This is a thread to talk about James Bond.
Home » Forums » Movies, TV and other media » James Bond Thread: movies, books and comics news
This is a thread to talk about James Bond.
So I watched Dr. No last night. Hadn’t seen it since I was a kid. As expected, it was very slow compared to later Bonds, but everything is still there. Some half-remembered bits were quite weird, like the whole “there is a dragon on this island!” thing that retrospectively feels like it should’ve been in a Scooby Doo comic and not in a James Bond movie. Or how there is a lot of showering first when the bad guys catch them.
I heard that Fleming at first did not like the casting of Connery, then things changed when the finished product came.
Connery is my favorite Bond… even though he said some controversial things like hitting/slapping a woman.
——–
After From Russia With Love, they went with Goldfinger. I like Goldfinger for its many elements, but it did take the franchise away from more realistic espionage and into movies with Bond having to take down some megalomaniac who wants to sabotage and take over the world. Part of me wishes that instead of Goldfinger, they went with a smaller scale plot. Just saying.
I heard that Fleming at first did not like the casting of Connery, then things changed when the finished product came.
Apparently, he wanted his cousin Christopher Lee to get the role since Lee had the bearing and experience from WW2. Peter Jackson told a funny story about filming Lord of the Rings and directing Lee about the scene where Saruman gets stabbed in the back. Lee stopped him and said, “I know exactly what it sounds like when one is stabbed in the back.”
I heard that Fleming at first did not like the casting of Connery, then things changed when the finished product came.
Wonder what he’d have thought of subsequent Bonds.
That’s a good question. Was Fleming still alive when Moore took over the role?
Fleming died in ’64, so no.
There’s a rumour that regularly does the rounds that Roger Moore was Fleming’s first choice for Bond, but I think it’s been pretty comprehensively debunked.
I heard that Fleming at first did not like the casting of Connery, then things changed when the finished product came.
Apparently, he wanted his cousin Christopher Lee to get the role since Lee had the bearing and experience from WW2. Peter Jackson told a funny story about filming Lord of the Rings and directing Lee about the scene where Saruman gets stabbed in the back. Lee stopped him and said, “I know exactly what it sounds like when one is stabbed in the back.”
Outlander’s Sam Heughan addresses James Bond rumours
https://www.digitalspy.com/movies/a34618115/outlander-sam-heughan-james-bond-rumours/
Journalist: “Would you like to be cast as James Bond?”
Actor: “Yes. Obviously.”
And in other “English actor would be up for playing James Bond” news:
After Daniel Craig, I think the producers should go in a completely different direction with the new James Bond actor. I nominate SNL’s Pete Davidson.
.
.
I might be kidding. You never know…
007: Why Goldfinger Was Sean Connery’s BEST James Bond Film
https://www.cbr.com/goldfinger-best-sean-connery-james-bond-007-film/
Serious question for the group:
Who would be your pick to play James Bond next?
Who would be your pick to play James Bond next?
Serious question for the group:
Who would be your pick to play James Bond next?
Someone I’ve never heard of.
Yeah, Someone I Never Heard of would be a cool choice. I hear he’s a really good actor, too.
Honestly, I’d like to see a more diverse Bond at this point. Craig was the old warhorse; he should be the last Bond of the old kind. In their place, I’d go for a black actor, and for a young one – use the idea of Bond being a legacy name to bring in a new generation.
In their place, I’d go for a black actor,
I’d prefer an original Black Bond, rather than racebending.
I think race mattered to the Bond that we used to have, the cynical, mysogynist, brutal killer – the “blunt weapon”, as it was put in the best Bond movie, that Britain would point at its enemies. That guy could only be a white male. But I think this version of Bond has reached its pinnacle with Daniel Craig; in Casino Royale, and the first third of Skyfall, they were very aware of who he was and worked with it. But they missed a step and let Sam Mendes rewind the clock on that. But anyway, they’ve done pretty much all they could with that idea of Bond and I think it’s time to go with a different version. I’d like to see one that’s slicker, more suave, cleverer, more aware of the world and of himself – and also less broken, less needlessly brutal, and instead funnier and enjoying himself. Tom Hiddleston would be good casting for such a Bond, but that’s a version of the character that could have any skin colour and be any gender, really. So I think it’d be fun to see them go for that.
And I wouldn’t racebend him either, but rather use the idea that’s been around anyway, that “James Bond” is a codename for a specific, one-of-a-kind position for an MI6 agent. “So you’re the new Bond now, huh?”
Not that I think any of this is going to happen. Well, maybe the change in character. If they’re smart. I really do think it’s the only way to go forward with him now.
