The MCU! The Disney+ series! Sony! (For the time being anyway.)
Talk about any and all Marvel movies and TV here.
Home » Forums » Movies, TV and other media » Marvel Movies & TV: Phase Two
Not my words but I agree:
Heres the thing, and don’t take this the wrong way as in just explaining my own opinion. It’s like I said, there are people who don’t understand, not truly, WHY Black Panther resonated so well. People read about or see images of kids and grown adults at the theater in tears when watching black panther and they don’t fully grasp the magnitude of how important this franchise is to people if you haven’t experienced it first hand what it’s like to see yourself represented like that.
I remember as a kid I used to wish I was white sometimes just so that I could feel that same feeling my friends who were white felt when they saw Spiderman, Batman, superman, and pretty much any hero or just character in general doing cool sh*t who also looked like them.
When you have it all the time it’s easy to, well take it for granted. I’m not a long time Black Panther fan, I actually didn’t learn about the character till I was browsing online one day in 2014 and happened upon him and then started researching him. Instantly I was intrigued and immediately after reading his wiki page I started looking online for any Black Panther comics I could get my hands on to buy. I couldn’t believe that such a character existed.
I became an instant fan. So while I haven’t waited my entire life to see BP specifically on sense of following his comics, I have been waiting my entire life to see a character who is truly one I want to aspire to be like.
This is more than just seeing him go to war with atlantis or joining the Avengers, or interacting with certain characters. This is about seeing T’Challa the man who from his franchise comes from a fantastical place, change it for the better, he is a King among kings, a warrior among warriors the GOAT.
And it’s about exploring this character, who has a ton of history and importance behind HIM, as he was the one who was holding his franchise together, now as a fan and a person who’s waited for such a character, have that taken away.
First there’s the tragedy of a truly wonderful person, I don’t get star struck or really care to meet any celebrities but Chad was one of very few on my list, but then also by this idea that there can only be one Black person occupying a certain space. Chadwick talked about that, wanting to break that mindset. But now exactly what he was working hard to break has just happened.
The a Black male led franchise with the potential (we already seen what it can do) to hit Spiderman, Batman, Superman, and Bond levels of success and household recognition, had had that very rare spot removed and it’s going to try and split it between characters that frankly don’t have any sort of weight behind them.
The one with the most, is M’Baku and he is nothing like his comic counterpart. They are trying to say Wakanda is bigger than T’Challa, he becomes a footnote in his own franchise while they try and make it work without any real Established.. anything to go off. Be it comics or even he MCU itself.
Every actor will always be compared to their predecessor when playing characters like T’Challa or Peter. That’s just how it is, but at the same time none of these characters are beholden to any actor.
Chadwick realised how important T’Challa was to people. You don’t need to see an interview with his spoon feeding it to know this, actions speak louder that words. When he talks about all my children and how his characters backstory, he could of kept quiet and got paid, instead he fought for change and more than stereotypes, he got fired but that led to his successor MBJ to get the character with better foundation and depth to him which led him to success.
In 42 Chad studied Robinson videos to see how he moved and slid into bases so he could get it right, and argued with the directors about how the stunt double wasn’t sliding how Robinson did in real life and they agreed to let him do it himself. For Black panther he fought to not have Wakandan speaking with a British accent and was willing to walk away if they didn’t relent. He turned down endorsements that he felt would hurt T’Challas positive image for young kid’s.
He’s done all of that worked so hard.. do you think he would really be cool with T’Challa dieing with him? After all that work? To rob people of that feeling they had wheb they left the theater for the the solo movie? Straight up, Disney f*cked up. This announcement was in bad taste. They waited less than 4 months after his passing and announced not only are they going to start filming next year but T’Challas out.
Under honoring a character Chad fought hard to get to the big screen. No ones allowed to play the character. Sure it sounds nice when they pretty up the words but they have just said that this character is not important enough to continue and what he brings to the table isn’t worth exploring. They say they want to Honor Chad while ignoring WHAT Chad was doing which was setting this character up for others to continue what he started and continue to inspire millions like he did.
You say they love the rich culture.. but not the Character, the Man who inspires greatness, the KING who inspired that greatness. Name another black hero that even matches up to T’Challas stature. No drugs, no baby mamas no gangs, or pimps, a good man with a good heart. People love Cap Because he represents american values. Well people love T’Challa Because he represents Black excellence and they took that character away from us because hey wanted to rush announcements and not let people have time (fans and the crew alike) to properly mourn
I saw a cool idea that an alternate universe Killmonger who is good could become BP.
