Marvel Comics Thread

Home » Forums » Comics talk » Marvel Comics Thread

Author
Topic
#429

This is the thread to talk about Marvel Comics.

Viewing 94 replies - 1,101 through 1,194 (of 1,194 total)
Author
Replies
  • #112056

    My LCS barely gets any comics for the shelves these days. Most comics that come in are for people’s pull files, then there’s a big island of back issues in the middle of the store, five bookcases of trades and then the vast majority of their shelf space is toys.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
  • #112079

    There is a local chain of stores in the Houston area called Bedrock City and while they do have new and old comics, but a lot of other stuff that is comics-adjacent like toys and t-shirts.

    Stores need to have a diversified inventory if they are going to have a chance of surviving.

  • #112129

    Apparently G.O.D.S. #1 is a triple sized comic for $9.99. That’s a pretty good deal, and I’m exactly the target market for this. Love Hickman’s stuff (I’m a 3W/3M subscriber) and this looks pretty cool. But, man, the launch of this book is a chuffing disaster as far as I’m concerned. Random single pages of prelude material throughout the last 2-3 months worth of Marvel titles. Fuck that. I’m not interested enough to chase down all these random issues of titles I do not buy for a single page of material on a brand new concept that may or may not be worth my time. Not happening. Sometimes they just can’t help shooting themselves in the foot :unsure:

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    Ben
  • #112131

    Apparently G.O.D.S. #1 is a triple sized comic for $9.99. That’s a pretty good deal

    I can understand this take in terms of a pure cost-per-page calculation, but at the same time I’m not sure retailers will be welcoming it.

    Far fewer people with only casual interest are going to take a chance on a new #1 that costs $10 than would buy one for $4 or $5.

    So again it feels like Marvel trying to make money out of the existing hardcore faithful, rather than reaching beyond that. Same as with Ultimate Invasion, which is quite a fun series but which has a massive barrier to entry with a #1 issue that costs $9.

    3 users thanked author for this post.
  • #112132

    Agreed. It’s definitely of no interest to the casual reader, and as I said the launch strategy is a disaster for the Hickman faithful (at least if I’m a barometer of that), so I think this launch is FUBAR’d all round.

    2 users thanked author for this post.
  • #112133

    Plus, for me, on the “what did he do last?” standard, Hickman is a flaming crater of wreckage due to Inferno.

    More than any other writer they have Marvel clearly think they can charge far for his stories.

    2 users thanked author for this post.
  • #112134

    and as I said the launch strategy is a disaster for the Hickman faithful

    Are these teaser pages all stuff that is going to be included in the final book, or original separate material?

  • #112135

    It’s original material. Not preview pages. Every page is different. There’s no indication that they will be reprinted in #1 (that would also be incredulous for anyone who did hunt down all these random early appearances). I suspect they will be included in a future collection, but that’s hardly conducive to buying the singles in the interim.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
  • #112136

    I can understand this take in terms of a pure cost-per-page calculation, but at the same time I’m not sure retailers will be welcoming it.

    My LCS is not happy about it. Comic books that cost $10 don’t move very well for them.

    Plus, for me, on the “what did he do last?” standard, Hickman is a flaming crater of wreckage due to Inferno.

    More than any other writer they have Marvel clearly think they can charge far for his stories.

    Plus, how involved will Hickman be moving forward? Is he going to start out everything then fade out, or is he going to be on the books for some time? Is he simply the creative catalyst who then turns everything over to others? He has too many unfinished creator-owned series to give me confidence in him sticking around.

  • #112137

    It’s original material. Not preview pages. Every page is different. There’s no indication that they will be reprinted in #1 (that would also be incredulous for anyone who did hunt down all these random early appearances). I suspect they will be included in a future collection, but that’s hardly conducive to buying the singles in the interim.

    I can see Marvel doing a #0 issue that collects the pages.

    2 users thanked author for this post.
  • #112138

    Far fewer people with only casual interest are going to take a chance on a new #1 that costs $10 than would buy one for $4 or $5.

    Agreed.

