Doctor Who: now discussing The Reality War (spoilers!)

Home » Forums » Movies, TV and other media » Doctor Who: now discussing The Reality War (spoilers!)

Author
Topic
#79641

Discuss your favourite Timelord here.

  • This topic was modified 3 years, 11 months ago by Dave.
  • This topic was modified 1 year, 10 months ago by lorcan_nagle.
  • This topic was modified 1 year, 5 months ago by paul f.
Viewing 97 replies - 601 through 697 (of 697 total)
Author
Replies
  • #127704

    The further I get from the episode, the more that bits of it don’t entirely seem to make sense. Conrad had Think Tank set up in advance of messing with Ruby. But he also had the podcast, Lucky Day, that he invited her onto, which surely she and/or UNIT checked out beforehand and was benign. So how did he set up Think Tank and why did he have a seemingly normal podcast? Just to lure Ruby on? His guy inside UNIT, Jasper, was shown listening to it as well, which doesn’t make sense either way: either he’s already working for Conrad, in which case he doesn’t need the normie podcast cos he’s getting the secret full fat nonsense with the rest of Think Tank (however that is) or he’s not working with Conrad yet, in which case, what’s the appeal of this seemingly benign podcast when he’s listening to “revisionist” pods? And Jasper had been actively covering up his right wing nonsense while working at UNIT, which only seems to make sense if he’s doing it specifically to be Conrad’s mole (why else be there?) in which case, why did Conrad need to do a social media thing to find Ruby (which ended with Ruby coming to him) rather than getting her identity from Jasper?

    And then other thing nagging at me is that, much like how McTighe’s Kerblam blames the protesting workers rather than the oppressive, monopolistic megacorp, this episode essentially sides with Conrad’s drunk abusive mother in saying he’s a worthless liar.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
  • #127717

    Wait, are you saying an RTD-era story doesn’t really hang together when you think about it?

    2 users thanked author for this post.
  • #127744

    Just saw online today that JMS was moving to London so that he could work in British TV. I wonder if there’s a rumour there worth spreading.

    2 users thanked author for this post.
  • #127761

    Just saw online today that JMS was moving to London so that he could work in British TV. I wonder if there’s a rumour there worth spreading.

    Not Cardiff though?

    Perhaps its Blake’s 7 reboot time?

    • This reply was modified 6 months ago by Dan.
    2 users thanked author for this post.
  • #127767

    Perhaps its Blake’s 7 reboot time?

    I would be very happy.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
  • #127768

    It’d be a far better fit for JMS’ writing style than Doctor Who would, TBH

    1 user thanked author for this post.
  • #127771

    Screenshot_20250507_070803_Samsung-Internet

    2 users thanked author for this post.
  • #127774

    That was definitely something going through my head as part of the story they rushed through to to get to the next big point.  But I could absolutely see that kind of rhetocial nonsense working in the real world.

    2 users thanked author for this post.
  • #127862

    The Story & The Engine starts with an interesting premise and an unusual setting, but somehow it feels like it never quite gets beyond the first act of the story to turn into a compelling adventure.

    There’s also a fair bit of fan-service loaded into the back end which feels like a crutch, as if they knew the episode wasn’t quite engaging enough in its own right. A shame as it felt like this had quite a lot of potential but just struggled to get into a higher gear.

    It’s the kind of thing that feels like it maybe would have worked better as a prose story, where the need for something visually interesting and dynamic isn’t the same as it is on TV.

    2 users thanked author for this post.
  • #127863

    Wait, are you saying an RTD-era story doesn’t really hang together when you think about it?

    I have found that treating Dr Who like a rollercoaster works best. Enjoy the ups, downs, and loop-the-loops but don’t actually think too hard about the narrative.

    The last weeks episode is a great example of this. Successful podcaster is actually leader of a massive movement but no one at UNIT is aware of him. He thinks aliens are a fakes put on by UNIT despite stumbling across real aliens. Space granny is putting a team together a team to fuck with the doctor and a social media influencer is the best candidate she can muster. I try to push such intrusive thoughts to one side so I can whoop with delight when the monsters spring back to life and bite someone’s arm off.

    One thing that makes this really difficult though is the fact that it’s subtle as a brick with the messages and mirroring of worries and woes of society today. I like a bit of subtext in my sci fi but this was 100% text and 0% sub.

    At least the doctor didn’t cry, yet again this episode as that’s getting a bit one note. A bit of fury was a nice change.

    4 users thanked author for this post.
  • #127868

    The Story & The Engine starts with an interesting premise and an unusual setting, but somehow it feels like it never quite gets beyond the first act of the story to turn into a compelling adventure.

    There’s also a fair bit of fan-service loaded into the back end which feels like a crutch, as if they knew the episode wasn’t quite engaging enough in its own right. A shame as it felt like this had quite a lot of potential but just struggled to get into a higher gear.

    It’s the kind of thing that feels like it maybe would have worked better as a prose story, where the need for something visually interesting and dynamic isn’t the same as it is on TV.

    Yeah, I agree mostly. I was assuming/hoping it was going to the Doctor telling stories (about Belinda?) and using that as a way to take control of the situation or something but instead it just got somewhat talky in a different way (and I could really live without the Fugitive Doctor cameo) while Belinda didn’t really do much and it fizzled out. A shame because it started pretty strong and the story telling window was a great concept that just went nowhere.

  • #127869

    I really enjoyed it. I could do without the doctors on the telly, but the cameo was delicious.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
  • #127873

    I saw this on Facebook:

    1 user thanked author for this post.
  • #127905

    Series 2 finale is on 31st May and will actually have simultaneous release on BBC One, D+ and cinemas.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
  • #128059

    I thought this week’s episode was the best episode of Gatwa’s run so far, and feels the most like a classic-RTD-era episode.

    A fun premise, a good adventure with little flab and lots of jeopardy, some solid political subtext, fun supporting characters, lots of enjoyable pop-culture references (including a movie homage I was not expecting in Doctor Who), the kind of casual inclusivity that worked so well in the original RTD era, and even some surprising lore built into the plot.

    Who knows how the big two-part finale will turn out, but this was very good.

    2 users thanked author for this post.
  • #128067

    I thought this week’s episode was the best episode of Gatwa’s run so far, and feels the most like a classic-RTD-era episode.

    A fun premise, a good adventure with little flab and lots of jeopardy, some solid political subtext, fun supporting characters, lots of enjoyable pop-culture references (including a movie homage I was not expecting in Doctor Who), the kind of casual inclusivity that worked so well in the original RTD era, and even some surprising lore built into the plot.

    Who knows how the big two-part finale will turn out, but this was very good.

    Yeah, I agree, I thought it was great.

    The end with Mrs Flood was cool too. Initially, when she bigenerated, I was a bit down on it – “oh, it’s Russell playing with his new toy again” – but actually, the interaction between the two was immediately interesting and hopefully this will allow more detail on the concept than we got in the 60th. Already my mind’s racing to “well did the Rani copy the ability to do it from the Doctor? Or did she come up with it in the first place and somehow road-test it on the Doctor?”. Panjabi is great casting.

    2 users thanked author for this post.
  • #128089

    Carole Ann Ford too!

    1 user thanked author for this post.
  • #128394

    So how did the song here compare with the actual contest?  Was Norton’s appearance revealed earlier? I thought Belinda surprise at Doctor’s anger a bit odd? Mrs Flood’s identity was well revealed and that she is not the boss.

