So Evangeline Lilly has changed her tune about the virus and has apologized about her past remarks… Is she off the hook now?
Sure – besides who’s holding that hook, anyway? I think that an entirely unprecedented catastrophe has somewhat blunted the effectiveness of shaming people when it’s become so apparent that surprisingly, we really do depend on other people – especially those with whom we disagree – to survive the hazards of the world. Forgiveness and acceptance is trending; shaming on the decline.
No one is talking about how the model is built. We’re talking about how all you have to do is pay attention to understand that things are going to continue to get worse here before the get better. So no, Trump isn’t right, even in a broken clock way.
Likewise, this is not getting much traction, but Lilly’s initial comments were in regard to the “election year.”
I mentioned in another thread that there is a tendency to find reasons for bad behavior AFTER a person is already engaged in the behavior. People naturally don’t want to change their routines. They don’t want to work from home and certainly they don’t want to stop working or changing plans that were already in place to deal with child care and so on. The first reaction is to deny there is a problem and then carry on. You don’t even need a reason to do it – denial is almost by definition ignoring any reason. It’s inherently irrational.
So, when confronted, rather than wake up and realize this is not right, a person (or more likely, a person’s subconscious) is going to latch on to a reason. I do this all the time and have to consciously actively realize it. People generally don’t do things because of the reasons they state, but rather the reasons they come up with are stated because of or to justify what they are thoughtlessly in the process of doing.
An easy “conspiracy theory” to latch on to goes something like this. A) the flu kills and probably will be responsible for killing more people this year than the coronavirus pandemic. B) If the news reported on the flu the same way that it’s reporting on Covid-19, it would cause the same hysteria. C) Therefore, this is just a stunt to upset the economy in advance of an election rather than anything we really need to worry about.
Of course, it avoids the obvious differences between the flu and Covid-19 in that we have vaccines and reliable treatments for the flu built up over decades or even a century plus of dealing with it. Our health care services are prepared for the flu for this same reason, and, of course, Covid 19 is hitting the same time as the flu season which means that the available services are already close to their limits.
So, Lilly just hit that “oh shit, this is really serious” stage of accepting reality and the falsehood of her rationalization and she went public with it in an apology. That’s a good thing because we need to strongly encourage more people to wake up to it. Certainly, it is also part of PR damage control, but no need to get all judgey when the net effect is positive.
2 users thanked author for this post.