    Erik Larsen’s upcoming Savage Dragon #267 will cost $9.99 for 100 pages of material; but that’s okay, since few “new” readers are going to start a book with issue #267, so it’s really just the Dragon die-hards (like me) who will be buying this issue. Retailers don’t have to feel obliged to buy extra issues of this one compared to a new Marvel #1.

    If Marvel owned the Titanic, they’d be charging passengers for life-jackets, and extra if you want to sit in a lifeboat.

    3 users thanked author for this post.
  • #112160

    It’s original material. Not preview pages. Every page is different. There’s no indication that they will be reprinted in #1 (that would also be incredulous for anyone who did hunt down all these random early appearances). I suspect they will be included in a future collection, but that’s hardly conducive to buying the singles in the interim.

    Yeah that’s disappointing. I imagine the teaser pages won’t be essential, but still it feels like you’ll be missing out if you start from #1.

  • #112478

    https://aiptcomics.com/2023/09/20/ultimate-spider-man-hickman-checchetto/

    Hickman and Marco Checchetto are doing an Ultimate Spider-Man book together next year.

    Hickman on Spidey doesn’t feel like the best fit to me, but we’ll see.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
  • #112479

    So long as Marvel don’t do something stupid, like say on pricing, it’s an interesting creative combination.

  • #112480

    So long as Marvel don’t do something stupid, like say on pricing, it’s an interesting creative combination.

    Issue #1 will be $12.99 :rose:

    2 users thanked author for this post.
  • #112481

    So long as Marvel don’t do something stupid, like say on pricing, it’s an interesting creative combination.

    Issue #1 will be $12.99 :rose:

    I don’t think it will be that cheap.

  • #112509

    Marvel Solicitations for December

    at GamesRadar/Newsarama

    at AIPT Comics

    • This reply was modified 2 years, 5 months ago by Sean Robinson.
  • #112534

    How does Manga sell at an LCS?

    Manga is actually an interesting example as the sales go through several models. They start at anthology, then collections which are generally cheap. My son bought 3 maxi volumes of One Piece in Forbidden Planet London for $20, a thousand pages for the cost of 100 pages of new US comics.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    Ben
  • #113344

    Marvel Solicitations for January 2024

    at GamesRadar/Newsarama

    at AIPT

    at Comics Beat

  • #113667

    Before I clear them out, anyone after Knights of Pendragon original comics 1-12? Not mint, read, but looked after reasonably.

  • #113897

    Marvel Solicitations for February 2024

    at Newsarama/GamesRadar

    at AIPT

    at Comics Beat

  • #115530

    Oh hell, yes:

    https://www.marvel.com/articles/comics/get-fury-series-garth-ennis-jacen-burrows-punisher

    Maybe Marvel will get smart and put this out as an OHC, with the Soviet mini from a few years back.

    2 users thanked author for this post.
  • #115532

    Ennis and Burrows have been doing good work together on Ribbon Queen – and Burrows’ style is quite reminiscent of Dillon for me, so I think they’ll be a good fit for this story.

    2 users thanked author for this post.
  • #115534

    I just spotted the trade for Ribbon Queen earlier tonight.

  • #115536

    It’s a shame that Parlov can’t illustrate this (due to illness) the same way he did Frank’s first tour and the Fury series. But, Burrows is a great substitute.

    Interesting phrasing from Ennis about this potentially being his final Punisher story. He had such an incredible run with the character over the years.

    2 users thanked author for this post.
  • #115585

    Major bit of Omnibus news from Omar at Near Mint Condition:

    X-Men: X-Tinction Agenda Omnibus

    Due October 2024

    Looks like it won’t be a huge volume, so might be a decent price. This is the last piece of Claremont’s X-run for me to nab.

  • #115873

    Marvel Solicitations for May

    at GamesRadar/Newsarama

    at Comics Beat

    AT AIPT

  • #115891

  • #116202

    Blood Hunt: Marvel Introduces the Event Series’ Villainous Vampire Team

  • #116266

    All in for Marvel vs Vampires :yahoo:

  • #116384

    It’s hitting similar story beats. I’m just hoping it doesn’t have me constantly saying, “Make it make sense!” as much as DC Vs Vampires did.