    • This reply was modified 5 months, 2 weeks ago by Rocket.
  • #128452

  • #128499

    I quite liked today’s episode. RTD is always at his best with satire and the bland utopia of Conrad’s wish is pretty cutting. Excited for next week.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
  • #128504

    I thought it was a bit crap. We get the concept of the alternate world fairly early on, and after that it’s just a lot of waffley treading water until the cliffhanger reveals, which weren’t all that exciting and which end the episode with a bit of a clunk.

    2 users thanked author for this post.
  • #128600

    The signs don’t look good for the immediate future of the show.

    https://deadline.com/2025/05/doctor-who-ratings-drop-speculation-future-1236409467/

    I can’t believe RTD didn’t manage to bring new viewers on board by kicking off the reboot with specials featuring the lead actor from three Doctors ago that picked up on plot points from 2008 and culminated in the return of a villain from 1966; before launching into a new series that built up a huge mystery that wasn’t resolved, with a climax based around a returning villain from 1975; all the while teasing a mystery woman who turned out to be a returning villain from 1987, whose big plan in the second season was to bring back a returning villain from 1983; all of which might help to finally explain the backstory of a supporting character from 1963.

    5 users thanked author for this post.
  • #128610

    Beep the Meep though.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
  • #128704

    So, this is the first time in 20 years that we have no idea if or when the show will be back? They have nothing else filmed, so I guess we’ve no Christmas Special, and no series next year.

    I hope The War Between the Land and the Sea is good? My hopes aren’t high.

    2 users thanked author for this post.
  • #128705

    Watched Wish World a couple of hours ago, episode was better than expected.

    The finale was OK. I can’t say I’m that hooked by the Rani, so her being a starter for Omega worked for me.

    UNIT having a four-way shoot out with the bone beasts was fun.

    The regeneration? Saw that coming with all the other Docs and 13 dropping in, which was cool.

    It’s guaranteed that Big Finish are now plotting.

    If the show continues, they are going through Doctors rather fast.

    Back to the series, I’m not sure all the talk of gods went anywhere.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
  • #128706

    I thought it was an awful, rushed and pretty nonsensical finale even by RTD’s standards. And whether or not she’s intended to be a future Doctor or not, the whole stunt with Billie Piper at the end just feels like desperation, a sign that they really don’t know what to do with the show at this point. If I was Disney I wouldn’t be able to cancel the co-production deal fast enough.

    4 users thanked author for this post.
  • #128707

    It felt like they were rushing through everything to get it all in one episode.

    The Rani was wasted, Omega was, as feared, just some CGI creation that did nothing. Blank slate Belinda was suddenly obsessed with having a child. The Doctors seeming inability to believe Ruby didn’t ring true at all and while it was nice to see 13 away from Chibnall, it also didn’t ring true that she’d be the one showing up at that moment.

    And Billi Piper….🤷‍♂️🤷‍♂️.i dont know🤨. I just feel like they’ve completed their contract with Disney and instead of having a proper regeneration, we’re just getting another stunt casting.

    If we do get another series, which will be a ways off at this point, I hope RTD isnt at the helm.

    3 users thanked author for this post.
  • #128708

    I just feel like they’ve completed their contract with Disney and instead of having a proper regeneration, we’re just getting another stunt casting.

    They didn’t complete the contract, Disney originally agreed to fund 26 episodes; apparently the next season was all written, and they planned to film earlier this year, but it was never ordered into production.

    2 users thanked author for this post.
  • #128709

    UNIT needs to be placed under serious scrutiny. How much tax payer cash was spent building a rotating building when they could have just built guns on the two unarmed sides for a fraction of the price.

    5 users thanked author for this post.
  • #128710

    They didn’t complete the contract, Disney originally agreed to fund 26 episodes;

    I think that includes this upcoming spinoff though. Once that’s over it will add up to 26.

    Three anniversary specials, two Christmas specials and sixteen regular episodes is already 21 episodes, and the spinoff miniseries is the other five.

  • #128711

    At least we know the Doctors shooting blanks now.

    3 users thanked author for this post.
  • #128712

    They didn’t complete the contract, Disney originally agreed to fund 26 episodes;

    I think that includes this upcoming spinoff though. Once that’s over it will add up to 26.

    Three anniversary specials, two Christmas specials and sixteen regular episodes is already 21 episodes, and the spinoff miniseries is the other five.

    Ah, I forgot the Tennant episodes would count.

    2 users thanked author for this post.
  • #128713

    At least we know the Doctors shooting blanks now.

    Susan must have some questions, after her big return in the past couple of episodes I’m sure they’ll get to explaining all that next week.

    3 users thanked author for this post.
  • #128714

    UNIT needs to be placed under serious scrutiny. How much tax payer cash was spent building a rotating building when they could have just built guns on the two unarmed sides for a fraction of the price.

    Or spent a little more money to simply rotate the entire earth underneath the building.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
  • #128715

    Well. I was sort of flip-flopping through that between “this is good” to “this is just self-indulgent wank” and settled on the last.

    I liked that the Rani had a scheme and it wasn’t about destroying Earth or particularly vindictive to the Doctor, he was essentially incidental, a means to an end. Gallifrey’s gone, I can remake it in my own image – solid Rani scheme. That plan ending up opening a door for a CGI bone monster that eats her was pretty shit though. Feels like such a waste of Panjabi and Omega. And I’m disappointed that the Rani bigenerating around the same time the Doctor did turned out to just be coincidence and not her having copied it from or caused it for the Doctor.

    The bit where the Doctor and Belinda are passing the ever shrinking coat between themselves in the TARDIS and Ruby slowly realises was really well done. But Belinda being reduced to A Mother kinda sucked for the character. The Doctor vehemently not believing Ruby didn’t ring true at all. And then the solution is the most arbitrary set up for a regeneration I think the show’s ever had.

    I’d seen all the rumours about Gatwa leaving and even Piper replacing him (which I dismissed the usual tabloid nonsense on the level of “Doctor Who’s coming back with Eric Idle as the Doctor” from the 90s) but I wasn’t convinced it was happening simply because they hadn’t publicly confirmed he was leaving, like they usually do. So there was a bit of a surprise to that for me for the first time since… Eccleston’s regeneration (I went into the Parting of the Ways thinking he was regenerating at Christmas).

    Piper being the next Doctor is so stupid. However much RTD managed to make Tennant’s temporary return work for the 60th, this is a whole different level of gimmicky, desperate crap. It’s like when Tom Baker used to say he’d like to come back as the Master and everyone just politely chuckled along knowing it wouldn’t work on any real level. Seriously, all the new, different, exciting actors and actresses unconnected to the show that could have been cast (as Gatwa was!) and they go for Rose as the Doctor? I despair. I mean, this is nothing against Piper, she’s a good actress. As she showed 20 years(!) ago on a show called Doctor Who.

    13’s appearance felt completely pointless. Well, not pointless. If I didn’t know that RTD was friends with, and has undeserving respect for the work of, Chris Chibnall, I’d have thought it was him taking the opportunity to show how well she could have, should have, been written (like Marvel Studios fixing Jamie Foxx’s Electro in No Way Home). And I think those few minutes, as extraneous as they were, were the best Whittaker had in the role. But yeah, sticking it to Chibnall can’t have been his motivation so… what was the point? Just to have the opportunity to write for her?