“So you’re the new Bond now, huh?”
I think this kind of thing would be a bit of a clanger and I hope they don’t address it explicitly. It just draws attention to something they don’t need to draw attention to.
I think this is as far as they’ve ever gone with that:
Interesting, I didn’t remember that moment!
Here's my Connery from last night's @Drink_and_Draw. @urbanbarbarian shamed me so I had to go back in and hand letter the logo. I hate doing logo work, thus I hate @urbanbarbarian pic.twitter.com/fw7Q7Z6NaY
— JoeQuesada (@JoeQuesada) November 6, 2020
And in other “English actor would be up for playing James Bond” news:
Remember only 2 out of 6 (official) Bonds so far have actually been English. Connery Scottish, Lazenby Australian, Dalton Welsh and Brosnan Irish.
007: Why Goldfinger Was
Sean Connery’sTHE BEST James Bond Film
Once, I’d have said Tom Hiddleston, both for his acting chops and for his passing resemblance to this sketch of Bond:
I’m not good at this kind of question because I don’t actually know many contemporary actors, but Hiddleston seems like a perfect choice to me.
How ‘GoldenEye’ Reinvented James Bond
https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/heat-vision/how-goldeneye-reinvented-james-bond
Here’s your chance to co-own the rights to James Bond!
https://www.theguardian.com/film/2020/oct/28/no-time-to-die-bond-crowdfunder-nationalise-007
Yesterday a GoFundMe page, started by a Coventry internet user known only as Team Bond, sprang into life. Its goal? To purchase the rights of No Time to Die from MGM so that we can all watch it by Christmas.
It’s a noble cause. After all, now that everybody knows how much MGM wanted Netflix to pay for it, the film has a solid market price. And that’s why the GoFundMe has a target of £607m.
At the time of writing, the campaign has raised £15.
In fairness, that article is from October.
They’re probably up to £20 by now.
James Bond Comic ‘Agent of SPECTRE’ Launching in 2021
https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/heat-vision/james-bond-comic-agent-of-spectre-launching-in-2021
In fairness, that article is from October.
They’re probably up to £20 by now.
£850 raised of £607,000,000 goal
The Case for Regé-Jean Page to Play James Bond
https://www.esquire.com/entertainment/movies/a35140478/rege-jean-page-new-james-bond-007-rumors/
James Bond film No Time to Die delayed again over Covid
Lots of time to die.
Regé-Jean Page Is Leading the Odds to Play James Bond
https://www.esquire.com/entertainment/movies/a36802190/rege-jean-page-james-bond-odds/
Liam Neeson says Natasha Richardson told him not to play James Bond or ‘you’re not going to marry me’
https://ew.com/movies/liam-neeson-says-natasha-richardson-told-him-not-to-play-james-bond/
What might have been…
Still waiting on that Jinx spin-off, guys.
Years ago, Tarantino said that he would do a Bond film but have it set in 1964or so. Apparently that’s how Quentin would make it work.
I guess he isn’t the only one who would like to “freeze”the Bond storytelling. Personally, I prefer the early Connery movies, the again I would freeze a lot like the X-men to the Claremont/Byrne era, DD with Miller, Prince to his Revolution/Purple Rain days, etc.
I guess it is a nostalgia thing, but storylines and characters have to move on and be relevant. Bond these days has to compete with other spy and action movies, Bond has to watch his womanizing and can no longer go through 3-4 women a film like Kleenex.
In the beginning of “Goldfinger” when Felix Leiter met Bond at this resort and was about to talk to him about Auric Goldfinger, Bond dismissed this bikini blonde who was hanging all over him saying that she must leave now, this is “ManTalk”. And he smacked her ass as she left.
It is a change but we all have to get used to it.
As for a black Bond with that actor from Bridgerton?
We will see. I don’t like the backlash and hate replies of the black woman character who is said to have taken over Bond’s number of 007 after he retired in the story.
I think freezing Bond in 1964 isn’t a bad idea. And it’s not nostalgia, it’s just that Bond’s character fits the 50s/60s better than it fits the 21st century. His entire personality is a product of those times, of the era he grew up in and now works in. And sure, you could update his personality to make him a touchy-feely me-too era millennial, but then is it really still Bond?
True Bond works better in the 60,s during the Cold War situation, but the excessive womanizing and treatment of women and other things that they got away with ( see the Connery movies) would be seen as off and dated to today’s audience.
And a 1964 set would also give it a dated look like Mad Men or so and the movies wouldn’t compete with other action movies. That’s the problem.