  • #116626

    Marvel Solicitations for June

    at GamesRadar/Newsarama

    at CBR

    at Comics Beat

    at AIPT

  • #116770

    THE ORIGINAL X-MEN: MUTANTS BEFORE THE METAPHOR

    MERRY MUTANT REVIEW #1

  • #117633

    Bleeding Cool reporting Aliens vs Avengers by Hickman and Ribic this summer. Very cool if true.

  • #117636

    https://www.gamesradar.com/aliens-vs-avengers-hickman-marvel/

    1 user thanked author for this post.
  • #117663

    Marvel Solicitations for July

    at GamesRadar/Newsarama

    at CBR

    at AIPT

  • #117665

    Interesting, Hickman-Ribic, Avengers vs Aliens….

    Issue #1 $7.99

    I am at the point where, even on trade prices, with discount, Marvel are pricing me out of buying their stuff.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
  • #117677

    That’s ridiculous.

    2 users thanked author for this post.
  • #117681

    That’s ridiculous.

    The price or the concept?

    4 users thanked author for this post.
  • #117685

    That’s ridiculous.

    The price or the concept?

    Yes.

    4 users thanked author for this post.
  • #117690

    That’s ridiculous.

    The price or the concept?

    3 users thanked author for this post.
  • #119019

    Hickman & Capullo on Wolverine.

    https://www.polygon.com/24159173/marvel-wolverine-revenge-greg-capullo-jonathan-hickman

    Sounds like fun, and the art looks great.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    Ben
  • #119023

    Yep, a really good, interesting creator combination.

  • #119088

    Marvel Solicitations for August 2024

    at GamesRadar/Newsarama

    at CBR

    at AIPT

  • #119821

    Marvel Solicitations for September

    at GamesRadar/Newsarama

  • #120859

    Marvel Solicitations for October

    at GamesRadar/Newsarama

    at AIPT

  • #121685

    What’s New in the MCU? Marvel Comics for Dummies Will Break It Down – People

    ‘Marvel Comics for Dummies’ and ‘Captain America For Dummies’ will be released first in February, 2025

    For those who just can’t keep up with the Marvel cinematic universe, help is on the way.

    Dummies, the franchise that helps readers figure out everything from real estate to technology to your own body, announced that it is partnering up with Marvel Comics to release a series of “approachable and engaging” books that will help fans get up to speed on the origin stories of many of its beloved characters.

    The six-book series will be published in three parts kicking off with inaugural titles, Marvel Comics For Dummies and Captain America For Dummies, scheduled to release next year. Books on other notable themes and characters like the Fantastic Four, the Avengers, Spider-Man and the Marvel Cinematic Universe will also be released in the future.

    “We’re thrilled to be collaborating with Marvel to bring the Marvel Universe to fans through Dummies’ signature style of accessible, friendly storytelling,” Jennifer Yee, senior editor at Dummies said in a press release.

    She continued, “For new fans looking for a primer to the Marvel Comic Universe, to superfans alike, this series of books will serve as approachable reference guides to some of Marvel’s most popular and enduring superheroes.”

    Each book in the series will cover the history of the respective comics and help readers locate key story moments critical to the backstory of Marvel’s iconic characters — including Captain America, who was portrayed in the Marvel films by Chris Evans.

    Captain America For Dummies “will walk readers through Captain America’s origin story, how civilian Steve Rogers became a superhero, thanks to a secret government project and a dose of Super-Soldier Serum, and how others, including Sam Wilson, have taken up the mantle of Captain America over time,” according to a synopsis.

    As for Marvel Comics for Dummies, the publisher described it as a “reference guide and definitive primer” to the “immense catalog of comics” under the Marvel brand. It will cover “key Marvel comic book characters, their superpowers, strengths, weapons, allies and enemies, and more.”

    “Readers will be introduced to key storylines that have been woven through Marvel comics for decades and learn the essential facts and foundational backstories necessary to understand how the comics and characters are interrelated,” a synopsis for the book read.

    “Along the way readers will get the scoop on popular characters like Iron Man, Wolverine, Black Panther, Thor and Captain Marvel,” the synopsis adds.