I dunno, they should jsut re-cast or give the mantle to someone else… while I didn’t think the movie was good, I do agree that the Black Panther character is important… So I hope they change their mind about it… it’s really not that complicated of a situation.
I was kinda puzzled when they said they would not recast and I am surprised Coogler went along with them. Forgive the morbid what if but if Tom Holland died would they not recast and make a movie about his supporting cast? Thor Love and thunder has a possible replacement for Thor. Falcon and Winter Soldier has a possible replacement for Cap. IS the Black Panther not important enough to recast? if so, why? the why better be a damn good reason because saying a black man is not important enough is just the wrong thing to say.
IS the Black Panther not important enough to recast? if so, why? the why better be a damn good reason because saying a black man is not important enough is just the wrong thing to say.
I don’t think that’s the argument at all. I certainly haven’t heard anyone else suggest it.
I think it’s more about that version of the character having been both so popular and also having been played by someone who suffered such a high-profile sad death that they don’t want to appear crass by simply moving on with movies about BP as if nothing happened.
It’s similar to what Star Wars had to contend with when Carrie Fisher died. Yes, you could have just recast her in Episode IX but the actor is so strongly tied to the character that the focus would become all about that casting decision and it would seem a bit insensitive. They went for a more sensitive decision and I could see Marvel going for a similar acknowledgement in BP2.
Falcon and Winter Soldier has a possible replacement for Cap.
One? try three… =P
Yeah, I just got a brilliant idea… why not take this opportunity to try something different? Let Shuri get the mantle, but not only her, how about a Black Panther Corps kind of deal with many of their wonderful actors also getting the mantle. I think it’s also a powerful message, as in “we’re all Black Panther” and that sort of thing, you know?
IS the Black Panther not important enough to recast? if so, why? the why better be a damn good reason because saying a black man is not important enough is just the wrong thing to say.
I suspect the thinking is quite the opposite.
Normally in a situation like this or just general recasting of a lead the default position is just to delay. I doubt that if Tom Holland passed away suddenly they would be carrying straight on with the shoot with a new star. In the case of Heath Ledger with The Imaginarium of Dr Parnassus they changed the approach entirely with using multiple actors.
Black Panther was quite a watershed in being a film primarily with a black cast and writer/director that was a massive global hit (upending certain imagined ideas in Hollywood like, for example, Asian audiences don’t want to see a black lead). I think to delay that would feel like a knock back to the momentum it created and that’s how I imagine they came to this conclusion/solution.
When an actor passes away tragically like Chadwick Boseman it really puts the franchise in a no-win situation. If they recast the part too quickly, it looks tacky. But then they have to reconfigure the franchise with a new lead, which can be tricky and is always a gamble. And they also have to deal with how they’re going to deal with the character and actor’s absence in the story without coming off as insensitive.
On the other hand, it’s fairly easy to simply recast Mads Mikkelsen in role of Grindelwald when your big name actor gets pinched for wife-beating. Or bringing in a new character played by a different actor to lead the Pirates of the Caribbean franchise. Nobody really bats an eye in those cases.
On the other hand, it’s fairly easy to simply recast Mads Mikkelsen in role of Grindelwald when your big name actor gets pinched for wife-beating. Or bringing in a new character played by a different actor to lead the Pirates of the Caribbean franchise. Nobody really bats an eye in those cases.
Ehhh… there’s quite a huge support movement for Depp… I wouldn’t call that decision an “easy” one. Lots of people are gonna be mad as fuck, which might (or not) be translated to a financial impact.
Drop’s salary for those movies had reached such ridiculous levels that even with lower box office results the movie would stand a chance of turning a profit. At least until the Hollywood accounting magic happens.
Ehhh… there’s quite a huge support movement for Depp… I wouldn’t call that decision an “easy” one. Lots of people are gonna be mad as fuck,
Is there? The only people I’ve seen getting worked up about it seem to be people who are upset that their vitriol against Amber Heard hasn’t been vindicated by the court decision, and who really wanted to be justified in hating her.
It’s very hard to tell nowadays. There’s a lot of sound and fury that can be created by relatively small groups on the internet from all sides of the spectrum. Stuff I think passes the vast majority of people right by.
Maybe I read too much into JR’s post and maybe I did not make myself clear enough but i don’t see the logic in writing a story called BP2 without Black Panther. I hope by the end of BP2 the MCU will have a new Black Panther. T’challa will die so Chadwick’s legacy will be unchanged. Both T’challa and Chadwick will be honored and cherished but Black Panther should go on.
Like I said earlier we may have a Cap who is not Steve Rogers and we may have a Thor who is not Odinson why shouldn’t we have a Black Panther who is not T’challa.