I think freezing Bond in 1964 isn’t a bad idea. And it’s not nostalgia, it’s just that Bond’s character fits the 50s/60s better than it fits the 21st century. His entire personality is a product of those times, of the era he grew up in and now works in. And sure, you could update his personality to make him a touchy-feely me-too era millennial, but then is it really still Bond?
On the other hand, contemporary audiences may not care for new movies with old attitudes.
Mad Men worked because the characters were actually complex and audiences were given time to explore them and watch them develop. Can you really do that with Bond in 2.5 hours? Is bond a character you want to do that with?
I think a lot of what made Bond special in the early years was that he was traveling to exotic places that most people had never seen before, except for maybe pictures in a magazine. He was always with gorgeous women. There were incredible action sequences and stunts.
Nowadays, travel to those exotic locations is lot easier and you can google pictures and videos of beautiful women. Action movies are incredibly common. I don’t think changing the time period will really make a difference. I think James Bond movies are still successful so out sides of a new lead every decade or so, what is really broken that needs to be fixed? I think the franchise stays relevant with the times while keeping true to its roots.
I’m not seeing an issue here.
Mad Men worked because the characters were actually complex and audiences were given time to explore them and watch them develop. Can you really do that with Bond in 2.5 hours? Is bond a character you want to do that with?
No. Bond is mostly a one dimensional action hero/spy.
Some effort to add more to Bond was made in the Lazenby movie “On Her Majesty’s Secret Service” and look how that went.
As for a black Bond with that actor from Bridgerton?
We will see. I don’t like the backlash and hate replies of the black woman character who is said to have taken over Bond’s number of 007 after he retired in the story.
Lashana Lynch opens up about ‘really mean, dark’ reactions to her ‘No Time to Die’ casting
Some effort to add more to Bond was made in the Lazenby movie “On Her Majesty’s Secret Service” and look how that went.
‘No Time to Die’ director reflects, says Sean Connery’s James Bond basically ‘rapes a woman’
Rewatched Spectre ahead of NTTD tomorrow. There’s a lot of good stuff in the first half, but all of the SPECTRE stuff, including the Andrew Scott scenes back at MI-6, is awful. Not a terrible movie. I’d have loved to have seen the John Logan-written version with David Oyelowo as Blofeld, before Purvis & Wade got their hands on the script.
Rolling Stone magazine has spoken:
I don't think it is stated enough how the plot of Die Another Day revolves around North Koreans faking their death, then replacing their bone marrow and DNA reconstructed so they can resemble white, upper-class British men as revenge on the man who "killed" them.
Just bizarre.
— Mathew Buck (@FB_BMB) October 9, 2021
This was kinda interesting:
https://www.travelperk.com/james-bond-expense-report/
Bringing this back again instead of starting a new one.
Resourceful eh? 😂
I wish I could just copy and paste a listing, but this link gives you a sliding screen shot of 18 actors who they feel could be the next Bond.
I don’t agree with all the choices, but that is just me.
Essentially, what does Bond represent? What is he an icon of?
To many, he is the quintessential white British male, mainly of the Cold War era. That explains all the hatemail Latasha Lynch recieved when new came out of her being the new 007. (James retired and her character took up the number but I digress)
These days, many say Bond also has to compete with the quick reflex action heroes like the Bourne franchise, Mission:Impossible, the Taken movies, etc… But should he really?
This was surprisingly good, it’s certainly way ahead of Spectre, which managed to do so little with such a great case.
Malak was the weakest part of it. I can’t really be impressed by a villain using a toddler as a human shield, it is such a weak look, surely a villain can do better than this?
But the central idea running through this, the idea of Bond trying to overcome the habits of a lifetime and failing, while Swann deals with the legacy cast by her father which she fears Bond will replicate for her daughter, is a good one. It is also the logical endpoint for Craig’s version of Bond. A man who unused to feeling has allowed himself to and we see where that goes.
If they really are true to the ideas displayed here and have any conviction about them the next film has to be with Lynch as Bond. She was OK in the film, overcoming a painfully macho start to work her way up to her standout sequence – kicking a racist Russian threatening ethnocide into a lake of acid! That was perfect.
One off note was just how stupid M was, an experienced spymaster believing an engineered precision assassination weapon would stay as that? Come on, that’s utter bollocks. Still, it made for a good enough plot device and Harris, Whishaw and Kinnear are a good support cast with Fiennes.
That bit at the end? “James Bond will return” – yeah, right. Short of a reboot, I don’t think so.