    Captain America For Dummies and Marvel Comics for Dummies are written by Marvel Crisis Protocol novel author Stuart Moore, and Executive Editor of The Saturday Evening Post Troy Brownfield, respectively.

    Moore and Brownfield each have extensive comic book knowledge. Moore was a founding editor of the Vertigo imprint at DC Comics, where he won the Will Eisner Award for best editor. Brownfield has written and created content for DC Comics, Comiccon.com, Star Wars and other brands.

    Marvel Comics for Dummies and Captain America For Dummies are scheduled to come out in paperback in February, 2025.

  • #121718

    Marvel Solicitations for November 2024

    at Newsarama

    at CBR

    at AIPT

  • #122394

    Marvel Gives The Avengers Matching, Doctor Doom-Inspired Costumes [Exclusive Preview]

    Read More: https://www.slashfilm.com/1669524/marvel-the-avengers-doctor-doom-costumes-comic-book-preview/

  • #122412

    Who needs good writers and competent artists? Let’s give ’em new uniforms in order to create the illusion of change!!

    1 user thanked author for this post.
  • #122421

    That’s really lazy. Not even new designs just new colors.

    And women with heads smaller than their tits, apparently…

  • #122426

    Marvel Solicitations for December

    at GamesRadar/Newsarama

    at CBR

    at FCN

  • #123221

    Marvel Solicitations for January 2025

    at GamesRadar/Newsarama

    at AIPT

    at FCN

  • #123222

    I think it ate my post, but Marvel is up at GamesRadar/Newsarama, AIPT, and FCN.

    I’ll get it when I get home.

    [Edit]… Or, there it is…

  • #123226

    It’s up for me Sean

  • #123917

    Marvel Solicitations for February 2025

    at GamesRadar/Newsarama

    at AIPT

  • #124500

    Marvel Solicitations for March 2025

    at GamesRadar/Newsarama

    at AIPT

  • #124921

    It looks like amazon has a kindle masterworks sale on – 5 quid/dollars a pop.

    I’ve no idea if there’s anything I really want, I did wonder about chris Claremont’s side hustles in Spiderwoman or something like that.

    Suggestions, and please don’t say Dazzler?

  • #124930

    If the new Thor MW is included then grab that – it’s the start of the Simonson run with the original colouring restored rather than the recolour used for the omnibus.

  • #124936

    It looks like amazon has a kindle masterworks sale on – 5 quid/dollars a pop.

    I’ve no idea if there’s anything I really want, I did wonder about chris Claremont’s side hustles in Spiderwoman or something like that.

    Suggestions, and please don’t say Dazzler?

    From the entirety of the Masterworks line? Hmm.. They’ve started on Tomb of Dracula, right? That’s fun. The second volume of Rawhide Kid, IIRC, has the few issues by Jack Davies. They’re worth $5. Is there a MW of Iron Fist? The Claremont/Byrne run on that is good.

  • #124937

    The original Frank Miller Daredevil run is now all done in MWs too, again with remastered original colouring. Well worth $15.

  • #124939

    I have Tomb of Dracula and a few other series in Marvel’s Essentials format from years ago. That was when Marvel released huge black and white trades on cheaper paper. At the time, they were a cheaper alternative and collected some Bronze Age books that probably wouldn’t ever receive a collection.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
  • #125419

    Marvel Solicitations for April 2025

    at GamesRadar/Newsarama

    at AIPT

  • #125721

    Deadpool creator Rob Liefeld slams Kevin Feige, will no longer work with Marvel

    No. Don’t leave. Come back.

    Anyway, on to truly important things concerning Marvel Comics:

    This new, hoagie-throwing Marvel supervillain takes inspiration from Philly’s favorite mascot

  • #125733

    At the premiere, Liefeld learned he and his family were not invited to the afterparty, something he was accustomed to attending. He also felt snubbed by Disney brass, including Marvel Studios boss Kevin Feige, whom he says was near him on the red carpet but did not acknowledge him.

    “It was meant to embarrass, diminish, defeat me,” Liefeld said on his podcast of not gaining access to the afterparty.