    When the regeneration was coming up, I genuinely wondered if they were going to end on just the effect with no resolution, to leave it open for whenever the show returns (however far in the future that is). I think maybe that would have been better. Although it has had good moments, I think RTD2 has broadly been a failure. Not as bad as Chibnall’s era, admittedly. And I admire how hard Davies went for it with the Disney money and renewed energy from the BBC: everything on the iPlayer, colourisations, special edits of old episodes, mini-episodes, bringing back a new version of Confidential, bringing back the Christmas special instead of hiding at New Year, massive TARDIS set, spin-off series. But it’s been too self-indulgent, too lacking in restraint. There needs to have been a voice (or a stronger voice at least) there saying “does this make sense?” “is that really a good idea?”. I was optimistic and hopeful about RTD’s return and there have certainly been highlights and good moments, but I think the show probably would have been better off with new blood having taken over after Chibnall (Toby Whithouse, ideally), even if that had meant continuing on in a more low key manner.

    EDIT: Oh yeah and the other thing is: I did not care about Poppy and it’s kind of weird the other characters did so much when she’s blatantly not real. “I remember her, that means she’s real” is nonsense when you’ve just all been stuck in a fantasy world with fake memories. Why is the Doctor killing himself to nudge the universe to recreate a fake child he didn’t even remember? Like, he absolutely could have been nicer to Ruby about it, but saddling Belinda with a initially-fake child is kinda gross.

    3 users thanked author for this post.
  • #128717

    I don’t think Piper is really the Doctor (or at least, they’re leaving the door open for her not to be) as they don’t credit her as such in the closing credits like they usually do with new Doctors.

    I think it’s mainly just a stunt to generate social media buzz, which seems to be the main thing RTD cares about these days.

    3 users thanked author for this post.
  • #128720

    The twist with Poppy worked for me, as the entire thing is that the kid isn’t created by the wish. The wish warped view and perception of her, even after it faded.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
  • #128721

    The twist with Poppy worked for me, as the entire thing is that the kid isn’t created by the wish. The wish warped view and perception of her, even after it faded.

    I like the idea, but where’s the evidence that she existed before wish world? The TARDIS energies rewrote all the “get me home” lines, once she existed, no?

    1 user thanked author for this post.
  • #128722

    The twist with Poppy worked for me, as the entire thing is that the kid isn’t created by the wish. The wish warped view and perception of her, even after it faded.

    I like the idea, but where’s the evidence that she existed before wish world? The TARDIS energies rewrote all the “get me home” lines, once she existed, no?

    Yes.

    One of the main problems with the episode for me was that it didn’t really set up any kind of emotional connection to the child – she was clearly a product of the “wish world” – and then spent half the episode acting as if she was the most important thing in the story and audiences would care about trying to restore her. That didn’t work for me at all so the whole back half of the episode felt flat to me.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
  • #128723

    I didn’t even realise she was one of the Space Babies until very late in the day (and not just because I’d tried to blank that episode out of my memory). But if the Doctor knew that, then surely he knew she wasn’t real for him and Belinda, but a copy of the space baby. But I think there was meant to be some kind of resonance with Susan Twist being made real after the Sutekh stuff. But it did not work at all.

    I saw someone on Bluesk suggest that Piper is there for a take on the Romana regeneration where she tried out loads of bodies before picking Lalla Ward, which I guess is possible, but to be honest, giving RTD the benefit of the doubt about this stuff (“why did Whittaker’s clothes regenerate as well when she became Tennant? Maybe it’s because he’s not really the 14th Doctor!”) has repeatedly not paid off, so… frankly, given we don’t know when or even if the show is coming back, I’m not convinced Davies does either and it’s entirely possible he threw this in for the stunt and will work it out later.

    2 users thanked author for this post.
  • #128724

    The twist with Poppy worked for me, as the entire thing is that the kid isn’t created by the wish. The wish warped view and perception of her, even after it faded.

    I like the idea, but where’s the evidence that she existed before wish world? The TARDIS energies rewrote all the “get me home” lines, once she existed, no?

    Oh, it did? Well, scratch that idea then.

    2 users thanked author for this post.
  • #128725

    next-episode

    7 users thanked author for this post.
  • #128728

    You have to hand it to Ruby, she definitely got her revenge on Belinda for replacing her as the companion..Convincing the doctor to rewrite reality to make her a single mother to a child that never existed. And she gave Conrad a happy ending and even forced the Doctor to “kill” himself in the process…Is Ruby the main villain of this series?🤔

    4 users thanked author for this post.
  • #128729

    Thinking a bit more about it, the reduction in ep count compared to RTD’s first Who run doesn’t cover why it’s weaker. He’s used to working with that. It’s A Sin was a five episode series.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
  • #128730

    frankly, given we don’t know when or even if the show is coming back, I’m not convinced Davies does either and it’s entirely possible he threw this in for the stunt and will work it out later.

    I am 99% sure this is the case.

    2 users thanked author for this post.
  • #128732

    He has said he is aiming at a younger audience, and its hitting its marks there.
    Maybe that’s it. We are not his target. His target likes shooting at bone dinosaurs from a rotating tower block and the doctor flying under tower bridge on a stolen witch’s broomstick.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
  • #128733

    Well, being goofy may work for the kids (though I am not sure that’s actually the case), but Dave pointed out quite succinctly why this series hasn’t been accessible to new viewers.

    (Personally, I didn’t make it past the first few new RTD episodes. Just doesn’t work for me anymore – it’s all been too goofy, too hyper-emotional, too little care in building the stories.)

    2 users thanked author for this post.
  • #128734

    He has said he is aiming at a younger audience, and its hitting its marks there.

    A younger audience wouldn’t have been born when Billie Piper was on the show!

    Of course, I wasn’t born when Mel was on the show, and her appearance did nothing for me.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
  • #128740

    Of course, I wasn’t born when Mel was on the show, and her appearance did nothing for me.

    There’s nothing wrong with bringing back old characters. The complaints about the Rani being a character from the 80s are pretty ridiculous when Daleks, Cybermen and the Master are even older. You’ve just got to do something with them good enough to make it worthwhile, which RTD definitely didn’t do with Mel. Almost did with the Rani, if her plan had had a satisfying resolution, but Mel contributed nothing of substance to these last two eps.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
  • #128741

    He has said he is aiming at a younger audience, and its hitting its marks there.
    Maybe that’s it. We are not his target. His target likes shooting at bone dinosaurs from a rotating tower block and the doctor flying under tower bridge on a stolen witch’s broomstick.

    Anecdotally, the people I know who are still hanging on and watching the show are 40+. Most families I know have lost interest and walked away from it, including my own kids.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
  • #128742

    There’s nothing wrong with bringing back old characters. The complaints about the Rani being a character from the 80s are pretty ridiculous when Daleks, Cybermen and the Master are even older.

    Not quite the same thing, I think. Those villains have continually recurred throughout the show’s history, so are always relatively fresh in the mind – whereas RTD is calling back to much deeper cuts that haven’t been on screens for literally decades.

  • #128745

    If done well, I’m not sure anyone cares about not knowing a villain’s history, or any other character, as the ep should cover enough info that you know what you need to. In those respects, for both Sutekh and Omega, it’s 50-50, not great execution, but enough info.

