligencia. Seems a bit odd putting him in this episode if not.
That’s a good shout, especially given the very pointed shot of him in the lobby as Jen is talking to her parents