    And there was another apparent slight: Liefeld said he posed for professional photos with creatives on the Deadpool & Wolverine team, but later was told by his publicist that those photos were deleted. He believes they were only taken as a courtesy and not intended to be used, though other photos, featuring Liefeld alone as well as with his family, appeared as part of Disney’s Getty press portal from the event.

    Scandalous how this man is being treated. Will nobody stand up to protest against the tortures he has to endure???!!!

    1 user thanked author for this post.
  • #125802

    Well, he can always bring Youngblood back.

    Oh, wait…

    1 user thanked author for this post.
  • #125880

    Marvel promises “Nothing is sacred” as it teases the resurrection of the original Gwen Stacy, and also a “long-lost loved one” for Jean Grey – GamesRadar/Newsarama

    LM8k4hbVvDsknDY9qL3EsW-1024-80.jpg

    Marvel is teasing a pair of shocking resurrections of characters who have been off-limits for decades

    Earlier this week, Marvel teased what seems to be the impending exhumation of the corpse of Gwen Stacy – as in the original, core Marvel Universe one who was killed in a fight with the Green Goblin way back in 1973’s immortal story ‘The Night Gwen Stacy Died,’ originally told in Amazing Spider-Man #121-122.

    But what the publisher has teased for Jean Grey could be even more monumental in terms of potential returns. As announced by Marvel, Phoenix #11 will feature the “miraculous return” of one of Jean’s “long-lost loved ones” – though, crucially, the publisher doesn’t say who will be coming back or how.

    More in link…

  • #125885

    Marvel promises “Nothing is sacred” as it teases the resurrection of the original Gwen Stacy, and also a “long-lost loved one” for Jean Grey – GamesRadar/Newsarama

    LM8k4hbVvDsknDY9qL3EsW-1024-80.jpg

    Marvel is teasing a pair of shocking resurrections of characters who have been off-limits for decades

    Earlier this week, Marvel teased what seems to be the impending exhumation of the corpse of Gwen Stacy – as in the original, core Marvel Universe one who was killed in a fight with the Green Goblin way back in 1973’s immortal story ‘The Night Gwen Stacy Died,’ originally told in Amazing Spider-Man #121-122.

    But what the publisher has teased for Jean Grey could be even more monumental in terms of potential returns. As announced by Marvel, Phoenix #11 will feature the “miraculous return” of one of Jean’s “long-lost loved ones” – though, crucially, the publisher doesn’t say who will be coming back or how.

    More in link…

    If I’m being really honest, this doesn’t surprise me in the least.

  • #126681

    Marvel Solicitations for June 2025

    at AIPT

  • #126694

    But what the publisher has teased for Jean Grey could be even more monumental in terms of potential returns. As announced by Marvel, Phoenix #11 will feature the “miraculous return” of one of Jean’s “long-lost loved ones” – though, crucially, the publisher doesn’t say who will be coming back or how.

    Well it’s presumably either a) her parents b) her sister or c) her best friend who died when she was a kid, which triggered her powers to manifest wildly. I can’t see that anyone really cares about any of them though.

  • #127513

    Marvel Solicitations for July 2025

    at AIPT

  • #128699

    Marvel Solicitations for August 2025

    at AIPT

  • #132741

    richards

    Wait. Really. This has confused me for years.

    Of all the… its not bloody Dai Evans or John Smith. There are two significant Nathanial Richards in the 616. WT actual F

    1 user thanked author for this post.
  • #139906

    A new riff on an Age of Apocalypse style event for the X-books? Could work.

    https://www.marvel.com/articles/comics/age-of-revelation-the-heir-of-apocalypse-leads-the-marvel-universe-october-2025

  • #139907

    Damn, 20 years on from Planet Hulk:

    Hulk returns to Sakaar this October in a special anniversary one-shot

  • #142004

    Marvel Announces Their Ultimate Universe Will End In April 2026
    (Sorry, it’s a Bleeding Cool Link.)

  • #142008

    (Sorry, it’s a Bleeding Cool Link.)

    You think saying “sorry” absolves you from this sin, Todd? Think again. :negative:

  • #142016

    (Sorry, it’s a Bleeding Cool Link.)