    3 users thanked author for this post.
  • #128751

    Plus, the entire back catalogue is on iPlayer and D+ now. Don’t know who the Rani is? Want more than what the episode tells you (which was enough imo)? Go watch her previous appearances on there. Or get filled in by whatever Confidential’s called now, as it had to do for Daleks, Cybermen, the Master, Sarah Jane etc back in the 00s.

    The issue is then making that worth everyone’s while by using said character well and not just going “look, it’s Mel.”

    2 users thanked author for this post.
  • #128756

    Plus, the entire back catalogue is on iPlayer and D+ now. Don’t know who the Rani is? Want more than what the episode tells you (which was enough imo)? Go watch her previous appearances on there.

    Yeah you can do that, but it’s not how casual audiences approach the show. Revealing a character to be the Rani isn’t going to make people immediately seek out her past experiences to get up to speed, you need to give them a reason to care in the present-day story. Make her interesting in the here and now, and then maybe people will want to learn more about her history.

    Or get filled in by whatever Confidential’s called now, as it had to do for Daleks, Cybermen, the Master, Sarah Jane etc back in the 00s.

    There wasn’t really a need for that as the stories that reintroduced those baddies for nu-Who did exactly what Ben is talking about – gave you enough information within the episode to understand what you were dealing with, without you having to go and research it yourself. The historical connections were just a bonus for longtime fans.

    But now it’s the reverse – the show is all about serving the longtime fans with these reveals of more obscure characters, and it doesn’t explain them in a way that makes them meaningful to newcomers.

    2 users thanked author for this post.
  • #128784

    I really think you’re building more of a problem out of this than there is Dave.

    First, there’s a mysterious woman (Mrs Flood) watching the Doctor across time.

    Then at the end of the Eurovision episode she’s revealed to be a Time Lord, says her name and bigenerates. Even if you don’t know who she is from her saying her name at that point, seemingly evil Time Lady pretty much gives you all you need to know to go with.

    Then Wish World has her explain at length who she is, that she knows the Doctor and what her goal is, which is built on even more in the finale.

    How much more hand-holding do you think people need to follow that? Even if you don’t go and watch back her previous appearances or Confidential, that’s fine because you don’t need to know more than that to follow the plot of the episode. Now, is the full plot of that episode satisfying. Not really. But it’s not because the Rani’s too unknowable or obscure or without clear motivation. It’s because it all gets binned off for her being eaten by a CGI monster.

    By comparison, when the Master came back, it was at the end of Utopia, after slow build up on Derek Jacobi being a bit weird, there’s a few audio clips from his watch of the previous Masters, he regenerates and then steals the TARDIS. There’s no explanation of who he is beyond that, what his problem is with the Doctor, why he would want/need to steal the TARDIS. And yet we coped!

    I mean Sarah Jane hadn’t been on TV since the early 80s (a throwback cameo in an anniversary episode at that!) yet she came back for an episode that  had to do a lot of heavy lifting explaining who she was and not only did that work well enough for an audience mostly too young to have known her, she got a spin-off aimed specifically at that young audience.

    Your argument just seems to boil down to you not thinking the Rani is as important as the likes of the Master or Daleks and so the show shouldn’t bother with them because other people won’t/shouldn’t care either.

  • #128787

    It may also be more problematic because it’s now been done to death. The re-vitalisation of supposedly dead and gone villains was awesome when the Daleks returned, still kinda cool when the Master returned, but at this point now, it’s kind of played out. Bringing back a random villain isn’t something that people are going to love just for the twist and reveal in itself; you have to deliver more than that at this point in the series.

    3 users thanked author for this post.
  • #128789

    I think there’s always the danger of not giving casual audiences enough credit, plus, where Who is concerned, I practically am the audience. I’m not always going to remember past stories from decades ago, be it old or new Who.

     

    Did I have enough info in the eps? I think so. Is the plan going awry that bad? I quite like the villlain being undone by their own hand, and Rani is definitely a gloating monologuer. (See the Vimes Theory of Villainy.)

    2 users thanked author for this post.
  • #128791

    Interesting Reddit thread looking at the changing story of Gatwa claiming (on Unleashed) that the plan was always to only do two series.

    Hey guys, I thought I would just do a quick breakdown of the time-line of Doctor Who season 3 delays and Ncuti’s last minute decision to depart the series, despite claiming that it was always the plan in a Doctor Who Unleashed interview.

    In June 2024, before Season 1 had finished filming, Russell T Davies revealed in an interview with Radio Times that he was already writing Season 3, with pre-production scheduled to begin in August once Ncuti Gatwa had completed his run in a play:

    “I’m working on the fourth script now for Season Three. It’s not actually commissioned—that’s still up in the air. But that’s the same for every TV programme. I shouldn’t say we’re confident, because that’s asking for a fall, but we’re very confident, to be honest. Ncuti’s off to do a play, The Importance of Being Earnest, and so we’re coming back after that. Amazingly, we might be shooting those scripts early next year. Those scripts are going to be ready by August for prep.”

    The play was scheduled to complete its run in January, so the original plan was likely to begin filming Season 3 in January or February 2025 for a Spring 2026 release—maintaining RTD’s promise of delivering a season of Doctor Who every year:

    “It takes a while to get the empire in shape, but that’s a serious plan: annual Doctor Who, no gap years, lots of content, on and on and on. Yes please!”

    Then, five months later in October 2024, during an appearance on The Graham Norton Show, Ncuti Gatwa confirmed that the plan was still for him to film a third series in 2025:

    “We did the second series this year, the Christmas special is coming up, and we are filming a third series next year.”

    Going back to April 2024, Ncuti also discussed his wish to face the Daleks –“By the time that I’m done with Doctor Who, I better have faced a Dalek. What on earth would be the point of me being Doctor Who without facing a Dalek!” – and with the daleks neither appearing in season 1 or 2, we have to presume at this point he was looking forward to taking part in further seasons when he would get to face the daleks.

    However, going back to the Graham Norton comments, they were removed from the BBC’s broadcast of the episode.

    Me cutting in. I’m not sure if they’re saying these comments didn’t air at all (and someone at the record heard them) or they were cut from repeats. Sounds a little suss. Anyway.

    Around the same time, RTD stated in multiple interviews that the show had not yet been renewed for Season 3, now claiming that a later renewal had always been the plan—despite earlier comments suggesting otherwise:

    “It’s an industry decision, it’s like any business—these things take time. I think the decision will come after the transmission of Season Two. That’s what we’re expecting, that’s what we’ve always been heading towards.” “The decision to commission Season 3 won’t be made until after Season 2 has been transmitted. And that’s always been the deal since the start.” (Doctor Who Magazine)

    This was also around the time some reports suggested that Season 1 hadn’t performed as well on Disney+ as hoped. I remember one insider claimed that a significant number of those who subscribed specifically for Doctor Who didn’t renew into the second month—around the time Episode 4 aired (forgive me, I can’t find the source for this one)

    Now with this, I would say that we can’t really blame Disney. If season 1 didn’t do that well, there isn’t much else they can do apart from wait and see.

    Because of this, many fans felt the show was in a kind of stasis. The BBC couldn’t move forward until Disney made a decision—expected by (at least) June 2025, six months after the originally intended start date for Season 3 filming. If Disney were to pull out (which some believed was becoming more likely), the BBC would need even more time to figure out how to continue Doctor Who without them.