I don’t know what is going on in the minds of the MCU executives so this is totally hypothetical but subtle racism is still racism. Remember when we had discussions before BP and Captain Marvel about Marvel being too white male?
I don’t often agree with Jon but if DS2 and SM3 are going full bore into the Multiverse, why not insert a Multiversal BP played by Michael B Jordan so you can have your megastar to pick up where Chadwick left off. if I am not mistaken, there were serious talks about BP being the focal point of Phase 4 like IM was the focal point up to Endgame. Now you can continue that.
In the end, these are just my thoughts and they are full of Ifs, assumptions, and suppositions. Another maybe could be that I’ve lived most of my life being subtly racist and I am feeling guilty about it and I am creating a mountain out of a molehill.
I hope by the end of BP2 the MCU will have a new Black Panther.
This could very well be the plot of the movie and therefore you don’t want to give it away. I mean in the comics lore it’s a position that has to be filled, in the first movie they established it wasn’t 100% primogeniture so T’Challa was challenged for the role after his father died.
They’ve done a couple with Hulk and War Machine but the MCU now seem more geared towards using legacy characters than recasting (and those two were driven by falling out with the actors) . We’ve all speculated as to who Black Panther could be so why give it away in a press conference?
Maybe I read too much into JR’s post and maybe I did not make myself clear enough but i don’t see the logic in writing a story called BP2 without Black Panther. I hope by the end of BP2 the MCU will have a new Black Panther. T’challa will die so Chadwick’s legacy will be unchanged. Both T’challa and Chadwick will be honored and cherished but Black Panther should go on.
I expect that is what’ll happen.
My guess replacing him will first be a team effort, but at the end of the movie there’ll be a new Panther. But there’ll still be a team, and I hope the BP will be female (yes, Jon is not wrong about what will probably be the thinking there). I’m hoping for Nakia, though, not Shuri.
Also, I wouldn’t be surprised if they used the opportunity to change Wakanda into a democracy. The whole tribal fight-to-be-king thing was rather too anachronistic, and it’d make sense to use the story they have to do now to change that.
Is there? The only people I’ve seen getting worked up about it seem to be people who are upset that their vitriol against Amber Heard hasn’t been vindicated by the court decision, and who really wanted to be justified in hating her.
Yes it’s only the misogynists… u_u
Come on man, we all know Depp has millions upon millions of fans, a lot of whom probably only go watch those movies because he’s in them (and a lot of whom might not even be aware of the whole Amber Heard situation for that matter)… we’re talking about a huge A-list actor, not a C-list random tv drama one.
Let’s be real here, a Pirates movie without Depp ain’t gonna do very well, because people want to see Cpt. Jack Sparrow. So unless they invent another amazing character and cast another amazing actor to do what Depp did for Sparrow (and writers are waaaaaaay too lazy to do that), I don’t see it.
I would agree in the case of Pirates of the Caribbean, Depp made that character and that franchise and I don’t think it would make sense to continue it without him.
But in a Harry Potter spinoff where Depp’s character has already been established as being able to change his appearance/actor I don’t think he’s quite as indispensable.
But in a Harry Potter spinoff where Depp’s character has already been established as being able to change his appearance/actor I don’t think he’s quite as indispensable.
And it’s not like those spin-offs are box-office fire either anyways (hence WHY they cast Depp in the first place), but still… the point is, no, it’s not just a marginal group like you described… Firing Depp could have a significant impact in their revenue… a lot more than firing Heard, for what that’s worth.
As far as I’m concerned, they should both be fired, or they should both keep their jobs and keep their shit private.
In “actor might like his own job back” news:
Exclusive: Mike Colter Says No Current Talks With Marvel for Luke Cage
Exclusive: Mike Colter Says No Current Talks With Marvel for Luke Cage
Both Luke Cage and Iron Fist shows ended just as they seemed to finally be getting going.
Also, I wouldn’t be surprised if they used the opportunity to change Wakanda into a democracy. The whole tribal fight-to-be-king thing was rather too anachronistic, and it’d make sense to use the story they have to do now to change that.
I think Western politics over the last half decade have shown that democracy isn’t automatically a better system. Wakanda seems to have done pretty well with a monarchy, they’d be mad to change it.
I think Western politics over the last half decade have shown that democracy isn’t automatically a better system.
What? Democracy isn’t the problem – it’s when democracy is subverted so that would-be-dictators get their own way anyway.
Firing Depp could have a significant impact in their revenue
I don’t know, Depp wasn’t even trailed as being in the first one, he was a surprise reveal at the end. With him on the poster the second one dropped around $180m.