    You think saying “sorry” absolves you from this sin, Todd? Think again. :negative:

    You misunderstand.

    When I said “sorry”, I was actually saying “fuck you”.

    ;)

    2 users thanked author for this post.
  • #142027

    Alternate link:

    https://comicbookclublive.com/2025/10/08/marvels-ultimate-universe-to-end-in-2026/

    1 user thanked author for this post.
  • #142041

    I love that they are sticking to the plan with the Ultimate universe, but cross that this was not an option in the Powers of X – I wanted to read that story.

    2 users thanked author for this post.
  • #142046

    Say Dan, Hickman isn’t on Endgame, Camp is

  • #142057

    Yeah, sounds like the same mistake as with HoXPoX – let Hickman kick off a big grand story and then milk it to the point where you don’t even let him finish it, and lesser creators have to try and wrap it up. Classic Marvel.

  • #142058

    Wasn’t the problem with the Krakoan Age that Hickman left Marvel for a year or two to do comics via substack?  Though I do recall Marvel saying something about extending the length of era as well?

    1 user thanked author for this post.
  • #142062

    Hickman wanted to go faster on X-Men than everyone else did, plus also taking the line digital-only.

    On that one, I think he was wrong. That first phase of Krakoa had a huge amount to explore.

  • #142065

    Wasn’t the problem with the Krakoan Age that Hickman left Marvel for a year or two to do comics via substack?  Though I do recall Marvel saying something about extending the length of era as well?

    No, they basically decided they wanted to deviate from Hickman’s initial plan and prolong the second act of the story indefinitely, and Hickman didn’t want to hang around longer than he had planned so had to turn it all over to other writers.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
  • #142068

    Is it known if post-Hickman Krakoa was what he had planned out?

  • #142072

    Just spotted Inglorious X-Force has Cable so I have to look at the eventual trade, even if its only 10 issues.

  • #142252

    I saw this on Facebook:

    Ultimates writer Deniz Camp has released a statement on the end of the Ultimate Universe:

    “Okay, the End of the Ultimate Universe (from my perspective):

    It’s true that the original plan was not to “end” the universe. A lot of my run is setting up characters I hoped would go on past me, I think I’ve made that clear and obvious.

    BUT

    John was ending his run at 24, that was always the case. He was done. Peach and Bryan were both ending their stories when the Maker got out as well. That was their decision. (according to what Iv’e been told/my interactions with them)

    (And it makes sense. Think about it – Peach is writing and drawing every issue for 24 issues. That’s insane. She works like 20 hours a day on that book, no joke. She’s the hero of the line. She deserves a break, if she wants one).

    Wolverine was only meant to be 12; then it got extended to 16. The other creators were offered more issues to run alongside Endgame, but they declined (I saw that happen).

    The only person who planned on continuing was me.

    Initially, still very early, those books were going to end as those creators left, and Ultimates would have continued and new books launched (I was pushing for Hawkeye, Guardians was discussed, etc). This was all very vague.

    But then, Wil Moss came to me and said, hey, I think we’re going to end it. End it end it. This was a long time ago, at least a year before now I think, but I’d have to check.

    Not because the books are “too woke” (if it were that, they’d interfere with the writing of it, which they haven’t) or because the main line is jealous (this is silly, money is money to them), but because everything seemed to be coming to a natural conclusion.

    They felt that they had something special with the universe as it was, consistent creative visions that told their stories and had a clear beginning, middle and end. An accessible, creator-forward re-imagination of the Marvel Universe. A version of the neverendingstory that ended.

    And that the purity of that vision, they though/think, could pay dividends for a long time after, if it didn’t overstay the welcome, dilute it, or fumble the ending.

    Yes, I had plans for stuff coming after, continuing this world, and part of me was bummed about that, but in my heart I think I knew that they’d be “lesser”. Moreover, for me, the Ultimate Universe has been a place for TRYING new things in comics. Radical things.

    Whether it’s the real time pacing, or the radical interventions of marvel characters, or the formal play that have characterized my run, that’s what excited me about the Ultimate Universe. Excites me still.