    This created a very uncertain outlook for Season 3’s production, something that likely didn’t appeal to in-demand lead actor Ncuti Gatwa. He is currently preparing to star in the West End play Born with Teeth, which has an 11-week run beginning in August. There have also been various rumours that Ncuti is looking to move to LA to expand his film career. For an actor on that path, being tied to a show with such an unpredictable future would understandably be a burden.

    Fast forward to February 2025: Doctor Who Season 2 enters reshoots. https://www.instagram.com/p/DFvNUyUMQLu/

    Based on these photos, the location, and reports from set_dw that Ncuti, Varada Sethu, and the actress playing Captain Poppy were all present, it appears these reshoots were for the scenes at Belinda’s house with baby Poppy—where the Doctor says goodbye before regenerating.

    To clarify, leaker “Andrew”—the source behind many accurate leaks this series (Susan’s return, Episode 3 being a Midnight sequel, the Rani, Fifteen’s regeneration, the return of Thirteen, and Billie Piper as Sixteen)—claimed the following regarding Ncuti’s reshoots:

    “He decided to jump ship and move on once it became clear Disney weren’t going to renew any time soon, and he didn’t want to stay tied to Doctor Who when production on Season 3, if it does happen, is still some way off. Hence why they filmed his regeneration earlier in the year. If Ncuti’s first season had been a big ratings success, Disney would’ve wanted to snap him up for Season 3 much sooner—when RTD was clearly expecting them to—so he wouldn’t leave.”

    Interestingly, Andrew also mentioned that the Fifteenth Doctor’s regeneration was initially going to be a cliffhanger, with no actor cast as the Sixteenth Doctor yet. However, this changed. Just a few weeks ago when Andrew claimed that Sixteen had now been cast and described the new Doctor as “female and familiar”—implying Billie Piper’s casting was a late addition.

    All of this also seems to confirm that there was an original ending to Season 2—something hinted at in this photo:

    New Photo from The Reality War (courtesy of Disney+ Germany)
    byu/Fabulous-Mix-9808 indoctorwho

    To further support this alternate ending, online scooper DanielRPK (who has about a 70% accuracy rate) revealed:

    “The original ending of Doctor Who S2 (before the reshoots) was: The Doctor, Ruby, Belinda, etc. are all having a big party (think Amy & Rory’s wedding). Everyone’s dancing. The Vlinx is a DJ. Susan is seen watching from afar—this would’ve been the cliffhanger leading into S3.”

    This also aligns with the interview photos of Carole Ann Ford (Susan) in a futuristic costume, which never appeared in the final version of the finale.

    I also believe these scenes would’ve included Archie Lal who was cast as Belinda’s father.

    Rewatching The Reality War, I would say that the Reality War was originally going to end around the 45 minute mark, however instead of leading into the scene shown above it shifted into the scenes where the Doctor decides he needs to sacrifice himself to save baby Poppy. But that’s just my guess.

    So, in a nutshell:

    RTD and Ncuti Gatwa initially planned to do Doctor Who Season 3 together.

    Season 1 underperforms, delaying Season 3’s production.

    Ncuti decides not to stay tied to a show with an uncertain future and chooses to depart.

    In February 2025, reshoots for Season 2 take place and Ncuti films his regeneration, replacing the original ending for season 2.

    Sometime in Spring 2025, Billie Piper is cast as the Sixteenth Doctor*.

    *or not, who the hell knows.
  • #128792

    If D+ expect subscribers to Doc Who to hang around longer than two months when there’s only eight episodes, then they are deluded.

    Then again, we’re talking of the streamer who only reluctantly issues disc releases, in high priced UHD-BR bundles, and then whines about not getting enough money from streaming.

    2 users thanked author for this post.
  • #128794

    If D+ expect subscribers to Doc Who to hang around longer than two months when there’s only eight episodes, then they are deluded.

    Then again, we’re talking of the streamer who only reluctantly issues disc releases, in high priced UHD-BR bundles, and then whines about not getting enough money from streaming.

    I saw an unsourced quote yesterday, in regard to the fight to get a budget from Disney for making Andor, where Disney said “streaming is dead” which is not great for a company that’s trashed its entire linear TV presence, let alone reduced its physical media presence, to build a streaming platform. And does rather lead to the question of where Disney thinks its money is coming from going forward?

    2 users thanked author for this post.
  • #128795

    Exactly, they have deliberately killed off their other income streams in favour of streaming which cannot give them that much.

    Paramount clearly understand this as they issue Trek in DVD, BR and UHD formats. They know people will likely sub for the releases then buy the discs later.

    Would be interesting to know how much the cinema showings of Wish World / Reality War made.

    • This reply was modified 5 months ago by Ben.
  • #128802

    If D+ expect subscribers to Doc Who to hang around longer than two months when there’s only eight episodes, then they are deluded.

    I think that is a problem with streamers in general. They take so long to produce a small number of episodes. It kills any momentum a show may develop.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    Ben
  • #128810

    My thoughts on this season.
    If you haven’t watched Andor, I promise you this is very clever.

    dr

    5 users thanked author for this post.
  • #128816

    It’s definitely a bit strange that Gatwa only did two seasons. I would say that I am glad because I didn’t really like an emotionally aware and happy-go-lucky Doctor – I rather prefer them when they’re sarcastic, emotionally unavailable and kinda mean-spirited – but I am not really enthused by that shot of Billie as Doctor, either.

    2 users thanked author for this post.
  • #128818

    It’s definitely a bit strange that Gatwa only did two seasons. I would say that I am glad because I didn’t really like an emotionally aware and happy-go-lucky Doctor – I rather prefer them when they’re sarcastic, emotionally unavailable and kinda mean-spirited – but I am not really enthused by that shot of Billie as Doctor, either.

    It seems pretty clear Gatwa wanted to do a third series, but also wants to do other things, and wasn’t going to wait around for them to commission the next run, so asked for the reshoots so he could be written out.

    Using Piper seems a pretty clear admission that they didn’t want to cast a new actor when they have no idea when they will get to film anything with them.

    I doubt RTD will ever admit to any of this, at least not anytime soon; I still remember him claiming that Eccleston leaving after one series was always the plan, to introduce new viewers to the idea of Regeneration.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
  • #128825

    I really think you’re building more of a problem out of this than there is Dave.

    First, there’s a mysterious woman (Mrs Flood) watching the Doctor across time.

    Then at the end of the Eurovision episode she’s revealed to be a Time Lord, says her name and bigenerates. Even if you don’t know who she is from her saying her name at that point, seemingly evil Time Lady pretty much gives you all you need to know to go with.

    Then Wish World has her explain at length who she is, that she knows the Doctor and what her goal is, which is built on even more in the finale.

    How much more hand-holding do you think people need to follow that? Even if you don’t go and watch back her previous appearances or Confidential, that’s fine because you don’t need to know more than that to follow the plot of the episode. Now, is the full plot of that episode satisfying. Not really. But it’s not because the Rani’s too unknowable or obscure or without clear motivation. It’s because it all gets binned off for her being eaten by a CGI monster.

    By comparison, when the Master came back, it was at the end of Utopia, after slow build up on Derek Jacobi being a bit weird, there’s a few audio clips from his watch of the previous Masters, he regenerates and then steals the TARDIS. There’s no explanation of who he is beyond that, what his problem is with the Doctor, why he would want/need to steal the TARDIS. And yet we coped!