I agree he’s absolutely key to the success of Pirates, everyone watched those movies for Captain Jack, but for Fantastic Beasts I don’t really think him in or out will make any impact at all. They primarily need to make the 3rd film better and less of an info dump with poor structure.
I think Western politics over the last half decade have shown that democracy isn’t automatically a better system. Wakanda seems to have done pretty well with a monarchy, they’d be mad to change it.
After the whole plot of the first movie was about how daftly easy it is for a madman to take over by defeating the king in combat? Yeah, it’s a really great system.
When Asgard, Atlantis, Latveria and Attilan become democracies.
Well, Asgard is a pretty shitty place in many ways (and its being a monarchy has caused a lot of problems), and Atlantis and Latveria are both villain dictatorships, so to speak. In contrast to Wakanda, none of these are examples to follow – quite the opposite.
I do agree where Attilan is concerned. Long overdue really, what with the eternal plot of Maximus usurping his wise philosopher-king brother.
After the whole plot of the first movie was about how daftly easy it is for a madman to take over by defeating the king in combat? Yeah, it’s a really great system.
In fairness, that’s pretty much how the Tories approach it.
After the whole plot of the first movie was about how daftly easy it is for a madman to take over by defeating the king in combat? Yeah, it’s a really great system.
And the whole theme of the first movie was about how awesome Wakanda is compared with us backward schmuks in the rest of the world. I stand by my assertion that monarchy has worked better for them than democracy has worked for us, regardless of the king-by-combat thing.
Take with a grain of salt:
https://lrmonline.com/news/rumored-spider-man-and-marvel-contract-extension-barside-buzz/
After the whole plot of the first movie was about how daftly easy it is for a madman to take over by defeating the king in combat? Yeah, it’s a really great system.
In fairness, that’s pretty much how the Tories approach it.
Yes, but people respect Wakandans.
Chadwick Boseman’s Final Performance as Black Panther Will Be in Disney+’s What If…? Series
We have not yet seen Chadwick Boseman’s final turn as T’Challa/Black Panther, which it has now been confirmed will come in Disney+’s animated Marvel series, What If…?
Boseman died on Aug. 28 at the age of 43, following a battle with colon cancer, which in his last four years progressed from Stage III to Stage IV. His final film performance was in Ma Rainey’s Black Bottom, which landed on Netflix this past weekend and was among the several projects he tackled “between countless surgeries and chemotherapy,” his family shared at the time of his passing.
Now, Marvel Studios chief Kevin Feige has affirmed to Emmy Magazine that Boseman — whose final live-action performance as Black Panther was in 2019’s Avengers: Endgame — voiced the Wikandan king and hero for What If…?, an animated anthology that explores fun, alternate takes on famous Marvel tales.
For example, Boseman’s T’Challa at one point finds himself suited up as Guardians of the Galaxy‘s Star Lord, as glimpsed in the trailer below.
“[He] came in about four times and recorded numerous episodes,” Feige told Emmy Magazine. “In hindsight, it’s very moving.”
Other MCU vets lending their pipes to What If…?, which will premiere in Summer 2021, include (but by no means are limited to!) Samuel L. Jackson as Nick Fury, Sebastian Stan as Bucky Barnes, Hayley Atwell as Peggy Carter, Mark Ruffalo as Bruce Banner/The Hulk, Chris Hemsworth as Thor and Karen Gillan as Nebula.
Fantastic Four Cast Odds: Which Actors Will Play Iconic Superheroes Next?
Chadwick Boseman’s Final Performance as Black Panther Will Be in Disney+’s What If…? Series
We have not yet seen Chadwick Boseman’s final turn as T’Challa/Black Panther, which it has now been confirmed will come in Disney+’s animated Marvel series, What If…?
Boseman died on Aug. 28 at the age of 43, following a battle with colon cancer, which in his last four years progressed from Stage III to Stage IV. His final film performance was in Ma Rainey’s Black Bottom, which landed on Netflix this past weekend and was among the several projects he tackled “between countless surgeries and chemotherapy,” his family shared at the time of his passing.
Now, Marvel Studios chief Kevin Feige has affirmed to Emmy Magazine that Boseman — whose final live-action performance as Black Panther was in 2019’s Avengers: Endgame — voiced the Wikandan king and hero for What If…?, an animated anthology that explores fun, alternate takes on famous Marvel tales.
For example, Boseman’s T’Challa at one point finds himself suited up as Guardians of the Galaxy‘s Star Lord, as glimpsed in the trailer below.
“[He] came in about four times and recorded numerous episodes,” Feige told Emmy Magazine. “In hindsight, it’s very moving.”