Overall, I enjoyed this. It has some excellent cinematography in places and some surprising casting, I never expected to see Hugh Dennis in a Bond film!
That bit at the end? “James Bond will return” – yeah, right. Short of a reboot, I don’t think so.
Bond reboots all the time, I don’t see any reason to think that will change with the next iteration.
No. Bond is mostly a one dimensional action hero/spy.
Some effort to add more to Bond was made in the Lazenby movie “On Her Majesty’s Secret Service” and look how that went.
Same with No Time to Die. Trying to give him emotions just makes Bond boring really.
(I liked a lot of that movie, the bits where it’s more of a spy adventure movie, but all the dark emotional parts just felt empty and a little dumb.)
Same with No Time to Die. Trying to give him emotions just makes Bond boring really.
I remember Connery’s Dr. No, when Honey Rider related how she was raped and got even by planting a tarantula to kill the guy,
Bond didn’t really show any feeling of sympathy for her, but just said not to make it a habit to plant tarantulas to kill people.
To many, he is the quintessential white British male, mainly of the Cold War era.
I don’t think now he has to be white.
He probably did in the 1960s but 60 years later he just needs to be a refined gentleman type. In 2022 there are black and Asian men that have gone through the elite school system etc. I’m pretty certain none of the white British posters here speak as poshly as this example:
I personally think Bond needs to be male, the unreconstructed part of him is part of the character, even if it is punctured now as much as it was praised originally. I think if you want a female secret agent then just do a Modesty Blaise film.
I get what you are saying but I don’t know if I can picture Bond as a black man driving like that and not being stopped by police, or going to check into the most elite European hotels casinos, other predominantly white venues and not being given the run around. Add to all that all the usual “microaggressions” that people of color get.
Don’t get me wrong. Cinema could use a black action hero in the lead part (and not as a side kick), but Bond… well…
Maybe but also fiction can change those stereotypes. Kirk kissed Uhuru on screen in a time that was illegal in various places. It doesn’t have to always follow the trends but can lead them.
We’ve seen this a bit with Doctor Who, can a woman or person of colour be treated the same across the span of history? No. It is a light touch approach but they have addressed that, Martha Jones being deemed ‘exotic’ in 1600s England for example.
Bond being non white could also push that narrative and that is important because the arts tend to be drivers of progress, the first time I heard being gay was a thing was on Dynasty of all places and the character was sympathetic.
Dynasty WOKE MOB coming in here (there (then)), white genociding all us straight men!
Eh, it’s a living…
I get what you are saying but I don’t know if I can picture Bond as a black man driving like that and not being stopped by police, or going to check into the most elite European hotels casinos, other predominantly white venues and not being given the run around. Add to all that all the usual “microaggressions” that people of color get.
I think a movie with a black James Bond would only end up being about those things if they chose to make it about those things, which seems unlikely.
You might feel that it would be implausible for a Bond film to overlook those aspects, but personally I feel like we’re now at the stage where audiences wouldn’t have a hard time accepting a black lead actor as a suave international spy who can move in those glamorous circles (in a way that wouldn’t have been the case in previous decades and certainly generations.)
Really there’s a lot of suspension of disbelief that has to accompany these movies either way. Whether black or white, the way Bond drives would probably get him stopped by police in the real world, but that wouldn’t make for a fun Bond film.
I do get the concerns about casting a non-white actor as Bond without acknowledging the prejudices and barriers that still persist today, but part of me feels that to suggest that those roles should be off-limits to non-white actors would be its own kind of barrier. I feel like we’re not going to see the kind of representation we want in mainstream movies without accepting that a black actor should be able to play a lead role like Bond without it being considered an obstacle to telling fun stories.
Well…
As it is now, there is some viewer backlash that is critical of unrealistic settings like predominately white NYC in Sex and the City, Seinfeld, Friends, Girls, etc. as well as an all white Paris in Emily in Paris.
Then the FF reboot that casted Michael B. Jordan as the Human Torch.
Listen, I would love for a Bond of color to work, but I really don’t know if it will go over well. If it bombs, it would set back the franchise and perhaps spill over to black casting for years.
As it is now, there is some viewer backlash
All those shows ended a long time ago. Sex and Friends both ended 20ish years ago. The most recent one is Girls, and that wrapped five years ago.
I’m not saying the criticism isn’t valid, it most definitely is, I’m just saying it’s fairly old news.
Besides, and more importantly than nitpicking, I don’t understand at all how that matters to James Bond being cast as a black actor. Why does the viewer backlash of a 20 year old tv show’s depiction of an american city as predominantly white matter to the casting of a british movie hero? Are the people that lashed back at the lack of black people in NYC the same people who wouldn’t be able to stand a black James Bond? Unlikely.