    I mean Sarah Jane hadn’t been on TV since the early 80s (a throwback cameo in an anniversary episode at that!) yet she came back for an episode that  had to do a lot of heavy lifting explaining who she was and not only did that work well enough for an audience mostly too young to have known her, she got a spin-off aimed specifically at that young audience.

    Your argument just seems to boil down to you not thinking the Rani is as important as the likes of the Master or Daleks and so the show shouldn’t bother with them because other people won’t/shouldn’t care either.

    You’re comparing what we’re given about the Master in the tease at the end of Utopia with what we’re given about the Rani in the tease at the end of Interstellar Song Contest, plus Wish World, plus The Reality War.

    It’s an apples and oranges comparison.

    The fairer comparison would be with the Master’s story across Utopia and The Sound Of Drums and Last of the Time Lords, which explains the Master’s backstory and characterisation far more fully and to greater dramatic effect than the show did with the Rani here.

    If you think RTD has done a great job in bringing back concepts and characters like Sutekh, Omega and the Rani and making them as meaningful as he did for the reintroduction of the Daleks, the Cybermen and the Master in his initial run, then that’s a matter of opinion – but I don’t agree. I think they’ve all been used far more superficially, and RTD has relied on recognition of their names for big “wow” moments but without putting in the work to make modern audiences unfamiliar with the characters’ decades-old earlier appearances give a toss who they are.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
  • #128828

    Exactly, they have deliberately killed off their other income streams in favour of streaming which cannot give them that much.

    Paramount clearly understand this as they issue Trek in DVD, BR and UHD formats. They know people will likely sub for the releases then buy the discs later.

    Not sure about in the US, but in the UK Disney+ and Paramount Plus have sold off second-run rights to a bunch of their shows to ITV.

  • #128829

    Oho? Interesting. Hadn’t spotted that.

  • #128938

    This guy writes some of the spinoff stuff for Doctor Who in other media, and has a great theory about how the story of the last two seasons could have been originally intended to go, before Ruby became a single-season companion:

  • #138677

    Some proper Monkey’s Paw stuff for all those people who were hoping for the BBC to rapidly commission more Doctor Who:

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/mediacentre/2025/doctor-who-bbc-to-expand-whoniverse-to-cbeebies

    3 users thanked author for this post.
  • #138904

    More rumblings on that JMS rumour:

    Straczynski Would “Love Nothing More” Than to Run Doctor Who, But Asks, “Would I Be Worthy?”

    2 users thanked author for this post.
  • #138907

    If JMS were to be attached to a classic UK SF show, it should be Blakes 7 or Quatermass, not Dr. Who.

    4 users thanked author for this post.
  • #138908

    If JMS were to be attached to a classic UK SF show, it should be Blakes 7 or Quatermass, not Dr. Who.

    I think he would be great on Blake’s 7.

    3 users thanked author for this post.
  • #139359

    509356895_24058483720456575_8176998938695779950_n

    2 users thanked author for this post.
  • #140662

    First Doctor: The Living Darkness

    I think this might work better for those with better Who knowledge. For me it was a bit all over the place, but I do like the idea of the Doctor crossing paths with old companions much, much later.  It also wraps up the mystery of who was pulling the Doctor out of time.

    I’ll see what they do with the upcoming Unbound trilogy, but beyond that I’ll probably stop here for the First Doctor range.

  • #141204

    Doctor Who: The Second Doctor: Beyond War Games

    I don’t know the Second Doctor well, will eventually get to what survives of those series on iPlayer. So does this work for me? It does.  It’s doing an alternate riff take that’ll probably get erased, but does that matter? Not that much to me.

    The first story, Beyond War Games, is one of the Daleks. The second features the Ice Warriors. Everyone knows Daleks, but Ice Warriors? Not so much. But on both points the stories give the listener what they need to not feel lost.

    Troughton does well in playing the role first occupied by his father, and that’s far from guaranteed. Culshaw’s version of the Brigadier, who I have vague memories of Courtney’s portrayal, works well in the second story.

    Both stories developed and concluded well. As a set, it’s a great example of how to introduce a Doctor, balancing continuity with accessibility.

  • #141209

    Is ‘The Second Doctor: Beyond War Games’ based on the idea of series 6b – or is it a different take?
    (https://tardis.fandom.com/wiki/Season_6B)

  • #141210

    I decided to re-watch Kinda and, well, wow, I was surprised at how well paced it was, compared to how I remember the old serials. I thought I was watching the 2nd episode first for a minute. No tardis scenes – jumped right in there, tidy like.

    Lets see how it goes

  • #141227

    Is ‘The Second Doctor: Beyond War Games’ based on the idea of series 6b – or is it a different take?
    (https://tardis.fandom.com/wiki/Season_6B)

    I think it might be. Not that great on Who continuity, but it’s all inbetween the regenerations.

  • #142186

    ‘Doctor Who’ Archive Expert Teases Announcement on Missing Episodes That Will Makes Fans ‘Very Happy’

    Doctor Who is missing almost 100 of 253 episodes from the show’s first six years, but an archive expert has shared an exciting update about the discovery of at least one of those long-lost instalments.

    Appearing on the Doctor Who: The Missing Episodes podcast, film collector John Franklin spoke on behalf of Film is Fabulous, an organization run by film collectors and vintage television enthusiasts, sharing an update on a recent post made on the Film is Fabulous Facebook page about missing Doctor Who episodes.

    The Facebook post read, “We are aware of several missing episodes of Doctor Who in private film collections in the UK. We are liaising with the individuals about cataloguing and preserving their entire collection, including the missing Doctor Who episodes, and ensuring that copies are returned to the BBC. We expect to make a detailed announcement shortly.”

    Franklin shared more details, explaining how, since 2023, he and other members of the Film is Fabulous team “have been aware of a large collection of films, thousands of films, that have become vulnerable.” He confirmed, “That collection contains some very important material including a missing episode of Doctor Who.”

    He added that the collection is “large” and could possibly contain “other episodes of Doctor Who,” but noted, “at this moment in time, we know of one.”

    Doctor Who debuted back in 1963 on the BBC, and at the time, the network erased or reused tapes to save on space and storage costs. This led to the loss of many classic era episodes (97 in total) until archiving became a policy. However, some of those missing episodes still exist in private collections.

    Franklin explained that the collector recently died and, while they’d previously received permission to catalogue the collection, there are now new legal obstacles to overcome.

    “We are doing everything legally, with propriety, to make sure we secure that collection and can return that missing episode of Doctor Who and other items to the rights holder,” he stated, per the Radio Times.

    Franklin added that once the legal situation is sorted, fans should expect some exciting news. “Give us the space to conclude the things that we’re doing,” he said. “You will be very, very happy with the announcements when they come, but we just need the space to be able to do that now.”

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    Ben
  • #142356

    It’s quite amazing they still find new episodes this late on, in the most obscure places too like Kenyan national TV.

    I read a great article recently on the future of Doctor Who but can’t find the link again.

    It’s fairly straightforward, Disney paid (or contributed to) 26 episodes, which includes the spinoff War Between the Land and the Sea that is coming very soon. Then they make a decision to continue.

    (This kind of nonsense is part of why streaming shows are so slow and take 2-3 years between seasons I think).

    I think it’s 95% likely they will end their interest there but both Julie Gardner, head of Bad Wolf, and the head of BBC Drama say it’s going to come back regardless. So the only question is when as I can see they can’t budget or schedule until they get that confirmation either way.