Other MCU vets lending their pipes to What If…?, which will premiere in Summer 2021, include (but by no means are limited to!) Samuel L. Jackson as Nick Fury, Sebastian Stan as Bucky Barnes, Hayley Atwell as Peggy Carter, Mark Ruffalo as Bruce Banner/The Hulk, Chris Hemsworth as Thor and Karen Gillan as Nebula.
That’s really good, it would’ve felt weird if they had to recast him for this series.
In that Odds article, the favorites are of course Krasinki and Blunt but #2 behind Krasinski is John David Washington. I haven’t seen Tenet so i am not completely informed about him but he does not strike as being a Reed type. The only lead role I know of for him is that Klu Klux Clan movie. Behind Blunt is a list of pretty blondes. I don’t know the guy in the lead for Ben(Stephen Graham) but Google tells me he taught Tom Hanks Scouse Anthony Ramos from Hamilton is the lead for Johnny.
If you rule out John and Emily, Marvel’s first family is a Black Man, Lily James(classic British beauty ), A Latino, and A Scouse
If I am just being old fashioned and insensitive, I apologize but i think it is stretching the family concept a bit here.
I know quite a few online fans saw Washington as a potential new T’Challa if Marvel Studios had decided to recast.
I believe the justification of JDW being on that list is that he is basically the hottest shit in hollywood.
Not to imply that he is shit, focus on the hot part.
Hot as in both trendy and sexy.
Lily James(classic British beauty ),
Did you see her in ‘Baby Driver’ where she plays an American diner waitress? James often plays the classic British beauty role, especially in Downton Abbey where she came to prominence but that’s the joy of actors, their primary role is really to pretend to be someone else.
You can push something beyond their abilities sometimes but I’m generally quite open if I think the person in question has acting chops and isn’t miles away from the role. In genre stuff I’m quite used by now to people calling crazy casting and then after it comes out declaring it pretty perfect.
In truth it’s why I don’t really engage that much in casting speculation, if the team is good they’ll usually cast well, if they aren’t then the film will probably not be very good anyway.
What I Heard This Week: Joseph Gordon-Levitt
https://www.murphysmultiverse.com/what-i-heard-this-week-joseph-gordon-levitt/
Take with a grain of salt.
I could see him as Reed.
I could see him as Reed.
I can see him as Johnny or Ben too. I know he’s a bit old for Johnny, but he doesn’t look his age.
Maybe Johnny and Sue are twins in this one, but Susan was born Stuart and is transgender. That way, he could play both of them.
Wayne Knight as Doctor Doom!
Get William Shatner in as the Big Giant Galactus and we’re all set.
Get William Shatner in as the Big Giant Galactus and we’re all set.
Michael Richards could be the Silver Surfer, but I think people are reluctant to work with him after that racist shit he pulled a couple of years back. Didn’t he scream the N-word at people at one of his shows?
Get William Shatner in as the Big Giant Galactus and we’re all set.
Michael Richards could be the Silver Surfer, but I think people are reluctant to work with him after that racist shit he pulled a couple of years back. Didn’t he scream the N-word at people at one of his shows?
Negative Zone?
Nullifier.
What I Heard This Week: Joseph Gordon-Levitt
I never would have thought of Gordon-Levitt, but now that the idea is in my head, I think it could be a pretty good fit. A good FF film needs to be an ensemble piece, though, so the cast for rest of the team will need to be on equal footing with Joseph in terms of ability and name-value.
Wayne Knight as Doctor Doom!
Well, he did voice Evil Emperor Zurg on Buzz Lightyear of Star Command.
Buzz Lightyear of Star Command
Sorry, I don’t watch Star Trek.
Buzz Lightyear of Star Command
Sorry, I don’t watch Star Trek.
That’s Star Wars, you asshole.
Buzz Lightyear of Star Command
Sorry, I don’t watch Star Trek.
That’s Star Wars, you asshole.
Just when I thought I’d squeezed every compliment out of 2020. Thanks, brother!
Buzz Lightyear of Star Command
Sorry, I don’t watch Star Trek.
That’s Star Wars, you asshole.
Just when I thought I’d squeezed every compliment out of 2020. Thanks, brother!
I love you, too, asshole.
Wanda/Vision is really the only thing Marvel related that I’m interested in. I thought it would be available by now.
All the trailers remind me a lot of DOOM PATROL – also, LEGION and UMBRELLA ACADEMY give me the sort of the same kind of vibe (not THE BOYS so much, though). I wonder if this is kind of conceptual super-heroic show is just a fad or going to become more of trend. Maybe shows like THE VENTURE BROS and RICK AND MORTY have forced us to see more of the absurdity inherent to superheroic concepts.
Also, makes me think comics like BLACK HAMMER have a better chance of making it to television than movies.