    And this –really, truly ending the universe on a high note, having it be this contained thing, giving a story an END– that’s radical for big 2 comics! It’s something that, to the best of my knowledge, has never been done on this scale by Marvel or DC. That is exciting to me.

    I hope it is exciting to you!

    But I don’t mean to tell anyone how to feel about any of this. And I don’t want to speak for anyone. Perhaps I’ve been misinformed, or feelings have changed – I don’t know. But this is how it is from my perspective.”

    2 users thanked author for this post.
    Ben, Dan
  • #142253

    Is it known if post-Hickman Krakoa was what he had planned out?

    Why we're not getting Hickman's ending: a semi-comprehensive account
    byu/azorahainess inxmen

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    Ben
  • #142264

    I saw this on Facebook:

    Ultimates writer Deniz Camp has released a statement on the end of the Ultimate Universe:

    “Okay, the End of the Ultimate Universe (from my perspective):

    It’s true that the original plan was not to “end” the universe. A lot of my run is setting up characters I hoped would go on past me, I think I’ve made that clear and obvious.

    BUT

    John was ending his run at 24, that was always the case. He was done. Peach and Bryan were both ending their stories when the Maker got out as well. That was their decision. (according to what Iv’e been told/my interactions with them)

    (And it makes sense. Think about it – Peach is writing and drawing every issue for 24 issues. That’s insane. She works like 20 hours a day on that book, no joke. She’s the hero of the line. She deserves a break, if she wants one).

    Wolverine was only meant to be 12; then it got extended to 16. The other creators were offered more issues to run alongside Endgame, but they declined (I saw that happen).

    The only person who planned on continuing was me.

    Initially, still very early, those books were going to end as those creators left, and Ultimates would have continued and new books launched (I was pushing for Hawkeye, Guardians was discussed, etc). This was all very vague.

    But then, Wil Moss came to me and said, hey, I think we’re going to end it. End it end it. This was a long time ago, at least a year before now I think, but I’d have to check.

    Not because the books are “too woke” (if it were that, they’d interfere with the writing of it, which they haven’t) or because the main line is jealous (this is silly, money is money to them), but because everything seemed to be coming to a natural conclusion.

    They felt that they had something special with the universe as it was, consistent creative visions that told their stories and had a clear beginning, middle and end. An accessible, creator-forward re-imagination of the Marvel Universe. A version of the neverendingstory that ended.

    And that the purity of that vision, they though/think, could pay dividends for a long time after, if it didn’t overstay the welcome, dilute it, or fumble the ending.

    Yes, I had plans for stuff coming after, continuing this world, and part of me was bummed about that, but in my heart I think I knew that they’d be “lesser”. Moreover, for me, the Ultimate Universe has been a place for TRYING new things in comics. Radical things.

    Whether it’s the real time pacing, or the radical interventions of marvel characters, or the formal play that have characterized my run, that’s what excited me about the Ultimate Universe. Excites me still.

    And this –really, truly ending the universe on a high note, having it be this contained thing, giving a story an END– that’s radical for big 2 comics! It’s something that, to the best of my knowledge, has never been done on this scale by Marvel or DC. That is exciting to me.

    I hope it is exciting to you!

    But I don’t mean to tell anyone how to feel about any of this. And I don’t want to speak for anyone. Perhaps I’ve been misinformed, or feelings have changed – I don’t know. But this is how it is from my perspective.”

    I think it makes sense to end the Ultimate Universe; it’s really long outstayed its welcome. It got its second (or third) breath and they’re apparently doing some really good stuff there right now. But giving it an ending does complete it in a way, and keeping it open would diminish it after a certain point.

    That being said, hey, I am sure they’ll revive it at some point or another, to get a really big event out of that. It’s how superhero comics work after all.

    2 users thanked author for this post.
  • #142451

    https://www.marvel.com/articles/comics/armageddon-assembles-marvel-comics-event-june-2026

    Hard to get excited about this based on the description

    1 user thanked author for this post.
  • #144506

    There is going to be some epic arseholery over this.