I believe that the locale would help determine the ethnicity of Bond. A Chinese villain An Anglo-Chinese Bond An African Villain An dark skinned Bond. An Indian Villain Anglo-Indian. Having a highbred Briton stroll through a predominately Black neighborhood like in Live and Let die stretches the credulity of the story.
We’d also have to view it within the context of British society rather than New York sitcoms from 1998.
The largest ethnic minority in the UK is south Asian, the current chancellor (finance/treasury secretary) of the UK is a multi-millionaire of Punjabi ancestry who went to Winchester private school, Oxford and Stamford.
I believe that the locale would help determine the ethnicity of Bond. A Chinese villain An Anglo-Chinese Bond An African Villain An dark skinned Bond. An Indian Villain Anglo-Indian. Having a highbred Briton stroll through a predominately Black neighborhood like in Live and Let die stretches the credulity of the story.
It’s only logical that MI-6 would have different Bonds for different missions. Trouble in Hong Kong? Send 007.1, the Chinese-English agent. “The name is Bond. Zhang Wei Bond. Trouble in Cuba? Send in 007.2, the Latino-English agent. “The name is Bond. Hector Marίa Gonzalez Lopez Bond.”
It’s only logical that MI-6 would have different Bonds for different missions. Trouble in Hong Kong? Send 007.1, the Chinese-English agent. “The name is Bond. Zhang Wei Bond. Trouble in Cuba? Send in 007.2, the Latino-English agent. “The name is Bond. Hector Marίa Gonzalez Lopez Bond.”
I don’t know, I have it on good authority that Sean Connery’s Bond was able to disguise himself as a Japanese man beyond all detection.
Well, if the audience views it as just a movie and pure escapism, it can work.
Something I guess like the Bridgerton series on Netflix that for the most part bypasses some racial aspects of history in its setting.
Who knows?
Bridgerton is different, it’s using the ‘colour blind casting’ concept that people like Branagh at the Royal Shakespeare Company instigated. As they are all period pieces with very little diversity you bar almost all non-white actors from being able to work on them and a horrible career disadvantage. So he had a choice of forever maintaining a system that locks people out or just decide to ignore the accuracy since we do suspend disbelief in a lot of fiction anyway.
Shonda Rhimes used elements of that casting approach in her contemporary TV shows and then continued it in Bridgerton.
Bond would not be the same, there are people of colour in the UK secret services, a woman as head of MI6 in the films actually followed after the reality when Stella Rimington was boss. I’m not naive enough to say the UK has full equality, yes he is more likely to be randomly pulled over for driving a flash car, but it’s also not a massive stretch of reality to present a story where he isn’t. You could even address it as they did with Judi Dench as M.
Cool
Gareth… You also are a gentleman and a scholar!
———————————
Switching a character from white to black… I can think of the comics Nick Fury.
A big thumbs up to whoever decided to change the character and pattern him after Samuel Jackson.
Then there is Eartha Kitt as Catwoman in the 60s…
Things change.
When Fury and the Howling Commandoes were introduced in a WW2 setting the US armed forces were segregated racially. When Millar and Hitch were asked to restart the concept in the early 2000s the leading US general in Colin Powell was black. Times move on and in 1960s Britain the idea of a female head of MI6 or a non white agent were fantasy, in 2022 they aren’t.
To be fair Kitt as Catwoman was very progressive, 60 years on that can and has been accused of being ‘woke’.
I could see it more easily, if they hadn’t basically just done Old Bond with Craig.
Take with a grain of salt:
Aaron Taylor-Johnson Will Reportedly Be the Next ‘James Bond’
See where Bond movies rank:
Bond is a franchise with (mostly) a 4-5 movie commitment.
Cavill just turned 40 back in May. Doing Bond would (like Craig) tie him up the next 10-12 years, into in early 50s.
Now Cavill is doing Argylle with Dua Lipa and Matthew Vaughn had a few things to say:
Looks like Vaughn getting Cavill might have ruined him for good doing Bond.
Bond is a franchise with (mostly) a 4-5 movie commitment.
Cavill just turned 40 back in May. Doing Bond would (like Craig) tie him up the next 10-12 years, into in early 50s.
Now Cavill is doing Argylle with Dua Lipa and Matthew Vaughn had a few things to say:
Looks like Vaughn getting Cavill might have ruined him for good doing Bond.
Quick inquiry:
Your thoughts on how OHMSS would have been with Connery.