Wanda/Vision is really the only thing Marvel related that I’m interested in. I thought it would be available by now.
Nearly, it comes out on the 15th.
While lurking on the Byrne Robotics forums (like I regularly do), I found this topic:
http://www.byrnerobotics.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=56969
One of the posters suggested Levin Rambin for Sue Storm, even posted this photmanip:
Another suggested January Jones might have made a good Sue once.
Well if they’re going with the blonde classic look they should get Evan Rachel Wood and not a clone of her =P
Lots of fans see Wood as Jean Grey.
ehhh… nah, I don’t see it… I don’t see her as Sue either for that matter, it was more a coment on how this Levin chick looks exactly like Wood… I actually thought it was her before I read the name. I kinda liked Kate Mara for Sue, too bad that movie was horrible.
Lots of fans see Wood as Jean Grey.
She is a little bit of a bland actress though. Like many ingenues though, she has improved and gotten a bit more distinction, but often it is hard to tell her apart from the crowd of skinny blonde actresses around when she showed up.
As far as Sue Storm, a lot depends on what period in their lives. I mean, in the original comic, Reed was like in his 40’s, Ben in his 30’s, but Sue was barely in her 20’s and I think Johnny was still in High School. What a team to break into a highly secured launch site and steal a rocket to Mars!
The actress I think has most broken away from the mold is Amanda Seyfried. With her roles in movies like Chloe and recently Mank, she’s the most intriguing option. Even in bad movies where she’s the lead like Jennifer’s Body and Red Riding Hood, she didn’t play the roles the way I expected. I don’t think she’s above making a Marvel movie, either.
The actress I think has most broken away from the mold is Amanda Seyfried. With her roles in movies like Chloe and recently Mank, she’s the most intriguing option. Even in bad movies where she’s the lead like Jennifer’s Body and Red Riding Hood, she didn’t play the roles the way I expected. I don’t think she’s above making a Marvel movie, either.
Well, she did turn down the role of Gamora in Guardians of the Galaxy.
Well, she did turn down the role of Gamora in Guardians of the Galaxy.
That was apparently mainly because she didn’t want to be green though.
Huh. That would’ve been different casting. Kinda glad things turned out the way they did on that one, but I could see her for Sue.
Ravi as Reed and Liv as Sue. They work great together. Major could be Ben and Blaine could be Johnny. GENIUS!
David Anders is one of those actors who I always think is much older than he is. He was barely 20 when he was first on Alias!
Marvel’s ‘Moon Knight’: Indie Auteurs Justin Benson and Aaron Moorhead Board as Directors (Exclusive)
The most intriguing and weird part of the initial concept was the planned cast. Although casting was never official, Reed and Petrie envisioned Charlize Theron as the Invisible Woman, John C. Reilly as The Thing, Paul Walker as the Human Torch and Alexis Denisof as Mr. Fantastic, with Jude Law as Doctor Doom. While each of these actors are popular, it’s wild to imagine them all in the same movie together as Marvel’s First Family.
Apart from Alexis Denisof, I don’t find this all that wild. Charlize Theron would still make a great Sue; she’s almost too obvious a choice.
While Reed and Petrie’s movie never saw the light of day, the details of the project are fascinating. Their intention was to display the celebrity life of superheroes in the style of The Beatles’ movie A Hard Day’s Night. Doctor Doom was even intended to be the film’s version of Pete Best, the original drummer who Ringo Starr replaced. Doom had been the odd man out, as the rest of the space crew gained superpowers while he had to create his own. From the premise to the cast, this non-existent film is more captivating than what’s been seen before.
Yeah, okay. Could’ve been cool. Still hoping they’ll somehow figure out a way to go with the FF as an already established team of rockstar superheroes and not do the origin again.
I don’t know if the FF are well established enough in the public consciousness to skip the origin story, especially when (re)introducing them in a new context like this.
I know there’s a bit of an obsession among fans with bucking the usual superhero trend by “not doing the origin”, but really I think it’s probably only Batman, Superman and Spider-Man that have origins that are well known enough to just dispense with them entirely when you do a new version of them.
I’m fine with kicking things off with the FF as an established team and then going back and filling in the backstory as part of their first movie, but if you don’t go back and explain who these people are and where they got their powers then I think you risk leaving a lot of the audience behind.
Actually with the F4 you kinda need to do an origin, and more importantly: you REALLY need to update it. That’s about the one thing fantfourstic got right… well, I mean the idea to modernize the origin story, not the execution obviously…
How did the Incredibles do?
(The Incredibles is a F4 movie in all but name, right?)