    Marvel’s ‘Ultimate Endgame’ Blind Bags went from collectible to straight-up lottery ticket

    1 user thanked author for this post.
  • #146000

    Marvel officially axes 2026’s most ambitious release (full details inside)

    It seems Marvel’s intergalactic Imperial saga has been cut short. What happened? After an exciting launch in 2025, the much-hyped new era for Marvel’s interstellar heroes and villains isn’t sticking around much longer. Let’s talk about what caused the change in creative direction, why Marvel’s Imperial spin-offs are going away, and what could have been.

    As reported by Bleeding Cool, Marvel’s plans for a slate of ongoing cosmic comics, one of the publisher’s most ambitious projects for 2026, have fizzled out.

    Five series were announced in the aftermath of the Imperial crossover event; it looks like none of them are going to survive much longer.

    Marvel’s Ambitious New Cosmic Era Is Ending With A Whimper, Rather Than A Big Bag
    Jonathan Hickman’s Imperial Was Supposed To Launch A New Era; It’s Not Going To Last Through 2026
    There is a vast Marvel Universe beyond Earth, featuring interstellar empires and cosmic characters. Imperial was Marvel’s latest attempt to do something exciting with all that potential. It was spearheaded by Jonathan Hickman, who previously revolutionized the X-Men franchise and rebooted Marvel’s Ultimate Universe. After drastically altering Marvel’s cosmic status quo, Hickman handed the reins to five other Marvel authors.
    Marvel put a lot of stock in its post-Imperial plans, but now creative plans for Marvel’s cosmic line have been abridged. Reportedly, it’s the same reason most Marvel titles are cut short these days: underwhelming sales. The figures seem to point to the fact that not enough interest was there to keep investing in titles like Imperial Guardians and Nova Centurion.

    Or Planet-She Hulk, Exiles or Black Panther: Intergalactic. Each of these has had its issue order cut short by Marvel. In the case of Exiles, it seems as though the book might never appear at all. The question readers have now is whether Marvel is pivoting, or bailing entirely on its Imperial follow-through.

    “Imperial” Rebooted Marvel’s Intergalactic Roster Of Characters; It Never Took Off With Fans
    What’s Next For Marvel’s Deep Space Heroes Is Unclear
    The entire point of Jonathan Hickman’s Imperial was to rewrite the balance of power in the wider Marvel Universe, and maneuver certain characters into position to take on new roles in the aftermath of the series. In this sense, it was the ultimate “destination, not the journey,” story, which might have been a factor in hampering the five-issue arc’s own sales.

    As for the announced follow-up titles, two things hurt their chances. After Imperial, fans didn’t like where the story left certain characters. Like Star-Lord, who was morally compromised by the end of Imperial. At the same time, fans didn’t respond well to where the spin-offs picked up with characters like Black Panther.

    In other words, Marvel was in a creative lose-lose situation with its cosmic plans for 2026. The critical reception wasn’t stellar, and issue sales didn’t justify pushing forward. Still, there’s a big difference between Marvel forgetting about its new post-Imperial cosmic landscape entirely, and recalibrating its approach to the new paradigm.

    Marvel Set Up A Major Conflict For Two Iconic Marvel Heroes, But Will It Follow Through?
    Marvel’s Cosmic “Civil War” Could Be A Huge “What If?” And Nothing More
    Following Imperial, both Guardians of the Galaxy’s Star-Lord and Black Panther are the leaders of huge intergalactic empires. It’s the perfect set up for a third Marvel Civil War, on a scale that makes the first two seem tame by comparison. Yet it doesn’t seem like Marvel is interested in telling this story.

    It’s unclear if there ever was a long-term creative direction for Marvel’s cosmic landscape following Imperial. In the short-term, the ambition was there, but the execution, and now the follow-through, have come up lacking. There’s still time to course correct, but it comes at the expense of five titles that never got a chance to fully find their footing.

    Marvel fans were excited by the prospect of Imperial, but the response the publisher needed to stay committed to the project didn’t materialize. Marvel’s early 2026 plans for its cosmic heroes are dead, but there’s still time for Marvel to figure out a new plan and salvage everything it has put into the line so far.

  • #146006

    A total mess.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
Viewing 94 replies - 1,101 through 1,194 (of 1,194 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Skip to toolbar