    2 users thanked author for this post.
  • #142359

    I think it’s 95% likely they will end their interest there but both Julie Gardner, head of Bad Wolf, and the head of BBC Drama say it’s going to come back regardless. So the only question is when

    I think the other big questions are who is in charge of the show when it does (I’m not sure RTD will be seen as a viable choice to continue so it will be interesting to see who takes over) and who will play the lead (I don’t think anyone really expects Billie to be the next full-time Doctor).

    Really, almost everything about the next era of the show is an open question.

    2 users thanked author for this post.
  • #142361

    By all accounts RTD has already written the 3rd season (with other writers as is usual) and a couple of episodes of the 4th.

    That’s not the same as being showrunner of course and as with the Billie question the gap in production makes everything less certain. In truth the gap in being able to confirm is why Gatwa left needing rewrites. It’d probably be preferable if Disney left, I don’t really want super effects and budgets, the BBC one was fine and some of the episodes looked excellent.

    2 users thanked author for this post.
  • #142367

    Yeah I agree. I don’t think the Disney deal has ended up being good for the show. It seems pretty clear by now that RTD expected an immediate renewal from Disney after the broadcast of the first season, didn’t get one, and that led to them losing their leading man and a two-year gap (at least) in production.

  • #142373

    If I committed my design to need a three year budget, and only had a 2 year budget, yeah my systems would end up looking like the end of season 2. On time, on budget, but fuck me, massive rescoping, hacked to pieces to make work. No one is happy. No one wants to see it again.
    (I’m probably also fired)

    • This reply was modified 1 week ago by Dan.
    3 users thanked author for this post.
  • #142375

    So there’s a bit of a storm brewing around the latest Collection blu-ray, season 13 Limited Edition (that’s the Tom Baker s13, not the s13 with Whittaker). The restoration process has used AI upscaling (which has apparently been increasing over the past few releases – they’re not in Standard Edition yet, so I don’t know first hand) resulting in some real uncanny valley results. Waxy, unnatural faces (ironically in Terror of the Zygons and The Android Invasion), shifting facial features and Tom’s got some real Turkiye Teeth.

    Really disappointing for a series that has, for decades now, been the gold standard of archival TV restoration and managed perfectly well without these AI tools up til now.

    2 users thanked author for this post.
  • #142382

    I think it’s ethically wrong while also being aware that if that guy hadn’t done side by side comparisons I’d never notice.

    2 users thanked author for this post.
  • #142388

    Doctor Who returns with a 2026 Xmas Special.

    And there a was a huge scream of rage from the Luthor monkeys, for the Doctor was, once again, not dead.

  • #142389

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/mediacentre/2025/doctor-who-future-confirmed-new-christmas-special-2026

    The good news: Disney is out

    The bad news: RTD isn’t

    2 users thanked author for this post.
  • #142390

    Yeah, not a huge surprise. Maybe RTD having to clean up his own mess of a cliffhanger* is for the best? Possibly not.

    I’m curious whether the Beeb will just try and fund the show itself again (however infrequently that means it’ll be made) or if they’ll look for another co-production partner. Amazon has a lot of money they’re quite happy to piss away on things, maybe they should go talk to them.

    I also wonder what the rights situation will be for the Disney seasons (outside the UK) in the future. Presumably they’ll keep the rights to them and control what can be done with them, like the Universal did with the TVM for years.

     

    * I don’t think it’s actually that hard to sidestep Piper appearing and not having her be the next Doctor. The glow of the regenerating Doctor doesn’t fade, IIRC. You could have Piper step out of it as an external manifestation of… some bollocks, a sort of combination of when Romana tried out bodies when regenerating into Lalla Ward and the Fifth Doctor having visions of all his mates as he died. Have a whole parade of old faces come out. Hell, could even have it resolve back into Gatwa in the end. I mean the “rules” don’t fucking mean anything at this point (insofar as they ever did).

    1 user thanked author for this post.
  • #142391

    I actually wouldn’t be surprised if Billie serves as the Doctor for a single story, the 2026 Christmas special (maybe even allowing for a reunion with Tennant – the bigenerated 14th is still around, after all) before regenerating at the end into a new actor who can then begin their tenure properly with the start of the next season.

    Total speculation, but it would avoid the hassles of trying to kick off a whole new era and do a Christmas special at the same time (which obviously can be done, Tennant pulled it off, but which is probably not ideal).

    1 user thanked author for this post.
  • #142392

    I wonder if we’ll get an announcement on the next Doctor. If they’re just filming this one-off, they might actually be able to keep a one-scene regeneration under wraps.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
  • #142394

    I wonder if we’ll get an announcement on the next Doctor. If they’re just filming this one-off, they might actually be able to keep a one-scene regeneration under wraps.

    It probably depends on a couple of things – how much of the Christmas episode the new Doctor is in, and also how far they are into production of the next season by the time Christmas 2026 rolls around.

    I would expect/hope them to be well on the way with filming the next season by then, in which case it may be hard to keep that casting under wraps.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
  • #142396

    The wording of RTD “agreeing” to write the Christmas special sounds odd to me. Hopefully it’ll just be a one off to clean up his own mess and then maybe take a back seat as a producer or something.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
  • #142424

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/mediacentre/2025/the-war-between-the-land-and-the-sea-new-imagery

    Looks like The War Between The Land And The Sea spinoff is going to be on iplayer in the UK late this year but not available on Disney+ internationally until later, in 2026.

  • #142432

    Why Disney Ditched ‘Doctor Who’: Sources Say Ratings, Big Ticket Budget & MAGA Politics Were Factors In BBC Deal Failing To Regenerate

    EXCLUSIVE: Dana Walden was in London earlier this month, but it’s safe to say that renewing Doctor Who was not among the Disney entertainment chief’s priorities. Sources have been telling Deadline for more than a year that Disney has been lukewarm on the sci-fi series, and by Tuesday afternoon, it was official: the BBC confirmed that its Doctor Who co-production agreement had vaporized.

    What was conceived as a plan to Marvel-ize the franchise did not translate into a big bang. Instead, the partnership has died with a whimper — with Disney not even putting out a statement to mark its passing. So what doomed the Doctor Who deal, and what comes next?

    Deadline has spoken to multiple sources in Doctor Who‘s orbit, who say the Disney deal fell apart for a variety of reasons, including concerns over the Ncuti Gatwa show’s failure to breakout from its established fan base and its big-ticket budget. Others suspect that fears of a “woke” backlash may be a factor, as Doctor Who has embraced diverse storytelling under showrunner Russell T Davies.

    “It Wasn’t For The Long Term”

    “It was pretty apparent from early on that this wasn’t for the long term,” says a former Disney executive. “Everyone got the impression that it wasn’t doing what it needed to do [on Disney+] to be sustained.” Another person close to Doctor Who adds: “The writing has been on the wall for ages. There has been a complete lack of enthusiasm over at Disney.”

    Announced in October 2022, Disney’s agreement to co-produce Doctor Who was inked at the height of the streaming wars, just weeks before Bob Iger walked back into the building and started scaling back spending. It was hailed at the time as an “unprecedented” pact bringing together “two giants of entertainment,” but the ex-Disney insider says they soon detected regret at spending so much on Doctor Who. The show’s budget was between £6M ($8.5M) and £8M per episode, we understand, putting the value of the deal at as much as £168M.