I know there’s a bit of an obsession among fans with bucking the usual superhero trend by “not doing the origin”, but really I think it’s probably only Batman, Superman and Spider-Man that have origins that are well known enough to just dispense with them entirely when you do a new version of them.
Well, that depends on whether you think that every character needs their origin told. Do we need to know how Columbo became such a shrewd detective, or how Jack Reacher first came to join the army? I’d maintain that many characters thrive precisely because we don’t know everything about their origin.
Sure, superheroes aren’t everyday types. You’ve got a family with different weird superpowers, you’re going to wonder how that came to be. But those are questions you can answer in all kinds of ways – from a intro-credits collage (see: Hellboy) to VO narration to dialogue in the movie, there’s a lot of ways to answer those question if you feel like you need to. (Say: Baxter building origin exhibition, school class).
So the question becomes, do you want to tell the origin story? There’s characters where the origin story is both extremely important to the character and also compelling – I’d say that for Batman, Superman or Spider-Man, for example. For others, less so.
When it comes to the FF, I think their origin story is far less interesting than they are as New York’s first family and most popular superhero-adventurers. So that’s where I’d start with them.
Fifteen years ago, you probably needed an origin story to explain why the heroes had special powers, but these days the concept of super heroes in movies is established enough for it not to be necessary. People can watch a movie with James Bond or Indiana Jones or Robin Hood without having their skills explained, and the same is probably true for the Fantastic Four.
Also: Their origin is crap, so just skip it instead of wasting time to make up one that is less crap. Spend the money on making Mr. Fantastic’s powers not look really cheap or really creepy or booth.
I think their origin story is far less interesting
Their origin is crap, so just skip it instead of wasting time to make up one that is less crap
Those re very excelent points… I changed my mind… nuke the origin crap… and for the love of jeebus SKIP Doom’s origin too… they always fuck that one up.
How did the Incredibles do?
(The Incredibles is a F4 movie in all but name, right?)
Incredibles had the luxury of not having to fit into an established universe and also being a more cartoonish anything-goes world where we immediately learn there are countless people with powers. For those reasons it was more easily able to present the Parr family as fully-formed without having to explain the ins and outs of it.
The MCU has always attempted to be fairly “science based” in its origins, in terms of giving an explanation for why the superheroes are special in that way (even if it’s comic-book science or pseudoscience), and it has also always tried to give a sense of who their lead characters are and where they come from, so it would be a break from their house style for them to not even try and explain any of that.
The examples of Jack Reacher or Columbo or James Bond or Indiana Jones or whatever are all interesting ones in this discussion though, because in many ways they’re the opposite of superheroes – they’re normal guys who find themselves in larger-than-life situations (to a greater or lesser extent) and have to deal with them.
With superheroes it’s often the other way around, the world is relatively relatable and normal, and the people at the centre of it are special or different, and it’s about how that new special person affects and interacts with the world around them.
So in that kind of story you probably need to dig deeper into the lead character than you would for a relatively generic character like Colombo, who is basically a blank slate defined just by a few recurring quirks. People don’t watch Columbo for Columbo so much as they watch it for the stories and situations he gets involved in; but with Spider-Man, you’re watching it for Spidey first and foremost.
But those are questions you can answer in all kinds of ways – from a intro-credits collage (see: Hellboy) to VO narration to dialogue in the movie, there’s a lot of ways to answer those question if you feel like you need to.
Yup. There are a variety of ways you can approach it without completely ignoring it.
I think the backlash against repeated origins really comes from The Amazing Spider-Man’s approach which was devoting most of the running time to tell the same story we’d seen 10 years earlier.
Funnily enough though rather than being dated I think the FF origin makes more sense in 2021 than it did in 1961. Cast Reed as an Elon Musk type character who’s made loads of money from his inventions and can afford his own space flight is more believable than what Stan thought up.
Christian wrote: But those are questions you can answer in all kinds of ways – from a intro-credits collage (see: Hellboy) to VO narration to dialogue in the movie, there’s a lot of ways to answer those question if you feel like you need to. Yup. There are a variety of ways you can approach it without completely ignoring it.
But I think if you do address those aspects then you effectively are “doing the origin story”, you’re just doing it in a more creative way, which is fine.
The first Iron Man movie is a good example of starting midway through the story, then jumping back and filling in some origin story stuff, then jumping forward again and making it more interesting than just a linear origin. Incredible Hulk covers it in a montage. The Burton/Keaton Batman starts with Batman fully-formed (cheekily misleading you at first to make you think you’re watching the origin when it’s actually a different family, not the Waynes) but then fills in aspects of the origin as it goes along.
All of those movies cover the “origin story”, they just do it in a way that’s more interesting than a bog-standard linear story.
There’s a difference between something like that and the Incredibles which doesn’t explain the background or source of the powers at all, just chucks you into the story and asks you to accept it as read, and learn enough along the way to keep up.
Yeah and I get all of that but I think what most people mean with ‘don’t do the origin’ is mainly to do with devoting a large section of the movie to it. I’ve heard nothing but praise for the Incredible Hulk approach of just putting it in the opening credits.
Even with non-linear though if Marvel went to reboot Iron Man with new actor this year I don’t really want to see anywhere near the same amount of time spent in that cave and building the armour etc.
I
Still hoping they’ll somehow figure out a way to go with the FF as an already established team of rockstar superheroes and not do the origin again.
I hate the term “rockstar superheroes” because I have zero interest in seeing superheroes cope with fame, and the FF aren’t remotely “rockstar.” They’re respected and admired but seeing even Johnny treated as a “rockstar” would be thoroughly obnoxious.
I’d like for them to be already established in the MCU because I see the FF as a cornerstone of the Marvel universe, but then you need to find a plausible explanation for them not even being mentioned up until now.
So maybe they should get their powers in 1961 during the space-race, but then disappear into deep space/the microverse/the Negative Zone during one of their adventures, then finally find a way back only to find that 70 years have passed. The problem then is that they end up like Cap, but since Steve is no longer active, maybe that’s okay.
Anyway, hopefully some actual screenwriters can find a better solution than some random dudes on a messageboard…
I hate the term “rockstar superheroes” because I have zero interest in seeing superheroes cope with fame, and the FF aren’t remotely “rockstar.” They’re respected and admired but seeing even Johnny treated as a “rockstar” would be thoroughly obnoxious.
Hey, I didn’t say that!
Yeah sorry, I just quoted from the wrong post.
Hey, I didn’t say that!
Or maybe you did. Who’s to say?
but seeing even Johnny treated as a “rockstar” would be thoroughly obnoxious
I liked that about the 2005 (?) movie.
They’re respected and admired
That’s the point. People walking up to them wanting their signature and whatnot. They’re loved and famous, that’s what makes them special in the Marvel universe. Rockstars don’t have to be obnoxious. I was thinking Bruce Springsteen here!
I’d like for them to be already established in the MCU because I see the FF as a cornerstone of the Marvel universe, but then you need to find a plausible explanation for them not even being mentioned up until now.
That definitely is the problem. Maybe it’s what’ll lead to an origin movie after all.
Well, that depends on whether you think that every character needs their origin told. Do we need to know how Columbo became such a shrewd detective
Personally I’m waiting for the “Young Columbo” TV series, where a teenage punk learns deductive reasoning and finds an old raincoat.
Well they have actually done that with Perry Mason so it’s not a huge stretch.
Anyway, hopefully some actual screenwriters can find a better solution than some random dudes on a messageboard…
but seeing even Johnny treated as a “rockstar” would be thoroughly obnoxious
I liked that about the 2005 (?) movie.
I liked hardly anything about that movie, that included. I just don’t think it has anything to do with the FF – it fits much better with post-modern bullshit like The Authority.
Tony Stark was absolutely a rockstar superhero in the MCU. Makes sense that the media would try to make another one without him. Can’t see any of the other current Avengers filling that spot, though.
but seeing even Johnny treated as a “rockstar” would be thoroughly obnoxious
I liked that about the 2005 (?) movie.
I liked hardly anything about that movie, that included. I just don’t think it has anything to do with the FF – it fits much better with post-modern bullshit like The Authority.
I don’t know, that celebrity angle was present even in the early Lee/Kirby FF – they get letters from an adoring public, and I’m sure the PR angle is at least partly behind them switching to the blue costumes in FF#3 – and has been progressively updated in the comics over the years, with people making comics about them and action figures of them and Johnny becoming a reality TV star and so on.
I wouldn’t have a problem with the movie reflecting that aspect (and modernising it) in some way.
Sounds good but runs the risk of a story based around Doom hacking into the Four’s social media to discredit them and boost his own follower numbers.
And in the end, Reed outsmarts him and Doom is deplatformed.
and has been progressively updated in the comics over the years, with people making comics about them and action figures of them and Johnny becoming a reality TV star and so on.
And it was ALWAYS cringe-worthy.
Yeesh… apparently Wandavision is gonna be the same-ish format as the Mandalorian, so presumably 8 short episodes (20-30 mins each)?
That’s disapointing.
Well, it’s supposed to be kind of a parody of sitcoms, and I don’t think I’ve ever seen an hour-long sitcom.
This topic is temporarily locked.