    The former Mouse House employee notes a lack of marketing firepower behind the brand — nowhere near the might of brands like Marvel or Star Wars — creating something of a chicken-and-egg scenario whereby it became harder for Doctor Who to cut through to American audiences. “It certainly wasn’t being shouted about as a big success,” adds this person.

    An executive at BBC Studios, which owns Doctor Who and oversees international sales, says “it never felt like Disney were making much of a deal” about the iconic sci-fi series, which has been on British screens for more than 60 years. Disney sources have countered this, with one telling The Times of London that “a lot of marketing muscle” was put behind the show.

    Ratings Flop

    Doctor Who‘s performance has been far from stellar in the U.S. This year’s season failed to register in Nielsen and Luminate’s streaming charts. Meanwhile, the Entertainment Strategy Guy blog branded Doctor Who‘s debut on Disney as one of the “flops” of 2024. There was also a serious lack of awards buzz around the series, which only managed one Primetime Emmy nomination (for Outstanding Choreography for Scripted Programming in 2025) during its time on Disney+.

    On the BBC, it has seen an alarming drop-off in viewing figures. Season 15 averaged 3.8M viewers, according to gold-standard 28-day viewing figures from Barb, the UK’s official ratings agency. This represents a decline of 1M on the prior season, the first starring Gatwa and produced by Jane Tranter’s Bad Wolf. Both Gatwa seasons were down on Jodie Whittaker’s concluding season in 2021 (watched by 5.2M people), a period that was not considered to be vintage Doctor Who. “The ratings were not up to much,” someone involved in the series ruefully acknowledges.

    While BBC drama boss Lindsay Salt thanked Disney for “being terrific global partners,” the Mouse House was not nearly as glowing, with a spokesperson simply confirming the BBC statement and noting that Gatwa’s seasons will remain on Disney+ outside the UK for the time being. Sources tell us that the BBC and Disney had initially planned to make a statement about Doctor Who‘s future after the premiere of spin-off series, The War Between the Land and the Sea, but Disney moved the announcement up.

    “They’ve clearly sat down and made a final decision in the past week or so, but it’s been on the cards for a very long time,” says Tony Jordan, who runs the Doctor Who Appreciation Society and speaks to the show’s fanbase every day.

    Jordan says Whovians believe Gatwa’s seasons have been patchy. “There were some strong episodes in both, but the two-part finales were not particularly well regarded,” he explains. “A lack of episodes made it difficult for audiences to get to know Ncuti and his companions to really develop their storylines.”

    Gatwa’s experience felt somewhat fraught. He left after two seasons and later blamed burnout, with the 33-year-old saying he was “getting old and my body was tired.” A Doctor Who source says the show suffered because Gatwa never fully embraced the role. “There is more to that role than performing,” this person says. “You have got to be an ambassador for the brand and embrace being that generation’s Doctor. Matt Smith and David Tennant fully understood the responsibility it carried.”

    Another well-placed industry source says Doctor Who became “too woke for Trump’s USA,” and this was “a factor in Disney minds” when it came to a renewal. Under writer Davies, the series has cast transgender actress Yasmin Finney, featured drag queen Jinkx Monsoon as a villain, and played host to a historic gay kiss between Gatwa and Jonathan Groff — some of which drew complaints from BBC viewers.

    Disney is incredibly unlikely to ever admit that politics were a factor in Doctor Who‘s cancellation, but Jimmy Kimmel’s brief suspension was revealing of the company’s desire to minimize MAGA wrath. With Davies yet to commit to showrunning future seasons, it’s possible that Doctor Who could have dialed down diversity under a Disney renewal, but the fact remains that celebrating difference has always been part of the show’s DNA.

    ‘Doctor Who’s Post-Disney Reset

    Season 15 concluded on an ambiguous note, with Gatwa regenerating into Billie Piper’s Rose Tyler, a Doctor Who companion of yesteryear. Jordan speculates that this will be temporary, and Davies will use the just-announced 2026 Christmas special to tie up some loose ends.

    Beyond that, Jordan thinks fresh blood might be required. “Nothing says that Russell will be showrunner from 2027 onwards,” he adds. “It might be time for a new showrunner to take it forwards.”

    Committing to a Christmas special that is still 15 months away buys the BBC time to ponder how to push on now that it has lost a hefty chunk of its Doctor Who budget. “It can be a reset and buys everyone time to make decisions,” was how it was characterized by someone close to the series.

    The former Disney executive reckons the BBC will be able to spend at most £2.5M to £3M per episode, which could work out at around £1M per episode from the BBC’s own pocket and any additional coming from a BBC Studios distribution advance in what is a tricky market for drama funding. That would see Doctor Who‘s budget slashed by around a half from the Disney days.

    “Once you’ve gone up, it’s always difficult to go back down,” the source says. “You can cut budgets to a certain degree but not by so much. Is the BBC really going to stump up even more for something showing decline?”

    Others point out that some of Davies’ cheaper episodes were his best, such as Season 14’s “73 Yards,” which was praised by critics and Whovians. “Budget limitations used to help the idiosyncrasies of the show,” adds an executive who used to work on Doctor Who. “Big budgets can cause a problem — a huge variety of voices tend to push towards the mediocre — but then the budget was nowhere near as big as [shows like] The Mandalorian, so they were stuck in the middle. You can have planets, flying cars, and robots, but ultimately you are always going to get better versions elsewhere.”

    Finding another American buyer for Doctor Who will be tough going, the ex-Disney source adds, while striking “piecemeal” deals across Europe and Latin America may prove difficult for a show that is ultimately quintessentially British. “How do you suddenly convince a buyer to take Doctor Who when it hasn’t been on their platform for so long?” the source questions.

    But it is still possible. We understand that prior to Disney+ and the BBC striking the co-pro deal, an alternative option was presented to then-BBC drama boss Piers Wenger, which would have raised up to £5M an episode without input from a big American player. This plan could yet be revisited.

    The BBC Studios executive strikes a positive tone and thinks big American buyers are still in play, pointing to the $1B Taylor Sheridan NBCUniversal deal as proof that the media giants are willing to pay big bucks. “I could make a case for any streamer wanting to create a foothold in a world with a pre-existing fanbase,” he adds. “If I’m Paramount right now, I’m losing Taylor Sheridan in 2029, and so am thinking about IP. What else can I buy for my streamer? They must be putting their heads together.”

    Coincidentally, Doctor Who’s first 13 seasons have recently come off HBO Max in the U.S., meaning a deal could be done for the entire series. Our BBC Studios insider argues that Disney’s indifference towards Doctor Who may prove to be a blessing in disguise. “I don’t think in the States there is a real association with Doctor Who and Disney, except for the fact that the past two seasons were on Disney+. We’re talking about a show that has re-launched many different times and shown up in many different places.”

    Salt, the BBC drama boss, also gestured to the timeless quality of the show, reassuring fans that “the Tardis remains at the heart of the BBC.” This ability to regenerate has always been central to Doctor Who lore, so who would bet against Disney simply being a fleeting passenger in the Time Lord’s travels through space and time?

    Disney, BBC Studios and the BBC declined comment.

  • #142434

    I mean, you can see the writing on the wall with the statement:

    MCU Doctor Who

    Like that was going to work at the mass level.

    (The funny is, it kind of has at the niche level, see Big Finish.)

    2 users thanked author for this post.
Viewing 97 replies - 601 through 697 (of 697 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Skip to toolbar